search
explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

Many conspiracy theories are false flags

Swiss LibertarianOct 26, 2021, 3:52:04 AM
thumb_up11thumb_downmore_vert

To all those who want to fight the "Covid" fascism and the Great Reset plans:

DO NOT FALL FOR THE CLAIM THAT THE VIRUS DOES NOT EXIST!

Most people who believe in conspiracy theories are convinced that innumerable events were "false flag operations", but the exact same people never realize that the conspiracies they believe in might themselves be false flags...

It's impossible to know if a given conspiracy theory just appears randomly out of nowhere and is then amplified or if it was intentionally planted, but any claim that cannot be backed up with evidence is extremely harmful to the cause of liberty. Those who falls for obviously fake conspiracy theories sounds like crazy people if they cannot back up what they believe with reliable sources.

The infamous claim that "the virus has not been isolated" is based on a statement by a Chinese official in an interview taken out of context.

What the official was explaining is that the virus in the wild, as in bats or other animals, had not been isolated, i.e. they did not have any supporting evidence for the official Chinese claim that the virus was "naturally occurring" and that was the problem he referred to.

He was not saying that the virus itself had not been found, identified and genetically sequenced, because that would be a lie. Electron microscope photos of the Sars-Cov-2 virus had been published as early as Jan 2020 and the genome had been completely sequenced, which is why an NIH collaborator emailed Fauci about the evidence that the virus was a lab creation in Jan 2020 - just before Fauci had a long conversation with him, in person, after which he reversed his position.

Here are some electron microscope pictures of the Sars-CoV-2 virus with a detailed analysis of how it interacts with host cells:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73162-5

To all those who think the virus does not exist, how do you think scientists in various laboratories in Australia, Singapore and Taiwan could say with certainty that the virus was artificially created? They squenced the virus and found inconsistencies with the claim that it was natural. They tested it and found that it was particularly well adapted at infecting human beings, which would not be the case if it had recently been adapted to specific animals such as bats. None of this was done on "models".

The scandal lies in the denial of the lab origin of the virus and the fact that Fauci financed gain of function research in China!

More than 900 pages of materials related to U.S.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept.

https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

Exaggeration of effects vs faking a virus

Of course the virus exists. They could not have created the entire pandemic without it. In the Simpson episode about the "Cat flu", one of the evil conspirators makes this case convincingly:

"We have standards, this cannot be a made-up disease. The only moral thing to do is to release a deadly virus into the public":

https://youtu.be/S5A0fhme7ys?t=51

The fact that the virus exists does not mean that they do not constantly lie about it and the actual effect it has.

Are the variants natural?

One of the core question concerns the variants. Are they really the product of natural evolution - mostly because of the leaky "vaccines" - or have they been created in advance, to be spread when required for the perpetuation of the pandemic.

If the "variants" are really more deadly, including to young people, they are most likely not natural evolutions of the original virus. In the entire history of medicine, viruses always become more infectuous over time, but less lethal. Lethality is a bad thing, for the virus, as it kills off its hosts before it can spread to new hosts.

If the variants are artificial creations, it would make sense that they first released a virus that was mostly harmless, except to the elderly. They then needed a virus also deadly to younger generations, so they would accept to be vaccinated. The goal is of course to get all kids and teenagers "vaccinated" for control and perhaps to be sterilized.

This is a strong hypothesis, but not confirmed. Yes, many pregnant women lost their babies, but without reliable data, it's impossible to say whether the vaccine-induced abortions are within the "normal rate", as they claim, or if they are significantly higher.

We also don't have any way to know that the vaccinated are sterilized. We do know that the "vaccines" mess with women's periods and cause heavy bleeding. If there is a sterilizing effect, it will not affect everyone. That would be too obvious. It will be interesting to see if there is a 5%, a 20% or a 50% drop in fertility, but for now, that's pure speculation, so don't talk about it as if it was a fact.

Make only well-supported claims

Ideally, when communicating information about a controversial issue, stick to the most reliable sources. There's often plenty of incriminating evidence and scientific information that debunks the official claims.

Factual information about the Wuhan virus:

  • the virus is real
  • it's genome was fully sequenced
  • that's how we know that it was created in a lab
  • we have electron-microscope images of the virus
  • it's mode of operation is largely established
  • it does cause specific symptoms (e.g. loss of smell and taste)
  • they massively over-counted Covid victims
  • among others, they counted 'flu victims as Covid victims
  • the PCR tests are unreliable and return way too many false positives
  • the "vaccines" do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus
  • the adverse effects of the "vaccines" are criminally downplayed
  • long-term effects of the "vaccines" are totally unknown, at this point and purely speculative
  • traditional vaccines are under development, but are delayed
  • effective treatments have been suppressed all along
  • the pseudo-"elites" who push this take the effective treatments

It is obvious that some simple and effective treatment has to exist. A bioweapon can't be controlled. The "elites" can not just isolate from the "rabble", so they know that they will all catch it, so they needed a treatment. But they had to prevent such effective treatments from being used universally or their entire scheme would collapse.

Ideally, quote scientific articles as reference. That immediately destabilizes their position.

Studies against vaccine mandates

Here are some fantastic studies and articles that will give you ammunition against the vaccine mandate crowd:

Absurd conspiracies are intentionally circulated

So please, do not back-stab the opposition to the Great Reset by spreading FALSE claims about the virus "not existing". Remember: they maintain fringe groups with the specific intent of information manipulation, to smear their opponents.

e.g. every time they want to silence information about black-on-white crimes, they bring in the KKK or some Neonazis with all the data any rational person would use, e.g. actual crime statistics. At that point, anyone referring to those statistics can be smeared as "white supremacist". A typical "guilt by association" fallacy. And yes, that even works on blacks, e.g. Prof.Roland Fryer from Harvard. As they could not silence him that way, they used a MeToo attack.

Conspiracy theories such as the "chemtrails", the "flat earth" and the "moon landing hoax" claim conveniently appeared after Waco and Ruby Ridge, which had created a significant, organized resistance to government abuse. So they needed a distraction for those who were openly anti-government. It was really easy - just make people believe that there's something "weird" about contrails and that the government is behind it.

I still don't get how they managed to convince anyone of the "flat earth" nonsense, but apparently, there are a lot of really dumb people out there - even dumb people who not score too badly in an IQ test.

Following 9/11, some teenagers circulated absolutely ridiculous conspiracy nonsense in their "Loose change" video. That kept way too many people busy to this day, although it's very easy to debunk - and hence to make them look stupid.

Don't believe me?

It's an absolute masterpiece of manipulation!

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/08/technology/loose-change-9-11-video.html

In the middle of the article, they tell you exactly how they use the 9/11 conspiracy:

"The film’s message that people could discover the truth about the attacks for themselves also became a core tactic for groups like QAnon and the anti-vaccine crowd, which urge their followers to ignore the experts and “do their own research” online."

The "anti-vaccine crowd" - there you have it!

If they can associate you in any way with Q-Anon, with the 9/11 or any other infamous conspiracy theories while you speak out against vaccine mandates etc. they will do so immediately.

They love to call people who disagree with their version of "reality" as "flat earthers", even when they are the ones who are completely irrational.

The message they push is "DO NOT DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH" and by "research", they mean "do not trust what you read anywhere else but in mainstream media".

Remember that Q-Anon is probably a psy-op:

'Q-Anon' Bears Striking Resemblance to Bolshevik Psy-Op From 1920s Known As 'Operation Trust'
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62008

I hope this will encourage you to be very careful about evaluating any piece of information you find or are sent online.

Always see if the information is:

  • plausible
  • coherent
  • backed by credible sources
  • relevant

While fighting the overwhelming propaganda power of governments and Big Tech, it is essential not to be distracted by irrelevant nonsense that would not matter even if it was true.

 

publicall-rights-reserved