Why are "minority" criminals rewarded for horrendous crimes in western countries?
I came across Jellybean's video about how Muslim rapists are literally rewarded for committing horrendous crimes, in Sweden. Please watch this first and try to come
It PAYS to be a criminal in Sweden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyAj3YiAqH0
I have been following this kind of news from numerous western countries for well over 2 decades now and I'm absolutely baffled how it is even possible for anyone, let alone for a judge who should understand the principles of justice, to allow barbaric psychopaths to get away with a slap on the wrist - or even a reward.
Trudeau's government - which is extremely pro-Islam - handed C$10 million to a terrorist who had murdered several people as "compensation" for having been imprisoned. 99% of Canadians will never make that kind of money in their entire lives! And that terrorist is now allowed to tour the country and give speeches in universities about the plight of poor, oppressed Muslims.
Meanwhile universities do not allow Ayan Hirsi Ali to speak, because her own story about being oppressed under Islam, having her friend Theo van Gogh murdered by a Jihadi and herself being threatened and prosecuted would be "offensive" ... to those who prosecute her.
What kind of mental illness gripped western countries and especially the justice systems? At some point, one is forced to research the causes of this disaster.
>>>Please note that nothing I say is even remotely a "conspiracy theory" and that I document every step of my argument with reliable sources. It took me years to piece together an image of what was really happening, especially because so much information is censored.
It turns out that it is not madness, there's a system behind it.
One of the puzzle pieces is Soros, the Marxist activist billionaire - he spent more than $30 billion to corrupt our institutions.
Given that I mention Soros, I have to add the disclaimer that this has nothing to do with his Jewish origin. I'm not antisemitic, in fact I have been fighting antisemitism, consistently. It is Soros who has been supporting antisemitic individuals and organizations. He attacked Israel, for decades, via his Oxfam NGO, and he's a persona non grata, in the country. He supports Rachida Tlaib, which was announced by his Open Society Foundation in 2016, and she has expressed extreme hatred against Jewish people. Soros does not follow Judaism. Based on interviews he gave, his parents - who were murdered in the Holocaust - were non-practicing Jews and he himself is atheist. He does, however, have a long history of being an ideological Marxist. Marx & Engels were racist, antisemitic and German nationalists. That's a huge debate, but it's obvious that any attempt to deflect criticism from Soros' agenda by calling his critics "antisemitic" is extremely dishonest.
Defending all the documented political activities by George Soros by using his Jewish ethnicity is actually as antisemitic as to accuse Jews of being "inherently evil". Both deny Jewish people their individual character and agency. Marx accused Jews of being the source of evil because they were supposedly "inherently capitalist", while modern antisemitic haters accuse them of being "inherently Marxist" - both are absurd. Jewish people have been all over the ideological map. George Soros happens to be a Marxist.
What's relevant to this debate is that he has a huge influence on the UN Human Rights commission
https://thespectator.info/2021/08/31/how-george-soros-bought-out-the-un-human-rights-commissioner/
And on the EU Human Rights court:
https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/emprise-de-soros-sur-la-cour-europeenne-des-droits-de-lhomme-la-cedh-persiste-et-signe/
In the US as well - it would take a lot more time, but it's easy to document that every prosecutor and judge who happens to be lenient towards criminals, rioters etc. has been financially supported by Soros for his election.
Here are just a few examples:
Kim Foxx, the Chicago DA who released Smolett without charges, although he had committed several felonies. She was elected with Soros money:
https://chicagoist.com/2016/03/10/kim_foxx_funding.php1
Satana Deberry DA of Durham County, N.C.
"In Durham County, the California-based Color of Change political action committee spent more than $74,000 on Facebook and other advertising for Deberry ... Color of Change, a racial justice organization, has received funding from Soros and his organizations, according to federal campaign and other reports"
https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/crime/article211206354.html
Kim Gardner, circuit attorney for St. Louis, Mo. - prosecuted home owners legally defending their property, did NOT prosecute rioters. Received close to $100K from Soros.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/who-is-kimberly-gardner-st-louis-prosecutor
So why is he doing this? Well for starters, he's not alone. The mass migration does not just happen, it is based on an official UN program, which is called ... "Replacement migration". If you ever heard that this was a "crazy conspiracy theory", explain this official UN web page:
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp
The program is active, not dorment:
http://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html
Ah, but it's only because of the "aging population", right?
No, sorry to disappoint you: the former head of the UN migrations office explained the real motivation before the UK parliament in 2012:
The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18519395
Note how that's a BBC link?
Try to post it on Facebook. You'll be surprised to learn that they actually block it as "against their community standards". A BBC page. So did they accidentally declare the BBC as "source of hatered"? No, you can post pretty much any other random BBC page. Just not that one.
So Facebook does not want people to know what a UN official told the UK parliament.
Remember the new UN "compact for migration"? It totally removes all the requirements for "asylum" and basically says that it is a "human right" for people from the 3rd world to move to western countries - ONLY western countries, of course - e.g. China does not accept any kind of immigration.
https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact
Yes, it's very clear what kind of "migrants" we should expect, when you look at that page.
Germany already implemented the "resettlement" program, through which they take people who are NOT refugees straight out of Africa and set them up in brand new luxury settlements in Germany:
Merkel was given multiple awards for her "refugee policies":
Also the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, but that one's hidden in the archives of the German government server...
As if they didn't want to make it all too visible...
But all those migrants must be really good for the economy, right? The UN resettlement plan says that this is why we have to bring themn to Europe. Well, German businesses are not really all that happy about them. 2 years after the massive wave of migrants from 2015 - which was supposed to bring in only Syrian war refugees but mysteriously also allowed hundreds of thousands of Africans to sneak in - employers realized that their integration into the workforce was almost impossible for 95%:
And then there's the ridiculous concept of "climate refugees" - there's no such thing. The climate is doing perfectly fine, but that doesn't deter the UN to use this pack of lies to justify why 3rd world migrants who are NOT refugees cannot be returned home:
"Climate refugees can't be returned home, says landmark UN human rights ruling"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/climate-refugees-cant-be-returned-home-says-landmark-un-human-rights-ruling
That ruling was passed by a court that - as I documented before - is largely under the influence of Soros.
The WEF is also pushing hard to promote this agenda, as does the CFR and the ECFR. The ECFR was co-founded by Soros and is largely supported by him. I'll let you go through their members list:
https://www.ecfr.eu/council/members
So there's a very high level plan to push this "replacement migration" and to do so, they push BLM and CRT (Critical Race Theory) to intimidate, vilify and marginalize white people.
They do not just tolerate such crimes by blacks and Muslims against white people, they intentionally encourage the criminals!
Imagine for a moment the level of psychotic evil it takes to plan the extermination of a major ethnics group and their culture - decades in advance and to fully accept the horrendous violence against men, women and children.
The French/German Marxist/Green Party member Daniel Cohn-Bendit wrote about the outcome of such a 3rd world immigration in 1991 and he admitted that it would be very violent, which he saw as merely a minor inconvenience:
http://www.zeit.de/1991/48/wenn-der-westen-unwiderstehlich-wird/komplettansicht
We are not facing random injustice and crazy people - we are dealing with people who have been indoctrinated and promoted financially and politically.