We Live in a Binary Star System

Do we live in a  Binary Star System  ?

It is the missing motion of the solar system curving through space that modern scientists have failed to calculate in their lunisolar precession theory. But the Moon does not lie. Its movement is exact and acts like a witness to the Earth’s motion. The only way the Sun can appear to move around the Earth, and be confirmed by lunar data, is because the Earth is spinning on its axis. Likewise, the only way the Earth’s axis can appear to precess or wobble relative to inertial space, and not wobble relative to the Sun as confirmed by lunar data, is if the solar system (the reference frame that contains the Sun and Earth) is curving through space. Furthermore, the only way the solar system can be curving through space at a rate of 50 arc seconds per year, is if it were gravitationally affected by another very large mass: a companion star. -    http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/research/evidence/lunarcycle.shtml

The most widely accepted explanation for how the solar system formed is the Nebular Hypothesis. In this theory, the whole Solar System starts as a large cloud of gas that contracts under self-gravity. Conservation of angular momentum requires that a rotating disk form with a large concentration at the center (the proto-Sun). The centifugal force balances the gravitational forces and the disk coagulates into planets. Most people accept this theory, but there is one big unresolved problem - the angular momentum should be proportional to mass (as every physics student knows) but it's not in our solar system.

-    http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/research/evidence/angular.shtml

Interestingly, a sheer edge is also widely thought to be typical of a binary system. In a binary system, you would expect the two companion stars gravity fields to cause any excess matter to be sheered away (ejected or captured) on a regular basis.

There are many common misconceptions about binary star systems, one of the most common myths is that binary star systems are the cosmic oddity and that single star systems are the most prevalent, when, in fact, the opposite is true. 50 years ago binary stars were considered a rarity. Now, most of the stars in our galaxy are known to be paired with a companion or multiple partners. 

Just because we cannot see it does not mean it does not exist. We now know that many stars cannot be seen including blackholes, neutron stars and many brown dwarfs. Furthermore, long cycle binary systems (those with orbit periods of thousands or tens of thousands of years) may be quite difficult to detect because of the very long observation period required.

For nearby Sun-like stars, more than 55 percent are confirmed to be in double, triple, or quadruple relationships. Total estimates are higher, with NASA's Chandra website reporting that up to 80 percent of all stars are in multiple star relationships. Therefore, it should not be unexpected to discover that our sun might be part of a binary or multiple star system. -   http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/research/evidence/prevalence.shtml 

Probably the companion star lies within the invariable plane (the angular momentum plane of the solar system) inclined to the ecliptic by 1.5 degrees. This would provide the most stability for the planetary orbits.

There are good reasons why we do not see our dual star. It must be very faint in all ranges of electromagnetic emission and located in an area of the sky that “camouflages” it. 

This basically rules out all types of stars except a black hole giving off only small amounts of radiation or a brown dwarf. The area toward the center of the galaxy is full of radiation, dust clouds, and background noise, making it difficult to track a faint object moving at an angular velocity around 50 arcsec per year.  -   http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/

We Live in a Binary Star System

Ptaah:  That is right. The SOL system is a binary star system, where the SOL twin is a so-called Dark Star, as you say. Its size is about ten times smaller than the SOL itself, whereby this twin also has its own planets orbiting around it, as you have known since 1975. The radius of the Dark Star to the SOL encompasses more than a light-year, therefore, more than 9.5 trillion kilometers, and the circumnavigation of the SOL’s centre of mass, that is to say, SOL’s own orbit, amounts to around 26 million years.

Billy: SOL’s own orbit – I do not understand. What does that means?

Ptaah: The Sun, that is to say, SOL does not stand still in outer space; rather it turns, indeed in its own sweeping circle, around an imaginary midpoint.

Billy: Aha. I did not know that. And why, so far, have the terrestrial astronomers not yet discovered the Dark Star?

Ptaah: The hitherto existing astronomical technical equipment and devices are not suitable. But it is only a question of time until a corresponding discovery succeeds. The currently existing technical devices are not yet capable, however, of capturing the extremely faint light of the Dark Star and its satellites. And that, to which the changes relate, in the Oort cloud, evoked by the Dark Star; the basis is that an enormous movement occurs in the innumerable – existing in billions – numbers of smallest, small, large and largest rock, ice and metal fragment formations, and sometimes great structures are hurled out as meteors from the Oort cloud, into orbits of the inner SOL system. A large chain of such meteors is, already for many decades, underway into the inner SOL system and has partly already passed the Earth or exploded high in the atmosphere. This is happening because of the Dark Star which has long since penetrated directly into the effective range of the Oort cloud, and since then evokes severe disturbances.

Billy : Then, from out of there, maybe new and still unknown comets and meteors reach into the inner solar system and in the area of the Earth, as is also indeed the case with respect to objects in the asteroid belt? And as I am already at this, I ask myself whether it is because, even with these projectiles from the Oort cloud, it is the case that some are circling in twos and threes, or that some are circled by small satellites like moons, as is the case for the larger asteroids, as I was allowed to observe from your Great Spacer in 1975 on my Great Trip.

 But what has happened to that very long, dark meteor-chain which emerged from the Oort cloud, which was on course for Earth, which you reported to me privately at the start of 2001? Are these meteors still underway into the inner SOL system and to Earth?

Ptaah : It was and is really a very long chain of meteors, which was catapulted out of the Oort cloud, and which found its way into the inner solar system, including the Earth. Some of the larger meteors of this very long chain, as I have just explained, have already passed near to, or more distant from, the Earth. Smaller ones have crashed, or exploded at great heights above the earth, and indeed across a number of years because they were stretched so far along their path and still are.

 The first meteor exploded in late July, 2001, high over the region of Kerala in India, as you know. Another meteor from the same chain exploded once again at a high altitude over India, in the year 2007, while the next two meteors from the same chain invaded the earth’s atmosphere and exploded in 2008, high over Colombia and New Mexico.

 And, from this very elongated meteor chain, still more and more are underway and on a course to SOL and the Earth, because these previously mentioned meteors were catapulted out of the Oort cloud by the Dark Star, that is to say, the dark twin of SOL. Also, there are still four objects, which were hurled from the Oort cloud by the Dark Star, which belong to the category of comets and are likewise on a path into the inner SOL system.

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_544