The illusion of the Corporate state of London.
I'd like to clear a few things up for people, there's an illusion that we live in a democracy. Technically, democracy does exist, but it's not as dominant as you'd expect in a "state". The United Kingdom is a registered corporation: namely, "United Kingdom Corporation LTD" which is owned by "Crown Corporation" . A freedom of information request confirms this; and everything I'm telling you can be confirmed, either on the web, or from freedom of information. I have confirmed through freedom of information, that the United Kingdom in the 1930's and 1940's had shareholders in the form of corporations, These were effectively directors of the company.
When you are born, you are registered as an employee to the so-called state. Your national insurance number confirms this (it's your unique employee number). The same applies with your car - your registered keeper document, you'll notice, does not imply that you own the vehicle. In fact, the "state" owns your car, this is why they can legitimately take it away from you, if you don't follow company rules "legislation".You don't own your home, business or children.
Your birth certificate is registered to ‘United Kingdom Corporation’ when you're born. You’re legally not owned by your parents (they are your legal guardian). The United Kingdom Corporation has company rules… these rules are set by Parliament; but legislation only applies if Crown Corporation agrees. The City of London Corporation has its own police force; namely: ‘The City Of London Police’. They are a separate entity from the Metropolitan Police. They have their own laws. Their own policy. They only operate within the vicinity of the Bank of England, The purpose of this police force is to protect the City of London's corporate banking elite, that are at the source of debt and influence which maintains the powerful influence of the City of London in world affairs…
There is confusion and misleading information concerning The British Empire’s historical globalisation, which isn't a very pleasant antiquity to those that look beyond the history books… those who recognise the barbarity at the helm was not Great Britain as such. The Crown empire. ‘The Banker’s Army’; lead by our ancestral corporate slaves; were not serving the Queen as the history books may hoodwink you into believing. They were merely serving the bankers for not love, not money. But for power; and dominance stripping cultural heritage, traditions and resources that money can't buy. Bankers don't desire wealth, as they create the illusion of wealth, and debt out of thin air. And the wealth, to them, is power using war as a tool to achieve it.
London Corporation’ is a registered Corporation. The City of London is not "State" property, so democracy operates inside London corporation … this means that democracy doesn't apply, unless approved. This is why large corporations can happily avoid tax evasion legislation. If you investigate a freedom of information request, you'll find MP's register themselves as Private Limited Companies; as with political parties. Labour was registered and traded as ‘Alistair Darling Ltd’ up until 2006. Registered companies (MP's) can (in theory) operate outside democracy legislation within London Corporation private land, thus tax laws don't apply unless agreed by The Crown. The Monarchy is on private land, the Queen is a representative (mascot) for the Crown. Buckingham Palace is funded by me and you (the taxpayers). The bank of England shares common ownership with the Crown, so the Royal family can legitimately receive "State" money, even though they are equal to the rest of the employees of The Crown Corporation, because of common law which I’ll explain further in this article.
Crown corporation, to this day, governs the majority of the world. States, borders and flags are nothing more than trademarks. Our past imperialism was not a simple surrender of land without an exchange (purchase). The British mandate of Palestine was a business deal agreed long before WW2 ended, the Balfour declaration between James Arthur Balfour and 2nd Baron Rothschild (a banker). Take a trip to Israel, and visit ‘Rothschild Boulevard’. One of the first streets in Israel. This will give you some clarity. After The Holocaust, we started moving in Jews from all over the world to Palestine. And land was acquired by ‘The Jewish Colonisation Association’.
I realise cognitive dissonance may set in for some people, democracy isn't an illusion. But it's operating inside a capitalist corporate state. And business is power. Outside of London, democracy applies too. But don't be fooled. Acts and statutes are consensual, not mandatory. They can't be enforced without consent; like any other business contract. This brings me on to the ‘illusion’ of law. Anyone who has read the Magna Carta (or has studied it) will confirm that the laws of the land are absolute. There is no law above common law. Common law is THE constitution, 'PARLIAMENT' is a legal fiction, along with 'STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS', 'ACTS', 'LEGALESE', 'LEGAL FICTION', 'LEGISLATION', 'POLICE' and so on. For these to apply to a flesh and blood human being if you are familiar with 'LEGAL CONTRACTS' then you will be aware that a contract must be signed by BOTH parties with black pen ink. For this to apply to you, you are required to consent to this contract.
Common law is based on common sense. Like natural law; it is actually evolved from natural law. Once upon a time, before the banking era, The Monarchy was not ruled by the banking elite, and the Magna Carta existed. The Magna Carta's original concept was built on Freedom. Traditional slavery that we know was "the norm" in those days; as we're taught indoctrinated to believe, much like it is still the "norm" now. Before this, only common law applied to all living human beings, no legal fiction. No contracts. Just flesh, blood, agreements And law.
I'll simplify the 4 concepts of common law:
1: Not to breach the peace.
2: Cause to no-one any harm.
3: Cause no-one else any loss.
4: Not to cause mischief in your promises and agreements.
These were (and still are) the only laws that exists within any British colony or Commonwealth. This includes Australia, America, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa, to name but a few. LEGAL STATUTES are written in legal language. Just like your birth certificate. Back in the dark ages, when slavery as we know it was the "norm", common law applied to the masters and LEGAL FICTION applied to the slaves. These slaves were not wittingly aware that they were slaves, but deceptive legal law created by parliament deceived them into thinking they had freedom of choice, freedom of speech; and freedom of expression… and so on, as we see today. But in reality these laws only had legal standing because the slaves consented either vocally, or via written contract. The thin line between their freedom and slavery was nothing more than a contract, which they unknowingly agreed to, just like ‘debt’ today.
As I've explained, acts and statutes of Parliament are not law… Common law only applies on dry land; and statutes are laws of the WATER… this is where the word “ownership” derives from. Just replace the word “ship” with the word “slave” ; and the laws of the water apply to human beings. The Magna Carta has been hijacked. The laws of the water only applied to ships in the sea, so any statutory instrument or act of Parliament is technically unlawful. And would be regarded as treasonous by any Judge, Policeman (policy officer), or government. This is where the term ‘LEGAL’ comes from. It's merely a deception, manipulated from the Magna Carta. So who was responsible? Well, as I've explained: “Crown Corporation”. Which owns ‘The Monarchy’, and The City of London; and its empire. And The City Of London Police Force, which operates in the vicinity of the ‘Bank Of England’ ; which, incidentally, is where our gold reserves are kept from our (their) Imperial escapades . Slavery derives from ‘LEGAL’, and ‘LEGAL’ derives from The Bank Of England.
The Crown which we are all familiar with, operates as a so-called "state". If you approach this from a capitalist perspective, it's a business. The central banks, throughout the Crown’s global empire, have always operated as a business; hence interest rates. Without debt, there would be no profit or poverty. If the central bank was truly a state-owned entity, then there would be no hunger, or struggle. It's a debt-based economy; which only benefits the very wealthy historically, at the expense of people’s lives. Capitalism is at its peak, and it has engulfed the whole planet. Morals and justice have been replaced with greed and aggression. It will continue to dominate world affairs whether left wing ideology is ruling or not. The only way to stop it, is to shut down the central banks.
Take what you will from this article, Study the Magna Carta, study The City of London Corporation, study The Crown empire, study ‘Slavery’. Double check and cross-reference information from books, and try to piece the jigsaw together yourself. Don't take my word for it. There is a world of knowledge out there and the “truth” can be deceptive. But trust your intuition. And above all, your common sense. The Magna Carta is, as I mentioned, derived from natural law.
Natural law: a body of unchanging moral principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct.
Common Law was built upon Natural law… Natural Law dates back to ancient philosophy, spiritualism and Kabbalah, and it still exists today here in Great Britain. The shackles are the illusion of debt and legal law that imprison and control us, Slavery is a choice.
There would be no war, borders or division if there was no greed. There would be a global unity, the only thing that divides us is the air that we breathe.
Please share this post:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London_Corporation
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/crowncorporation.asp