As I explained in my previous post about Gravity ( https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/874627957427335168 ) and Hydrogen cloud forming a star (https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/874667067723304960 ) that is based on the assumption that the force we experience as gravity is actually a force from an absolute zero super-fluid, also called Bose-Einstein condensate, what science call dark matter (in spiral galaxy) and energy (accelerating expansion). I noticed that people are skeptical for this idea, claiming computer can compute without the need of dark energy. Indeed there's one research paper that claims we don't need dark matter based on a simulated universe ( https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170330115254.htm ), but what it only shows is that the expansion is not everywhere the same. "In-between these islands of matter are vast voids where the density of matter is far lower." So while they try prove dark matter isn't needed, I can interpreted it indirectly as proof dark matter exist. What should a void of absolute zero Bose-Einstein dark matter do when it experience a force (see https://phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-negative-mass.html ) from the surrounding matter that wants to distribute (expand) his excessive energy by the laws of thermodynamics in this super-fluid, indeed in my interpretation this void (nothingness) even measurable up to the smallest scale in a vacuum, Casimir effect, should expand faster, proven by the research that wants to disprove dark matter, the voids, that expand faster, causing the discrepancy. “We’re all scratching our heads about this, trying to figure out what could cause it,” says Riess. Speak for yourself. June, 2018, Physics World. "Make no mistake, dark energy – be it the cosmological constant or quintessence – is the leading theory with plenty of observational evidence to support it. The alternatives remain highly controversial. Yet those nagging questions – like that huge 10120 discrepancy – just won’t go away." so...