History of COVID-19 - Chapter 4 - Part 3: The virus behind the 2002-2003 epidemic identified in a bat colony in Yunnan
Shi Zheng Li traced the bat traffickers' route to flush out the virus that caused 2002-2003 SARS
In 2015, Shi Zheng Li wrote about the two particular coronaviruses that she had identified following her surveillance campaign carried out in 2013 in Yunnan (in a cave located 1 km from a village 60 kilometers from Kunming ): “Complete genome sequencing revealed that the Rs3367 and RsSHC014 viruses shared more than 95% identity with human and civet SARS-Cov viruses, which was remarkably higher than the sequence identity of any other SL-Cov virus identified (76 to 92%). " What a miracle ! Was it really against all odds as she seems to suggest in her post?
For journalists, the question still arises as to how the virus got from the Kunming cave to the Canton seafood market some 1,500 km away. For a rational mind, this undoubtedly indicates that trafficking in bats captured in Yunnan has certainly supplied the wild animal market in Canton city located in Guangdong province. In his article, Shi Zheng Li does not explain why she campaigned in Yunnan in 2013, but it is not forbidden to think that she had learned about the trafficking of bats to trace it. In any case, this is what any scientific researcher would have tried to do by following the logic of an investigator. It should be noted that these markets for wild animals that the Chinese are so fond of developed in the 1990s, after the Tiannamen Square crisis in 1989, and the creation of radical liberalism by the communist authorities. It was the advent of free enterprise in China in the spirit of uncontrolled business and trafficking of all kinds.
There are now tens of thousands of markets in China where dozens of species of sometimes truly wild animals are piled up, such as bats, or very often farmed game. These markets can extend over giant areas of more than 100 hectares in megalopolises of more than 10 million inhabitants each. They are biological time bombs. It did not take 13 years for a first coronavirus zoonosis to emerge in Canton in October 2002. 17 years later we helplessly witness that of SARS-Cov2, officially accredited to the Huanan wildlife market in Wuhan. These markets generate 100 billion euros in annual turnover and provide a living for millions of Chinese ...
It is such a problem for China that it did not hesitate to backtrack when it comes to the Huanan market with the announcement from Gao Fu, director of the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, saying end of May: “the samples taken there (the Huanan market, NDA) in early January did not reveal any presence of virus on the animals. »( Source CNEWS ). Moreover, CNEWS with the almost journalistic which consists in asserting without verifying the information is wrong in its title by asserting that the first cases were detected on the seafood market. In chapter 1we have shown that in reality the first cases officially detected in December 2019 had not been linked to the Huanan market or one of the other annexed markets of this type in Wuhan. On the other hand, retrospective radiological reviews have shown that the very first undetected cases took place in mid-November 2019 without any investigation having taken place in the places frequented by patients or the people with whom they were. had been in contact.
In any case, this statement by Gao Fu is the reverse of the one he made 4 months earlier, on January 22 , 2020, when he told the rest of the world that the focus of the epidemic was the fruit market. of Huanan Sea. Faced with such a turnaround, Western governments remain paralyzed and still do not call China to account, which continues to wallow unashamedly in repeated disinformation. We can say that it would be wrong to embarrass herself. This latest announcement is not intended for transparency or the search for the truth. It came at a time when the thesis of the pangolin, intermediate host, was beginning to be seriously questioned scientifically., by a publication published on May 14 in PLOS Pathogene, a prestigious journal. This article seems to have all the more weight since it is made by Chinese researchers affiliated with the Central Laboratory for the Preservation and Use of Animal Resources of Guangdong!
We will see in detail in the course of the following chapters how much credit can be given to this assertion. The mode of communication of China on the essential facts surrounding the start of the epidemic in Wuhan being, from the beginning, the fruit of maneuvers of disinformation such as the fact that it is a team of Chinese researchers which scientifically demonstrates that it does not the pangolin is not responsible, may appear suspicious. Did the Chinese authorities find themselves obliged to adapt their official discourse or did they plan an announcement which allowed them to skillfully drown the fish with regard to the Wuhan seafood market, and consequently those of the rest of China? On the one hand, she hinted that this was not worth closing risky markets since the Wuhan epidemic would not come from there. On the other hand, it still left some doubt since it had carried out the destruction of the samples taken from which we do not know whether the list included bats or not.
For its part, the WHO unsurprisingly takes up the same explanation as the CNEWS article reports : “it is even certain that [NDA, the Huanan market] played a role. But what role we don't know, whether it's the source or the amplifying framework or just a coincidence that some cases have been detected in and around this market, ”said Peter Ben Embarek, WHO security expert food and zoonoses, during a virtual press conference in Geneva earlier this month. "( Source CNEWS )
In this muddle of disinformation which serves China then emerges the possibility described by Colin Carlson, professor at Georgetown University, USA, and specialist in the propagation of zoonotic viruses, which evokes the hypothesis of the presence on the Wuhan market of a "super propagator" at the start of the epidemic. That is to say an individual who would have transmitted the virus to many more than the 2 to 3 people infected on average by a patient with the coronavirus. Super contaminators do exist, like this Canton doctorwho had treated SARS patients and who himself ended up infecting in a few minutes, on February 21, 2003, 16 people whom he had met in the hallway of the Hilton Hotel in Hong Kong before dying in the days that were following. Likewise, the Covid-19 epidemic broke out in Alsace, probably following a religious gathering of 2,000 evangelists organized by the Church of the Porte Ouverte Chrétienne in the Bourtzwiller district in Mulhouse. We do not know exactly who was present at this rather confidential gathering, with participants potentially coming from all over France and even from abroad, but we think that a single patient could have contaminated a few dozen in a weekend, not to mention one. significant number of Chinesepresent in the region (Colmar) due to reality TV shows on cooking, bound for China. Finally, it is no coincidence that the SARS-Cov2 epidemic has really exploded in France from the Colmar-Mulhouse conurbation in Haut-Rhin. Mulhouse is twinned with Bergamo, which is the Italian martyr city most appallingly affected by Covid-19 and from which the epidemic in Italy started on January 25, 2020. With its low-cost international airport (Bergamo Orio al Serio), Bergamo was before the epidemic the transit point for countless Chinese workers, some of whom came from Wuhan, and who were employed in textiles and clothing in the region around Milan. Jining, which was the second epidemic center in China after Wuhan, was also twinned with Mulhouse.
All this masks the reality of the situation and we must remain very careful with regard to all the official statements coming from China, the WHO or our own leaders who until now have not shown a great judgment in the prevention and management of the epidemic.
In summary, China did not formally survey the very first patients who presented with respiratory symptoms due to atypical pneumonia ( Chapter 1 ) outside the Huanan market between mid-November and early December. She just says: (1) that the virus did not initially come from the Huanan market and (2) leaves it to the Western media to claim that the virus is of animal origin. A recipe that suits him to the highest point.
As for the wildlife markets, following the deadly SARS outbreak of 2003 which was contained in time, the Chinese government has not closed them despite urgent demand from the WHO and other international bodies. She still has no real intentionto close them. As usual, the most artistic vagueness reigns between the Chinese regulations prohibiting the trafficking and sale of wild animals, introduced after 2003, and the reality on the ground. The health of mankind is held hostage by China. The raw analysis of the figures shows that with only 4,600 dead and an epidemic under control, China has just won by force of events an overwhelming victory against the West and especially over its enemy brother which are the USA where there are 16 September 2020, more than 200,000 deaths from Covid-19. Today, October 6, 2020, 9 months after its revelation to the world, the pandemic still covers a million deaths in total worldwide. But this figure is paltry compared to what could happen in the future if China
Unlike the 2003 SARS-Cov, there is enormous doubt about the natural origin of the 2019 SARS-Cov2 virus.
The origin of the virus is not established with certainty and its genome presents very disturbing characteristics for which a natural explanation seems unlikely according to a good number of researchers who do not hesitate to affirm it publicly, especially to the foreign. Quite a few others are content to affirm it in their friendly circle, without however daring to openly testify to it as it is now difficult, and above all professionally dangerous, to give a critical opinion in France on anything that does not fit. in consensus thinking. As the author of this text we believe that this unique thought is imposed by the media in the service of the globalist oligarchy but we admit that this is a purely political opinion.
As we saw in Chapter 1, there has been destruction of evidence, withholding of information and willful failure of scientific investigation on the part of China. As a result, the question of the intermediate host, which would be the pangolin, has become very complex because it could not be resolved with sufficient reliability and raises many questions as we will see in the next chapter. This obviously confirms the unofficial conspiratorial thesis that the virus does not come from the Huanan market but rather from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its mythical P4 laboratory, which the institute has had since 2015.
Reality seems to have gone beyond fiction with the spectacular interview with Prof. Montagnier, Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the AIDS virus, broadcast on April 17, 2020, on a mainstream television channel. In this long interview, he claims that the genome of the SARS-Cov2 virus, responsible for the pandemic, presents exogenous elements of information (EEI) that cannot be of natural origin. We dedicate the penultimate chapter of this book to the work of Prof. Luc Montagnier and the mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, which allows them to draw this terrible conclusion. Note that they are not the only ones and that many questions have been raised by other established scientific researchers,
The official thesis, defended by researchers from the Institut Pasteur, who are the reference in France in the matter, is that this region which seems to come from nowhere is the result of a natural recombination between viruses operated by nature. In a form of elliptical reasoning, dear to the French research community and found in many theses, their conclusion is that obviously nature is capable of doing this type of rearrangement since it is observed, excluding any other possibility ... However, we will see that this unstoppable reasoning comes up against the theory of probability and the fact that new methods of genetic engineering have made it possible for a few years to edit a genome and insert sequence elements into it, even complete genes,
Author (s): Valère Lounnas with the collaboration of Gérard Guillaume for FranceSoir