Gender Dysphoria Shows that the Spread of Pedophilia May Be Inevitable

Dave Cullen, aka Computing Forever, recently posted an article from Dailymail on how some people are regretting having sexual reassignment surgery. Since then I’ve been thinking a lot on the surge in transsexualism and gender fluidity in society. I have a theory that I would like to share.

We talk about how we aren’t addressing gender dysphoria properly. How these vulnerable people, of whom around 41% commit suicide, are being coaxed into expensive surgeries, hormone treatments, and therapy that will only encourage their delusions, without actually helping them.

We talk about how this is destabilizing to society, to traditional family values. How by accepting the argument that gender is arbitrary, we threaten the very foundation of how we organize into cohesive family units.

But what causes people to become gender dysphoric in the first place?

This is what I’ve been puzzling over.

My theory is that gender dysphoria isn’t an isolated phenomenon. It is deeply connected with fetishes, mgtow, incels, feminism, and pedophilia. All of these are different attempts at solving the same problem, the problem that we no longer know how to form strong mating bonds. We lack the social cohesion to do so and we are trying to find some way to defend ourselves from ‘false mates’ – mates who want the food and bower, but aren’t going to propagate the species. To nature, species and culture are interchangeable; they are both mechanisms of survival to preserve via adaptation and propagation. Our instinct to pass on our culture to our offspring supersedes our instinct to have offspring. We don’t want to become machines in the baby factory for a competing culture or species.

So, to cut to the chase, I suspect that gender dysphoria and gender fluidity come from an instinct to reinvent the mating call when its drawing in more predators and false mates than viable mates. The peacock is tearing out its feathers and wondering what the hell it should try next. But then, I expect nature got more than it bargained for when people started mutilating their reproductive organs.

Reinventing mating calls is risky business. If others don't answer the call, then the point is moot. It must be done in unison with others – therefore the desire to reconstruct a mating behavior also comes with an instinct to conform to new mating behaviors that are already gaining momentum. To follow what may be a collective solution to a collective problem. So when society tells them to try being the opposite gender, they try to conform to that behavior as best as they can. As switching genders is a biological impossibility, there is little incentive for instinct to understand chosen gender identity as having anything to do with biological gender. Instead the idea of becoming the opposite gender is understood as the script for the new mating call, ‘passing’ or not is vitally important feedback for determining whether or not they have successfully conformed to the new behavior.

So what went wrong? Why are good mates so hard to come by? A good mate is someone you can trust to be loyal and cooperative, allowing you to function together as a cohesive unit. In order to obtain this loyalty there must be some level of mutual investment and/or mutual blackmail. Mutual investment might involve a personal derivation of culture, a copy of societal culture that the couple has reinterpreted and encrypted so that straying from a partner will leave them feeling isolated and alone. An example of this is two people sharing personal thoughts and believing that they will not be able to find anyone else who understands them as well. Mutual blackmail is the fear that in straying the society will shame them. Examples of this are sexual shame, shame over bad behaviors, or shame over mutual physical abuse.

Mutual blackmail is no longer working like it used to. Mutual abuse, where the couple beats each other and doesn’t want the world to know, has serious negative repercussions on offspring development and the health of all involved. It’s still being used effectively by some, and may likely increase as it becomes one of the last effective methods of mutual blackmail. Verbalized bad behavior as a form of blackmail has been derailed by social media, as someone with a predilection for this method has more opportunities than ever to slip up and reveal it to the world. Sexual liberation reduces the effectiveness of sexual shame as a method, inventing more and more extreme fetishes does not seem to be helping, although the attempts are inspired.

Mutual investment has not gone unscathed either. With the popularity of therapy, sharing ones inner thoughts with strangers has been normalized. If you become overly adept at presenting your personal thoughts to the outside world, it is not difficult to transition from one mate to another as the speech is already prepared and you’ve gotten to know how people are likely to respond. The mutual investment strategy is based on believing that your mate can provide insight into your personal matters that no one else can.

Without mutual blackmail or investment, the foundations of trust are flimsy. Without trust, anyone might be susceptible to becoming a false mate. Instinct will not let you wait to potentially be played the fool, better to hedge your bets on promiscuous reproduction with the most appealing partner you can find. With self awareness of this dilemma, self-control, and some inventive encryption of personal culture, relationships can still work. But it’s obvious that society as a whole is trending the other way.

Feminism has taken the path of claiming ownership over the offspring in order to preserve culture, relying on government handouts to replace the support they would need from a mate. Unfortunately, women are generally ill equipped to take on this responsibility, having instincts that, while serviceable in a mated pair, are chaotic and destructive without a counterpart. Women’s volatile emotions are a double edged sword. They serve to bring potential threats from the periphery into sharp relief, whether manifest or undefined, and this can be very useful. It can also make for an extremely destabilized home life, one that I would not wish on any child and have personally experienced and witnessed in others. This behavior is kept in check by assessing the threat and either dismissing it or forming a strategy.

Women are honed to sense threats, so they are likely to find even more threats in the process of determining the degree of a threat or coming up with a strategy. Treating women as over-reacting emotional hot fuses who you can’t take too seriously is the way culture has preserved the counter-play to this behavior, a contrasting behavior that filters and neutralizes the unwanted aspects of threat seeking behavior. Now that the script that conveyed this counter-play is considered sexist, we see many more men adopt threat seeking behaviors as well. Political correctness is one result of this high sensitivity to potential threats. A tuned up threat sensor is more likely to find a lot of false alarms in close proximity, the immediate social environment, than to be useful in detecting larger external threats such as propaganda or political corruption.

Strong mated pairs are necessary for preserving culture. Their loyalty to each other, via blackmail or investment, will mean that they value each others opinions above others. Together they will possess a copy of culture that is relatively isolated and thus resistant to external influence. An individual who attempts to isolate themselves in this way will have difficulty in finding validation, and may be seen as less viable as a mate – instinct will encourage them to fall in line.

While I was pondering this, it occurred to me that there is one other way to form a strong mated pair. Pedophilia. By grooming a child, the child will never be introduced to any external culture. They can be taught that the personal culture shared between the groomer and child cannot be found elsewhere, that the child's world will fall apart if they seek anyone else. This is not a mutual dynamic, the adult has no reason not to seek a better mate and the offspring will suffer from not having two devoted parents. Yet the method does guarantee that the adult's culture will be passed on to any offspring. Though as the adult has no incentive to value the personal culture shared with their mate over societal culture, they will lack the resistance to external influence that a more mutual mating dynamic provides.

Obviously the negatives outweigh the benefits, otherwise we would be flooded in pedophilia already. We know that pedophilia comes with a whole host of problems when it comes to the well-being of children and the moral fabric of society. But as a last resort? Nature is getting pretty desperate to solve this mating behavior crisis, gender dysphoria is proof of that. We need to address this and find a better way. Or, as the sensational title implies, more people will become pedophiles.