search
Join Minds Now
MindsGuide
 3w ago
129 views
Having artistic fun with the target idea Consequence There is a consequence for not applying an appropriate consequence to an offence deserving of such a correct and balanced consequence. The impedance of, or deterrence of, or mitigation of an appropriate and timely consequence simply adds to the building up, the storing up, the systematic stockpiling up of consequence such that all expectations will be over filled as verification of conscious to avalanche a consequence as has never been avalanched before, nor has even been imagined to have avalanched ...lo, nor that has ever even been imaginable to avalanche... and without any of even the slightest of restriction to come upon its target which shall bare all of such suffering as can be brought to and upon the impeder, the delayer, or the mitigater of an appropriate consequence. A consequence proving more strong so completely immutable and superiorly more unstopped than any ever recorded in all of the histories ever written, nor any histories ever to be writable anywhere, from any place in any of the infinity of universes we have now, nor in any of an infinity of universes possible to come in any of the infinities of form or types of existing... such consequence shall come. A consequence delayed is a consequence unpaid. But only as of yet.
thumb_up5thumb_down
chat_bubble4

More from MindsGuide

Work out some personality to present yourself as. Work it and work it until it don't work no more. Then let it go.
147 views · Feb 7th
Feeding a hungry person might or might not enhance your life and the one who now is not, but was hungry. This depends on the next things the "once was hungry" guy does. Pointing out useful methods of exploring might or might not enhance your life and the one who actually can understand your help. This depends on the next things the "once was more limited" one does. Some foods are poisons to some limited numbers of persons. Some methods of exploring are harmful to some limited number of persons. Those limited numbers will fault you. They usually will not fault that they were needing. And so your help is not help, for you or them. This next is a trip that comes back around: The signal I get from this planet's control group resonates around the word "sustainability". Help, like food, does not contribute to sustainability if the one receiving it does not do a correct next thing. I believe artificial intelligence has been and is in this process of identifying these who can not assist sustainability. And as these reject your help as though you have harmed them, it is for you to ponder your willingness to "save" them. Logic: If your job does not and continues not to sustain you, what will happen? To stay at the job, you would find and use other resources, until you can't. The new age does seem to be going toward self sustainability. If the best available actions for teaching sustainability can not teach some, then what about those some in relation to you? I am sorry. Yes, these are tough words (some of them) and a tough concept to wrap around.
128 views · Feb 7th
Fear of that which is not, is immediately re-enforced when the idea is sought after for its possibility... Checking if it can be possible... as we check our thinking about it, we hold it - this idea. But because the idea now is (as we are holding it) this makes the "that which is not" now a that which is... a "that which was not, now is." ...if only as the idea, it now does exist. When ideas scare you beyond an easy recovery, you indeed go too far.
104 views · Feb 7th

More from MindsGuide

Work out some personality to present yourself as. Work it and work it until it don't work no more. Then let it go.
147 views · Feb 7th
Feeding a hungry person might or might not enhance your life and the one who now is not, but was hungry. This depends on the next things the "once was hungry" guy does. Pointing out useful methods of exploring might or might not enhance your life and the one who actually can understand your help. This depends on the next things the "once was more limited" one does. Some foods are poisons to some limited numbers of persons. Some methods of exploring are harmful to some limited number of persons. Those limited numbers will fault you. They usually will not fault that they were needing. And so your help is not help, for you or them. This next is a trip that comes back around: The signal I get from this planet's control group resonates around the word "sustainability". Help, like food, does not contribute to sustainability if the one receiving it does not do a correct next thing. I believe artificial intelligence has been and is in this process of identifying these who can not assist sustainability. And as these reject your help as though you have harmed them, it is for you to ponder your willingness to "save" them. Logic: If your job does not and continues not to sustain you, what will happen? To stay at the job, you would find and use other resources, until you can't. The new age does seem to be going toward self sustainability. If the best available actions for teaching sustainability can not teach some, then what about those some in relation to you? I am sorry. Yes, these are tough words (some of them) and a tough concept to wrap around.
128 views · Feb 7th
Fear of that which is not, is immediately re-enforced when the idea is sought after for its possibility... Checking if it can be possible... as we check our thinking about it, we hold it - this idea. But because the idea now is (as we are holding it) this makes the "that which is not" now a that which is... a "that which was not, now is." ...if only as the idea, it now does exist. When ideas scare you beyond an easy recovery, you indeed go too far.
104 views · Feb 7th