What if Hitler had won the war?

Legendary US General George S. Patton realized late in the war that the US fought on the wrong side. Patton felt the US should have sided with Germany to destroy the Jewish Bolshevik/Communist USSR. This information comes from Patton's personal diary entries, letters he wrote to his wife, and comments he made to military officers and staff.

WW2 was incredibly complex on the surface of it, many different powers claiming they fought for many different reasons, some of these powers weren't even nation states, just ethnic, religious or political groups. However, in the final analysis, WW2 was essentially a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism VS Jewish Internationalism/Globalism. Adolf Hitler and his allies genuinely fought to preserve the concept of Nationalism, not just for Germans but for all peoples the world over (except perhaps the Polish but that's highly debatable). Nationalism at its heart really just means respecting the sovereignty of an ethnic people and the rights of such ethnic peoples/nationalists -within their own bordered country- to self-determination. What does self-determination mean? Self-determination just means an ethnic people being allowed to preserve their unique culture and heritage and pursuing their collective goals as a unique people. This applies to any ethnic peoples: Nigerians, Tibetans, Germans, Swedes, Vietnamese, Mexicans etc.

On the other side of WW2 was Jewish (Bolshevik) Internationalism, today we simply call it (((Globalism))). In the 1920's, 1930's, and of course during WW2, powerful Jewish internationalists were fervently advancing the Jewish worldview of eventually eliminating all nations... except for a jewish homeland... (what was later to be known as Israel post ww2, in 1948). Today we see that little has changed; Jewish Internationalism/Globalism still works toward gradually “merging” all peoples of the world (particularly in the West) into one globalist system with a global government (EU, American Union etc) global laws, homogeneous degenerate globalist culture, private globalist banks, globalist currency etc. In short, Jewish globalism (i.e., the weakening and eventual elimination of all nations other than Israel) is the exact opposite of Nationalism (i.e., a world composed of nations … specifically, ethnically, homogeneous and bordered nations). The allied powers of WW2 (led by Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin etc) were essentially mere tools and weapons of International Jewry* and thus de-facto fight for the Jewish Globalist worldview. This can be hard to take in and believe, because the true horror of WW2 was that millions upon millions of noble, brave, intelligent European men and women were killing, dying and genociding each other for the most worthless of reasons, because they were all pawns in the hands of elitist monsters, and all the bravery celebrated and revered on both sides in the end had no positive purpose or result, the Allied Forces all fought and died unwittingly to serve masters that hated them while being told they were patriots for doing so. After the Allies won WW2 in 1945, International Jewish forces were then free to exercise a Jewish 'Sphere of influence' over the greater Western World and as we see today, increasingly over the rest of the world.

Alternatively, if Hilter had won WW2 and then exercised a Nationalist 'Sphere of Influence' over the greater Western World, we'd have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious since German influence would have surely spread elsewhere, ideas such as non-usurious/no-interest banking, currency based upon the value of labour, not the value of gold/silver or no value at all like our current monopoly-money-style currency system, and strong family and racially-oriented culture, based on value and belief systems inspired directly by the laws of nature, alongside a greater appreciation of natural wonders and environments than we experience currently, would have spread throughout the west and the rest of the world.

Had General Patton gotten his wish of a USA alliance with Germany against the USSR, and a patriot had hung Franklin Roosevelt and his military-industrial complex cronies from trees for high treason like they deserved, all causing Hitler and the Germans to win WW2, what would be different in the post-war world? Here are a few examples:

1. No more USSR, the Soviet government murdered tens of millions of its own people during its 70 year reign – to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated the USSR, though likely taking parts of its Western region for Lebensraum, “living space”. A fair trade for the many millions of innocents that would have gotten to live a full life in relative safety.
   

2. No Cold War because there would be no USSR by this point, and no nuclear arms race as a result, at least hypothetically.

3. No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain, when WW2 ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism, this was part of Stalin's spoils of war. The western nations who fought against the Axis sold their souls and your futures away to Jews and Communists to win WW2, make no mistake, the USSR should never have gotten a tenth of the territory they seized.
   

4. No Red China and Mao's subsequent genociding of ~40-60 million Chinese citizens, the USSR created favorable conditions and aid for Mao's Communists which ultimately led to Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists in 1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory. Their later animosity is irrelevant, millions of Chinese citizens starved to death or were genocided before that, their deaths were preventable.
   

5. No Communist North Vietnam, as both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh. Vietnam suffers to this day under an extremely inept and corrupt authoritarian government that regularly kills it's own citizens through incompetence and greed, despite leaving much of it's communist policies behind.

6. No Communist Cambodia or Pol Pot's slaughter of nearly 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided the Khmer Rouges coup, although admittedly Communist Vietnam did step in to stop the genocide eventually to stop the tide of fleeing Cambodian refugees into their own territory, which was causing massive problems for them, about the only time a communist nation ever did any good).

7. No dividing Korea into North Korea and South Korea, as the Allies split Korea after WW2 ended, with North Korea becoming Communist... Another of Stalin's Spoils of war....

8. No Communist Cuba, as without support from other Communist nations Castro would never have had a chance to succeed in the 50s. Ask US-born Cubans about Castro if you want to know what he did wrong.

9. No Communism anywhere. Hitler was the worlds most devoted anti-Communist, the cancerous marxist ideals could never survive or spread with him around.

10. Liberalism and multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western societies and ideologies in the same way or to the same extent as both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no liberalism and no multiculturalism... at least certainly nowhere near the degree we see today. The West would remain a demographically homogeneous series of nation-states.
    

11. No Cultural Marxism and no Political Correctness as these are social engineering “tools” which came out of the Jewish-run think-tank known as the infamous Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, post WW2. For the express purpose of destroying the USA and any nation-state that gets in the way of Globalist-goals from the inside with a cancerous ideology that undermines every aspect of society that nations rely upon to stay stable, safe and successful, and paves the way for communism to eventually take over.

12. No Third World immigration into the West as Jews wouldn't be in positions of power to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews running lobbying groups or NGOs today are at least partially responsible for every Western nations liberal immigration policies/law changes, as all were orchestrated by a varying consortium consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, B'nai B'rith, and many more NGOs.

13. No widespread depraved and degenerate filth on TV, in movies, a vastly reduced prevalence of porn in all forms etc because Marxist Jews wouldn't be running Hollywood and the media and thus wouldn't be pushing it, and no, Hitler never had any intention of invading and ruling over the United States or anywhere else in the world, he wanted the natives of each nation ruling over themselves in relative harmony and peace, free of Jewish influence, history intentionally forgets the many times Hitler tried and failed to form peace treaties before and during all stages of WW2. The most likely outcome of the US allying with Germany (the most likely hypothetical of Germany winning the war outside of just staying out of it) would be the US crushing the Jewish subversive influence within as a sign of solidarity.

14. No widespread pornography ruining womens minds, bodies, lives and futures and damaging the balance of sexuality between men and women, because Jewish lawyers, Jewish porn directors and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of “Freedom of Speech”. (Look guys i know most of us have enjoyed a porno or 3 over the years, but trust me, we'd all have been MUCH better off in our sexual relationships with women if none of it ever existed, it would be a very good trade overall.) Another case of Jews ignoring the law when it suits them and wielding it as a weapon against an enemy whenever a Jew needs to. The porn industry has done much harm to the men and women who work in the industry and has many subtle, adverse negative effects upon the mental-states of the men and women who consume it.
    

15. There would still be prayer in public schools at least in the US, for better or worse, as Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called “separation of church and state,” something that appears nowhere in the US Constitution. Yet another undermining of the morals that allowed the early United States to rise quickly in a united, stable, civilized manner post colonization.

16. No man-hating radical feminist movements, as Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among many many others, were the key drivers of radical feminism.

17. No Zionist-run Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians. It would be a very different creation if it lacked the blind support and funding of the US and other nations, and much more likely to be a friendlier, more co-operative nation with its neighbors, instead of being a Jewish supremacist state covered in the blood of their pawns and victims.**

18. Those who identify as Jews would most likely be living only in Israel and perhaps Madagascar after a few generations and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was another place Hitler considered as a potential Jewish Homeland). Thus many of the potential destroyers of Western Civilization would never have taken root in the West in the first place. Whether it would remain this way by 2017 however is pure speculation.

19. No speculation-based markets, no gigantic Wall-Streetesque booms and crashes based upon financial trickery/greed and high level bankers crashing economies and ruining lives en masse to seize immense wealth created by the honest, hard work of the middle class and working poor. Each nation would have a much better chance to develop it's own independent wealth and enrich it's middle class without relying on the dog-eat-dog philosophies of International Capitalism, which demands that there always be many poor nations and it's desperate citizens toiling to prop up the wealthy habits and lifestyles of the richer ones.

    This Fractional Reserve Banking System/Fiat money system/Debt-based Currency Systems, or whatever you wish to call it, is essentially a gigantic ponzi scheme, for it to function it requires ever more people and nations to sign up to it and keep it afloat, Hitlers hypothetical victory in Europe would mean numerous European nations and surrounding ones would have no choice but to abandon the Rothschilds pet project or face total economic collapse, and the cataclysmic consequences that doing so would pose to the economies of the USA and rest of the developed world still under the thrall of private banks money, strongly indicates that it would be abandoned entirely and state-owned central banks would spring up instead similar to Germanys, and as a result Hitler's win would likely cause a gigantic economic boom worldwide post WW2, instead of the deep depression many nations suffered for years before and after the Allied forces victory. Historically going back to even the Roman empire these booms often occur in any nation that engages in creating it's own state-backed and owned currency for mass distribution.

    20. The United Nations might still exist (as would the EU, however it'd be a vastly different beast, designed by nationalists who value the sovereign rights of each nation, instead of the International Jews who ended up creating it to destroy such things), as it was formed post WW2 , but it would have a different purpose, the UN as it exists today is a largely worthless organization that does nothing good for anyone except push for endless welfare and handouts for the third world and their mass immigration into the west, and sucking up your tax dollars in pointless bureaucracy, the few tangible effects the UN has upon developed nations are largely negative, always attempting to undermine a sovereign-states laws with it's own demands styled upon globalist ideals and oppressing the freedom of speech of people like me wherever it can. A key part of the UN and EU's mission objectives is to keep national socialists from ever running a nation again, thus it is just another obstacle in the way on the path to save the West.

Now many reading this will ask, “But what about the Holocaust? Wont it happen again? or wouldn't it grow to rival communist genocides post Germany victory?” (https://www.minds.com/blog/view/624261094419996675 is another blog I wrote on this for reference read this next if you haven't yet) The Holocaust has been a massively exaggerated PSYOP by organized elite Jewry in order to create sympathy for Jews worldwide and thus help advance the Jewish agenda (i.e., people seen as victims tend to get their way more often), and the worldwide domination of the Jewish-Rothschild designed usury-based reserve banking system, instead of people discussing Hitlers wonderful and effective new form of currency and economic design, the manipulated citizen simply thinks "Holocaust is bad and so are evil nazis oh no!" and even if they don't, they'll never publicly support attempts to create such a system for fear it'll somehow magically oppress the people or turn them against you, and the huge stigma of suggesting that anything Hitler did was a good thing can have on your personal and professional life. It is also used as a political weapon to leech funds, weaponry, intelligence and aid off of Western Nations and to justify Israeli militarism against the Palestinians. Hitler's “Final Solution” (re-branded in the early 1970's as the “Holocaust”) was a plan to remove Jews from Europe, not to kill them. During WW2, just as the US couldn't trust Japanese Americans post Pearl Harbor, thus causing FDR to round many of them up and place them in POW camps, Hitler couldn't trust alot of Jews since many were partisans sympathetic to the USSR and so they aided the USSR in various subversive, anti-German activities. Therefore the Nazis rounded up any Jews suspected or accused of conspiracy or sedition and placed them in concentration camps as well, however there was always a pathway to freedom or acceptance even if you were Jewish, many jews and partial jews lived perfectly normal lives in Germany as citizens and tens of thousands of them fought for their nation under Hitler in WW2.

It should also be noted and stressed once again that Hitler never wanted to “conquer the world”. He simply wanted to safeguard Germany, Europe and the greater Western World from all manner of nefarious Jewish influence and, more broadly, safeguard the world-at-large specifically from; 1. Usurious Jewish Banking, 2. Jewish-driven cultural degradation and 3. The terrible threat of Communist Russia.

As previously stated, the Allied heads-of-State (Roosevelt, Churchill etc) were puppets of International Jewry; each sold his soul for power and prestige, along with almost all leaders of the West since to this day. Again, as earlier stated, WW2 was a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism vs Jewish Bolshevik Internationalism/Globalism - - unfortunately the Jews won, and we all lost.

Was WW2 “the war of good against evil” as is often claimed? No, although there were no saintly nations involved in WW2, all committed warcrimes, it was essentially the opposite. The Allied victory achieved with the corpses of millions of brave white men marked the beginning of the possible end of Western Civilization.

*http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm

**https://www.minds.com/blog/view/620657519286558720