Frangas non flectes - Thou may'st break, but shalt not bend me. -- Grenfell Family Motto
It's been precisely a year since the Grenfell Tower fire which took so many lives, so after a year's reflection I thought it now the right time to address some of the facts surrounding the tragedy.
It occurred on Trump's birthday (June 14, 1946). Trump has a tower which has subsequently had two fires: April 7th 2018 and on January 8th 2018 (both buildings were said to be without sprinklers).
The day of the Grenfell fire it was reported by the Boston Globe that he would not make a trip to the U.K. that year.
British Intelligence has subsequently been definitively proven to have been behind the Dossier and indeed the campaign to derail Trump's Presidency from the very beginning.
United States House of Representatives Majority Whip (pro 2nd Amendment/advocate against human trafficking) Steve Scalise was shot (by a single rifle bullet allegedly by Sanders supporter James Hodgkinson) earlier in the day in Alexandria, Virginia, by an alleged 'far left-wing activist' (Hodgkinson was shot and later died of his wounds in the George Washington University Hospital). Dead men tell no tales.
The incident represented the first shooting of a sitting member of Congress since Gabrielle Giffords was shot in 2011. To this day (at time of writing) there is no Wikipedia entry for the Eugene Simpson Stadium where the Scalise shooting took place.
Over the next few days these two events; the shooting of Scalise and the Grenfell Tower fire, cleaved Atlantic news coverage to an extent, the U.S. was focussing on the former and the U.K. on the latter.
The result of the United Kingdom's snap general election was in doubt with Prime Minister Theresa May having failed to achieve an outright majority. The establishment's worst fear of a Corbyn premiership 'for the many' was almost a reality. Two days later a man armed with a knife was apprehended outside the Parliamentary gates. Three days later former PM John Major of GWI fame tries to stop a Tory-DUP deal to form a majority government.
On the 17th of June 2017 the U.K.'s Daily Telegraph ran the frontpage headline: "Corbyn-backers spread 'fake news' about blaze toll"
"In the immediate aftermath of almost every major tragedy, conspiracy theories take root to fill the void left by the absence of hard facts."
It turns out the conspiracy theorists were much closer to the disputed final death toll than the establishment terrorgraph (an oft-used mouthpiece of British Intelligence information dissemination) wanted to admit at the time, with a frail Conservative electoral minority and the result of a stable government very much not concluded, either legally or settled decisively in the public's mind.
In constrast the Sun's headline ran "IT WAS MURDER". Which may, upon reflection, have been infinitely closer to the truth.
"During the inquiry (into the Grenfell incident), the 999 call made by Behailu Kebede, in whose kitchen the fire started, was released."
Behailu Kebede's fourth floor flat exploding refrigerator, which is reminiscent of a similar incident in the 1999 film 'Fight Club', even more so in conjunction with the very end of the movie where tall skyscraper buildings are seen in flames. One could make a temporal inference that the logical extension of a small fridge 'fire' could lead to an entire district engulfed in flames. Was a 'seeding' taking place in the public subconscious for an event that could later be staged and then denied?
And as if by proffering circumstantial supporting evidence it appeared that there was a brand of fridges which did upon occasion have fires with their condensers. So the authorities decided to look no further. The culprit was a cool box with a bad attitude. This is now the 'official' narrative and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future.
Could someone have tampered with said refrigerator or placed a timed device in a perfect spot behind said fridge giving a perfect alibi? But that would be a conspiracy and the mainstream media doesn't do conspiracies, because as we all know there is absolutely no historical precedent for such things. None whatsoever.
However in a fit of supreme clumsiness and presumed intellectual arrogance the usual prime suspects had already telegraphed their move in advance, emblazoned on the cover of their Economist. Presumably they had done their astro-theological and gematraic due dilligence for the correct time and maximum effect, although a message is only a message when you understand the message, thus primarily the event could primarily be seen as a black magic fire sacrifice.
The Tower major arcana corresponds to the element of fire and Mars (war), the 'Shining Eye of Horus' an oft-used symbol of the Illuminati/NWO. The trump card also denotes power of destruction.
Without going into the archetypal depth of the symbology (or gematria values, or the Tower of Babel) contained within the depictions of the arcana presented, if the timeline of the front cover of the Economist's "The World in 2017" can be taken to begin in June, with the 'Tower' major arcana trump card being the first month, then by October we have the death card depicting a nuclear mushroom cloud, which leads us to the height of the North Korean (DPRK) 'crisis' and it's 6th nuclear test. (Interesting to historians, a month prior to the aforementioned depiction is the allegory of Peter the Hermit's first crusade of the children.)
According to that illustrious bastion of unbiased information, Wikipedia informs us that 43.4% of shares of the Economist are owned by the Agnelli family of FIAT fame (sometimes referred to as the Venetian Black Nobility). Again according to Wikipedia; "Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Layton and other family interests..."
Mayfair-based private equity firm Coller Capital, a known Conservative party donor, owned a fifth of Rydon Construction, after a 2010 deal as part of a £332 million investment with Lloyds.
I have presented only verifiable facts. In light of incredible recent world events, it is up to your worldview and depth of knowledge how you arrange them.
Will we ever know for sure? Fire has a canny and convenient way of destroying evidence.
Probably not but that is often the way with perfectly planned and executed psyops.