Nov 10, 2021,10:00pm EST|14,040 views Blood Moon Eclipse 2021: Exactly When, Where And How You Can See Next Week’s Longest Lunar Eclipse Of The Century
Nov 10, 2021,10:00pm EST|14,040 views
Blood Moon Eclipse 2021: Exactly When, Where And How You Can See Next Week’s Longest Lunar Eclipse Of The Century
I saw in 2020 the first blood moon would be in April an dnow it is appearing.. Online they say May.. I wonder. May 26, 2021 Total Lunar Eclipse (Blood Moon) - Time and Date
[Buscar dominio timeanddate.com] https://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/lunar/2021-may-26
May 26, 2021 Total Lunar Eclipse (Blood Moon) If you are in Australia, parts of the western US, western South America, or in South-East Asia, you will see a Super Full Moon totally eclipsed for about 14 minutes during this total lunar eclipse, weather permitting. Is this Total Lunar Eclipse visible in New York? What This Lunar Eclipse Looks Like
28 April ·
Rare “super full moon”!!a special phenomenon on because it is a supermoon make it bigger and brighter than usual
The phrase 'Pink Moon' actually came about due to a spring flower called Wild Ground Phlox, which is very pink and appears in the US at the same time as April's full moon.
Earth's oxygen and nitrogen-rich atmosphere filters out the bluer wavelengths of white moonlight when the Moon is close to the horizon as it rises.
This filtering process, known as light refraction, results in more of the red component of moonlight travelling directly into your eye.
LETS BE HONEST. The sun will be turned to darkness and the moon to blood before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord. ( Acts 2:20, NIV) was not in my bible as a child nor up to 2009 that I can remember.. what about you was a blood moon mentioned in your bible?
Shared with Your friends
Nibiru
Nibiru: this name is common through the whole internet. However, this name is misunderstood by a lot of people. Nibiru is being indentified as a big planet that should be the home of the ancient (Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Mesopotamian, Assyrian and Magian)Gods, but Nibiru also has a second name that gives more detail of it's origin. That name is Nib-ru.
A sumerian myth about Nibru is 'Enlil and the E-Kur'. Here is a small sample of the myth's translation: "Enlil, when you marked out the holy settlements, you also built Nibru, your own city." The city of the sumerian god Enlil(Ellil) here is called Nibru. This city is known today as Nippur and this name has striking similarity to the name Nibru. Also the Temple of Enlil is, or was, in Nippur.
According to the sumerian Flood myth, Enlil wanted to flood the people because he could not sleep. So he planned this flood and told the other gods not to tell anybody about this. Enki(the wise-one, the al-knowing one) dit not want his creation (men) to die for this. Before the flood, the myth says that the Gods depart from the earth.
Beside the myth, we can understand that the gods are creatures, just like us. And also Enlil should leave earth, because his city Nibru would be flooded. Not a Planet.
Another sign to the city Nibru, is the bond, Duranki. Dur-an-ki is sumerian for; “The Bond between Heaven and Earth”. Dur: a Bond between somethings, An: Heaven and Ki: Earth, Making Duranki. What has this to do with Nibiru? Well, Nibiru is also know as “the Ferry” or the “Planet of the crossing” or the sumerian “Winged planet” there is also a symbol from ancient sumeria of the winged planet.
The “winged planet” refers to be a comet or some sort.
And “the Ferry” is an extra name given by some theorists.
The Planet of the Crossing however, is the original meaning, but also this is been wrongly interpreted. The planet is earth, and the crossing is Duranki in Nibru(Nippur). So you could say that it is not Planet of the Crossing but the City of the Crossing.
This does not mean that Planet X, that is given the name Nibiru, does not exist. According to the Mayans, a calandar will end in the year 2012, and a new one begins, and this calandar hail's the coming of the Red Comet. This red comet is, possibly, also know as Wormwood.
Wormwood: This is discribed in the book of Revelations in the bible. The bible says that archangels throw down thunder and lightning. If you read the book Revelations carefully, you read that the writer of Revelations is exually describing comets raining on the earth, turning the rivers and seas into blood, this is because of the fosfor and iron inside the comets coloring it red, like blood. Also fire is discibed because of the comets treveling through the ozon-layer. All of this could have come from the Red Comet, if the Red Comet is Wormwood.
In the book of Revelations, there is a very strange sentence: “8:12 The fourth angel sounded, and one third of the sun was struck, and one third of the moon, and one third of the stars; so that one third of them would be darkened, and the day wouldn't shine for one third of it, and the night in the same way. “. This is not just an angel doing something, this could be one of two things, the cloud of the Red Comet is darkening the sky, or this is the gravitational pull of the Red Comet. Halting the earth's cycle for a while and slowing it down for a third.
These day's, scientists have found and track a planet they named Sedna. This planet is reddish of color and is believed to be planet X, but this could not be, because of the distance and the size of the planet. Sedna is a little smaller compared to our moon. But the size is not sure yet, because Sedna is still so far away. And this planet, or comet, should be very visable in the sky according to the legends and mythology.
And an other observation of scientists have discovered to coming of a very large object. This object is a brown-dwarf(an unborn star). Sinds a lot of stars in the Universe are binary stars (meaning that it is usually two stars circling around each other), than there is an possibility that also our star (Sol) is binary. The coming of the brown-dwarf is near and our star is going into a frenzy (causing extra heat to the green-house effect) This brown dwarf is not very visable until it reaches near our sun. The brown dwarf has a dust cloud around the surface. This will look like a planet with wings of fire (The Winged Planet). At the moment, a very big telescope is being constructed on the south-pole to watch the sky for the brown dwarf. It is believed the brown dwarf will come from the south passing us. Legend from the Mayans says, that the Red Comet will hit Earth at the seventh time it passes by, And this is the sixth time if the Red Comet passes us.
Let my beloved city, the sanctuary Nibru, raise its head as high as heaven. "Enlil saying, to Nibiru"'
Shared with Your friends
The number of twinkles in my eye are just enough to cause me a bit of a head ache. I think if I told people that the election will not be over until December they would laugh.
Deja vu? Oh I have been here before. I remember enough to say December 21 through 26 should be something to see in some realities. Then for others the next blood moon. In yet? I can tell you something else no one seems to remember from their Montauk project stories that his is only the black knight game. I survived the gold stallion, the silver stallion and now to see the end of the black knight is wild. Yes I know the numbers were made so that was impossible. Someone did not pay attention to the book of Revelation here compared to Revelations elsewhere. Hell? I would say cyclones now turned into the borg from what is left of humanity seems like a sickness and that the sickness is already started is wild. I hear their stories in those dark places that people assume someone like me would not read. Why do I read that crap? Simple if I tell you this you must understand. EVERY word you SPEAK EVERY word in your mind will be Judged say what? If you have not figured out what Solomon did with the king of the djinns or what the mirror reality is maybe this will help. Every figment of your imagination in the mirror reality takes place. It is why it takes me billions of years to go through realities while others laugh and say just because the internet said 6.5 billion years old and 365000 years until the next galaxy does not mean you are 4.5 billion years old here because it will take the next galaxy 4.5 billion years to hit this one. Laughter from the shadow boy. Those realities where flashes of illusions for a brief moment what you recorded as billions of years was nothing more than a moment in time here. If you do not grasp what I am saying every single horror I have in my head I have to play out to go to the next level. So? Ask anyone in Lame Deer Montana who I am and you realize no one remembers me. I did not live outside my mind. In my mind I live and you if you are golem better repent and pray to God I do not catch you in my mind.
Shared with Your friends
Speculation on age and time. So, I traced my journals from 6.5 billion year old earth to 5.7 billion. To 5.3 billion year old earth where everything was in chaos. Those of us suffering from the Mandela effect noticed everything was up in the air. The reason I believe and my opinion is some worlds cheating got too greedy. Say what? The system of things was meant as rules for God to not discover cheating in the parallel worlds. Meaning? Say you take a wonderful loving little boy and put him in his hell. Pavlov style by forcing him to do what he hates so much that the only relief he gets is to do what he hates? Sounds awful, you know? So what do the other realities get for causing pain and suffering?
The reality is according to Zechariah, which while I grew up was Zachariah. A full 33 percent of the game has been changed or Pavlov-ized. Meaning? From my understanding. Those people with great childhood who would have grown up to be mighty people. Their childhoods were a living hell. Example? The parallel world’s music frequencies and speed are different. Meaning? Imagine you married the love of your life and her voice was music. Then for three months suddenly she sounds like a bitch from hell? Or you were speaking normal in your reality in yet it either was too fast or slow for the world they dumped your soul into body? Causing people to say slow down or think faster. In the 1960s through 1970s, almost a full 25 to 60 million people. Had this experience just what I am talking about. Now the government making the switch so people hate their spouses. Because they sound like a bat out of hell whistle or something another. The children were to have wonderful homes now are in a single family home and to make matters worse? Think Epstein and crew. Think of close to 10,000 to 100,000 each year disappearing to be someone’s lunch. Sounds evil beyond anything Stephen King even writes about in yet? If you look at the missing children and people report you realize. That somewhere between 1970 to 2020 some 3 to 8 million people just are gone. It is like all of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, and Wyoming. They just disappeared. In yet no one seems to bat an eye. You say but the FBI. The FBI agent investigating Hillary Clinton. As for an example for tax invasion committed suicide while dancing on a dance floor in public. You think I am fibbing when I am talking about evil? What most people do not realize about the thief or the extent of the crime is how much money I am talking about. One estimate at 23 trillion dollars. Or all of the social security fund plus 3 trillion dollars spent on the war against terrorism. If you look for example, war on terrorism cost 6.5 to 9 trillion dollars. And supposedly killed 800,000 terrorist. If you do the math, that is 8,125,000 dollars to kill one bad guy at the low end. I am not sure how to say the ineffectiveness of the US military is but they should be able to kill someone for a lot less. That seems like a lot when you consider Vietnam they could kill one person for 35,000 dollars. What am I saying? That that US government destroyed their own populations lives. To create some sort of world. Where evil people ruled over the majority of the population. That were put into some sort of Pavlav system where evil wins?
Yes. That is exactly what I discovered at an earth where John Von Neumann lived to be until May 1957. His very last paper ironically was dealing with math. In something mathematically similar in game theory. It dealt with a story line. The statement was if set null is possible or impossible to a confirmed statement. Say what? Meaning in game theory the idea was to win more than you lose or make sure a balance of 50–50 so there is no unbalancing act. Causing? In this case, God, to hear about this evil. And according to the book of Revelation comes down because he heard how evil the city of new Babylon is or was. Meaning? John Von Neumann’s computer program exchanged souls. To realities where they were perfectly set to be 50 percent good, 50 percent evil, so time would be held at bay. Or more specifically, the souls of the living did not cry out too much for the end of reality. Sounds absurd, I know I argued with a lot of people against it. Now they are all dead. Or ending up in some other reality, but the conclusion of the system of things is pretty much a generation. What does that mean? Well, I think that means my soul is going back to its original body for judgment day. God has pulled the plug on this reality. But come now, surely you jest?
1. Kingdom versus kingdom. Yellow vest, Hong Kong freedom, and Bolivia anti Marxist. These were all trying to start bible Kingdom versus kingdom part of the bible. To stop this. The CIA in these evil worlds and other has moved the movement. From freedom to some bizarre black lives matter movement. Where they have killed more people destroyed property for corporation paying them. To destroy property for insurance fraud. And basically misuse that verse to fix their mistakes.
So? There attempt to blackmail a few people have failed in some areas. What areas? I can assure you if I spoke of what I have heard. No, it does not matter.
2. The future is dead. According to the bible. Paul states the Gentiles that can be saved. Until something happens and then will be called back into a branch of the tree of life. And that branch of the gentiles will be burnt up. Again, I say this with some confidence. Meaning on December 2017 in some realities Hawaii was nuked and those realities which were a future are gone.
3. The signs in the sky. Blood moon I do not recall that in my bible but here the blood moons indicated Jesus Christ return. I have seen either 4 or 5 or 6 blood moons. I am no longer sure how many. However, May 2021 is supposedly the next blood moon. So? August 31st there will be a huge change.
4. The real end of 2012. For those that study calendars most are designed around seasons and stars, and cycles of the moon and sun. The only one calendar supposedly accurate. In this reality is the Ethiopian calendar which the year here 2020 is 2012. And September 2020 is the real end of 2012.
5. What signs in the sky? First you have to look at the links. Realize the sun here has been hidden behind a mirror since 2003. It is why the sun is white here, no longer yellow. Say what? Meaning in my reality, Katrina hurricane happened in 2003. There the sun was yellow still. Here due to my next statement the sun has been hidden behind a mirror since 2003.
6. We are going back in time to where our original bodies were and our souls were stolen from to be judged. So? I would repent more often and pray more if I were you. The end of time is something to watch. To see a mountain move daily is awkward and write about it and no one believe you? Well, I am me and you are you. What am I saying? This might be your final chance to make amends. Ask forgiveness before something evil this way comes.
7. So all those divorced people are part of the 33 percent tin Zechariah. That had their lives screwed with by the government and corporations? Well, that is only part of it. The next part was the government made prisoners out of 14 percent of the population. How? Making smoking a weed illegal. Sounds stupid in yet the democrats did just that. They punished people mercilessly for smoking a weed. If that is not even the worse part? Due to the Pavlov style life style forced on people that are single. Thus making them raised in a single home. A lot are alcoholics and due to democrats moral superior of shutting down whore houses? Thus causing the epidemic of rape and homosexuality wildly increased. Am I blaming just one party for all the ills of the world? When I look at who sponsored the laws. And put in place said laws and those enforcing those laws and prosecuting those laws. Yes, I am blaming them.
8. So the government is playing a game with God, trying to win or cause more pain? What has that got to do with today and the rioting and looting? Well, Revelations New York City go bye and the two reasons? 1. Epstein files at the federal court house and 2. Clinton library in New York City.
9. Speculation why Clinton Library? It holds some program management office files. That was not destroyed in 9 11 due to it being presidential records that caused a lot of this shit.
Shared with Your friends
http://www.foxnews.com/.../immigration-costs-fair.../ 113 billion cost tax payers - immigrates only pay 12 billion in taxes http://latino.foxnews.com/.../undocumented-immigrants.../ The real sadness is unemployment is brought to you by the US government. policy H-2A vs. H-2B 3 million http://www.immigrationdirect.com/immi.../immigrant-visas.jsp undocumented 11 million. 72 billion sent to Mexico per annum year- think 1 billion equate to about 23,000 job for people. Thus, unemployment is caused by the government giving out VISA to workers and allowing undocumented workers into the country. THINK about all the college kids not even given a chance to work for companies using VISA workers.. http://www.motherjones.com/.../silicon-valley-h1b-visas... EXAMPLE Trump 1,000 workers with VISA - http://www.reuters.com/.../us-usa-election-trump... is this just another lie by a politician selling an ideology of people first only to be found to be using that system to make money instead of helping those in need. Think 50 billion are sent to India also each year also... That is another one million jobs lost if that money was spent just in the US. Now think 3 million VISA plus 11 million undocumented workers meaning if they all went home, there would be 14 million job opens along with the supposedly 4 million currently open positions. There is roughly 2.3 million people in prison because they desired something that they could not legally get. Just think if they had a job or some of those jobs were opened to them. How this world would be changed fewer people in prison. Less crime from those that have a job instead of looking for work. INSTEAD of raising wages for those that need to work instead of commit crime to live. What a world when companies and government conspire to lower wages for work that has to be done by people that already have no to little education and have few people in power working for them.
Shared with Your friends
“Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.”
- Helen Keller The question to ask should be taken in context. Being a book reader and enjoyed of life, why take the chance for adventure. If you find that magic is just around the corner, that or another world which could be ported to with enough magnetic power, ie portals like CERN, HDR, or Montauk chair should you do it? That question is one at this point I am asking myself.
That people think I am joking. I wonder. I remember JC Penny. I remember Hardee’s still working.
That most people scoff at my stories and do not realize my photos are real and not photoshopped. And that I have lived lives that many a religious fanatic would consider a marvel is beyond me.
That I believe in the Shadow of the Lord Almighty God to save me is something. Why I already see the ending of humanity with the coming virus and vaccine. Just why would someone do this? https://www.sphir.io/cards/5e9de3238401f43b4cadd692... The technology has always been here. A way to remove parts of your conscience acceptance of God? Do not believe me watch the video. I do not believe in the bible? States those that do not realize the ending of time. Well, mark of the beast or not. This seems like a hive mind or a Borg system of things. About to take over your life. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf...
Revelation 13:16-17
And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Revelation 14:9-10
Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
Revelation 7:2
And I saw another angel ascending from the rising of the sun, having the seal of the living God; and he cried out with a loud voice to the four angels to whom it was granted to harm the earth and the sea,
Revelation 13:16
And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,
Revelation 13:17
and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Revelation 13:7-10
It was also given to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him. All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain. If anyone has an ear, let him hear.read more.
Revelation 16:2
So the first angel went and poured out his bowl on the earth; and it became a loathsome and malignant sore on the people who had the mark of the beast and who worshiped his image.
Revelation 19:20
And the beast was seized, and with him the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone.
Revelation 20:4
Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
Source: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Mark-Of-The-Beast
The idea of a U.S. digital dollar is no longer a fringe novelty. Now, it may be a means to an end. To force people into the mark of the beast step by step photo by photo. A question on ones mind. https://www.coindesk.com/senate-hearing-sees-digital...
Let me be honest that this was a planned destruction of humanity can be shown in the links and following pictures. The question is since there does not appear to be anyone in power stopping this from happening what to do?
https://www.minds.com/.../raccoon-city-wuhan-china-day-21...
Let me be honest that this is a planned depopulation and reduction of the US citizenship is awkward for me.
https://www.minds.com/.../059-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
Let me be honest the collapse of the US dollar is planned for by corporations which did a lot of this evil.
https://www.minds.com/.../wuhan-lab-on-left-or-umbrella...
Let me be honest that I do not hear remove microsoft from all computers from pastors and religious leaders means they might all be bought and paid for or blackmailed already.
https://www.minds.com/.../050-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
Let me be honest that the politicians are planning to purge those not willing to go along with their ideological changes is already planned and accepted. There was no political outcry or shaming.
https://www.minds.com/.../052-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
Let me be honest that people say no we won’t go in yet see the trains already made for their death. Is a question mark to me. If they see it and do not believe it. Means Christ is near. Why? He will make those that think they are religious blind in the end times.
https://www.minds.com/.../054-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
Let me be honest that the US government predicted this and is running this plan to see the end results of how long until people die or comply with the mark of the beast is awkward.
https://www.minds.com/.../060-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
Let me be honest that no major news paper is SCREAMING that Communist are murdering millions by marching them into the burn cargo ship containers. Is awkward.
https://www.minds.com/.../that-awkward-moment-did-the...
Let me be honest. That someone is willing to say lets reduce the world population instead of lets move to Mars or outer space is awkward.
https://www.minds.com/.../057-days-for-end-of-2012-count...
For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and for the gospel will save it. 36What does it profit a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? 37Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?
Let me be honest the book Zachariah changing to Zechariah and the verses I remember being told were about an army melting in a river blood being turned to zombies is not what I expected.
https://www.minds.com/.../062-days-for-end-of-2012-11...
This is the plague with which the Lord will strike all the nations that fought against Jerusalem: Their flesh will rot while they are still standing on their feet, their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths. 13 On that day people will be stricken by the Lord with great panic. They will seize each other by the hand and attack one another.
https://endertalon.blogspot.com/.../the-planned...
6 May ·
Shared with Public
The year’s biggest “supermoon” on May 26, 2021 is surely one of them, a sight that for half the world will be merely the largest-looking and brightest full Moon of the year. For others—notably those in the western half of the U.S.—that “Super Flower Moon” will also be a rare total lunar eclipse during which our satellite will turn a reddish-orangey colour for 15 minutes. https://www.forbes.com/.../a-super-blood-moon-eclipse.../... dates changed
Clinton Siegle
8 July ·
Shared with Public
https://www.minds.com/.../you-should-not-need-an... no.sorry I don't end here. NEW date for blood moon. It was 2035 in 2019, on May 2021 it was 2033 and today the next blood moon is May 16, 2022 – North and South America, Europe and Africa. https://my.astrofame.com/astrology/article/blood-moon which is 8 days after the oseh starts reporting vaccine deaths again.. reality switch. They will be coming for you.
Clinton Siegle
Shared with Your friends
August 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM ·
The cubicle was smaller than normal at the new office building. Making life more noisy and at times comfortable and at other times less easy. Jane was a recent new hire, and she seemed to be a bit of a nut. She would talk loudly about her latest conquest of men or her disappointment with a lover in such tones that as a just person that sat close to her; you wondered what or if she truly has personal bounders or if she was an artist stuck somewhere in this cubicle farm by accident. Then, for some reason, she toke an interest in me. As a writer on the side of a career in finance I was more interested in doing my work, reading, writing, and sleeping... because my dreams were much better than reality, and I did not usually want to wake up. The life of a writer is always in question is what being written worth anything or just a thought that makes the world less or more worth living.
Anyway Jane seemed to start to take notice and started me as a fix up project. Speaking to me about shirt colors and ties I wore. I was a grey person personally liking a grey that made me feel less of a white color world of finance where everything was ones and numbers adding up to neat figures that I could figure out and go home knowing the world was safe from ruin.
However her . She had personality. That was one think going for her. That her brazen attitude. As for the writer? Let be honest he had misstep along the way of life. And? Well, one day awoke in a completely different reality.
That the two had not spoken in six years since he had written the first part in 2014 made him a bit curious as to what that lady saw down this rabbit hole of reality. He went backed and looked. Sadly some how she had passed away in February of 2019 of breast cancer. He wondered what her life had been like since 2016 the last time they spoken about a project that was now missing.
Life of a time traveling writer is oddly weird at times. Did the project exist here? Would looking for it make it exist here or was it all a fabrication of the internet? The writer time traveler did not want to know. He felt sad that someone who was a bit of color in peoples life had left. He was even sadder when he counted 58 or 64 people in the grave he knew that knew him by a first name bases that no longer were here. Where ever here was?
That he was unsure of the rabbit hole of late. That in 2019 the dates said one thing that the next blood moon was 2035. Now to happen in 2021. But on what date? Did it really matter?
Just like the next super moon appeared in January in yet here it has always been that date. So when the end of 2012 with the only accurate sun calendar date moved from September 7th to the 17th he was a bit worried. That the date kept on moving around from September 10 through the 12 these days made it a question on his mind. Was he insane or were different realities splicing the film of life back together really changing the date like he had convinced himself it was?
What made this whole reality jumping a question on his mind lately?
That his mountain which was something he looked for every so often. Well the view suddenly got a 40 foot tree in its view making this whole story a question of reality and on his mind what was real and what seemed real? https://www.minds.com/.../to-watch-the-walking-tree-and...
thanks for liking my post. so few people like or read my stuff I was getting tired. anyway a short story for you.. Clinton Siegle
22 June 2016, 05:57
6 22 Finding things differently - one there is a chance reptiles are going to replace humanity. Two there is no God per diety that we worship. Three change is not what I would expect - ie there is a brain holding each universe in a game pattern that can not be broken in most cases. ie money, accounts, bills, lost opportunities, seem similar enough. Four personsalities.. they change along with shifting earth.. The butterfly affect is truly amazing to watch. I thought the mountain moved. Then I started paying attention to where I was and realized my location shifted even if I was in the same house. Meaning earth shifts moutains etc tend to stay the same. Fifth shifting to other people reality is not as scary as it was for a while. I am tired of being scared and being yelled at.. life if there is a soul which I believe there might be is teaching me something.. if I learn it I will pass it on.
Reply
author Clinton Siegle
22 June 2016, 14:14
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 18 (4 days ago)
to Sky
Mr. Moon,
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 13 (9 days ago)
to orgoneproducts1, skybooks
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Dear Mr. Moon, Mr Preston B. Nichols,
I am writing to you because I can find you on the internet.
Since 5.20 I have been traveling to different people's realities is the best to explain.
Locations, braning of products, colors, sounds, taste and personalities all have changed several times along with my feelings towards this adventure.
I am wondering my eyesight is getting better ere but worst for the guy tat was me today. What and how do I get back to my timeframe?
Also can I sue CERN for these affects to my life meaning I have discovered a few things that I make me going home a question that I am unsure how to reflect on.
https://cosmofunnel.com/stories/a-dairy-of-sorts-92183 Remember I am blind in one eye and typing this with size 350 font so if some words are wrong I apolgieis.
Tank you and hopefully you will respong
Sky Books
Jun 13 (9 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Sorry, but we do not have such time capabilities.
Only thing I could suggest would be getting grounded in the reality you are experiencing.
Suggestion: CONTROL YOUR BREATH = CONTROL YOUR LIFE
Best,
Peter
NEW VIDEOS JUST RELEASED: Learn the science of time travel in Peter Moon's brand new and easy to understand videos "Time Travel Explained". To sign up: up: http://zeqyedx3.megaph.com/
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 13 (9 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Peter,
I am not interested in being here.
These people are mean.
I can not tell a joke.
They yell at me.
I am not from here.
I want to go home.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 13 (9 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Peter,
Have you read what I have been going through?
I am not enjoying this stop at all.
You say focus and breath.
I am more interested in the computer simulation set up in 1950s that was supposedly working for Dr. John Von Neumann.
Since 57 the program should be easy to duplicate in todays world. Any ideas on who to ask and how to get out of here?
Thanks,
Clinton
Sky Books
Jun 13 (9 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
You might find the same or a similar situation if you were indeed able to escape.
This is why life presents us challenges.
Try breathing......it is the basis of life.....
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
I breath meditate with focus fingers daily.
I do not expect to be yelled at all in this life or the next.
If magic is what it is then blood and tears is what I will offer this world.
Not one scream not one yell. I do not do that to others and I do not expect that for myself.
My magic worked wonders in Michigan in 2008. Let us see if this world can handle me.
Sky Books
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
It is good that you breathe.
Have you learned and/or contemplated "The Inner Smile" - this can lead to a rather unbridled joy.
The world can and has handled everything. We have to learn to "handle" the world and then harmonize with it.
Time travel might help but there is much to learn about it and especially the psychology of such.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Marina von Neumann Whitman has a computer from her father some place.
I am more of a practical person.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Pete
Question how far back in time can you go?
Also, can you jump to another universe?
thanks
Sky Books
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
I cannot travel in time personally.
Theoretically, there are no limitations.
The hardware I cannot account for.
Clinton SiegleJun 14 (8 days ago)
Preston Nichols Curious who is the guy you spoke to on this site? http://www....
Kevin CourtoisJun 14 (8 days ago)
Clinton, I am not preston. I currently do not have any contact info on him.
Sky Books
Jun 14 (8 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Don't know whose that site is. Sounds like extracts from Preston and possibly Al.
John von Neumann is long dead.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
But according to the interview he is or was a consultant in 1989.
I know he died in 1956. But according to the article the person speaking saw him as late as 1989.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
PS His daughter is currently in Spain she gave me these two peoples name
Peter Lax or Freeman Dyson
- do you know either?
Sky Books
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
No, never heard of them and I have heard von Neumann's daughter is not accepting of his secret life, but I have no contact with her personally.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
I am a bit more personal.
She messaged me from Spain on facebook.
I do not know her personally.
The wildness here is the email access.
Three days ago I had never heard of Dr. von Neumann.
Three days ago I had never heard of you nor any additional project outside of ^Philadelphia the Montauk Project is something new to my timeline.
In my timeline the Mandela Effect showed up as a google date 5 16 on 5 20 when I realized something is up I was number 402 viewing some guy talking about changes etc.
Meaning Mr. Books the world I came up in both Mandela and Montauk was or were not part of it. Meaning I am what they considered a conspiracy nut and would have known of you or Preston Nichols.
My world Santiago, Chile is right under San Francisco 11 hours by some airlines and 9.5 hours by others.
My world there is no two New Zealand island it is one island.
Japan is south of South Korean there is no Japan Sea.
The world is strange and marvalous but at times I must accept where I am at. The difference how nutty your politics is.
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
https://cosmofunnel.com/dreams/dear-journal-92330
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 15 (7 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
You know worlds change - I recognized finally a name. Pruitt - https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshua-pruitt-89a384107
In my timeline he was boss https://cosmofunnel.com/stories/mentally-i-was-there-92342
Clinton Siegle <>
Jun 16 (6 days ago)
to Sky
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Mr. Books,
I have listened to some of your interviews now.
I am sure if you would have existed in my time frame I would have read your books.
I am interested in the Atlantis library. The series of books - any truth or clues as to if the library would be opened and to whom?
My sercet clearance, sub contract non disclosure forms etc were updated when I was at the Missiles Defense Agency.
Whom would I be looking to talk to get access to the library?
Thanks,
Clinton
Checking to see if we have spoken before?
If so can I ask other then breathing what else would you suggest to my prior question.
If not thank you for your time.
Sky Books
Jun 18 (4 days ago)
to me
We have not spoken before.
o me
This message has been deleted. Restore message
Ask the local librarian on how you can improve your researching skills. There are a lot of libraries in the world and one thing leads to another.
Best advice I have given is in my book "The White Bat" which teaches one to integrate both sides of the brain.
NEW VIDEOS JUST RELEASED: Learn the science of time travel in Peter Moon's brand new and easy to understand videos "Time Travel Explained". To sign up: up: http://zeqyedx3.megaph.com/
Reply
author Clinton Siegle
22 June 2016, 19:16
Hot Big Bang :
In the 1930's it was discovered by Edwin Hubble that all galaxies have a positive redshift. In other words, all galaxies were receding from the Milky Way. By the Copernican principle, we deduce that all galaxies are receding from each other, or we live in a dynamic, expanding Universe. The expansion of the Universe is described by a very simple equation called Hubble's law; the velocity of the recession of a galaxy is equal to a constant times its distance (v=Hd). Where the constant is called Hubble's constant and relates distance to velocity in units of light-years.
The discovery of an expanding Universe implies the obvious, that the Universe must have an initial starting point, a Creation. A point in the past when the radius of the Universe was zero. Since all the matter in the Universe must have been condensed in a small region, along with all its energy, this moment of Creation is referred to as the Big Bang.
A common question that is asked when considering a Creation point in time is ``What is before the Big Bang?''. This type is question is meaningless or without context. For example, it is similar to asking ``What is north of the North Pole?''. The question itself can not be phrased in a meaningful way.
Four main pieces of scientific evidence support the Big Bang theory:
Olber's paradox
expanding Universe (Hubble's law)
chemical abundances of light elements
cosmic microwave background
The Big Bang theory has been supported by numerous observations and, regardless of our final theories of the Universe, remains the core element to our understanding of the past. Note that a Creation point automatically implies two things: 1) the Universe has a finite age (about 15 billion years) and 2) the Universe has a finite size.
Geometry of the Universe :
How can the Universe be finite in size? What is ``outside'' the Universe? The answer to both these questions involves a discussion of the intrinsic geometry of the Universe.
There are basically three possible shapes to the Universe; a flat Universe (Euclidean or zero curvature), a spherical or closed Universe (positive curvature) or a hyperbolic or open Universe (negative curvature). Note that this curvature is similar to spacetime curvature due to masses, like stars, in that the entire mass of the Universe determines the curvature.
All three geometries are classes of what is called Riemannian geometry, based on three possible states for parallel lines
never meeting (flat or Euclidean)
must cross (spherical)
always divergent (hyperbolic)
or one can think of triangles where for a flat Universe the angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees, in a closed Universe the sum must be greater than 180, in an open Universe the sum must be less than 180.
Its important to remember that the above images are 2D shadows of 3D space, it is impossible to draw the geometry of the Universe, it can only be described by mathematics. All possible Universes are finite since there is only a finite age and, therefore, a limiting horizon. The geometry may be flat or open, and therefore infinite, but the amount of mass and time in our Universe is finite.
Density of the Universe:
The description of the various geometries of the Universe (open, closed, flat) also relate to their futures. There are two possible futures for our Universe, continual expansion (open and flat), turn-around and collapse (closed). Note that flat is the specific case of expansion to zero velocity.
The key factor that determines which history is correct is the amount of mass/gravity for the Universe as a whole. If there is sufficient mass, then the expansion of the Universe will be slowed to the point of stopping, then retraction to collapse. If there is not a sufficient amount of mass, then the Universe will expand forever without stopping. The flat Universe is one where there is exactly the balance of mass to slow the expansion to zero, but not for collapse.
The parameter that is used to measure the mass of the Universe is the critical density, Omega. Omega is usually expressed as the ratio of the mean density observed to that of the density in a flat Universe.
Given all the range of values for the mean density of the Universe, it is strangely close to the density of a flat Universe. And our theories of the early Universe (see inflation) strongly suggest the value of Omega should be exactly equal to one. If so our measurements of the density by galaxy counts or dynamics are grossly in error and remains one of the key problems for modern astrophysics.
Birth of the Universe :
Physics of the early Universe is at the boundary of astronomy and philosophy since we do not currently have a complete theory that unifies all the fundamental forces of Nature at the moment of Creation. Thus, there is no possibility of linking observation or experimentation of early Universe physics to our theories (i.e. its not possible to `build' another Universe) and, thus, our theories are rejected or accepted based on simplicity and aesthetic grounds rather than an appeal to empirical results. This is a very difference way of doing science from centuries.
Our physics can explain most of the evolution of the Universe after the Planck time (approximately 10-43 seconds after the Big Bang). However, the time before this undefined in our current science and, in particular, we have no solid understanding of the origin of the Universe (i.e. what started or `caused' the Big Bang). At best, we can describe our efforts to date as probing around the `edges' of our understand in order to define what we don't understand, much like a blind person would explore the edge of a deep hole.
Cosmic Singularity :
One thing is clear in our framing of questions such as "How did the Universe get started?" is that the Universe was self-creating. This is not a statement on a `cause' behind the origin of the Universe, nor is it a statement on a lack of purpose or destiny. It is simply a statement that the Universe was emergent, that the actual of the Universe probably derived from a indeterminate sea of potentiality whose properties may always remain beyond our understanding.
Extrapolation from the present to the moment of Creation implies an origin of infinite density and infinite temperature (all the Universe's mass and energy pushed to a point of zero volume). Such a point is called the cosmic singularity.
Infinites are unacceptable as physical descriptions but our observers are protected by the principle of cosmic censorship. This means that singularities exists only mathematically and not as a physical reality that we can observe or measure. A typical solution to this problem is an event horizon as with black holes.
Planck Era :
The earliest moments of Creation are where our modern physics breakdown, where `breakdown' means that our theories and laws have no ability to describe or predict the behavior of the early Universe. Our everyday notions of space and time cease to be valid.
Although we have little knowledge of the Universe before the Planck time, we can calculate when this era ends and when our physics begins. This occurs when the Universe is at the Planck scale in its expansion.
Remember, there is no `outside' to the Universe. One could, in theory, measure the size of the Universe much like you measure the radius of the Earth. You don't dig a hole in the Earth and lower a tape measure, you measure the circumference (take an airplane ride) of the Earth and divide by 2 pi (i.e. C = 2 x pi x radius).
The Universe expands from the moment of the Big Bang, but until the Universe reaches the size of the Planck scale, there is no time or space. Time remains undefined, space is compactified. Superstring theory maintains that the Universe had 10 dimensions during the Planck era, which collapses into 4 at the end of the Planck era (think of those extra 6 dimensions as being very, very small hyperspheres inbetween the space between elementary particles, 4 big dimensions and 6 little tiny ones).
During the Planck era, the Universe can be best described as a quantum foam of 10 dimensions containing Planck length sized black holes continuously being created and annihilated with no cause or effect. In other words, try not to think about this era.
Unification :
One of the reasons our physics is incomplete during the Planck era is a lack of understand of the unification of the forces of Nature during this time. At high energies and temperatures, the forces of Nature become symmetric. This means the forces resemble each other and become similar in strength, they unify.
An example of unification is the consider the interaction of the weak and electromagnetic forces. At low energy, photons and W,Z particles are the force carriers for the electromagnetic and weak forces. The W and Z particles are very massive and, thus, require alot of energy (E=mc**2). At high energies, photons take on similar energies to W and Z particles, and the forces become unified into the electroweak force.
There is the expectation that all the nuclear forces of matter (strong, weak and electromagnetic) unify at extremely high temperatures under a principle known as Grand Unified Theory, an extension of quantum physics of as yet undiscovered relationships between the strong and electroweak forces.
The final unification resolves the relationship between quantum forces and gravity (supergravity).
In the early Universe, the physics to predict the behavior of matter is determined by which forces are unified and the form that they take. The interactions just at the edge of the Planck era are ruled by supergravity, the quantum effects of mini-black holes. After the separation of gravity and nuclear forces, the spacetime of the Universe is distinct from matter and radiation.
Spacetime Foam :
The first moments after the Planck era are dominated by conditions were spacetime itself is twisted and distorted by the pressures of the extremely small and dense Universe.
Most of these black holes and wormholes are leftover from the Planck era, remnants of the event horizon that protected the cosmic singularity. These conditions are hostile to any organization or structure not protected by an event horizon. Thus, black holes are the only units that can survive intact under these conditions, and serve as the first building blocks of structure in the Universe, the first `things' that have individuality.
Based on computer simulations of these early moments, there is the prediction that many small, primordial black holes were created at this time with no large black holes (the Universe was too small for them to exist). However, due to Hawking radiation, the primordial black holes from this epoch have all decayed and disappeared by the present-day.
Matter arises at the end of the spacetime foam epoch as the result of superstrings, or loops in spacetime. The transformation is from ripping spacetime foam into black holes, which then transmute into elementary particles. Thus, there is a difference between something and nothing, but it is purely geometrical and there is nothing behind the geometry. Matter during this era is often called GUT matter to symbolize its difference from quarks and leptons and its existence under GUT forces.
Symmetry Breaking:
In the early Universe, pressures and temperature prevented the permanent establishment of elementary particles. Even quarks and leptons were unable to form stable objects until the Universe had cooled beyond the supergravity phase. If the fundamental building blocks of Nature (elementary particles) or spacetime itself were not permanent then what remained the same? The answer is symmetry.
Often symmetry is thought of as a relationship, but in fact it has its own identical that is preserved during the chaos and flux of the early Universe. Even though virtual particles are created and destroyed, there is always a symmetry to the process. For example, for every virtual electron that is formed a virtual positron (anti-electron) is also formed. There is a time symmetric, mirror-like quality to every interaction in the early Universe.
Symmetry also leads to conservation laws, and conservation laws limit the possible interactions between particles. Those imaginary processes that violate conservation laws are forbidden. So the existence of symmetry provides a source of order to the early Universe.
Pure symmetry is like a spinning coin. The coin has two states, but while spinning neither state is determined, and yet both states exist. The coin is in a state of both/or. When the coin hits the floor the symmetry is broken (its either heads or tails) and energy is released in the process.
The effect of symmetry breaking in the early Universe was a series of phase changes, much like when ice melts to water or water boils to stream. A phase change is the dramatic change in the internal order of a substance. When ice melts, the increased heat breaks the bonds in the lattice of water molecules, and the ice no longer holds its shape. Phase change in the early Universe occurs at the unification points of fundamental forces. The decoupling of those forces provides the energy input for the phase change.
With respect to the Universe, a phase change during symmetry breaking is a point where the characteristics and the properties of the Universe make a radical change. At the supergravity symmetry breaking, the Universe passed from the Planck era of total chaos to the era of spacetime foam. Spacetime was acquired during the phase transition. During the GUT symmetry breaking, mass and spacetime separated and particles came into existence.
Notice that as symmetry breaks, there is less order, more chaos. The march of entropy in the Universe apples to the laws of Nature as well as matter. The Universe at the time of the cosmic singularity was a time or pure symmetry, all the forces had equal strength, all the matter particles had the same mass (zero), spacetime was the same everywhere (although all twisted and convolved).
Inflation:
There are two major problems for the Big Bang model of the creation of the Universe. They are
The flatness problem relates to the density parameter of the Universe, . Values for can take on any number between 0.01 and 5 (lower than 0.01 and galaxies can't form, more than 5 and the Universe is younger than the oldest rocks). The measured value is near 0.2. This is close to an of 1, which is strange because of 1 is an unstable point for the geometry of the Universe.
the flatness problem
the horizon problem
Values slightly below or above 1 in the early Universe rapidly grow to much less than 1 or much larger than 1 (like a ball at the top of a hill). So the fact that the measured value of 0.2 is so close to 1 that we expect to find in the future that our measured value is too low and that the Universe has a value of exactly equal to 1 for stability. And therefore, the flatness problem is that some mechanism is needed to get a value for to be exactly one (to balance the pencil).
The horizon problem concerns the fact that the Universe is isotropic. No matter what distant corners of the Universe you look at, the sizes and distribution of objects is exactly the same (the Cosmological Principle). But there is no reason to expect this since opposite sides of the Universe are not causally connected, any information that is be transmitted from one side would not reach the other side in the lifetime of the Universe (limited to travel at the speed of light).
All the Universe has an origin at the Big Bang, but time didn't exist until after the Planck era. And by the end of that epoch, the Universe was already expanding such that opposite sides were not causally connected.
The solution to both the flatness and horizon problems is due to a phase of the Universe called inflation. Currently, inflation is the only theory that explains why the observable Universe is both homogeneous and causally connected. During inflation the Universe expanded a factor of 1054, so that our horizon now only sees a small piece of what was the total Universe from the Big Bang.
The cause of the inflation era was the symmetry breaking at the GUT unification point. At this moment, spacetime and matter separated and a tremendous amount of energy was released. This energy produced an overpressure that was applied not to the particles of matter, but to spacetime itself. Basically, the particles stood still as the space between them expanded at an exponential rate.
Note that this inflation was effectively at more than the speed of light, but since the expansion was on the geometry of the Universe itself, and not the matter, then there is no violation of special relativity. Our visible Universe, the part of the Big Bang within our horizon, is effectively a `bubble' on the larger Universe. However, those other bubbles are not physically real since they are outside our horizon. We can only relate to them in an imaginary, theoretical sense. They are outside our horizon and we will never be able to communicate with those other bubble universes.
Inflation solves the flatness problem because of the exponential growth. Imagine a highly crumbled piece of paper. This paper represents the Big Bang universe before inflation. Inflation is like zooming in of some very, very small section of the paper. If we zoom in to a small enough scale the paper will appear flat. Our Universe must be exactly flat for the same reason, it is a very small piece of the larger Big Bang universe.
The horizon problem is also solved in that our present Universe was simply a small piece of a larger Big Bang universe that was in causal connection before the inflation era. Other bubble universes might have very different constants and evolutionary paths, but our Universe is composed of a small, isotropic slice of the bigger Big Bang universe.
Reply
author Clinton Siegle
22 June 2016, 19:21
Is the Universe Closed? http://mathpages.com/rr/s7-01/7-01.htm
The unboundedness of space has a greater empirical certainty than any experience of the external world, but its infinitude does not in any way follow from this; quite the contrary. Space would necessarily be finite if one assumed independence of bodies from position, and thus ascribed to it a constant curvature, as long as this curvature had ever so small a positive value.
B. Riemann, 1854
Very soon after arriving at the final form of the field equations, Einstein began to consider their implications with regard to the overall structure of the universe. His 1917 paper presented a simple model of a closed spherical universe which "from the standpoint of the general theory of relativity lies nearest at hand". In order to arrive at a quasi-static distribution of matter he found it necessary to introduce the "cosmological term" to the field equations (as discussed in Section 5.
, so he based his analysis on the equations
where l is the cosmological constant. Before invoking the field equations we can consider the general form of a metric that is suitable for representing the large-scale structure of the universe. First, we ordinarily assume that the universe would appear to be more or less the same when viewed from the rest frame of any galaxy, anywhere in the universe (at the present epoch). This is sometimes called the Cosmological Principle.
Then, since the universe on a large scale appears (to us) highly homogenous and isotropic, we infer that these symmetries apply to every region of space. This greatly restricts the class of possible metrics. In addition, we can choose, for each region of space, to make the time coordinate coincide with the proper time of the typical galaxy in that region. Also, according to the Cosmological Principle, the coefficients of the spatial terms of the (diagonalized) metric should be independent of location, and any dependence on the time coordinate must apply symmetrically to all the space coordinates. From this we can infer a metric of the form
where s(t) is some (still to be determined) dimensionless scale factor dependent on time, and ds is the total space differential with no time dependence. In other words, the “shape” of the spatial metric is fixed, but the scale factor is a function of time. Recall that for a perfectly flat Euclidean space the differential line element is
where r2 = x2 + y2 + z2. On the other hand, if we want to allow our space (at a given coordinate time t) to have curvature, the Cosmological Principle suggests that the (large scale) curvature should be the same everywhere and in every direction. Thus the Gaussian curvature of every two-dimensional tangent subspace has the same value at every point. Now suppose we embed a Euclidean three-dimensional space (x,y,z) in a four-dimensional space (w,x,y,z) whose metric is
where k is either +1 or −1. If k = +1 the four-dimensional space is Euclidean, whereas if k = −1 it is pseudo-Euclidean (like the Minkowski metric). In either case the four-dimensional space is "flat", i.e., has zero Riemannian curvature. We then consider a three-dimensional subspace comprising a sphere (or pseudo-sphere), i.e., the locus of points satisfying the condition
where A is a constant characteristic length. From this we have w2 = A2 - kr2, and therefore
Substituting this into the four-dimensional line element above gives the metric for the three-dimensional sphere (or pseudo-sphere)
Taking this as the spatial part of our overall spacetime metric (2), replacing r with Ar (so r is now dimensionless), and defining R(t) = As(t), we arrive at
This metric, with k = +1 and R(t) = constant, was the basis of Einstein's 1917 paper, and it was subsequently studied by Alexander Friedmann in 1922 with both possible signs of k and with variable R(t). The general form was re-discovered by Robertson and Walker (independently) in 1935, so it is now often referred to as the Robertson-Walker metric. Notice that with k = +1 this metric essentially corresponds to polar coordinates on the "surface" of a sphere projected onto the "equatorial plane", so each value of r corresponds to two points, one in the Northern and one in the Southern hemisphere. We could remedy this by making the change of variable r ® r/(1 + kr2/4), which (in the case k = +1) amounts to stereographic projection from the North pole to a tangent plane at the South pole. In terms of this transformed radial variable the Robertson-Walker metric has the form
As noted above, Einstein originally assumed R(t) = constant, i.e., he envisioned a static un-changing universe. He also assumed the matter in the universe was roughly "stationary" at each point with respect to these cosmological coordinates, so the only non-zero component of the stress-energy tensor in these coordinates is Ttt = r where r is the density of matter (assumed to be uniform, in accord with the Cosmological Principle). On this basis, the field equations imply
Here the symbol R denotes the assumed constant value of R(t) (not to be confused with the Ricci curvature scalar). This explains why Einstein was originally led to introduce a non-zero cosmological constant l, because if we assume a static universe and the Cosmological Principle, the field equations of general relativity can only be satisfied if the density r is proportional to the cosmological constant. However, it was soon pointed out that this static model is unstable, so it is apriori unlikely to correspond to the physical universe. Moreover, astronomical observations subsequently indicated that the universe (on the largest observable scale) is actually expanding, so we shouldn't restrict ourselves to models withR(t) = constant. If we allow R(t) to be variable, then the original field equations, without the cosmological term (i.e., with l = 0), do have solutions. In view of this, Einstein decided the cosmological term was unnecessary and should be excluded.
Interestingly, George Gamow was working with Friedmann in Russia in the early 1920's, and later recalled that "Friedmann noticed that Einstein had made a mistake in his alleged proof that the universe must necessarily be stable". Specifically, Einstein had divided through an equation by a certain quantity, even though that quantity was zero under a certain set of conditions. As Gamow notes, "it is well known to students of high school algebra" that division by zero is not valid. Friedmann realized that this error invalidated Einstein's argument against the possibility of a dynamic universe, and indeed under the condition that the quantity in question vanishes, it is possible to satisfy the field equations with a dynamic model, i.e., with a model of the form given by the Robertson-Walker metric with R(t) variable. It's worth noting that Einstein's 1917 paper did not actually contain any alleged proof that the universe must be static, but it did suggest that a non-zero cosmological constant required a non-zero density of matter. Shortly after Einstein's paper appeared, de Sitter gave a counter-example (see Section 7.6), i.e., he described a model universe that had a non-zero l but zero matter density. However, unlike Einstein's model, it was not static. Einstein objected strenuously to de Sitter's model, because it showed that the field equations allowed inertia to exist in an empty universe, which Einstein viewed as "inertia relative to space", and he still harbored hopes that general relativity would fulfill Mach's idea that inertia should only be possible in relation to other masses. It was during the course of this debate that (presumably) Einstein advanced his "alleged proof" of the impossibility of dynamic models (with the errant division by zero?). However, before long Einstein withdrew his objection, realizing that his argument was flawed. Years later he recalled the sequence of events in a discussion with Gamow, and made the famous remark that it had been the biggest blunder of his life. This is usually interpreted to mean that he regretted ever considering a cosmological term (which seems to have been the case), but it could also be referring to his erroneous argument against the idea of a dynamic universe, resulting from his unfortunate "division by zero".
In any case, the Friedmann universes (with and without cosmological constant) became the "standard model" for cosmologies. If k = +1 the manifold represented by the Robertson-Walker metric is a finite spherical space, so it is called "closed". If k = 0 or -1 the metric is typically interpreted as representing an infinite space, so it is called "open". However, it's worth noting that this need not be the case, because the metric gives only local attributes of the manifold; it does not tell us the overall global topology. For example, we discuss in Section 7.4 a manifold that is everywhere locally flat, but that is closed cylindrically. This shows that when we identify "open" (infinite) and "closed" (finite) universes with the cases k = −1 and k = +1 respectively, we are actually assuming the "maximal topology" for the given metric in each case.
Based on the Robertson-Walker metric (3), we can compute the components of the Ricci tensor and scalar and substitute these along with the simple uniform stress-energy tensor into the field equations (1) to give the conditions on the scale function R = R(t):
where dots signify derivatives with respect to t. As expected, if R(t) is constant, these equations reduce to the ones that appeared in Einstein's original 1917 paper, whereas with variable R(t) we have a much wider range of possible solutions.
It may not be obvious that these two equations have a simultaneous solution, but notice that if we multiply the first condition through by R(t)3 and differentiate with respect to t, we get
The left-hand side is equal to times the left-hand side of the second condition, which equals zero, so the right hand side must also vanish, i.e., the derivative of (8p/3)GrR(t)3must equal zero. This implies that there is a constant C such that
With this stipulation, the two conditions are redundant, i.e., a solution of one is guaranteed to be a solution of the other. Substituting for (8p/3)Gr in the first condition and multiplying through by R(t)3, we arrive at the basic differential equation for the scale parameter of a Friedmann universe
Incidentally, if we multiply through by R(t), differentiate with respect to t, divide through by, and differentiate again, the constants k and C drop out, and we arrive at
With l = 0 this is identical to the gravitational separation equation (3) in Section 4.2, showing that the cosmological scale parameter R(t) is yet another example of a naturally occurring spatial separation that satisfies this differential equation. It follows that the admissible functions R(t) (with l = 0) are formally identical to the gravitational free-fall solutions described in Section 4.3. Solving equation (4) (with l = 0) for and switching to normalized coordinates T = t/C and X = R/C, we get
Accordingly as k equals −1, 0, or +1, integration of this equation gives
A plot of these three solutions is shown below.
In all three cases with l = 0, the expansion of the universe is slowing down, albeit only slightly for the case k = -1. However, if we allow a non-zero cosmological constant l, there is a much greater variety of possible solutions to Friedmann's equation (2), including solutions in which the expansion of the universe is actually accelerating exponentially. Based on the cosmic scale parameter R and its derivatives, the three observable parameters traditionally used to characterize a particular solution are
In terms of these parameters, the constants appearing in the Friedmann equation (4) can be expressed as
In principle if astronomers could determine the values of H, q, and s with enough precision, we could decide on empirical grounds the sign of k, and whether or not l is zero. Thus, assuming the maximal topologies (and the large-scale validity of general relativity), we could determine whether the universe is open or closed, and whether it will expand forever or eventually re-contract. Unfortunately, none of the parameters is known with enough precision to distinguish between these possibilities.
One source of uncertainty is in the estimates of the mass density r of the universe. Given the best current models of star masses, and the best optical counts of stars in galaxies, and the apparent density of galaxies, we estimate an overall mass density that is only a small fraction of what would be required to make k = 0. However, there are reasons to believe that much (perhaps most) of the matter in the universe is not luminous. (For example, the observed rotation of individual galaxies indicates that they ought to fly apart unless there is substantially more mass in them than is visible to us.) This has led physicists and astronomers to search for the "missing mass" in various forms.
Another source of uncertainty is in the values of R and its derivatives. For example, in its relatively brief history, Hubble's constant has undergone revisions of an order of magnitude, both upwards and downwards. In recent years the Hubble space telescope and several modern observatories on Earth seem to have found strong evidence that the expansion of the universe is actually accelerating. If so, then it could be accounted for in the context of general relativity only by a non-zero cosmological constant l (on a related question, see Section 7.6), with the implication that the universe is infinite and will expand forever (at an accelerating rate).
Nevertheless, the idea of a closed finite universe is still of interest, partly because of the historical role it played in Einstein's thought, but also because it remains (arguably) the model most compatible with the spirit of general relativity. In an address to the Berlin Academy of Sciences in 1921, Einstein said
I must not fail to mention that a theoretical argument can be adduced in favor of the hypothesis of a finite universe. The general theory of relativity teaches that the inertia of a given body is greater as there are more ponderable masses in proximity to it; thus it seems very natural to reduce the total effect of inertia of a body to action and reaction between it and the other bodies in the universe... From the general theory of relativity it can be deduced that this total reduction of inertia to reciprocal action between masses - as required by E. Mach, for example - is possible only if the universe is spatially finite. On many physicists and astronomers this argument makes no impression...
This is consistent with the approach taken in Einstein's 1917 paper. Shortly thereafter he presented (in "The Meaning of Relativity", 1922) the following three arguments against the conception of infinite space, and for the conception of a bounded, or closed, universe:
(1) From the standpoint of the theory of relativity, to postulate a closed universe is very much simpler than to postulate the corresponding boundary condition at infinity of the quasi-Euclidean structure of the universe.
(2) The idea that Mach expressed, that inertia depends on the mutual attraction of bodies, is contained, to a first approximation, in the equations of the theory of relativity; it follows from these equations that inertia depends, at least in part, upon mutual actions between masses. Thereby Mach's idea gains in probability, as it is an unsatisfactory assumption to make that inertia depends in part upon mutual actions, and in part upon an independent property of space. But this idea of Mach's corresponds only to a finite universe, bounded in space, and not to a quasi-Euclidean, infinite universe. From the standpoint of epistemology it is more satisfying to have the mechanical properties of space completely determined by matter, and this is the case only in a closed universe.
(3) An infinite universe is possible only if the mean density of matter in the universe vanishes. Although such an assumption is logically possible, it is less probable than the assumption of a finite mean density of matter in the universe.
Along these same lines, Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler ("Gravitation") comment that general relativity "demands closure of the geometry in space as a boundary condition on the initial-value equations if they are to yield a well-determined and unique 4-geometry." Interestingly, when they quote Einstein's reasons in favor of a closed universe they omit the third without comment, although it reappears (with a caveat) in the subsequent "Inertia and Gravitation" of Ciufolini and Wheeler. As we've seen, Einstein was initially under the mistaken impression that the only cosmological solutions of the field equations are those with
where R is the radius of the universe, r is the mean density of matter, and k is the gravitational constant. This much is consistent with modern treatments, which agree that at any given epoch in a Friedmann universe with constant non-negative curvature the radius is inversely proportional to the square root of the mean density. On the basis of (5) Einstein continued
If the universe is quasi-Euclidean, and its radius of curvature therefore infinite, then r would vanish. But it is improbable that the mean density of matter in the universe is actually zero; this is our third argument against the assumption that the universe is quasi-Euclidean.
However, in the 2nd edition of "The Meaning of Relativity" (1945), he added an appendix, "essentially nothing but an exposition of Friedmann's idea", i.e., the idea that "one can reconcile an everywhere finite density of matter with the original form of the equations of gravity [without the cosmological term] if one admits the time variability of the metric distances...". In this appendix he acknowledged that in a dynamic model, as described above, it is perfectly possible to have an infinite universe with positive density of matter, provided that k = −1. It's clear that Einstein originally had not seriously considered the possibility of a universe with positive mass density but overall negative curvature. In the first edition, whenever he mentioned the possibility of an infinite universe he referred to the space as "quasi-Euclidean", which I take to mean "essentially flat". He regarded this open infinite space as just a limiting case of a closed spherical universe with infinite radius. He simply did not entertain the possibility of a hyperbolic (k = −1) universe. (It's interesting that Riemann, too, excluded spaces of negative curvature from his 1854 lecture, without justification.) His basic objection was evidently that a spacetime with negative curvature possesses an inherent structure independent of the matter it contains, and he was unable to conceive of any physical source of negative curvature. This typically entails "ad hoc" boundary conditions at infinity, precisely what's required in an open universe, which Einstein regarded as contrary to the spirit of relativity.
At the end of the appendix in the 2nd edition, Einstein conceded that it comes down to an empirical question. If (8p/3)Gr is greater than H2, then the universe is closed and spherical; otherwise it is open and flat or pseudospherical (hyperbolic). He also makes the interesting remark that although we might possibly prove the universe is spherical, "it is hardly imaginable that one could prove it to be pseudospherical". His reasoning is that in order to prove the universe is spherical, we need only identify enough matter so that (8p/3)Grexceeds H2, whereas if our current estimate of r is less than this threshold, it will always be possible that there is still more "missing matter" that we have not yet identified. At this stage Einstein was assuming a zero cosmological constant, so it may not have occurred to him that it might someday be possible to determine empirically that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
Ironically, already in 1919 Einstein had written privately to Lorentz acknowledging the weakness of the idea that the universe must be closed.
My view that the state of the ether (i.e., the gmn’s) must be determined by the matter alone has nothing compelling about it. That is why one cannot argue for the closure of the world with as much certainty as I have done.
His use of the word “ether” for the gravitational/inertial field was in deference to Lorentz, but even aside from that, this is a remarkable statement, considering how strongly Einstein subsequently continued to promote the concept of a closed universe, based on the Machian idea that the metrical field “must be determined by the matter alone”. Even after he later disavowed “Mach’s principle”, he went on arguing in favor of a closed universe.
Ultimately, was there any merit in Einstein's skepticism toward the idea of an "open" universe? Even setting aside his third argument, the first two still carry some weight with some people, especially those who are sympathetic to Mach's ideas regarding the relational origin of inertia. In an open universe we must accept the fact that there are multiple, physically distinct, solutions compatible with a given distribution of matter and (non-gravitational) energy. In such a universe the "background" inertial field can in no way be attributed to the matter and energy content of the universe. From this standpoint, general relativity can never give an unambiguous answer to the twins paradox (for example), because the proper time integral over a given path from A to B depends on the inertial field, and in an open universe this field cannot be inferred from the distribution of mass-energy. It is determined primarily by whatever absolute boundary conditions we choose to impose, independent of the distribution of mass-energy. Einstein believed that such boundary conditions were inherently non-relativistic, because they require us to single out a specific frame of reference - essentially Newton's absolute space. (In later years a great deal of work has been done in attempting to develop boundary conditions "at infinity" that do not single out a particular frame. This is discussed further in Section 7.7.)
The only alternative (in an open universe) that Einstein could see in 1917 was for the metric to degenerate far from matter in such a way that inertia vanishes, i.e., we would require that the metric at infinity go to something like
Such a boundary condition would be the same with respect to any frame of reference, so it wouldn't single out any specific frame as the absolute inertial frame of the universe. Einstein pursued this approach for a long time, but finally abandoned it because it evidently implies that the outermost shell of stars must exist in a metric very different from ours, and as a consequence we should observe their spectral signatures to be significantly shifted. (At the time there was no evidence of any "cosmological shift" in the spectra of the most distant stars. We can only speculate how Einstein would have reacted to the discovery of quasars, the most distant objects known, which are in fact characterized by extreme redshifts and apparently extraordinary energies.)
The remaining option that Einstein considered for an open asymptotically flat universe is to require that, for a suitable choice of the system of reference, the metric must go to
at infinity. However, the imposition of this condition in a spherically symmetrical way (for example) singles out one particular frame of reference as the absolute inertial frame of the universe with no relational foundation. This, Einstein said, "is contrary to the spirit of the relativity principle", and it was the basis of his early view that general relativity is most compatible with a closed unbounded universe. The recent astronomical findings that seem to indicate an accelerating expansion have caused most scientists to abandon closed models, but there seems to be some lack of appreciation for the damage an open universe does to the epistemological strength of general relativity. As Einstein wrote in 1945, "the introduction of [the cosmological constant] constitutes a complication of the theory, which seriously reduces its logical simplicity".
Of course, in both an open and a closed universe there must be boundary and/or initial conditions, but the question is whether the distribution of mass-energy by itself is adequate to define the field, or whether independent boundary conditions are necessary to pin down the field. In a closed universe the "boundary conditions" can be more directly identified with the distribution of mass-energy, whereas in an open universe they are necessarily quite independent. Thus a closed universe can claim to satisfy Mach's principle at least to some degree, whereas an open universe definitely can't. The seriousness of this depends on how seriously we take Mach's principle. Since we can just as well regard a field as a palpable constituent of the universe, and since the metric of spacetime itself is a field in general relativity, it can be argued that Mach's dualistic view is no longer relevant. However, the second issue is whether even the specification of the distribution of mass-energy plusboundary conditions at infinity yields a unique solution. For Maxwell's equations (which are linear) it does, but for Einstein's equations (which are non-linear) it doesn't. This is perhaps what Misner, et al, are referring to when they comment that "Einstein's theory...demands closure of the geometry in space ... as a boundary condition on the initial value equations if they are to yield a well-determined (and, we now know, a unique) 4-geometry".
In view of this, one might argue that the (apparent) uniqueness of the metrical field supports the idea of a closed universe - at least within the context of general relativity. To put it more explicitly, if we believe the structure of the universe is governed by general relativity, and that the structure is determinate, then the universe must be closed. If the universe is not closed, then general relativity must be incomplete in the sense that there must be something other than general relativity determining which of the possible structures actually exists. Admittedly, completeness in this sense is a very ambitious goal for any theory, but it's interesting to recall the famous "EPR" paper in which Einstein criticized quantum mechanics on the grounds that it could not be a complete description of nature. (See Section 9.5.) He may well have had this on his mind when he pointed out how seriously the introduction of a cosmological constant undermines the logical simplicity of general relativity, which was always his criterion for evaluating the merit of any scientific theory.
We can see him wrestling with this issue, even in his 1917 paper, where he notes that some people (such as de Sitter) have argued that we have no need to consider boundary conditions at infinity, because we can simple specify the metric at the spatial limit of the domain under consideration, just as we arbitrarily (or empirically) specify the inertial frames when working in Newtonian mechanics. But this clearly reduces general relativity to a rather weak theory that must be augmented by other principles and/or considerable amounts of arbitrary information in order to yield determinate results. Not surprisingly, Einstein was unenthusiastic about this alternative. As he said, "such a complete resignation in this fundamental question is for me a difficult thing. I should not make up my mind to it until every effort to make headway toward a satisfactory view had proved to be in vain".
Return to Table of Contents
Reply
author Clinton Siegle
22 June 2016, 19:51
wild last paper was 1947.. not 1917... wave if time is null, speed is null, and distance is null- then what is a universe or multiuniverse space?
Grays say the diety is a mind - no religion
Reptiles use politics - no politics
Community is all there is for humanity to live by or cease to exist in 10,000 years. Can humanity survive? BriEXIT happened three days ago.. Now vote is happening this night.. Britian stayed in EU three days ago.. what will be tomorrow? per discussion read it matters not for at least 2800 AD -
Null triangle is more than 180 degrees - the room was new - the person asked - I answered how and the answer came..
Bread if you look at the top you can not see the loaf. Renard versus Bernard Grimm the difference is wild. 180 degrees null a triangle formula. Speed, distance, time are null...
The line above a triangle is not seen as 180 degrees. Above a loaf of bread there is no view of the universe within.
Changes today noticed - BriEXIT happened 3 days ago. Trees on walk leaves are dying. Winter is happening while I was looking forward to summer three days ago..
Changes not noticed broom colors did not change.
Person I checked with said only one thing changed for her. unsure how much I can believe - imaganation is wild at times.
Time - is fluid but the amount given a person stuck or something has to be thrown at the concept of a universe picture to win something big.
Speed - I have seen distance and speed differ by an amount greater than 5 minutes on a bus trip.
Distance I have seen blocks grow by a 1/3 and lose space by 2/3. Distance is not the same.
If 180 degrees is not a triangle - what makes up reality.
Reality one mind - or multiple minds. What are they trying to show me. Vengence is vague. Against coordination of hate is something not within me.
Power not interested. Influence not interested. Life but at what cost? If we are open to multiply universe what is the outcome?
Reptiles versus humanity? the time frame means less now but more in the long run.
Pretend gods what do they want? For what purpose? control... reality..
Community is needed. Government wants to tax something which destroys the very person or group being taxed while helping whom? The community is all that can survive while the government come to a power problem.
180 there is that.. I do not understand the open versus close universe. I would say a 180 greater would make more sense to be expanding and new stuff is created always versus everything has been created within a universe and there is nothing new?
What is or what if?
no way that what I am thinking - is all I am here for is a new story teller? Bookworms let me know if you are there?
Reply
author Clinton Siegle
23 June 2016, 17:48
William James investigated mystical experiences throughout his life, leading him to experiment with chloral hydrate (1870), amyl nitrite (1875), nitrous oxide (1882), and peyote(1896).[citation needed] James claimed that it was only when he was under the influence of nitrous oxide that he was able to understand Hegel.[31] He concluded that while the revelations of the mystic hold true, they hold true only for the mystic; for others, they are certainly ideas to be considered, but can hold no claim to truth without personal experience of such. American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia classes him as one of several figures who "took a more pantheist or pandeist approach by rejecting views of God as separate from the world
The issue of a parallel universe not being on drugs and not buying a ticket for the trip is when or what are we or I am here for to what purpose.
the whole idea of being moved from one experience to another would mean I should be learning something. Outside that a broom colors can change. That peoples personalities and certain aspects of their sexuality is changed wildly along with dogs sizes and colors. Along with location being changed. I thought the mountain moved. The mountain did not move only my location waking up did. If I was on drugs what purpose is this story for and to whom would I care to be with.
The more I travel the quieter I become. I realize silence is something more than golden.
Community versus government money. We the individuals need to take back out liberty to live for money runs out and the government seems willing to murder people for their own fait money.
Hard ballot with a record is the only way to vote.
Shared with Your friends
If I told you what I read on one of these planets you would say I am insane. Sure no doubt. however does not mean I did not read it. Quantum mechanics and the coming end of reality.. Seems there are several endings to the bible.
1. A third of the suns die or fall. I did not take this literally in my reality. Just like I did not believe in parallel realities nor time travel to extent that I have experienced. Meaning? https://earthsky.org/space/is-our-milky-way-galaxy-a-zombie/ EVERYTHING you see is dead a long time ago or just a moment ago until you wake up to it. Wild I know but the concept took a while for me to understand. Same with me being dead and that this all of this
is
my
final few minutes of brain activity https://www.sciencealert.com/brain-activity-recorded-as...
That I have been dead for a long time or a short time all depends on sped distance and time..
That I might have another 9 years to go is wild to me however the math seems to indicate something more than I expected.
Meaning? Well welcome to the real 2014 for those not on the illuminati calendar https://www.ethiopiancalendar.net/
In my reality the illumanati calendar showed 13 years diference compared to here 8 years differences. So Clint oh smart one why 9 years? Simple all of this is happening within the last few seconds of the real 2012.. Which is wild but nothing passed 2012.. everything imagined is planets spun up or slowed down to have life in those last few seconds of life. That we are all dead here awaiting hte day of judgment is wildly not what I expected. I am ashamed Idid not expect this.. The latest clock ticking is the next blood moon.. and how soon or long it will be or? And here is the kicker my Revelation book of the Bible had 70 years of time of tribulation and since I might be living among the dead in teh shadow of death who knows how long this absurd story goes on.
You are nuts.. Ys but I a also sure tha Princeton has Neumann's last paper he would hav published in May o 1957 explaining that htere is absolutely no chaos or more specifically FATE or a story is real and God's bond is real and that all those worlds that had horrifying deaths form what I heard form CO2 clouds coming out of the ocean wiping out humanity to comets hitting the earth to volcanoes happened and those people died in a future that no longer exists. That the future is already written and there is not much I can do about it seems absurd. Prayer is the only hope. Dear God, We’re in need of your peace and truth to soothe our hearts and spirits right now. When we find ourselves awake in the middle of the night, our pressing needs and worries can feel overwhelming. We need to be reminded of your constant love, healing, and grace. We ask for your Mighty Power to surround us in Jesus name.
Eclissi di Luna: il 27 luglio la più lunga del secolo. Quando e dove vederla
La prossima eclissi di Luna, perfettamente visibile in Europa, Asia e Africa, sarà la più lunga e spettacolare di tutto il secolo. Lo spettacolo inizia venerdì 27 luglio ore 21
Quella del 27 luglio 2018 sarà ricordata come l'eclissi di Luna più lunga di questo secolo. Lo spettacolare fenomeno della Terra che, frapponendosi tra il Sole e il nostro satellite oscurerà il disco lunare avrà infatti una durata complessiva di quasi 4 ore, con un periodo di oscuramento totale da record di 1 ora e 43 minuti, ben 40 minuti superiore alla media.
La dilatazione dei tempi dipende dalla distanza fra Terra e Luna che il prossimo 27 luglio sarà massima e cioè pari a circa 406.000 km. La Luna, che si troverà nel punto della propria orbita più distante da noi, detto apogeo, si muoverà più lentamente rispetto quando si trova più vicina alla Terra, rimanendo così per 103 minuti completamente all'interno del cono d’ombra.
A rendere ancora più entusiasmante l’osservazione della volta celeste quella notte ci saranno anche una caratteristica colorazione rossastra della Luna, dovuta all'assorbimento della luce solare da parte dell’atmosfera terrestre, e la presenza nella stessa porzione di cielo del Pianeta Rosso. Marte, anch'esso in opposizione rispetto al Sole sarà maggiormente visibile proprio grazie all'assenza della luce riflessa dalla Luna.
L’appuntamento è per le ore 21 italiane di venerdì 27 luglio quando la Luna, appena sorta a sud est avrà già fatto il suo ingresso nel cono d’ombra terrestre fino all'oscuramento totale che durerà dalle 21:30 alle 23:13 con il picco massimo alle 22:22. Per chi vuole continuare l’osservazione la Luna sarà nuovamente piena e senza ombre alle ore 01:28 del 28 luglio.
Eclissi totale Luna 27 luglio 2018: come vederla in Italia
„
In arrivo una spettacolare eclissi totale di Luna, la più lunga del secolo
Il 27 luglio il cielo si tingerà di rosso regalando alla Terra una spettacolare eclissi di Luna (la più lunga del secolo). Come godersi lo spettacolo dall'Italia
Eclissi totale Luna 27 luglio 2018: come vederla in Italia
„
l cielo ci regalerà uno spettacolo mozzafiato. Un evento memorabile. Durerà un'ora e 43 minuti la super eclissi di Luna che si verificherà il 27 luglio. Un'eclissi totale, la più lunga del secolo, destinata a stupire la maggior parte del mondo, tranne gli Stati Uniti. In questa occasione la Terra 'scivolerà' tra il Sole e la Luna e l'atmosfera del nostro pianeta regalerà al satellite il colore rossastro che contraddistinguerà questa eclissi (per questo motivo viene chiamata anche blood Moon, luna di sangue).
Proprio la notte dell’eclissi, inoltre, il pianeta Marte raggiungerà l’opposizione mentre sarà prossimo alla sua minima distanza dal Sole (perielio), che identifica la condizione ideale di visibilità del pianeta rosso, la migliore da quella storica dell’agosto 2003: quella del 2018 sarà una cosiddetta “grande opposizione”. Poiché la Luna piena, condizione indispensabile per la sua eclissi, corrisponde all’avere il nostro satellite in opposizione al Sole, ne consegue che sia Marte che la Luna in eclissi saranno nella stessa regione di cielo, opposta al Sole, a soli sei gradi di distanza: una splendida coppia in rosso che non capita di ammirare frequentemente.
Come spiega Amanda Bosh, professoressa di Astronomia al Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), la Luna si troverà nel suo punto più lontano dalla Terra, chiamato apogeo, durante l'eclisse. Ciò farà sì che la Luna si muoverà più lentamente di quanto farebbe se fosse più vicina alla Terra, quindi l'eclissi durerà in totale un'ora e 43 minuti. Un tempo lunghissimo: secondo la Nasa, sono solo 4 minuti in meno rispetto all'eclissi lunare più lunga mai verificatasi sulla Terra.
Eclissi Luna 27-28 luglio: come vederla in Italia
L'eclissi lunare, a differenza di quella solare, può essere vista tranquillamente a occhio nudo: il bagliore della Luna ha una luminosità molto meno intensa di quella del Sole. Quanto al momento migliore per vederla, secondo la dottoressa Bosh la cosa migliore è puntare gli occhi al cielo più volte durante la notte del 27 luglio per cogliere ogni fase dell'eclissi. Un binocolo e un telescopio offriranno un’immagine ben più grande, ma chi non dispone di alcuno strumento ottico sappia che non rinuncia a nulla di essenziale. Marte, invece, richiede un buon telescopio per ammirarne la calotta polare e i chiaroscuri dei suoi deserti: tra i pianeti visibili ad occhio nudo, è quello più impegnativo da osservare con profitto.
Eclissi lunare: lo spettacolo nei cieli europei
In Italia, si legge sul Notiziario online dell'Inaf (Istituto nazionale di Astrofisica) "sul nostro territorio, l’evento sarà visibile, nuvole permettendo, quasi nella sua interezza. La Luna infatti sorgerà pochi minuti prima delle 21, ora locale italiana, verso sud est, già in fase di attraversamento del cono di ombra creato dalla Terra, che in quel periodo si verrà a trovare esattamente tra il Sole e il nostro satellite naturale. La fase di totalità si verificherà tra le 21 e 30 e le 23 e 13, mentre il massimo dell’eclissi, ovvero il maggiore oscuramento della Luna, è previsto alle 22 e 22. La Luna, dopo l’uscita dalla totalità, attraverserà il cono di penombra per emergerne definitivamente e segnare così la fine dell’eclissi all’1 e 30 della mattina del 28 luglio".
L'eclissi totale di Luna più lunga del secolo e la grande opposizione di Marte del 27 luglio 2018 possono essere seguiti in diretta sul sito del Virtual Telescope di Gianluca Masi, astrofisico e divulgatore scientifico italiano.
https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/.../27-luglio-2018.../
-------
LINK.
https://www.dday.it/.../eclissi-di-luna-27-luglio-2018-la...
---
https://www.today.it/.../eclissi-luna-27-luglio-2018...
--
SPANISH.
Este 27 de julio se verá el eclipse lunar más largo del siglo
-------
Con una duración de 1 hora y 43 minutos, este 27 de julio se verá en todo el mundo un eclipse lunar, pero no es uno cualquiera, sino que este será el más largo de este siglo
Tendrá un proceso de duración de hasta 3 horas y 55 minutos y esto es lo que tardará en cruzar la sombra de la Tierra.
Este evento ocurre cuando el Sol, la Tierra y la Luna están alineados directamente, y la órbita de la Luna lo lleva directamente a la sombra de la Tierra. Durante el eclipse, cuando la luna pasa a través de la sombra proyectada por la Tierra (lo que conocemos como umbra), esta adquirirá un color rojo intenso o anaranjado en lugar de desaparecer por completo de la vista (de ahí el apodo de ‘luna de sangre’). Este extraño efecto conocido como dispersión de Rayleigh filtra las bandas de luz verde y violeta en la atmósfera durante un eclipse.
La dispersión de Rayleigh también es responsable del color del cielo, de los atardeceres anaranjados e incluso del color de los ojos azules. Una vez que termine el eclipse, la luna será visible nuevamente en todo su esplendor.
Tendrá una duración de 1 hora y 43 minutos
Y es que la ‘luna de sangre’ de julio de 2018 y el eclipse lunar serán más duraderos que cualquier otro evento de este tipo entre los años 2001 y 2100. Ya que la luna estuvo muy cerca de alcanzar ese máximo de eclipse que tendremos la noche del 27 al 28 de julio el pasado 16 de julio de 2000, cuando el eclipse duró 1 hora y 46 minutos.
¿Por qué será tan largo?
Esa noche se verá la luna más pequeña y lejana, puesto que estará más lejos de la Tierra, por lo que tardará más tiempo en atravesar la sombra oscura de la Tierra, haciendo que el eclipse dure más tiempo.
Esta adquirirá un color rojo intenso o anaranjado en lugar de desaparecer
Luego de unos días después del eclipse de Luna más largo del siglo, Marte pasará por la Tierra en su punto más cercano a nosotros desde 2003. Esto sucederá el 31 de julio y el planeta rojo estará a solo 57,6 millones de km de distancia de la Tierra, lo que lo hará claramente visible a simple vista.
Para los observadores de estrellas en el Hemisferio Oriental podrán ver fácilmente tanto a Marte como a luna de sangre el 28 y 29 de julio. Y es que el eclipse, será visible desde casi toda Europa, África, Oriente Medio y países de Asia central.
Pueden observarse sin protección
Las personas que deseen verlo deben recordar que al contrario de lo que ocurre con los eclipses solares, los lunares pueden observarse sin protección, por lo que si quieres puedes utilizar telescopios o binoculares para observar con más cercanía y detalle el evento.
Lluvias de estrellas
Las lluvias de meteoros alcanzarán su máximo ritmo con las Delta Acuáridas —30 de julio— y las populares Perseidas —12 de agosto—; desde el Observatorio Astronómico destacan que estas últimas coincidirán con la fase de luna nueva lo que propiciará un cielo oscuro durante toda la noche, excelente para observar las Perseidas.
----------------
LINKS
https://www.vercalendario.info/.../espana-27-julio-2018...
https://www.20minutos.es/.../eclipse-total-luna-mas.../
http://notipascua.com/este-27-d-julio-se-vera-el-eclipse.../
http://www.xeu.com.mx/nota.cfm?id=974907
https://dragonesyunicornios.com/.../el-eclipse-total-de.../
https://www.google.it/search...
-
https://www.dday.it/.../eclissi-di-luna-27-luglio-2018-la...
Here we go again
Shared with Your friends
Alone? I think I have always been alone. Ever since the gold man in 1973 or 1965 or whenever they twisted time. Why? Simple. I was a child and the gold man appeared. I thought he was an angel. Who would believe me if I told you a story of hell at that age? I doubt I would. And Just talking about that experience brings shivers down my spine.
After which everything changed. I would get told I did not know what I was talking about. Even though I knew where I got my references from. I knew certain things and spoke of them as if they were common knowledge. And people? They just assumed I was insane or crazy or worse.
When I tried to make friends it was the same. Who wants to know someone that either is crazy or insane? I think the most dramatic conversation was :;I don't know what you are talking about.; It was the most often part of my conversations. That I had that conversation with more than one person made me wonder at times. That I was traveling through time and not even with the same people don't disturb me much up until 2016.
That I had been having the experience since 2015 at least and did not even know it was more disturbing. I am more than a friendly person. I can handle your shit and yours tupity and when you become violent you discover why you did not want to disturb me.
However, that is why I am alone? That I am a closed time curved loop reality traveler is wild. That I spend a moment in time with people and that moment might be years or a second or weeks or months. Until? Well, until I have a story I suppose.
Why a story? Simply Being and Time is the 1927 magnum opus of German philosopher Martin Heidegger and a key document of existentialism. Being and Time had a notable impact on subsequent philosophy, literary theory and many other fields. Its controversial statue in intellectual history has been favorably compared with several works by Kant and Hegel. If I see their reality, that reality is real for a moment or second in time. And if I choose to ignore it? Did that reality ever exist? Of course someone of the Mandela affected person saw that reality and thus reality there existed if only for a moment in time and that moment? Did it last seconds in this real time or there millions or even billions of years? I knew or know some of their stories at least thousands of years in some worlds and millions of years in others. And Babylon reality where God did not destroy or mix up the languages of mankind? Millions of years and realities all the same I suppose. Those stories are some of the most horrific I had or have ever heard.
The question on my mind of late is several new rabbit holes have appeared along with other shall we say confessions of people that I knew once upon a time. Sort of like finding out the people you hang out with are all mass murders and or more than a bit or part weirdos. I think that is the ticket to the next rabbit hole. The ending of the true 2012. That on this timeline December 21, through 26 is the real end of 2012 makes me wonder. The age of Aquarius should have ended in the 1970s. However, I have memories of the 1960s that were stated also. Which is real, which is surreal? I am no longer sure.
Should I change? If I really grew up on Sagittarius arm of a milky way galaxy that was 377,000 light years across where on April 2016 there was 365 million US citizens and the world's population was 8.5 billion if I change do I murder 1.2 billion people by forgeting them? Or are they like the mirror worlds I am traveling in right now just golems or clay avatars of mirror representation of the real souls playing out a game on a different timeline? Kind of not what I was expecting when I died.
Died? Yes of course. The only way I can travel a closed time curved loop to the point where I was stolen from is to travel back to my original body via the pathway my soul was stolen from to my original body for the day of judgment. Kind of wild I know. It was not the answer I was seeking when I caught the shadow and well in your world tortured the meaning of this out the shadow. To me? I was not torturing, I was just doing what I do.
Finding, seeking, trying to solve a problem. What problem? An ending event. That Ethopian calendar states we are now in 2013 not 2012 makes me wonder. That Georgian calendar states December 21st in some realities is the end of 2012 and in some realities 22 through 26 makes me wonder. It is like the book of Acts which now has blood moon will be there when God or heaven comes. Is that May 20 or 26 or any of the dates in between then and there? Or and here is the funny part. When I recall looking it up in or October 2019 the next blood moon there or where ever I was supposedly on 2035. So which reality is real and where exactly will I end up? And is this all just some abstract dream that if i do not care for will vanish and never really exist?
Alone? I thought I had found a few companions to travel with. The Mandela affected people tended to have some of the better stories to tell. The problema? I soon discovered that their souls did not match their stories from one reality to the next. Meaning? We would agree to write down what is new and what was changing and for a couple of days they would do just that. Then poof. Did they forget or was it not them anymore or and here is the bigger question: did the golem or soul there at that moment not recall the conversations or did they no longer care or were they blanked out. I mean I know I was blanked out recently for something I wrote and I know why. Sort of bad form probably to tell everyone hey this is the valley of the shadow of death and you are all dead. Change or die. Bad form. Still I try and still I get censored here and there.
The plan? I am alone. What plans I had are no longer worth much. I had an operational plan. Stay safe. but that no longer makes sense in the valley of the shadow of death. That these worlds are already dead and none believes me when I say hey look beyond the mirror you call a sun and realize that the sun is blood red nowadays meaning? Billions of years older than 4.5 billion years. so? Means this is a rerun of this reality an animated rerun. Why? I know I can no longer change a single thing and my ranting Be good and do good has let alone fallen on deaf ears it annoys people.
Maybe I should try another passage? I mean I was offered a ride off world once. I am sure i can find a person sooner or later to go again. In yet I doubt that these days. I think I really want to see what happens at the end of time. Was I a fraud or am I just writing what tI see and what I was programmed to do?
To think that I am nothing more than a program and this story is already told and whether I lived well or good is already written in some book of life or the book of death is wildy not what I expected. Yet the spelling on the walls tell that these days.
I wonder if I could make a hard choice of changing? What or for what purpose? To be good? I tried that already. To survive to the next level of the game? I was not such a good player in this game. If I look at my life I am a pretty bad failure. I am not sure why I would want to continue on to the next level just to attempt to fail again.
Maybe just to see what the adventure was or is supposed to be like? I guess I could still do with a bit of adventure before tea. That is the funny part about Bolivia. I get tea three times a day now. Yet I drink alone. Wild is it not to be alone and to have a family. I wonder. I ask, are they real? I test them ever so often and they fail the basic three questions. Making them no more my family than a stranger dropped in their body playing out a game on some massive scale to some end.
Maybe I am not real and this is all some fragmented memories of some guy who lived once upon a time in some other reality and is just crossing paths with them and? I worry did I fail them too? I already have an answer from the bible that changes daily these days. A sad answer but one that makes me wonder for what purpose did I live on Sagittarius and why the long parth back to my original body?
That is the trick is it not? To realize that all this is happening in my final breath. My final 10 minutes of life this is where the electrics form paths taking a soul backwards in time to where their choice will be for good or evil or.. That is the funny part there are other paths from heaven and hell which I no longer recommend but the rabbit holes are there to perturb me these days. Do I really want a 50 50 chance of dying or?
The plan i guess is there are now more endings in the book of Revelation or Revelations which makes me wonder about reality. Where exactly will I find an ending?
That is just a result. Maybe my final plan is to be alone forever. After all if I have lived with the soulless on Saggitarius and lived a life that I would compare to someone worth living. And here I am writing this nonsense, not even poetry that is read. I wonder. Did I write anything worthwhile while I lived? And if this is my final moments of life. Am I inspiring anything new or good by writing this?
I am assured at least a final battle is coming. That people are talking about the UFO or heaven coming already is surprising for me. I would recommend surrender. For even with 1000s of years of technology hidden or under construction to fight a battle with the god or Gods humanity or golems already lost that battle a long long time ago.
Alone? I will die alone. That I am already dead and alone and speaking to you as the dead and no one listens that the time of tribulation is upon mankind shows justhow alone I am.
Shared with Your friends
Speculation on age and time. So, I traced my journals from 6.5 billion year old earth to 5.7 billion. To 5.3 billion year old earth where everything was in chaos. Those of us suffering from the Mandela effect noticed everything was up in the air. The reason I believe and my opinion is some worlds cheating got too greedy. Say what? The system of things was meant as rules for God to not discover cheating in the parallel worlds. Meaning? Say you take a wonderful loving little boy and put him in his hell. Pavlov style by forcing him to do what he hates so much that the only relief he gets is to do what he hates? Sounds awful, you know? So what do the other realities get for causing pain and suffering?
The reality is according to Zechariah, which while I grew up was Zachariah. A full 33 percent of the game has been changed or Pavlov-ized. Meaning? From my understanding. Those people with great childhood who would have grown up to be mighty people. Their childhoods were a living hell. Example? The parallel world’s music frequencies and speed are different. Meaning? Imagine you married the love of your life and her voice was music. Then for three months suddenly she sounds like a bitch from hell? Or you were speaking normal in your reality in yet it either was too fast or slow for the world they dumped your soul into body? Causing people to say slow down or think faster. In the 1960s through 1970s, almost a full 25 to 60 million people. Had this experience just what I am talking about. Now the government making the switch so people hate their spouses. Because they sound like a bat out of hell whistle or something another. The children were to have wonderful homes now are in a single family home and to make matters worse? Think Epstein and crew. Think of close to 10,000 to 100,000 each year disappearing to be someone’s lunch. Sounds evil beyond anything Stephen King even writes about in yet? If you look at the missing children and people report you realize. That somewhere between 1970 to 2020 some 3 to 8 million people just are gone. It is like all of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, and Wyoming. They just disappeared. In yet no one seems to bat an eye. You say but the FBI. The FBI agent investigating Hillary Clinton. As for an example for tax invasion committed suicide while dancing on a dance floor in public. You think I am fibbing when I am talking about evil? What most people do not realize about the thief or the extent of the crime is how much money I am talking about. One estimate at 23 trillion dollars. Or all of the social security fund plus 3 trillion dollars spent on the war against terrorism. If you look for example, war on terrorism cost 6.5 to 9 trillion dollars. And supposedly killed 800,000 terrorist. If you do the math, that is 8,125,000 dollars to kill one bad guy at the low end. I am not sure how to say the ineffectiveness of the US military is but they should be able to kill someone for a lot less. That seems like a lot when you consider Vietnam they could kill one person for 35,000 dollars. What am I saying? That that US government destroyed their own populations lives. To create some sort of world. Where evil people ruled over the majority of the population. That were put into some sort of Pavlav system where evil wins?
Yes. That is exactly what I discovered at an earth where John Von Neumann lived to be until May 1957. His very last paper ironically was dealing with math. In something mathematically similar in game theory. It dealt with a story line. The statement was if set null is possible or impossible to a confirmed statement. Say what? Meaning in game theory the idea was to win more than you lose or make sure a balance of 50–50 so there is no unbalancing act. Causing? In this case, God, to hear about this evil. And according to the book of Revelation comes down because he heard how evil the city of new Babylon is or was. Meaning? John Von Neumann’s computer program exchanged souls. To realities where they were perfectly set to be 50 percent good, 50 percent evil, so time would be held at bay. Or more specifically, the souls of the living did not cry out too much for the end of reality. Sounds absurd, I know I argued with a lot of people against it. Now they are all dead. Or ending up in some other reality, but the conclusion of the system of things is pretty much a generation. What does that mean? Well, I think that means my soul is going back to its original body for judgment day. God has pulled the plug on this reality. But come now, surely you jest?
1. Kingdom versus kingdom. Yellow vest, Hong Kong freedom, and Bolivia anti Marxist. These were all trying to start bible Kingdom versus kingdom part of the bible. To stop this. The CIA in these evil worlds and other has moved the movement. From freedom to some bizarre black lives matter movement. Where they have killed more people destroyed property for corporation paying them. To destroy property for insurance fraud. And basically misuse that verse to fix their mistakes.
So? There attempt to blackmail a few people have failed in some areas. What areas? I can assure you if I spoke of what I have heard. No, it does not matter.
2. The future is dead. According to the bible. Paul states the Gentiles that can be saved. Until something happens and then will be called back into a branch of the tree of life. And that branch of the gentiles will be burnt up. Again, I say this with some confidence. Meaning on December 2017 in some realities Hawaii was nuked and those realities which were a future are gone.
3. The signs in the sky. Blood moon I do not recall that in my bible but here the blood moons indicated Jesus Christ return. I have seen either 4 or 5 or 6 blood moons. I am no longer sure how many. However, May 2021 is supposedly the next blood moon. So? August 31st there will be a huge change.
4. The real end of 2012. For those that study calendars most are designed around seasons and stars, and cycles of the moon and sun. The only one calendar supposedly accurate. In this reality is the Ethiopian calendar which the year here 2020 is 2012. And September 2020 is the real end of 2012.
5. What signs in the sky? First you have to look at the links. Realize the sun here has been hidden behind a mirror since 2003. It is why the sun is white here, no longer yellow. Say what? Meaning in my reality, Katrina hurricane happened in 2003. There the sun was yellow still. Here due to my next statement the sun has been hidden behind a mirror since 2003.
6. We are going back in time to where our original bodies were and our souls were stolen from to be judged. So? I would repent more often and pray more if I were you. The end of time is something to watch. To see a mountain move daily is awkward and write about it and no one believe you? Well, I am me and you are you. What am I saying? This might be your final chance to make amends. Ask forgiveness before something evil this way comes.
7. So all those divorced people are part of the 33 percent tin Zechariah. That had their lives screwed with by the government and corporations? Well, that is only part of it. The next part was the government made prisoners out of 14 percent of the population. How? Making smoking a weed illegal. Sounds stupid in yet the democrats did just that. They punished people mercilessly for smoking a weed. If that is not even the worse part? Due to the Pavlov style life style forced on people that are single. Thus making them raised in a single home. A lot are alcoholics and due to democrats moral superior of shutting down whore houses? Thus causing the epidemic of rape and homosexuality wildly increased. Am I blaming just one party for all the ills of the world? When I look at who sponsored the laws. And put in place said laws and those enforcing those laws and prosecuting those laws. Yes, I am blaming them.
8. So the government is playing a game with God, trying to win or cause more pain? What has that got to do with today and the rioting and looting? Well, Revelations New York City go bye and the two reasons? 1. Epstein files at the federal court house and 2. Clinton library in New York City.
9. Speculation why Clinton Library? It holds some program management office files. That was not destroyed in 9 11 due to it being presidential records that caused a lot of this shit.