catalyst? parts? - - - division <|> unity - - - -

let's keep this simple:

is one able to see what the subject matter of the above photo is if the author hides information, holds a gun to one's head, manipulates one's emotions, wraps one in faulty beliefs, or causes one to blame their brother/sister for one's inability to see or know the answer? - forget about the words above and below the thin image and share what's in that strip between the words?

unless one has seen this image before, more information is likely needed, and is this not where division begins? is it not a much easier affair to prevent unity when those who control the flow of information simply block access to knowledge that would cause change in perception and therefore allow unity's growth?

here is the same photo now with the proper orientation, so how does disclosure affect one's ability to find answers? was one even aware that "proper orientation" was occult? what happens inside when one sees that word - - occult - - ? all it really means is "hidden". what has "religion" said about occult? what if the "state"(corrupt "authority") told you that this second image was "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"?!? what if the "state" could get one to be-LIE-ve what has been shared, then would not the "state" have succeeded in controlling the one who will now not even look into "the truth" by virtue that they have been taught that to be-LIE-ve is the end of their responsibility because one "trusts" the "state" that they be-LIE-ve they "elected"?

looking back at the second image, what if the "state" knew people on both the light and dark side and told each side that the "state" had their best interest in mind when they taught them that "the other side" can not be trusted? what if the "state" taught one that because one is from the light-side one has a "right" to "resources" that can only be found on the dark-side? that folks on the dark-side are "sub-human"? and what if the "state" told folks on the dark-side that folks on the light-side have a "superiority complex"?

what if the "state" was an "expert" in the psychology of folks on both the light and dark side? would the "state" not be able to take advantage of the alleged "inherent greed" folks have as a way to get them to attack each other allowing the "state" to avoid detection as being responsible for the attack in the first place? would not the "state" have successfully deployed f.e.a.r. which is simply "false evidence appearing real"? could not the "state" further cement f.e.a.r. in the hearts and minds of folks on both sides by creating something they know to be a myth? what if the "state" could make one be-LIE-ve in something like "scarcity"?

looking once more at the second image, which the "state" has said in the "truth", is it not clear that there is only so much room? only so many resources? only so many options?!? now let's take a look at the actual image:

does one see? 

bounty/abundance/plenty/wealth is one's true condition . . . .

the thing used to divide is merely a tool . . . .

a friend once told me that "money" is just a way of keeping score . . . .

is not "money" a fiction, a vapor, and idea, a construct? is "money" not empty?

have not folks been convinced that "money" makes the world go around? is it not the labor put forth by all the folks in this world that creates? does not the world go around with or without something called "money"? 

folks argue that "money" is a medium for "exchange", and folks think this means something of value is traded for something else of value, but is that not called barter? the "exchange" that the "money" creators refer to is simply the trading of lien rights, for is this not the true nature of what folks call "money"? is not all "money" simply a lien? does not the monetary-note plainly say "promise to pay" and if it is a promise, then does something called "payment" ever really happen?

folks say that slavery was abolished many decades ago, but is it not clear that slavery was simply perfected and EXPANDED to include ALL RACES?!? of course, some will "call BS" and say something like, "i don't see any chains or masters whipping purchased humans"! 

what is the number one thing that married couples fight about? is it not lack of "money"?

why does the drug dealer break the law? is it not lack of "money"?

why does the prostitute sell their body? is it not lack of "money"?

is it not lack of "money" that causes everyone to prostitute themselves for something that "if they had the "money" in the first place" they would never even think about doing? does any j.o.b. truly satisfy? is not the j.o.b. person perpetually "just over broke"?!?!?!?

does not the "state" and the "church" use "money" to become the master of the masses?

what is the catalyst for division? is it not this thing folks call "money"?