Germ Theory or Terrain Theory

"The Germ Theory of Disease," as promoted by the medical industry today, is wrong - it's a proven lie.

A quick analogy to explain this.

A fish in a dirty fish tank gets injected against the infections that will stem from swimming in the dirty water.

However, if the fish tank is cleaned, the environment is clean, the filter is clean, the food and residue is scooped out, there's no need for the vaccine.

The "germ theory" demands that exposure means disease, and that simply doesn't hold true in the real world.

The fact is you do not, and cannot, "catch" germs, bacteria or viruses, nor can you "catch" candida overgrowth or cancer.

Germs are capable of change and take on the nature of their environment (good germs can turn bad, and bad germs can be reversed to good germs).

A toxic environment creates a toxic germ, therefore, infection and disease depends on the inner environment of the individual-- their susceptibility--rather than simple exposure to a "disease germ". That's why when an epidemic runs through a group of people, although all may be exposed, some get sick and some don't.

Food, living environment, water, soil, sun, rest, exercise, lifestyle. Our immune system will only be favorably impacted by these (organic) factors.

The Germ Theory is false - the terrain and somatid (tiniest life form in our red blood cells) health are how the body works.

I don't see how any living organism will benefit from an injected infection, with additional chemicals, especially adjuvants, that are designed to remain, to 'enhance' immune response, as a form of better health.

That's the same as believing that getting bitten by a viper snake will protect you from getting poisoned.

You're gonna get poisoned.

We don't inject infections to prevent infections. It's not only absurd, but criminal.