Transgenderism between Marxism, Satanism and Islam
This slope was far more slippery than anyone could have seen coming - the LGBT movement is now promoting Satanism, especially relating to the transgender part of their acronym.
They have been successful beyond their wildest dreams. They can now dictate to major corporations that they have to sell "pride" branded items. Not "respecting" a pride flag can get you thrown in jail with more charges than a violent criminal, in New York City.
LGBT is not an organization representing gay, lesbian and trans people - they are a Marxist organization that exploits an ever expanding list of social minorities to gain political power, reflected in their continuous adding of letters to their acronym - this collection here is not exhaustive, there is more. I added the N, which apparently they do not support.
They use the average person's natural empathy and desire to help those who seem to be suffering and who are presented as "oppressed" - thus implicitly proving that western society is not oppressive, but very compassionate.
This is not about gay and lesbian people
I have to clarify this right from the start - this is about the LGBT movement and especially the Transgender part, not about people who happen to be homosexual, which covers gay, lesbian and bisexual. This is a sexual preference which is their personal issue.
By far not all those who are in any of the groups claimed by LGBT actually support the LGBT organization. There are many who are conservative or libertarian and oppose the LGBT agenda, e.g. Brandon Straka, a gay man who founded the WalkAway movement which encourages people to leave the Democrat party.
I personally have many friends who are libertarian and homosexual. They are good, decent people who support individual liberty and strongly oppose any kind of collectivist ideology. I remember that there was one guy in a libertarian organization who turned out to be a pedophile. He was immediately kicked out and was denounced at length in the organization's paper.
In my view, support for individual liberty and rejection of collectivism is the only coherent position for any person who is from a socially marginal group, as any collectivist society will be oppressive and intolerant.
The connection between LGBT and Pedophilia
The LGBT movement was founded by Michel Foucault, a practicing pedophile, and Gayle Rubin - the founder of Queer Theory - who wanted to lower or eliminate the age of consent, claiming that sex with minors was "like eating spicy food". This is why the LGBT movement and pedophilia were always connected, despite their usual denial:
Watch this video of Prof. Derrick Jensen, a professor of ecology who is on the far left himself, explaining the connection between the Queer movement and pedophilia to his students:
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1509147910929911810
Because of this "original sin" of the LGBT movement, they are constantly trying to sneak in pedophiles as "oppressed group", calling them "MAPS" (Minor attracted person) and pretending that pedophilia is just another sexual orientation.
This view has famously been promoted by a trans-identifying individual, Allyn Walker, a professor of sociology and criminology at Old Dominion University:
To quote: "I use the term Minor-Attracted Person or MAP in the title and throughout the book for multiple reasons. First of all, because I think it’s important to use terminology for groups that members of that group want others to use for them."
So murderers should be allowed to name themselves "Compassionate end of life assistants"?
"I think we believe societally, that stigma against MAPs serves to protect children because we don’t fully understand the differences between MAPs and sex offenders. Again, we have this confusion between the attraction and a criminal behavior."
The attraction is what leads to the criminal behavior!
Even pedophiles who "just" consume pedophile images create the demand for such material, which feeds an enormous global market that creates an incentive to produce new content - i.e. commit horrible crimes against children!
Take this UK Labour politician who was caught with more than 1 MILLION pedophile images and videos:
Allyn Walker, as trans and LGBT activist, is a perfect illustration of the fact that they will not rest until they can "normalize" pedophilia as just another "attraction". Fortunately, Walker was fired, but to quote Ian Oxnevad in the NY Post:
"Walker has now resigned, effective the end of May — and his removal from the faculty of Old Dominion may bring the public controversy to a temporary close. But his success in persuading colleagues that his work met all applicable standards for legitimate research, and his further success in having his findings published by one of the most important university presses in the country, demonstrate that the barriers in academe to his ideas are flimsy. Without a doubt, there will be further efforts to advance the cause of “minor-attracted persons.”
NB: While pedophilia is more common among homosexual men than among the general male population (about 40% of police identified victims of male pedophiles in the US were boys), the majority are not. Hence there are organizations such as "gays against groomers".
The LGBT movement and Marxism
The association with Marxism is bizarre, considering that Marx & Engels hated homosexuals. Interestingly, Marx called them "worse than pedophiles".
Every communist regime in history prosecuted homosexuals. The USSR did. Cuba under Castro did - they "purged their deviants":
Mugabe, another Marxist, told the UN that "they were not gay, in Zimbabwe":
Admittedly, in Africa, homosexuality is not well accepted. Gambia's president threatened to "slit the throat of gay men":
Uganda just signed an anti-gay bill that even includes the death penalty for some pedophile acts:
In Communist China, being homosexual is still considered as a mental illness:
China and Africa provide evidence that the social rejection of homosexuality has nothing to do with white people, Christianity or monotheistic religions in general.
In view of all of this, the LGBT movement supporting Marxism and "multiculturalism" (i.e. the mass immigration of Africans and Muslims) is a bit like chicken having a KFC fan club. LGBT supporters who live in western, majority white, mostly capitalist countries, don't seem to understand just how lucky they are:
Trans ideology vs gays and lesbians
While LGB were defending gays and lesbians, activists snuck in the trans part, which actually undermines gay and lesbian rights.
The very notion of homosexuality implies that there are 2 sexes and that a homosexual (gay or lesbian) person is attracted to the same instead of the opposite sex. By claiming that anyone can be any sex they want, even "non-binary", randomly deciding that they "feel" male or female at any given moment, this distinction becomes meaningless.
This is a gay black man who explains why the TQ+ should not be part of the LGB:
On a sidenote, I highly recommend his channel. He is great!
Most teens identified as "trans", over the last 20 years, are actually gay or lesbian or on the autism spectrum, thus easily manipulated.
Clearly, they are not trying to "help" kids by misdiagnosing them as "trans" if they suffer from other mental issues or are simply gay or lesbian.
They are either recruiting new members for their ideological cult or they just want to make money. The money factor is definitely strong, as we could learn from clinics where they were ecstatic about the profit potential of top- and bottom surgeries.
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-sex-reassignment-surgery-market
https://dallasexpress.com/health/videos-imply-transgender-clinic-driven-by-profit/
How dare you have a sexual preference?
Trans activists are actively berating people who express a preference for a specific sex as partner - be that a heterosexual or homosexual preference.
Lesbians and heterosexual men are pressured into dating men who pretend to be women (trans women). This typically fails on heterosexual men, but lesbian women are really feeling the pressure as they have been indoctrinated to think that they cannot reject people who are presented as "victims of heterosexual oppression".
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-57853385
Trans people can be outright hateful towards gays and lesbians - not to mention racist:
This shows the extreme intolerance and the narcissism of "trans" individuals.
As heterosexual man, I have no problem accepting that lesbian women are not interested in having a relationship with me, just as I expect homosexual men to realize that I won't be in a relationship with them. But both can be friends. Another person's sex and sexual preference only matters with people I would consider as dating partner.
Bring in the Satanists
It gets worse - it's not just "pride" anymore. They openly promote Satanism with slogans such as "Satan respects pronouns" etc. as in these items designed for Target's "pride" collection by Abprallenuk (Eric C.) who claims to be "a gay trans man" i.e. basically a woman who claims to be a man who likes men - so a heterosexual woman with extra steps, but with mustache because of added testosterone:
In her own words: “As a gay trans man it can be hard to find a place in this world that suits you, so I carved out my own and learned just how many people out there are like me. I get to speak with people all over the world, from so many unique and beautiful backgrounds, and I hope I incorporate some of our stories into my work.”
From her Instagram page about the Satanist image:
This is such a bizarre sentence:
“Satan loves you and respects who you are; you’re important and valuable in this world and you deserve to treat yourself with love and respect. LGBT+ people are so often referred to as being a product of Satan or going against God’s will, so find. We’ll hang with Satan instead.”
There obviously is an element of mockery of Christians in this Satanism and a childish desire to provoke, but it goes much further than that. They actively ENJOY to revel in Satanism, pretending that it represents "freedom" and "tolerance", although the traditional meaning of the symbols they use is the exact opposite.
Gays and lesbians resent that many Christians reject homosexuality based on Old Testament verses, although many modern Christians, especially European Protestants, accept homosexuality.
The Catholic church used to sternly reject homosexuality, but the current pope Francis, who is a Jesuit Marxist, supports it. He also supports the expansion of Islam in Christian countries. Let's just say that although that's his role, he does not represent Catholicism. Whether that is good or bad depends obviously on each person's individual perception of the Catholic church.
I observed long ago that American "atheists" are not actually atheists - they are anti-Christian, which then translates into things such as Satanism.
Satan is supposed to represent evil. It's the projection of all the evil things mankind does, personified. The origin of the goat as representing evil is apparently the custom of sending a "scapegoat" into the desert, carrying with it the sins of the people.
It then morphed into a mythical creature that attempts to control human beings to make them do evil things. It's basically a personification of psychopathic behavior, an explanation for why people do evil things, which is maybe more bearable than the thought that they do evil just because that's who they are.
Goethe's most famous drama, "Faust", is about a brilliant man who is tempted to do evil by Mephistopheles, another name for Satan or the Devil. It is always an evil entity, always superficially friendly to seduce, corrupt and lead astray.
The imagery created by satanists is not exactly inspiring confidence in their decency and love for life and liberty:
Satan has never been represented as child-friendly, either:
Actual Satanists, i.e. people claiming to worship Satan, have been around for centuries. The movement became popular in Europe in the 19th and early 20th century with people such as Aleister Crowley.
Here is an article about Crowley's Satanism and his association with Balenciaga and their affinity with pedophilia:
Karl Marx was a self-declared satanist, which ties nicely into the LGBT organization as having its roots in Marxism:
And then there's Marina Abramovich who built her entire persona and public success on her satanic "art". Her background is Serb Orthodox from ex-Yugoslavia. Her parents were active in the communist party that ruled the country, i.e. they were Marxists. She is immensely popular among celebrities:
She knows Bill Gates who used her to promote Microsoft's VR glasses, but the video was removed after 24 hours because of the massive social media backlash. Somehow, the rich and famous seem to live in a bubble where they don't even realize what normal people think about Satanism:
Tell me this Dust magazine cover is not implicitly promoting pedophilia...
Abramovich somehow made it on the cover of Vogue Ukraine in April 2014, immediately after the Maidan putsch, which was the starting point for the conflict with Russia, which resulted in the annexation of Crimea and the current ongoing war. Again with what looks like an abused child:
The implications of this cover cannot be overstated.
LGBT and Islam
The fact that the LGBT movement is anti-Christian, not anti-religion, is obvious, as LGBT activists do not seem to feel the same hatred towards Islam - which, from the perspective of Christian values, is outright satanic, as it promotes lying, murder, slavery, rape, wife-beating and pedophilia.
Islam claims to be a monotheistic religion related to Judaism and Christianity, but that is just plagiarism used by Mohammed to lend credibility to his newly invented cult. He copied many elements from Arab polytheism, Christianity and Judaism. Nothing about Islam reflects the ideas in the New Testament, although Mohammed called Jesus a prophet respected by Islam.
He denied the divine origin of Jesus and that he had died on the cross, directly contradicting Christian beliefs. To explain why his references to the Bible were all completely false, mixing up dates, names and story lines as well as the actual messages, he claimed that the Bible had been "altered" and that the "original" would have agree with him.
Islam also designates Satan ("shaytan") as the most evil being.
Islam is far more oppressive towards homosexuality than Christianity ever was, imposing the death penalty on any kind of homosexual acts. Those prohibitions are actively implemented in many Muslim majority countries such as Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen, Sudan, Chechnya and to a lesser degree in Algeria, Morocco, Nigeria, some regions of Indonesia, Malaysia etc.:
Despite all this evidence of Islamic violence against homosexuals, LGBT groups actively promote and defend Islam and call people who criticize it "Islamophobes".
The degree of mental gymnastics is breathtaking:
This is how it usually works out:
Their blindness is baffling...
A Toronto sex-ed guide for Muslims stated outright “Homosexuals are cursed by Allah”, LGBTQ “not permissible”:
I yet have to see outrage from LGBT organizations about this. Instead, the official Ontario government's sex-ed guide was "watered down" to accommodate Muslims:
So conservative Christians = bad.
Conservative Muslims = Multiculturalism = Good.
Charles Jaco, an openly pro-Islamic and antisemitic "journalist", is the perfect illustration for that particular hypocrisy - or insanity. He called Christians who oppose LGBT indoctrination in US schools "neo-Nazis" and wanted to bomb them with truckloads of ammonium nitrate. Hanging out with "Palestinian" terrorists clearly influenced his thinking.
When I asked if Muslims withdrawing their kids from a school in the UK over LGBT content were the neo-Nazis he was referring to, he blocked me...
This Twitter post by a Muslim illustrates how leftists re-frame every information to fit into their own world view - they simply do not understand that reality is very, very different from their rainbows and unicorns:
Muslims exploit stupid tolerant leftists by targeting them with propaganda that goes totally against their own views - which is perfectly ok, with them, as Islam tells them that it is ok to lie to non-believers:
See my documentation about how Islam allows Muslims to lie strategically:
Islam allows Muslims to lie in 4 ways
This is why I will never trust a Muslim who says things like "Islam is very feminist" or "supports LGBT", because he is clearly lying and even if he's 100% aware of the fact that he is lying, he will feel no qualms about it.
Transgenderism and Transvestites in Islam
It may seem rather surprising, for the uninitiated, that Iran and, to a lesser degree, some other Muslim countries, accept transgenderism. Except that this is really just a method for homosexuals to evade the death sentence against homosexuality under Islam.
In Iran, gay men can legally register as "trans women", which allows them to be in relationships with men, so the regime can ignore them, as the imprisonment or execution of gay men looks bad, internationally. Lesbian women are mostly being ignored, anyway, as long as they are not too public about their preference.
This has tradition. Wealthy gay Muslim men dressed up their gay lovers as women and hid them away in their harems. This was Shah Naser al-Din Shah Qajar:
He was very fond of photography - he had even added a dark room to develop them himself in his place:
These were some of his "wives" who could never be seen by any of his subjects. The photos were intended strictly for his own personal pleasure:
A colorized image, just to drive home those beautiful feminine legs...
Modern LGBT activists assume that those were "trans" men. They don't understand that this was a result of the extreme Islamic intolerance towards homosexuality.
According to other sources, those were real Iranian women and mustaches for women just happened to be popular. Except that Iranian women are actually quite beautiful and most definitely feminine. They do not have mustaches. Here are some photos published in the 1960s & 1970s before the Islamic revolution:
What is a Transgender person?
While homosexual transvestites were common, "transgenders" did not exist, even as concept, until the 1960s.
Extremely rare cases of genetically abnormal developments that give some individuals naturally the appearance of being of the opposite sex were never sufficient to have a social impact where society had create a vocabulary to describe them.
Intersex, i.e. genetic or developmental issues with the sexual organs, have nothing to do with transgenderism. These issues are debated in this study, which finds that intersex affects about 1 in every 10'000 births or 0.01% of the population:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Actual Gender Dysphoria is also extremely rare. From 1973 to the 2003, i.e. over 30 years, a total of 324 "trans" persons underwent trans surgery, in Sweden. That's 10.8 per year in a population of 10 million or about 0.013%:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
This is a very far cry from the exponential increase over the last 15 years, which is entirely based on the promotion of transgenderism. As this study observed, it spreads like an infectious disease and operates like a cult:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202330
The medical evidence is clearly against any kind of "transgender" treatments. In the latest news, judges in Australia are warned against the use of what is maliciously called "gender affirming treatments":
Judges warned on trans protocols amid new research on puberty blockers and hormone treatment effects
(without paywall: https://archive.is/rdq0N#selection-499.0-499.379)
“The court has been left without evidence of the raging international and national debate about the evidence base for gender-affirming treatment,” Ms Lane writes in her paper. University of Queensland emeritus professor of law Patrick Parkinson, who is quoted in the paper, said the court presiding over Re Kelvin did not appropriately consider evidence of the implications of a legal framework supporting gender-affirming care. “The whole basis on which the Family Court has said ‘we don’t need to be involved in this anymore’ is now falling like a stack of cards,” he said. “Furthermore, in Re Kelvin, which is the leading case, they never actually looked at the medical evidence.” Mr Parkinson said courts should not be approving “this sort of treatment without hearing both sides of that medical argument.” He said the courts have long been told “things which aren’t actually true” in regards to puberty blockers and hormone treatments on young Australians. “They‘ve been told there was no controversy about this stuff,” he said. Courts have been told for years that puberty blockers are entirely reversible, and they aren’t. They are reversible in part ... but they were never authorised for this purpose. “Critically, we also do not know what effect this has on brain development at all, given that we know adolescence is a hugely important time for brain development.” Cautioning against a “massive liability bill” if Australia continues on its current path, Mr Parkinson said the country could be on the brink of the “worst medical scandal in 100 years.” “I really do (think so) and the and the liability risk is enormous,” he said. |
It's absolutely obvious that interfering with the natural development of a child or adolescent can only have negative effects on their health. Why was this even considered, at any point?
Who is behind the Transgender movement?
The nefarious influence of various ideologically driven organizations is unraveling. Julie Bindel, a feminist activist, just published this article about the Mermaids organization in the Spectator:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-malign-influence-of-mermaids-is-becoming-increasingly-clear/
She points out how women's right have been massively harmed by the transgender movement and how the Mermaid organization was in direct contact with the NHS and the Travistock clinic to influence their stance on Transgenderism and transgender treatments:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mermaids_(charity)
Although the evidence shows that medical interventions do not improve the mental health of those who are given "transgender" treatments and that they typically suffer from multiple mental health issues, the founder of Mermaids is against the idea of offering only mental health treatments instead of the sterilizing, health destroying hormone therapies and surgical treatments:
In response to the decision, Mermaids CEO Susie Green was "cautiously optimistic", but expressed concerns that priority would be given to mental health over medical care.[14] She said: "We would not want any further barriers to be put in place in terms of access to medical intervention."
Other organizations known to have been active in the promotion of the Transgender movement since the very beginning include - you guessed it - the Open Society Foundation, i.e. George Soros, as documented here by Michael Biggs, "Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford and Fellow of St Cross College. He researches social movements and collective protest". He self-identifies as "liberal"/"progressive" and expresses how uncomfortable it makes him to talk about Soros.
The Open Society Foundations & the transgender movement
https://4thwavenow.com/2018/05/25/the-open-society-foundations-the-transgender-movement/
"This blogpost focuses on the Open Society Foundations (OSF), funded by Soros. This is not easy to discuss because he is vilified by right-wingers, whose criticism sometimes degenerates into anti-semitism (Williamson 2018). Therefore those of us who are liberal or progressive tend to react instinctively by dismissing any scrutiny of Soros out of hand. This is unjustified, as I will show by providing some facts about how OSF has funded the transgender movement."
And then there's the Pritzker family who made their money as owners of the Hyatt hotel chain:
The Billionaire Family Pushing Synthetic Sex Identities (SSI)
Tablet Magazine is an Israeli source, hence they cannot be accused of antisemitism. The fact that they denounce a Jewish billionaire family as pushing a "synthetic sex identity" shows that this is not a "Jewish conspiracy" and non-Marxist Jewish people are just as outraged by this as everyone else.
Conclusion
I have no definite conclusion, I just present the evidence.
I just know that pedophilia is pure evil and that Marxism, Transgenderism, Satanism and Islam are not healthy ideologies that promote human well-being and happiness.
Their mutual attraction seems to stem from their rejection of western society, as in "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" - which is not necessarily true. The second their shared enemy is gone, they will be at each other's throat, as the communists in Iran found out once their former allies, the Mullahs, had taken over the government and immediately started prosecuting, imprisoning and executing them.
I do wonder how they could all gain so much power and influence over modern western societies.