MY TAKE ON THE DNC-CROWDSTRIKE -FBI CONUNDRUM

It seems, Crowdstrike, while working under contract for the Democratic National Committee was also working under Contract for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Hmm..sounds like Comey and his MSM pals gave a false narrative about Crowdstrike's role in the examination of the DNC and HRC servers.

It's not that the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine the servers for evidence of Illegal breaches, for through its Crowdstrike proxy the FBI had covert access and knowledge of Crowdstrke's investigative discoveries regarding everything contained within and experienced by these servers.

I doubt the DNC and Crowdstrike had a working contract. I believe that Crowdstrike only had the DNC's written permission to monitor and safeguard the servers as a private contractor under paid contract of the FBI.

This scenario would allow the following MSM false narratives.

1. The DNC/HRC Campaign refused the FBI access to the servers.

2. Crowdstrike informed the FBI that it had discovered nothing remarkable about the servers.

3. The FBI was unable to examine the servers for breaches and/or criminal wrongdoings.

There should be a Special  Prosecutor appointed to examine the relationships of these entities with special emphasis on the working contracts, written agreements, oral agreements and who worked for who and what information was shared with whom and evidences gained.