Race-mixing and You: Why it's Genetic De-Evolution
It is a perfectly natural, instinctive desire in all mentally healthy parents of children or parents to be, that the offspring they will have, will largely be better versions of themselves, socially, mentally and physically. We know that all decent mothers and fathers reach out to friends, family, coworkers, doctors etc, to make efforts to learn as many tips and tricks to do so, before and after childbirth. It is why it's soo disturbing to witness, that out of the hundreds of different factors that determines the health and strength of your child that is mostly all well-known information, from diet to hormone levels to exercise, who you should chose as your partner on the matter of race is no longer discussed and you aren't educated about this topic anymore. A surprising amount of what you are about to learn, was once considered common knowledge amongst the educated classes, and reduced to old wives tales and folklore amongst the lower class Europeans a few generations ago.
As backwards and “racist” as it may seem to say this in modern times, Race-mixing genetically healthy adults does in fact result in objectively, categorically lower quality children, in a wide spectrum of measurable abilities and talents, and most importantly, in your childrens intellectual potential, which is affected most of all. This blogs purpose is a one-stop-shop for the whole gamut of both why Race-mixing is such a terrible deed to commit, to how genetic inheritance works and why understanding it is such important knowledge for all Europeans to know. This is the sort of information that should be taught the very next day after sexual education is finished in schooling.
Before I get into the specifics, it's likely important to quickly debunk some of the more popular myths that are subtly, or blatantly taught to you from a young age in the West, most of these points will be covered in more detail later.
1. We are all the same!
This is a no-brainer folks, we aren't in any capacity 'the same' past basic biological traits like having brains, ten toes and 2 eyes.
2. Race Mixing increases genetic diversity!
Incorrect, there is more than enough genetic diversity within any sufficiently numbered Human Subspecies (IE: Irish, Dutch, Italians etc) to not require any foreign DNA from other Subspecies in order to improve a race in any useful capacity or to avoid inbreeding issues. The organizations and people telling you this are highly political and their motivations are very sinister in origin. If there were under ~10-20,000 ethnic Swiss left in the world, then you might want to make the argument for them mixing with another European race, instead of the few million there currently are.
3. We are Moving Towards a Single Human Race!
Possible, but that doesn't mean it's in any way a good thing, or an inevitability you should resign yourself to, many Human Subspecies will simply subsume or absorb a smaller race almost entirely due to birth rates and population numbers, and whatever unique genetic traits they had will simply disappear into the primordial DNA soup forever, never to effectively resurface. The Human Races as a whole, would lose out big time from this in a thousand ways big and small, even when putting cultures and societies aside for a moment.
4. Mixed Race Children are Healthier!
A complete lie, their immune systems are statistically and notoriously weaker than racially-homogeneous children as there are only a limited number of viral pathogen resistances that any child can be born with without experiencing them firsthand, your ethnic heritage comes by default with inherited resistances to regional pathogens (whatever viruses/diseases you and your ancestors lived through) branded into your DNA that transfers to your children, race-mixing essentially screws up that system, and can drastically increase the rates of infant death per capita. Geographically-foreign diseases are largely useless to hold resistances to unless you live there, they can potentially make you more vulnerable to local diseases your children are guaranteed to be exposed to, and it fills up important genetic capacity in the immune-system DNA of newborns, with worthless DNA data. Chronic trends of greatly increased mental disorders/illnesses, health problems and drug addiction are also common amongst every breed of mixed raced children.
Not to mention, that if some sort of super virus/Black Plague 2.0 came out of Africa, Asia, or anywhere else for that matter, the more varieties of humanity that existed, the better the chances of humanities overall survival, and the increased diversity would greatly reduce casualties, as many of the worst diseases known to man, are still tailor-made to the genetic setups and immune systems of the race/s in the geographic region it originated from, and either don't affect other races at all, are less contagious, or cause much less damage to the system. Alternatively the opposite can be true, a disease or virus that barely affects one sub-species of mankind can have a shocking affect on another, having this kind of genetic diversity can often be key to curing deadly diseases, a gift taken for granted.
For example, there are multiple strains of HIV out there worldwide, most are found regionally, and in some cases there are currently small sections of these local populations in Africa that are largely immune to their regional form of the virus, read this article for an example. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/may/27/aids.features
5. Hybrid Vigor
This is a real condition/concept that deserves scrutiny and study, but it's being used incorrectly when applied to ~90% of the human populations on planet Earth. It is only an effective way to improve the genetic quality of a population if they are chronically inbred or deformed (incest and inbreeding is an issue for a population when cousins, second cousins or siblings are having children with each other over multiple successive generations, otherwise it's not a problem for humans) such as pure-bred dogs with only a few thousand of their population to choose mates from, and most are geographically isolated to boot. After ~100+ years or so any of these pure-breeds have become progressively more sickly, increasingly deformed, less intelligent and weaker by default, and will need another breed to mix into them to restore the breed to, at best, a similar tier of genetic health as before the inbreeding started to occur.
India, Pakistan and many Muslim Majority/African nations have a deep, ongoing problem with inbreeding (mostly amongst their lower class citizens) that exacerbates their already limited genetic potential, due to a combination of an absurd interpretation in the Koran of approaching greater holiness by imitating Muhammad's marrying of one of his cousins, and general backward cultural norms. Now that problem would hypothetically need to be fixed via mixing with normal humans of the same or similar Subspecies in India and Sri Lanka, if the Muslims involved could ever bring themselves to admit or correct it, but this gets progressively harder to achieve as their collective IQ slowly drops even further due to said inbreeding, the outcome of this generations-long extreme-devolution should be a matter of great interest and concern to racially-aware geneticists.
6. Aren't Mixed Race People More Attractive?
While everyone has their own tastes in what they consider “attractive” in others, a standard theory around what people look for and appreciate in others when judging appearance and genetic health, regardless of race, is facial and body symmetry. Most people with very symmetrical faces/bodies are far more likely to be considered attractive and healthy, which is exactly why that above statement is utterly false. Different Human-Subspecies tend to have visibly different cheekbones, jawlines, cranial structures, and even different length spines, necks, and torso to leg ratios and therefore mixing them together will greatly increase chances of asymmetry, not symmetry.
The attractive mixed-race celebrities and models you see on your chosen media outlets are all exceptions pushed to the fore to manipulate you, they are not the norm (and they are often cleverly hiding what physical deformities they may possess through camera tricks, surgery, makeup and flattering clothes/shoes). Not to mention almost without exception, only Europeans have eyes and hair colored anything but black and brown, and these unfortunate, for lack of a better word, mongrels can almost never replicate that naturally, such traits are usually the first to disappear when race-mixing.
Intellectual Inheritance
The actual science behind this concept can be highly complicated and difficult to read, so I will use some examples and analogies instead, if you want college thesis-tier explanations you're reading the wrong blog, please attempt to enter the labyrinth of PubMed/PMC yourself for that.
There are some mental talents/traits that are directly inheritable and observable in your offspring, and many that are not. This can be due to many factors, one being that certain traits and talents require a great many different sections of their mind to operate a certain way to a certain degree of efficiency or dexterity, which can be quite difficult to directly inherit wholesale from one parent. Or that a sizable percentage of your personal genes are not directly inheritable at all and recess against your partners, due to a combination of chance and dominant genes overwriting your own during the development of your child, this is both common and hard to predict, and can even vary wildly between siblings from the same parents. So we'll be using a talent for this example that is well known to be directly inheritable to explain this concept better.
Example 1, we'll have 2 people, a male Irishman and a female Han-Chinese woman, both aged 20.
Since they were children they both showed great talent in the realm of Mental Arithmetic, which is on the spot addition/subtraction/division and multiplication without using calculators or visual assistance. They were also both tested monthly since childhood in this skill with randomized tests and both scored similarly, finishing at near-identical times and at equally high-accuracy from youth until their current age. They also both work the same job practicing this talent regularly so they maintain their ability at their peaks after leaving school. Health-wise both eat well, live healthy, active lifestyles and have no known medical problems or family histories of any genetic problems. This is the best-case scenario for being able to scientifically analyze what gifts their children can inherit with the lowest risk of latent genetic disorders and/or diseases from interfering with the process.
Now lets say for the sake of this example, they enter a lab and create dozens of children with their sperm and eggs on the spot in test tubes. These children are all raised to train the same abilities, perform the same maths tests and work the same job as their parents did until age 20. The best case scenario to assess their true ability in this talent over a long period of analysis.
Now on paper and to all appearances, the 2 parents abilities are equal to each other and are well above the norm for either race. But on the cellular level, where their minds bio-electrical signals make numerous, rapid connections and compute the answers, it is a wildly different cellular-structural setup for each partner, because many of the biggest genetic differences between each Human-Subspecies are largely found in the brain and nervous system. Irishmen and Han Chinese are proven to be separated by at least 30,000 years of separate, isolated evolution from each other, and very likely far longer than that. This will affect their children's genetic compatibility, and evolutionary potential, to each other greatly.
Currently the latest scientific study done on this subject has thus-far identified 1271 separate DNA signifiers collectively amongst humanity relating to above-average intelligence in the brain, that's a lot of different ways our brains can develop, both good and bad.*
Now, because of these 2 wildly different brain-cell architectural structures in both the Irishman and Chinese woman, their children will largely fail to inherit the same degree of talent. To the point where the vast majority of the children raised will score from slightly to significantly worse on these tests in all categories, and a decent amount of this below-average group will also score at or below both respective nationalities average to boot (an average currently trending down in every western nation for the last decade already, from a variety of factors).
A small fraction of this brood (~5-10%) will be essentially equal to their parents scores, as they got a lucky roll of the genetic dice and inherited the cellular-structures of the brain that calculate arithmetic talent exclusively from one parents DNA family, not the other, and ~1% at best will get VERY lucky and inherit a unique cognitive architecture that when trained will surpass either parent. If you were breeding dogs for a particular trait like speed or size, results like these would be considered a complete and utter failure. And though you would be hypothetically successful with this singular person, they would have little chance of passing this trait onto the next generation unless many other subjects who have similar genetic history wound up developing this unique mental architecture are found for him/her to breed with, or else this trait will be lost again in the next generation with a ~99% chance.
This is an example of what is commonly known as Regression to the Mean, and can happen even with same-race relationships, when the intellectual or physical capacity of one parent is vastly superior or simply different to the other, albeit to a much lower degree, and it has no serious or negative impacts on future generations of that family tree even when it does.
Example 2, the Irishman remains the same, except suddenly the Chinese woman is switched with another Irish woman. She scores the same as them both on the tests, is also 20, and a very healthy young woman. Essentially on paper shes the same as the Chinese woman in every way, except her genetic heritage is the same as the Males (no family relation however). Then they also entered the same lab and created dozens of children with each other who are raised and trained under the same circumstances.
Out of these children, a small number would admittedly score worse than either parent, either by bad/unlucky combinations of their parents cellular-structures, deformed or mutated eggs/sperm being fertilized and becoming the undesirable foundation for the existence of a child, or by partially inheriting their grandparents or great-grandparents mental cellular-structures from one parent and it either being inferior in function to the current parent or just mixing poorly with the partners DNA contribution and functioning inefficiently.
But this time, the vast majority of these children would at least be on par with their parents scores, due to a highly compatible, similar, proven effective cellular-structure, the remaining children would now score better than their parents and a decent number of this group (~10-20%, far more than the lucky 1% of the first example), would be in the clear genius-level tiers of ability in mental arithmetic as compared to the nations average.
These genius-tier children, during their biological development in the womb and early childhood, combined both parents mental cellular-architecture and took the best working, most efficient elements of both systems and combined them, and/or built upon an already great foundation and created an even more evolved cellular setup, a genetic leap forward of sorts. They are also far more likely to be able to pass on such superb traits at least partially and more likely in a dominant manner to successive generations if they stick to their own race, even if their chosen partners are not talented in mathematics.
This is an example of Controlled Positive Evolution, or Eugenics at it's finest, give it a few generations and have many starting couples instead of just one and you would have an army of super-human calculators down the line, assuming you'd have a need for it.
A good analogy for these 2 examples would be, you have 2 drag-racing cars doing the quarter mile. Example 1 is a heavily modified, supercharged and turbocharged V8 Mustang, running against a reduced-weight AWD Impreza WRX twin-turbo running on nitro. They both wind up consistently scoring the same times on the drag strip, but you cannot break both cars down to their basic parts, and expect to easily create a car as fast, or faster than either previous racing cars using only those parts without a great deal of ugly welding and luck at best.
Example 2, is simply 2 heavily modded V8 Mustangs, both going down slightly different design routes and choosing different parts or brands, but both are still scoring the same lap times, thus breaking them down into parts makes for easy work building a car equal or superior to them both no?
Funnily enough, the combustion engine and the vehicle are a great analogy to compare the human mind to. Much of our actions and activities are performed mentally by a rather inefficient series of cellular add-ons and additional checks and control systems attached to the much older, primitive, ancient parts of our brains. For example, it's why you struggle to control your pinky finger and keep it straight and extended whenever you attempt to curl the rest of your fingers into a fist whilst your thumb is extended and your wrist held back. The primitive parts of your brain that perform this action is designed to only send a message through your nervous system to simply close your whole fist, but an add-on developed many thousands of years ago gave us all much better control of our digits that cuts into and interrupts/modifies the signal just after it was originally sent, so you can instead use the fingers you desire to. It's not perfect but it gives you the dexterity to do the tasks you take for granted every day, such as typing on a keyboard. Much like adding on digital fuel pumps, Disc brakes, ABS, on-board computers and rev limiters in old car engines to get more control, efficiency and stable power than ever before out of them.
The average human body and mind is easily compared to a highly tricked out, modified and customized old 50s Ford Mustang, the base frame of the car and engine is ancient, but the rest of it is tacked on top and relatively new.
Degrees of Separation
It's foolish, pointless and irrelevant to measure the differences between the various Human-Subspecies by defining how much of the same DNA we share, as all mammals on earth share a vast level of similar DNA, as DNA in its totality, holds trace signifiers of our entire species evolution since before we were even apes walking on land to begin with, thus we share a great amount of DNA with pigs and mice for example.
This means it's far more practical and prudent to measure the differences between us via the concept of Genetic Separation, or Degrees of Genetic Separation. This can be accurately measured between even the most similar Subspecies of Humanity, such as Irish and Scottish people, although it's a very fine line there. It's important for you to establish a basic understanding of this, to truly appreciate how unique we all are and how important it is to protect our uniqueness for the miracle it is. The days of Hitlers racial idealism laws are largely dead/unfeasible today, too much has been lost already, but the European races can regain much with simple mass education on these critical points, for the betterment of mankind as a whole, to marry and procreate with your own people, your own tribe and your own sub-species.
https://ibb.co/hPuUNK - Click me!
The Above charts are great examples of how each Human Subspecies are both connected and separated from each other, in the first image URL link (by far the most in-depth and detailed, as well as a very useful tool to break down what nationalities are most compatible with your own genetic history, but it is far too large an image to host on Minds) you'll notice quite a few names there that you have never heard of, they are either scientific phrases for various ethnicities, or older races, eliminated from modern existence and/or subsumed into another, more modern racial tribe/s due to various historical events and the inherently violent nature of human expansion, migration and development prior to the industrial revolution.
It should not be a source of shame for us that prior to, and after recorded history began, mankind collectively engaged in a great deal of genocidal warfare against each other, especially those of Asiatic and European heritage. During nomadic eras our ancestors would usually resort to attacking any rival tribes they saw to ensure their own survival and easy access to local resources without competition, and if victorious they would usually slaughter all the men and elderly, most of the boys, and enslave all the women and girls who were still fit and/or fertile. Then the newly-enslaved womens genetics would be subsumed into the victorious tribe through forced marriages/rape and the pattern would repeat until the nomadic lifestyle itself was collectively left behind via a natural progressive mastery of the landscape and a natural progressive evolution of the minds of the nomads living in the area. It was an earlier, barbaric, but essential stage of evolution for us, beneficial then, but not now, for Europeans, and East Asians at the very least.
http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/cro-magnon-dna-unchanged-for-28000.html
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002700
This fossil find linked above is the linchpin for proof that while “we” Europeans likely indeed came from Africa in the ancient past, we are truly, deeply, separated from the various African Sub-Species due to the fact that this Cro-Magnon fossil has direct links to all European Sub-Species, from Mediterraneans to Scandinavians, whilst no other discovered fossil of this age and species, can claim the same anywhere else on Earth. In addition, this fossil and all European and Asiatic Phenotypes contain a small, varying degree of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA, no African Phenotypes contain any percentage of either, and Asian Phenotypes contain lesser amounts of Neanderthal, but larger amounts of Denisovan DNA than Europeans, alongside the many conquered/extinct mini-tribes DNA sitting inside both Europeans and Asians taking up small places in our DNA sequences.
There is also strong evidence indicating that Sub-Saharan and Central Africans are directly linked to Homo-Erectus variants as racial ancestors alongside an as-yet undiscovered additional ancient primitive human-subspecies**, completely separated from the vast majority of other Human Sub-Species who intermixed with many variants of Homo Sapiens/Neanderthals/Denisovans etc in their migrations all over the world outside of Africa. There is no evidence to suggest that Africans have met the genetic criteria to call themselves Homo-Sapiens, they simply did not walk the same paths that all European and Asiatic Sub-Species did. Papua New Gineans and Australian Aborigines are also in a similar situation.
Strangely enough, despite all this, in the highly politicized scientific-field of genetics, we are all still labelled the “same race”, that is, all human races are considered officially “Homo Sapiens”. But if this isn't clear, concise evidence of a massive Evolutionary Fork (the scientific term that defines whether 2 related animals are a different species or not) that separates us from all other races, then I don't know what an Evolutionary Fork is and neither does anyone else. We are not the same, the ability to breed “successfully” is common with many different entire species, from the man-made Ligers and Mules (who are admittedly born sterile) to wide varieties of bird species who are all quite rightly defined as separate species, to the Sumatran and Bornean Orangutans, Orangutans who were recently officially classified after DNA testing as distinct, different subspecies, but they look, behave and act almost identically, and when artificially put together in zoos were perfectly capable of cross-breeding. This is not a valid scientific reason for labeling a Polish man and a sub-Saharan Sudanese man the same species or race.
Reversing the Negative Trends and Securing a Future for Humanity
Have you ever pondered about whether or not mankind collectively needs to improve, or what traits we might need to develop en masse to assist in our expansion into the stars, to guarantee survival of our species? You'll likely have just assumed without realizing it that we would simply have to be far more intelligent on-average than we currently are, in order to help solve the myriad problems we currently struggle with on the subject, and to be capable of handling any further issues and to guarantee continued scientific progress into the far future as well, to deal with the new issues that would inevitably arise after we succeed in ascension to a space-capable species.
For that to be possible, or even slightly plausible, a complete, total reversal of all current birthing trends in the West is absolutely mandatory, and from what you've just read that means at the very least to begin with, a huge public awareness program of the evils of race mixing, regardless of your personal feelings on the subject of who has the right to live in a Western country. The current birthing trends are ensuring a great decline in intelligence and general health of all populations, and because there has been no recent changes in any first world nation to deal with any of this, the prospects for the future are very grim if we cannot change our current course.
We need the smartest, healthiest of us having the most children, we need to abandon the concept of having any children with people outside our own race, to the point of even considering IVF and artificial-insemination over normal intercourse if a mixed-race couple insist on being together (there are even same-race couples with the issue that one partner has genetic diseases or disorders best left out of the collective gene pool, donor sperm/eggs are also ideal in this scenario, assuming government assistance in the process), we need the smartest women amongst us focusing on having the most children of all with healthy male same-race partners, instead of spending their best child-birthing years trapped in universities and colleges studying full-time, being brainwashed to hate men and their own race and nation with variations of Critical Theory, and usually being quite poor financially, a huge disincentive for most intelligent people to have children.
To put it simply, we need well paying jobs easily accessible for young male workers, a lowered cost of living to allow for women to not feel the need to enter the workforce, or to work more than casually/part time even if they have a partner/husband (as stay at home mothers statistically have many more children than working mothers and can raise them more effectively) and a large quantity of decent housing and safe communities for said couples to feel secure enough to raise children in. For Europeans that means racially homogeneous societies/countries as a minimum to even attempt to create this kind of setup, nobody of any race feels comfortable or safe on a sub-conscious level in a multicultural society, despite all the propaganda that preaches otherwise. All races instinctively gravitate towards each other, even in NYC apartment complexes.
The Necessity of Eugenics
Despite the positive stereotype of educated Chinese and Japanese classes being considered the most civilized and educated of the non-European races, it's been ignorantly assumed by many that race-mixing with them isn't a big deal and your children will not suffer or be lesser for it, this is a big mistake to make, even if there were a race considered superior intellectually to Europeans (Ashkenazi-Jews might take this spot, but they have soo many inherent genetic diseases and disorders*** you're better off with a less intelligent partner of the same race when it comes right down to it, intellect is not the only factor that makes a person a worthwhile member of society.), the mixing of both tribes would cause more negatives at our stage of evolution than positives, we aren't nomadic, malnourished tribesmen anymore, we largely don't benefit from this behavior, refining ourselves amongst ourselves is proven to give us the best results at our current evolutionary state, it's why Germany under Hitler pushed for Eugenics and racial laws based on an early conceptual version of Natural Law****, as we have no natural predators culling the weak or sickly anymore. Thus we need to instead, selectively promote the best traits and talents amongst ourselves and possibly sterilize, or financially dis-incentivize any citizens from having children with severe genetic diseases that are inheritable. Our nations need to incentivize healthy eating, living and conservation of our natural environment to maintain a life without being poisoned by man-made toxins and refuse, such things not only damage our health, but scar our very DNA in ways that are hard to predict and usually negative.
I don't believe in the climate change propaganda cult/scam personally, but i understand the very important need for environmental conservation, another big failing of mankind.
Simply having mandatory prenatal scans widely available and free in Iceland, along with available abortion, has almost entirely eliminated Down Syndrome births (families who give birth to disabled children with severe autism or Downs unfortunately suffer massive rates of marriage breakdowns and much lower birth rates than the norm, however you may feel about these permanently disabled children put aside, when viewing this issue from a long term societal perspective, eliminating them from the gene pool is a net gain) in the entire nation over a period of just a few decades, and even the genetic predispositions towards Downs Syndrome in the population itself is much reduced.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/
This action has changed the face of their nation, and likely saved them a fortune in healthcare costs aswell, the argument for and against Legal Abortions put aside for a moment. This is the sort of Eugenics needed, instead of violent and unnecessary methods like mass cullings, as all of humanity needs to progressively evolve in a positive manner to solve the problems we face, and forge a path for survival in the future. In particular the more intelligent, fit and genetically healthy European people we can create, the better, especially without resorting to the risks of genetic engineering, like China is pursuing right now. That will likely be an inevitability for all humanity one day, but it's quite far off for now and unnecessary, we have much ground to gain within easy reach.
Another concept to dwell on, is that what truly makes each individuals talents and abilities soo unique, are traced back to millennia of mainly slow, subtle genetic evolution, and race-mixing damages and sets back this process, we aren't designed on the genetic level to do this and get a positive result in all but a tiny minority of cases, the only races that could benefit from this are deeply primitive, genetic throwback races such as Pygmies, Australian Aborigines and geographically close-by Pacific Islanders, Sub-Saharan Africans, Amazonian jungle tribes in the stone age, etc. Historically they did not migrate far outside of their genetic origins, and by comparison did not encounter, mix with, or conquer numerous other human-subspecies and share in their DNA tens of thousands of years ago or longer like all Europeans, East Asians and Middle Easterners did, they have yet to take the steps we did in the ancient past, and will always remain behind us as a result without direct, large scale gene-editing.
And even if they did mix with more advanced races, then they'd inherit issues with mental stability and emotional control due to the wild DNA and hormonal differences between the parents, the same as Asians pairing with Europeans or any other racial mix. Statistically, all children of these various mixed-race couples are vastly more likely to develop mental health problems than racially-homogeneous children. In addition to that, statistically a much higher rate of organ failure and bone-marrow defects occur in mixed-race people, on top of the already discussed intellectual-problems.
Even their mental health and ability to bond will forever be affected on a fundamental level by the fact that many mixed-race children cannot identify with either of their parents on a visual basis, although studies need to be done on this topic to determine what the effects can be of this issue.
Now, modern science is not quite so controlled and subverted, yet, that it does not admit in both recent and older studies, that a high IQ is largely inherited from your parents, and IQ is primarily inherited from the mother, more so than the father. There is also a wealth of evidence that clearly states that once a female is past ~22-26 depending on her personal health, genetic health and good environment, her eggs genetic quality starts to degrade (especially if she remains childless, harvests her eggs for use in future IVF or uses hormone based contraceptives), and in men this also starts to occur past 30, although there is much a male can do to improve and keep his sperm healthy that a woman cannot. These are the ideological fundamental building blocks you need to take into account when you think about building or rebuilding a society with a racially homogeneous population in the long term, if you want it to last, the fact that the complete opposite is currently occurring throughout the entire western world should concern you greatly.
How Do I Pick The Right Partner Then?
Well this is a complex question really, ideally you should undergo a DNA test if you have any unanswered questions from your family lineage first to determine what racial makeup is most dominant in your family tree, in most cases majority % wins.
The question you then ask yourself is, what skills and talents was i born with, that i consider useful to possess and i want inherited by my children? if it is physical traits you have, well, race won't really matter unless maybe you are an elite gold medal athlete or a world's strongest man competitor (certain traits WSM competitors have such as broad shoulders, barrel chests and wider than usual hips are mandatory for reaching their heights, you need to look for a larger than usual partner, usually of Scandinavian or Slavic descent if you want powerlifting kids), finding a partner with similar traits and an athletic disposition will usually be enough. You have a great singing voice? sure, many great singers have parents who had no talent there, but it's definitely an inheritable trait, but like for like is important, opera singers should look for other power vocalists at the least, but their race is largely unimportant in this manner.
Height is also quite a mis-understood trait that is not really relevant from a biological or genetic perspective, the benefits of being excessively tall are, from a population and evolutionary perspective, somewhat minimal, and ones predetermined height is more a case of what hardships your ancestors went through and what their diets were like and how much they were able to eat day-to-day, rather than some sort of genetic feature in your DNA, the life you live leaves positive and negative marks upon your DNA that goes onto your children, and shorter people need less calories per day to live, can handle constant physical labor with a lower chance of injury to their spines or knees (an almost fatal injury in the ancient past, if you could not work you could not eat without your tribe caring for you), being shorter puts less strain on your heart and organs to maintain bodily functions allowing you to live longer, etc.
For the sake of social status and first impressions, as well as striking reach and increased hand-combat capabilities in some martial disciplines, sure, height has it's advantages, but guns made most of that irrelevant.
However if this is an important trait to you, understand that your partners height is not of extreme importance as height is a genetically dominant trait no matter who the parent is in the modern day and so long as you and your parents both ate well and didn't have long histories of starvation/famine in your early years.
Intellectual inheritance is more complicated as i explained earlier, do you have a photographic memory? extremely good quick thinking skills and mathematical ability? your ideal partner lies in STEM graduates (or students if you are still in university), maths and physics in particular. Are you incredibly good at Chess? go find an intelligent Russian partner. Are you a deep thinker who reads/writes a lot and enjoys philosophy or theorizing on geopolitics and government? talented authors, writers and musicians are your best bet. Are you talented at craftsmanship or artistry? (painting, sculptures, design etc), look for anyone with a similar passion and skill-set, it doesn't need to be the same shared interests at all, your partner will simply require the same basic talents or skills as you on a fundamentals level, and they must display a measure of genuine skill in comparison to you, although in the creative skills department, what your children may inherit will be much more random than other mental abilities and talents due to the fickle, overly complicated nature of possessing such abilities.
And of course, in all intellectual cases the racial similarity of your partner will help a great deal towards guaranteeing genetic inheritance in at least a few of your children. Although i must admit that you should NOT partner up with someone you are not compatible with on a personal basis just because you think they are a perfect genetic specimen for you, that's a road to a quick divorce and broken family, which undermines the whole point of the West needing strong, stable families. It's hard enough to find a compatible life-partner in the modern day dystopia that is our lives, i'm just explaining this if you need some direction in what to look for or where. Did you start a new job and meet 2-3 people of the opposite sex, all of which are single and to varying degrees interested in you? well, this essay will tell you who to approach first without you even needing to think twice.
Conclusions
If you wish to reform society, nations and governments based upon the fundamental truths I've been explaining here, this means that the younger that Western women are having children, the better their health and strength will be for said children in every category, however admittedly our societies need some serious reform to support women returning to this behavior again en masse, it's more expensive, time consuming and difficult than ever to raise children in the West due to wage suppression, the breakdown of families and multi-generational decline in family sizes, the end of homogeneous high-trust societies etc. We need to greatly lessen the burden that will be placed on anyone starting families in the future.
The purpose of this blog is not to self-congratulate Europeans on being the “most intelligent/most evolved race” etc, the circumstances of our birth should be irrelevant to our egos, especially considering the threat we're all under. Genetic superiority we arguably have, but that is no guarantee of survival, only the strong survive, only those who can secure the existence of their people, and a future for their children, get to survive long-term. African, Syrian, Japanese or Amazonian jungle tribe, we are all born with a great debt to our families, ancestors, nation and heritage, and so sticking to and breeding amongst our own racial groups is the very least one can do to help pay back such a debt. Natural Law as a worldview, believes deeply in conservation, of both nature and of endangered species, and that includes all valuable human Phenotypes as well, and it is high time the unfairly-maligned concept of Eugenics is collectively re-examined by both the public and academia, so we can all embrace the philosophies of Natural Law as a guiding stone for our peoples and nations.
Every European Phenotype is currently in grave danger of being subsumed or genocided out of existence. Once upon a time Liberals and Conservatives both, used to bemoan the plight of the Tibetans, forced to live amongst multiple times their number of ethnic Chinese with no rights, doomed to slow extinction of race and culture, but now they all tactically turn a blind an eye to the injustice and slow replacement-genocide they suffer at the oppressive hands of Communist China, just as they do to the injustices we are surrounded by daily in the Western World.
We are, by design, surrounded by non-Europeans who, whether they are aware of it or not, seek to replace, consume or just destroy us, let in by powerful lobbyist groups consisting of pro-immigration, multicultural-advocating traitors and their puppets in the media and politics, who are either narrow-minded useful idiots at best, or dedicated, deliberate, relentless enemies of all European peoples at worst.
Our peoples collective ignorance of the information displayed in this blog is just another weapon used against us to great effect, education and celebration of our unique culture, history and genetic attributes are badly needed in the war against White Genocide, so spread this blog around by all means. It's about time we all started fighting back against it, awareness is but step one.
Supplementary Information;
For a hint of who's at fault for this terrible situation.
And for passion and entertainment value, Muhammad Ali is against Race Mixing
Citations;
*https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0147-3
**http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/09/africans-arent-pure-humans-either/
***https://www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/jewish-genetic-diseases/
****http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-national-socialist-view-of-the-natural-world/