She (HRC) is a cold calculating animal who clearly not only doesn't know the difference between right and wrong, but puts enormous effort and resources (not hers!) into pretending the opposite is true. That is just my perception. But regarding the perceptions of her shills:
More interesting of the private (vs. public) words from this Wikileaks released email is the acknowledgment from another, Brent Budowsky, of her deficit of character.
Interesting (not surprising) that a liberal shill (who whines because he is not at the time a paid shill) compares the entire democratic (sic) base of being like the worst woman (the “hell hath no fury” comment is a bad-woman-specific term). HRC, the democrat not-leadership, and the democrat base are “not trustworthy” (I, for one, would use other less negatively generalizing descriptions for much of the democrat base, but that for another time).
It is the “not trustworthy” portion of this “not trustworthy” democrat base that has, over the past couple of decades, infiltrated the mainstream media clearly transforming it into the propaganda media that has surpassed (in moral decadence) the Russian PRAVDA media from the 60s and 70s (when I was a child), which the U.S. state schools (commonly referred to as public schools) belittled relentlessly.
Here's a link to the RealClearPolitics article referred to by Brent Budowsky (</sarcasm on> and you know this guy is great, because he tells you that he is in his first sentence </sarcasm off>). The lies, distortions, untruths, libel, proceed.
When democrat shills say that HRC is the most qualified, the truth is that she is the most criminal in the history of the U.S. This criminality was evident to those with eyes before hero Assange or hero Snowden or hero O'Keefe (and others) were able to surface above the mire (even while in exile, or in virtual prison, or undercover) and show those with glazed eyes what they didn't know that they wanted to see. In the 70s and 80s as an older child or young adult, when I began to realize that the anti-PRAVDA rhetoric was in fact propaganda, I still didn't know that it was more than just a cold war battle.
More ignorant then, I assumed that it was just a competition of words between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Now that I'm older and somewhat wiser, I realize that it was more than that. In the 30s, 40, and 50s, the nefarious elements of the U.S. brought in and embraced the nefarious elements of NAZI Germany. The elements that made possible the rise to power of the authoritarian NAZI Germany, have brought the U.S. to tyranny. I hope to speak more to this notion elsewhere. But about this Democrat shill, Budowsky:
This shill talks about truth and lies but his words are opposites, clearly showing that he doesn't know the difference (or, perhaps worse, that he does know the difference, but is taking money to lie to people who still look to “news” articles from accredited, credentialed experts to learn). There are so many lies in his article, even I, with my limited knowledge can see them. I would urge caution when reading it.
Neither thehill.com Website nor the realclearpolitics.com Website are ones that I've frequented. Now I see why. Further, I'll keep those names in mind for sources to NOT be trusted.
Brent Budowsky, was also a politician! (according to his bio at the hill article linked on the RealClearPolitics Web page: Budowsky was an aide to former Sens. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, then chief deputy majority whip of the House. He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics. He can be read on The Hill’s Contributors blog and reached at [email protected].)
Why does it not surprise me that he is a lawyer?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Alan Strohm is a truth seeker, and truth teller who finds himself in a world controlled by those with different ideas about what is important. Scott believes that truth, nonviolence, and anarchy are the way forward toward a more humane humanity. If you find any inaccuracies in this post, please contact me with the information.