Architect of UK online censorship bill condemns cancelation of cricket star for "offensive" tweets On Sunday, England cricket star Ollie Robinson became another high profile victim of cancel culture when the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) suspended him from all international cricket after eight-year-old tweets that he posted when he was a teenager resurfaced on the day of his England debut. Robinson swiftly apologized for the old tweets by saying: "I deeply regret my actions and am ashamed of making such remarks. But as with many others who have been canceled before him, the apology and the age of the tweets weren't enough to prevent him from being canceled. UK Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden responded by speaking out against the ECB's harsh punishment and tweeting: "Ollie Robinson’s tweets were offensive and wrong.They are also a decade old and written by a teenager. The teenager is now a man and has rightly apologised. The ECB has gone over the top by suspending him and should think again." UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's official spokesperson also shared the PM's support of Dowden and Robinson by saying: "The Prime Minister is supportive of the comments from Oliver Dowden that he made via a tweet this morning.As Oliver Dowden set out, these were comments made more than a decade ago, written by someone as a teenager and for which they have rightly apologised." Yet while Dowden and Johnson's statements are railing against someone being canceled for posting "offensive" tweets, a bill that Dowden is pushing would likely require Big Tech platforms to censor tweets that others deem to be offensive. The Online Safety Bill, which was published as draft legislation last month and is being spearheaded by Dowden, will block social media websites in the UK or force them to pay hefty fines if they fail to remove "legal but harmful content." The scope of this so-called legal but harmful content includes anything where "the provider of the service has reasonable grounds to believe that the nature of the content is such that there is a material risk of the content having, or indirectly having, a significant adverse physical or psychological impact on an adult of ordinary sensibilities." And The Online Safety Bill is based on a previously published 🛡 Online Harms White Paper that urged regulators to create a code of practice that would force social media companies to take action against "offensive material." This is the latest of several examples of high-ranking UK government officials condemning cancel culture or encroachments on free speech in their public statements but then continuing to crack down on speech via the laws and policies that they push. Last year, UK Home Secretary Priti Patel threw her support behind British political commentator Darren Grimes after he was investigated by the police over comments made by a guest on his podcast. "It's important the law protects freedom of speech," Patel tweeted at the time. But when it comes to private speech, Patel has no qualms about putting restrictions in place and recently threatened to fine Facebook if it allows private messaging. Ironically, while Patel and other UK lawmakers attempt to crack down on the end-to-end encryption that enables private messaging, many use it themselves to avoid transparency. http://reclaimthenet.org/uk-online-censorship-bill-architect-cricket-star-canceled/ http://reclaimthenet.org/online-safety-bill/ http://reclaimthenet.org/the-uks-proposed-online-harms-bill/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8826993/Priti-Patel-hits-police-race-hatred-probe-David-Starkey-interviewer.html http://reclaimthenet.org/uk-says-it-will-fine-facebook-if-it-allows-private-messaging/ http://reclaimthenet.org/uk-lawmakers-consider-banning-end-to-end-encryption-but-use-it-themselves/
7Upvotes
2Reminds
thumb_upthumb_downchat_bubble

More from Murphycat2012

Instagram is forcing users to remove satirical posts about Fauci emails Shortly after Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails were published by BuzzFeed and The Washington Post after Freedom of Information Act requests, Facebook and Instagram started to suppress mentions and screenshots of them after they were flagged by its third-party "fact checkers." Now, Instagram is using these third-party fact checks to flag satirical posts about these emails and force users to delete them. Luke Rudkowski, founder of the independent news outlet We Are Change, reported that when he shared a post that jokes about Fauci recommending "face masks over your eyes so you can’t read his leaked emails" on Instagram, he was told it was "missing context" based on a fact check from USA Today. When posts are flagged by fact checkers, Instagram usually allows them to stay up but attaches a warning, hides them behind an interstitial, and suppresses their reach by up to 95%. But in this case, Rudkowski was forced to delete the post, told "accounts that repeatedly share false information and their posts won't appear in certain places on Instagram," and denied the right to appeal the decision. "Seriously @USATODAY got nothing f better to do but to attack clear satire trying to take my account down!?," Rudkowski tweeted in response to the fact check. "It’s a clear joke!!!!!!!" While Instagram didn't point to any specific posts when alluding to Rudkowski's account repeatedly sharing "false information," most of the posts on his account are memes. Ever since Instagram rolled out its fact checking program in December 2019, the way it targets memes and jokes has proved controversial. The fact checking of this light hearted content has become so notorious that the fact checkers themselves have become a meme. This year the program became even more controversial when the Facebook-owned platform started using German language fact checks to flag and suppress memes posted by US accounts. http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-removes-satirical-posts-fauci-emails/ http://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-suppresses-fauci-emails-with-fact-checks/ http://reclaimthenet.org/zuckerberg-defends-censoring/ http://www.instagram.com/lukewearechange/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-fact-checks-ruining-memes/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagrams-meme-fact-checkers-have-themselves-become-a-meme/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-memes-german-fact-checks/
143 views · Jun 9th
The latest anti Big Tech smartphone is sourced and made in the US Another Linux-based, privacy-focused phone is hitting the market in the US, this one seemingly covering all the bases by offering secure hardware and software, but also tightly controlled for an increased security manufacturing and assembly process.
30 views · Jun 9th

More from Murphycat2012

Instagram is forcing users to remove satirical posts about Fauci emails Shortly after Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails were published by BuzzFeed and The Washington Post after Freedom of Information Act requests, Facebook and Instagram started to suppress mentions and screenshots of them after they were flagged by its third-party "fact checkers." Now, Instagram is using these third-party fact checks to flag satirical posts about these emails and force users to delete them. Luke Rudkowski, founder of the independent news outlet We Are Change, reported that when he shared a post that jokes about Fauci recommending "face masks over your eyes so you can’t read his leaked emails" on Instagram, he was told it was "missing context" based on a fact check from USA Today. When posts are flagged by fact checkers, Instagram usually allows them to stay up but attaches a warning, hides them behind an interstitial, and suppresses their reach by up to 95%. But in this case, Rudkowski was forced to delete the post, told "accounts that repeatedly share false information and their posts won't appear in certain places on Instagram," and denied the right to appeal the decision. "Seriously @USATODAY got nothing f better to do but to attack clear satire trying to take my account down!?," Rudkowski tweeted in response to the fact check. "It’s a clear joke!!!!!!!" While Instagram didn't point to any specific posts when alluding to Rudkowski's account repeatedly sharing "false information," most of the posts on his account are memes. Ever since Instagram rolled out its fact checking program in December 2019, the way it targets memes and jokes has proved controversial. The fact checking of this light hearted content has become so notorious that the fact checkers themselves have become a meme. This year the program became even more controversial when the Facebook-owned platform started using German language fact checks to flag and suppress memes posted by US accounts. http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-removes-satirical-posts-fauci-emails/ http://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-suppresses-fauci-emails-with-fact-checks/ http://reclaimthenet.org/zuckerberg-defends-censoring/ http://www.instagram.com/lukewearechange/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-fact-checks-ruining-memes/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagrams-meme-fact-checkers-have-themselves-become-a-meme/ http://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-memes-german-fact-checks/
143 views · Jun 9th
The latest anti Big Tech smartphone is sourced and made in the US Another Linux-based, privacy-focused phone is hitting the market in the US, this one seemingly covering all the bases by offering secure hardware and software, but also tightly controlled for an increased security manufacturing and assembly process.
30 views · Jun 9th