I will never understand this constant battle certain far left folk have with their imagined "far right" straw-enemies. Take this nugget of stupidity [image attached]. OK, so, first "the right", who or whatever that is, is more concerned over violence A than violence B. This has not been confirmed at all but ok. Surely if "the right" has no problem with neo-Nazi mass murders it should be easy to provide proof of this claim? Yet it never happens. Also, which neo-Nazi mass murderers? Anders Breivik? Wasn't actually a neo-Nazi when he shot people up, he has in fact gone on record stating that he later became one in prison, yay prison gang culture etc. Who else then? Elliot Rodger? Pfffffffffttttttt, don't make me laugh. Secondly, it's hypocritical to be more concerned over violence A than violence B? So, women have is worse is no longer a valid argument? Cause you know, 'not as bad fallacy' and all that right? Who am I kidding, it's only hypocrisy when 'they' do it. In group is excused, out group condemned. So, if women experience lower rates of violence than men, it's hypocritical for you to be concerned about women and not men. Gotcha. That doesn't sound completely insane at all. "Why not both" doesn't exist, clearly. We can talk about prioritizing things and the validity of certain responses being proportional to the problem but to write off anyone who is concerned about one type of violence as a hypocrite because you imagine they don't care about other violence is asinine. Thirdly, victim blaming. So he only follows them around to get beaten up for attention? How about 'teach antifa not to attack'? Oh right, sorry, in group/out group hypocrisy is OK. Excuse their actions then take the bold stance of "don't hit people" and take a bow from your retarded clapping seal like audience. It's so interesting that EVERYTHING has to become political point scoring and a giant tu quoque. Far left did some violence? BUT MUH FAR-RIGHT VIOLENCE THO!!!!!...