Culture Shift: Part 2

               In this installment I will take an investigative look into some of the tactics that have been used to encourage widespread cultural shifts. Some of it may be quite obvious, but I hope to touch on some things that maybe aren't common knowledge. 

Guilt/Shame

Starting with the most obvious, and perhaps most effective psy-op is the demoralization of local cultures and mindsets. This is done on all levels, no matter how big or small in scope.  Generally speaking it started big and now has worked its way to attacking every fabric of traditionalism. What started out as teaching shame to Nationalists, Christians, and White men has now turned to things like gender, sexuality, and even health. Though in a seemingly bizarre twist its the healthy who are shamed and the obese/mentally ill who are lauded as champions by society. That's not to say we shouldn't attempt to help the mentally ill, but encouraging them to act out is not help. Just as encouraging a 400lb human to continue living an unhealthy lifestyle is not real help. True help, the kind that makes a difference in our lives isn't so comfortable to our feelings in the beginning but in the end.  That's the point though, none of this is really meant to help anyone but instead meant to tear down the fabric of society. 

Historical Revision 

Closely related to the public shaming is the revision of historical accounts. All good feelings purged from the records and instead "new" findings are constantly added, coincidentally none of them are good.  Historical figures like Hitler will only be discovered to be even more cruel, and evil than previously thought. The same extends to European Monarchies, especially people like Tzar Nicholas II which the communist jews absolutely despised for his traditional beliefs. Religious figures like Jesus Christ will be completely debased. From his image to his actions every record altered, eventually leading to the claim he wasn't real at all. Meanwhile figures that most people generally don't have much bad to say about will also be discovered to be bad; look at the smut they print about the US founding fathers these days. The only consistent message will be that everything you know and love is actually bad. The new evidence will always prove it to be the case. Coincidentally those people you may have been taught were bad, are now discovered to not be so bad.  Lenin? Stalin? Mohammad? Pretty nice guys, very wise. New findings suggest this is fact, who are you to argue that? 

Gaslighting

As if the first two weren't bad enough, they open the door to something much darker. Its an advanced form of psychological attack and manipulation called Gaslighting. Once you see the definition of it, you will immediately recognize the impact of it in our post-modern societies. I will post one such definition for clarity: Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target's belief.  This tactic has become incredibly far reaching in many countries. The end goal being to manipulate information to always defend the abuser, and make the abused question if they are correct in believing they are abused. Using a prominent example: The migrant crisis. While its very obvious these migrants are behaving poorly and even abusing local populaces, many locals have trouble believing it is the case because of constant Gaslighting in every source of information around them. Instead they question themselves and pity those who abuse them. 

Slippery slope

What some would claim is just a fallacy is sadly a very real and traceable occurrence reinforced by the above tactics of subversion. Now that society has been completely demoralized, and mentally debased to the point of critical self doubt. It is susceptible to being moved in a new direction, but too large a shift and they will notice. It must be done incrementally. This incremental shift has been named "the slippery slope" by those who have recognized it. What can be summarized by the old proverb; If we give them an inch they'll take a mile, is much more true than many people realize. In fact every change they ask for has a more devious plan in mind. 

Of course they argue how moderate and reasonable it is to get it started, but it will always lead somewhere that is increasingly immoral or extreme as the years go on. What many originally believed to be insignificant minor changes for equality have grown into major sociopolitical cultural shifts. Examining the United States for example, many important battles between atheists and the Christian church were fought in court. Over various  topics ranging from pornography, divorce, homosexuality, abortion, to God in school/government. The Christians lost every battle. Now not only is the religion nearly completely destroyed and constantly having vitriol thrown at it; many schools are openly teaching Islamic principles or at the very least Islamic tolerance. To many this correctly seems like a betrayal.  How can you advocate for separation of church and state then turn around and use the state to mingle with mosques, its hypocrisy. The unfortunate answer is these people don't play by their own rules, they only put those rules in place for you to follow because they know you are bound by morality while they are not. Its one key advantage they have over you. 

Subversion

Now that society is no longer unified in any common beliefs about anything, the gospel of international authoritarian egalitarian socialism(see: communism) can take root. They will teach you that you can't "oppress" anyone or return to any normal common ground. The only common ground can come from Government mandates. Its the only way for everyone to be equal(ly miserable.) We are in this stage already, the open information war between subversive infiltrators and proud descendants of Western culture. 

Subversion extends to many things.  Perhaps most noticeably is its impact on gender mindsets and their roles in society. The worst thing for a communist is happy mono-racial nuclear families, as that group is the least likely to become communist.  If only there was some way to disrupt that family model! This is where feminism, emasculation, race mixing, and general confusion angle of subversion comes into play. Women should "just have fun" instead of making homes. Men should accept women's new identity, or become women themselves. Both genders should enjoy the child free lifestyle.  Those who refuse to become whores, childless, or mentally unstable freaks should then be encouraged to have their family with someone from another race. Which then destroys the identity of both parent's family line; creating offspring with an international identity and much less reason to defend any particular race, country, or its traditional culture.