If the government subpoenas information, then the individual being investigated destroys almost half of that information, would you assume that the individual in question was hiding something or is an honest person?
The pathetic thing is that most journalists cannot answer this obvious question, as it would result in admitting what most Americans clearly understand - the rich and the powerful are above the law. Hillary Clinton is above the law.
However, if a young working class black man were to destroy such information after recieving a subpoena, he would be arrested for destruction of evidence.
How appalling is it, then, that this young black man is expected to vote for a person who is above the very laws that would destroy his life?
This simple train of logic dissasembles the Clinton campaign. It is utter hypocrisy to expect those destroyed by injustice to support those who are immune to justice. It is disgusting, and all Democrats must answer for it.
Just as all Republicans must answer for Trump, of course, as in the coming weeks women who accuse him of groping them will be rolled out in spades. The fabled war on women is undoubtedly true for Trump, and Republicans who defend him will do so at their own peril. Trump sees women as pieces of meat - is this a surprise? He is a rich celebrity sleaze, a New York billionaire playboy.
Hollywood and college campuses, both liberal breeding grounds, are deeply rife with misgoyny. Maybe liberals also hate women? Maybe the victims of Bill Clinton's sexual assault will recieve no major media coverage because deep down, most liberals also think like Trump?
The dogs have taken over the asylum. Lawlessness and groping are the main characteristics of our Presidential nominees.
If this isn't the rapid irreversible moral decline of the Republic, it sure looks that way.
Those who seek to escape with their dignity must think in terms of principle, and disavow these villains.