We know most of what we know about Freemasonry today because the NSDAP raided Freemasonic lodges across Germany and turned some of them into museums for the general public to explore, so that the public could see for the first time what Freemasons had been previously up to behind closed doors and a veil of secrecy. The primary function of Freemasonry since the French Revolution was the destruction of monarchy (no-one can buy-out or pay-off a King, usually) so as to setup nations for democracy, which is then used to take control of a nation completely by international banking and finance. Freemasonry is hypocritical in many ways, but the main hypocrisy is that whilst Freemasons practice and preach democracy among themselves in the lower-degrees, the top of the organization remains authoritarian. Members of the Supreme Council are chosen, not democratically elected by other Freemasons. Why is that; is it because the upper echelon of Freemasonry know that democracy is a complete sham? "When looking more closely, one discovers that even though the lower degree Lodges appear as a variety of systems, the world of higher degrees operates under a unified system: the Old and Adopted Scottish Rites. They work as one, teach the same, and represent — most important — a unified political front to the world. Whereas John Masonry, consisting of only three degrees, is overseen by two loosely formed umbrella organizations located in Geneva and Basel, high degree Freemasonry is represented by a well organized world society, the Lausanne Confederation. In 1875, all existing Masonic great powers of this world gave themselves a constitution at a meeeting in Lausanne, outlining rules and regulations. All of the high degrees were then instructed as to their worldly dogma as well as how to act politically. the most important rule passed at the Lausanne Conference was that in each country only one high degree body can exist, the "Supreme Council." Only in the U.S. was an exception all...