Do refugees make people racist?
I just came across this very good question here from Aadya2 @aadya2:
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1284797143395078145
To quote:
"In countries where refugees get an allowance from the government the civilians are easily full of anger towards their country.
In fact they become racists.
Isn't it strange?
The refugees get the blame for getting an allowance.
It's not right off course.
The government's way of working has to be evaluated.
Not the refugees are the problem.
That's why civilians are upset, start a war, become racists, are unhappy, get sick and get stuck in their own country.
Refugees are being hated 😤 while they search freedom and a better life."
End quote.
The abuse of the Asylum System
The issue is really complex, because there are refugees and "refugees".
Real refugees are people who are being prosecuted based on their identity (whatever that may be - political, racial, ethnic, religious, homosexuality...) or because they want to escape from a war zone.
Fake "refugees" are people who merely want to move to a wealthy country but without going through the normal immigration process.
Worse: there are some - even many - "refugees" who are not victims, but perpetrators. They are the very people the real refugees try to get away from.
The problem is that fake "refugees" consume aid intended for real refugees and in addition, they don't integrate and often import bad habits and incompatible cultural values that cause conflicts. They also commit high rates of crime, thus creating negative feelings about all migrants.
The problem largely stems from the fact that the left started using the principle of asylum to import large numbers of migrants for ideological reasons. They wanted more 3rd world immigration since the 1960s as they saw them as a voter base, , which they have indeed become. Their traditional voters, the workers, were abandoning them, because the left had nothing to offer them anymore.
Without the immigrants from the 3rd world, the Left would be politically completely irrelevant, today. No matter where you look, in western countries, the Left is now largely dominated by former immigrants from the 3rd world. e.g. the German Green Party is basically their Islamic party. The US Democrats have become a party more and more dominated by minorities who want to gain more power by importing more people who resemble them while pushing identity politics.
They don't want people to vote based on values but based on tribal affiliation.
The Left does not want any immigrants who do not support their political agenda. Hence they reject Cuban refugees - who qualify in every way - and they do not want people such as Ayan Hirsi Ali, the Somali ex-Muslim woman who speaks out against Islam.
They would rather import the most extremist Muslims and tolerate the security risk they represent, as long as they vote for the Left. Which they do. Except that they have their own long-term goals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1prA3W1tk2I
Real and Fake Refugees
To illustrate the difference between real and fake refugees, 2 examples from Switzerland:
Real refugees: we have the largest population of Tibetans outside the Himalaya region, about 50'000 of them, which is why the Dalai Lama visited Switzerland so often; most Swiss people don't even know that because they are never in the news; you never hear about a Tibetan being involved in criminal activities. They are real refugees, as their country is still occupied by China and they do prosecute and oppress Tibetans.
Fake refugees: we have about 35'000 Eritreans who arrived as "refugees", although there is no war in Eritrea; the country is at peace now; they all travel back to Eritrea regularly to visit their families, proving that there's no risk in doing so; one of their pretexts is the mandatory military service which they don't want to do; I never understood why that was accepted as excuse - we have mandatory military service in Switzerland.
Eritrea is poor - so is most of Africa; we can't import 1.5 billion Africans, they have to solve their own problems. Offering asylum from poverty is neither feasible nor morally or rationally defensible. Eritrea is not a free country - but that's also true for the rest of Africa.
90% of the Eritreans living in Switzerland do not have jobs, even after 10+ years of residence; they live happily on very generous social security.
Worst case scenario: In one case in canton Zurich, a woman with 7 kids cost her community 60'000 CHF (about $65'000) per month because she needed 2 large appartments, social workers to do all her homework and cooking, all the kids had to be sent to different special schools as they were unwilling to integrate into the public school and had been violent, so they all get "psychiatric assistance".
The economic issues can be substantial and simply cannot be ignored.
In Germany, poor families were kicked out of their subsidized apartments to make room for refugees. They even did that in Switzerland, in some cases.
This is a page from a German newspaper - on the same page they published an article about how there are "more and more homeless [German] people" due to the lack of affordable housing in their community and right under it, another article that says that "there is still room for more refugees" in that very same community. Do they have an editor? Was this a mere "accident" or did they do this on purpose? Did they want to mock their readers or subtly draw attention to the hypocrisy of their administration?
And then there are the cultural issues...
A few years ago, they moved 50 Eritreans to a village nearby - a village on the border of the lake where housing is extremely expensive. These Eritreans were Muslims (not all are). Their kids started bothering 2 little Jewish girls whose parents are close friends of mine. They were forced to move out.
Lots of actual refugees had to discover that the very people they tried to get away from - e.g. ISIS terrorists - had also been accepted as "refugees":
Yazidi woman who fled from ISIS sex slavery sees her ISIS rapist on a bus in Ontario, Canada
https://zero-filter.com/2018/06/18/yazidi-woman-who-fled-from-isis-sex-slavery-sees-her-isis-rapist-on-a-bus-in-ontario-canada/
The fact that there's absolutely no vetting of the refugees totally undermines the asylum system.
Population replacement
I've written about the plan for population replacement before. This is not a "right wing conspiracy", as is claimed in the media every time the issue comes up. It's a fully documented plan that is being implemented by the EU, the UN, Trudeau in Canada and the Democrats in
the US.
https://www.minds.com/SMetzeler/blog/un-resettlement-plan-in-action-1108620921133088768
Note that the BBC article from 2012 about Peter Sutherland is banned from Facebook - you can't quote it.
We are now way past "asylum" and "refugees" - the UN moved on to the UN "Migrations pact", which allows anyone from a 3rd world country to move to any western country without having to provide any kind of justification.
The EU Commission just posted this image on Instagram with the comment "the next EU generation". It could not be more obvious what they are doing:
Accepting refugees is one thing. Being told that your people are being replaced is entirely something else.
Let's call it what it is - a Genocide
China acts like Nazi Germany and tries to replace their minority populations by moving Han Chinese people into their regions. They allow or even order Han men to rape minority women in large numbers. A process that is age-old. It's called a genocide and no one will dispute this fact.
Various leftist governments throughout the EU do the exact same thing, just in a bit less obvious ways. They do it by not prosecuting rape by migrants - or only with a slap on the wrist:
In the UK, this has been going on for more than 50 years and until very recently, it was not even mentioned in the media. Even in 2019, the numbers are horrendous:
Nearly 19,000 children in England are exploited in a year
Lots of politicians and police are involved in covering for the rapists, if they don't outright participate:
Halifax ‘grooming gang’: Police officer among 16 men charged with sexually abusing girls
In the UK, as in Sweden, the rapists are outright rewarded:
Rotherham grooming gang: The child rape brothers given £500k in legal aid
It is estimated that more than 1 million British girls were sexually exploited - often for years - and forced to bear the children of their rapists:
Girl who conceived a son through rape when she was held as a sex slave
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6324297/Girl-15-conceived-son-rape-held-sex-slave.html
The nightmare of those girls and women is just unimaginable:
Sarah was repeatedly raped, twice forced into marriage
There is still absolutely no political will to prosecute such horrendous crimes - the charges are often just dropped:
Claim: Police Dropped Cases Against 20 Telford Groomers Because They Were ‘Too Much Trouble’
We see the same in Sweden, France, Germany, Austria etc.
This is what normally happens to women in a militarily conquered and occupied country.
Conclusion
We are no longer facing an issue of refugees, we are facing the fact that the political class of western countries decided to betray their own people and commit a genocide against them. Most people don't really understand what's happening and the media do their best to obfuscate the issue.
Those who are aware and complain are immediately attacked as "racists" - even when they are immigrants and Black, Persian, Asian, Arab, Indian etc. themselves. A very large number of former immigrants do fight the mass immigration and the import of exactly that which they tried to escape.
This totally undermines the otherwise perfectly legitimate principle of allowing people to migrate to improve their own lives by finding a better country where they can use their skills, intelligence and labor to achieve better living conditions.
Economic migrants are perfectly welcome to the extent that they integrate into their host country towards which they should have positive feelings. They should never try to import those cultural and ideological aspects of their country of origin that caused them to leave that country in the first place.
People who flee socialism should not import socialism.
People who flee an oppressive religious environment should not import that religion.
And those who arrive as invaders should be treated as such.
At the very least, those who commit crimes should immediately be deported back to their country of origin. Illegal immigrants should be deported on the spot. As president Trump said: "Immigrants are welcome, but they should come in through the door".