explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

Farrakhan, Obama and Black Supremacy

Swiss LibertarianJul 10, 2021, 8:06:00 PM
thumb_up26thumb_downmore_vert

Let me start by saying that this article is only about black supremacists, such as Farrakhan. It is not a racist attack on blacks based on their race. I'm not a believer in identity politics. That's a Marxist strategy and it's exactly what I want to denounce - black, white, Hispanic, Jewish or Asian supremacy all exist, to various degrees. The only thing they will ever create is hatred and conflict.

This is the the Farrakhan speech that made me think it needs a reaction - yes, he really said "White people deserve to die":

Louis Farrakhan - "White People Deserve To Die" speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZschZMW3oU

Just as he previously said "Kill white babies", "Jews are roaches" and other charming racist, antisemitic comments:

https://www.azquotes.com/author/4679-Louis_Farrakhan

According to FBI statistics, his message was heard: 90% of all inter-racial crimes between black and white people are committed by blacks against white victims.

Blacks - 13% of the population - commit more than 50% of all violent crimes in the US and more than 50% of all homicides. Most of their victims are other blacks, but they murder twice as many white people - more than 500 per year - than white people kill blacks - just over 250 per year. (cf. the appendix for statistics).

Farrakhan being a Muslim is quite bizarre, as Mohammed was actually racist and kept black slaves. Slavery is justified, under Islam, including sexual slavery. Throughout the Hadiths (religious scriptures which include books that are essential to Islam and define its core values), it is said repeatedly that Mohammed is white and that the man who will destroy Mecca will be black. Muslims took far more black slaves than the entire transatlantic slave trade. Those slaves were sold to Europeans by black and Arab slave traders who had established their own slave markets long before.

Right now, as we speak, there are blacks captured and sold as slaves by Muslims in Libya - a result of Obama's totally unprovoked attack on Gadhafi, who was definitely a violent dictator, but clearly, he kept the country from falling apart. Will Farrakhan ever mention that fellow Muslims enslave blacks in Muslim countries? Or that fellow blacks still enslave each other in Africa? Yes, sure, any minute now...

Just as Marx & Engels are profoundly racist and antisemitic, which never bothered the self-declared Marxist BLM movement or any other Marxist "antiracist".

https://www.minds.com/demolitionmanch/blog/marx-and-engels-in-their-own-words-1326686044493451273

Hypocrisy is not a deadly affliction. It only hurts those are aware of it.

This isn't new, either - Malik Zulu Shabazz, the former leader of the New Black Panther Party, was also extremely racist and antisemitic:

https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/malik-zulu-shabazz

The fact that Farrakhan can spread his racist hatred while the Biden puppet administration claims in its terror report that "the greatest threat are white supremacists" is quite unbelievable.

As interviews before the Chauvin trial show, a very large number of black people are totally ignorant about reality and apparently listen to people like Farrakhan and CNN, which make it sound like blacks are victimized:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZj54iPXTqI

Practically all the young black people interviewed by Ami Horowitz thought that the police were - intentionally - killing "thousands of blacks" and that this was "a genocide". I fear that these interviews are quite representative, given the extent of the riots of 2020.

The actual number of "unarmed" blacks killed by police was 19, in 2020. It's generally even fewer than that. More unarmed white people are killed by the police every year. And "unarmed" does not mean "harmless". e.g. Brown in Ferguson was a very large, strong black man who tried to take an officer's handgun, who was forced to defend himself. The autopsy showed that Brown was shot from a very close distance as he was facing the officer.

Do police officers exceed their power and commit unjustified acts of violence? Absolutely, that's inevitable. Give a group of men a monopoly of violence and this will happen. But local and State police are far less likely to commit unspeakable crimes than agents of a large, central government.

Remember Waco, where the FBI and the ATF slaughtered 76 Branch Davidians, including 25 children and two pregnant women, without the slightest justification. The FBI decided that 51 days of bad press was enough, so they launched a completely unnecessary assault:

https://carolmoore.net/waco/waco-victims.html

Note that there were many black, Hispanic, Asian and Jewish vicitms, so the Branch Davidians were definitely not "white supremacists". The government doesn't care.

This disaster was entirely motivated by federal politics, as the ATF was under scrutiny in congress, so they tried to make themselves look useful by serving a warrant to David Koresh over an unpaid fee of $400 for legally purchased gun parts - David Koresh was a licensed gun dealer. They didn't just send one person to Waco to serve the warrant, they sent an entire assault team - clearly expecting resistance. But they messed up the whole thing and 2 of their agents shot each other during the assault, so they had to call in the FBI.

They later claimed that the assault was motivated by accusations that David Koresh abused children. Except that it was the ATF, not the FBI, which initiated the confrontation and the ATF is not involved in child abuse issues. Besides, burning 25 children to protect them from abuse does not seem to be a winning strategy, especially ex post.

Biden just nominated one of the officers responsible for this catastrophic event, David Chipman, to head the ATF, probably precisely because he had proven that he was willing to use extreme force against citizens even if they did not represent a threat to anyone:

Now it might make sense why those who want to expand government power try to smear anyone who so much as mentions the federal crimes committed in Waco as "white supremacists". In reality, actual Neo-Nazis have no problem with Waco - they love big government. Richard Spencer, the best-known Neo-Nazi in the US, officially supported Biden:

https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-reiterates-support-biden-disavows-useless-traitorous-gop-1527555

David Duke, another famous white supremacist, praised Ilhan Omar as "most important member of Congress":

https://apnews.com/a97b8b2d48c163c5965c2574ccbbe3d3

Ilhan Omar is a close friend of Farrakhan, Obama and the Islamic supremacist Erdogan in Turkey.

https://nypost.com/2020/02/25/ilhan-omars-appalling-collusion-with-turkeys-tyrant/

This should come as no surprise, as Obama also nominated the openly antisemitic Erdogan as one of his 5 "best friends":

https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/19/obama-names-his-world-leader-best-buddies/

The demands to "defund the police" have led to a catastrophic increase in violent crime with more than 1000 additional homicide victims - to 95% blacks killing other blacks. So at face value, this would seem like an extremely counter-productive strategy, but it has a specific goal: the Democrats (the extremist who now run the party) want to replace local and State police with federal police, in a move that mirrors what the Nazis did. This will NOT result in less police violence - it will result in total fascism.

The Democrats, borrowing from Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, accused Trump of being a "fascist", i.e. they accused their opponent of their own crimes. Trump never committed a single act of federal over-reach, but the Democrats did so all the time. Obama abused all the federal agencies to prosecute his political opponents, even the IRS (Lerner etc.) and the Biden puppet administration continued right where he had left off since the first day Biden was officially in office. Their latest act? Create offices for the Capitol Police around the country with an initial budget of $2 billion. The Capitol Police whose ONLY job is to protect the Capitol. In DC.

Capitol Police plan to open field offices outside Washington to track threats to lawmakers
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/06/us/politics/capitol-police.html

They use the Jan 6 protest in DC as justification - this is the Democrat's "Reichstagsbrand" (the event the Nazis used to seize total power and eliminate their political adversaries).

The fact that Obama is directly connected to Farrakhan should be extremely concerning, given that Obama is most likely the driving force behind the senile and very stupid Biden:

Would this photo have cost Obama the presidency?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5314421/Journalist-reveals-photo-Obama-Louis-Farrakhan.html

For over 20 years, Obama followed the "reverend" Jeremiah Wright, whose speeches are just as hateful as Farrakhan's - and the 2 are close friends. In 1984, they traveled together to Libya to meet Gadhafi. 30 years later, their buddy Obama wiped out Gadhafi's regime:

https://spectator.org/42832_obamas-farrakhan-problem/

Ask yourself why Obama would associate with 2 such preachers of hate. Could he have gone to church every Sunday, for 20 years, and listen to a promoter of racist hatred without agreeing with his views?

During Obama's presidency, race relations seriously deteriorated. Don't take my word for it - this is confirmed by the far left New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/most-americans-hold-grim-view-of-race-relations-poll-finds.html

Wasn't Obama - who is mixed-race - supposed to have the exact opposite effect? His election was proof that white people actually were willing to trust a black president.

Unfortunately, he was elected under an entirely false pretense. He tried to look "centrist" and "balanced". In reality, Obama is a Marxist and a black supremacist. His mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a card-carrying member of the communist party and openly supported the USSR during the cold war years. And that's just one of his numerous communist contacts and supporters.

Bill Ayers, former "Weathermen" terrorist and unrepentant communist, not only supported Obama's campaign with his communist allies, he was Obama's ghost writer for "Dreams of my father", as he himself admitted, publicly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfIZDYm0a54

Obama was obviously the driving force behind the spread of CRT, Critical Race Theory, which is a product of Cultural Marxism, i.e. the Frankfurt School:

A Complete Timeline of Race Relations Under Obama

The alliance between Muslims and Marxists is not new. It's a classic. Muslims also allied with the Nazis. Such alliances never turn out well. In the USSR, Muslims were heavily prosecuted. The Soviets invaded Afghanistan and set up a communist party there that was supposed to secularize the country. In Iran, communists supported the Mullahs in their fight to remove the Shah from power - and they provided them with help from the USSR. But as soon as the Mullahs were in power, they prosecuted, imprisoned and executed thousands of their former communist allies.

The core lesson? Never associate with the followers of extremist ideologies! They have a habit of back-stabbing. Remember that Hitler allied with Stalin? They also ended up at each other's throat! The funny part? When Hitler launched his war against the USSR, Stalin already had plans to attack Nazi Germany in his drawer.

But ... "white people deserve to die", so black supremacists can rule.

It is high time for this ridiculous narrative of black victimization and white supremacy to end. Blacks murder more black people every 2 years than the KKK murdered during its entire existence. And every 10 years, blacks murder more white people than the KKK ever murdered blacks.

Blacks busting black supremacy lies

This is one of my all-time favorites: a young black man who confronts a white leftist woman who is totally ignorant with facts. He knows the data, he did his due diligence. He's smart and clearly highly educated:

https://youtu.be/34Cb_C0d4aw

There are blacks who understand that confronting white supremacists with hatred and black supremacist views actually confirms their views and just generates more conflict.

The idea to "hug" or at least communicate with those who hate you is a much better approach. It may work on those who do not stand to lose by abandoning their racist views:

https://youtu.be/W-gUIZW7MKQ

It's obvious that it won't work on professional race baiters and looters, whose entire income depends on pushing a racist agenda, such as Farrakhan, Obama or Richard Spencer and David Duke or the BLM and Antifa rioters, but a lot of people form every supremacist group might see through the scam if given sufficient information, presented in a way they can accept it.

Appendix

US FBI Statistics 2018

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018

US FBI Statistics 2019

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019

Crime Data Explorer

https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov/explorer/national/united-states/crime

Officer Down statistics

https://www.odmp.org/

Income and Crime Victimization

https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/99v05n3/9909levi.pdf

The fact that the police do not kill black people at a higher than average rate was confirmed by a black Harvard professor:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html

People shot dead by US police by race

https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/

NYC official government statistics on homicides

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year-end-2018-enforcement-report.pdf

Black gang violence in NYC, 2020

https://vimeo.com/441131932/c05a156e52

Race, Reform, & Progressive Prosecution

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi

Heather Mac Donald summary in the Spectator:

https://thespectator.info/2020/06/02/interracial-violence-in-america-by-the-numbers/

From the National Criminal Justice report, 1985

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=96748

Data from the 1981 national victimization survey reveal that more whites are victimized by whites (77 percent) than by blacks (17.1 percent), and more blacks are victimized by blacks (77 percent) than by whites (14.4 percent). Although violent crime by white offenders is apparently strongly intraracial, in that 96.9 percent of the white offenders chose white victims, violent crime by black offenders is apparently predominantly interracial, with 55.2 percent of the black offenders choosing white victims.

Black offenders chose white victims in 63.9 percent of robberies, 51.8 percent of assaults, and 58.6 percent of rapes. In contrast, white offenders chose black victims in 8.3 percent of robberies, 2.7 percent of assaults, and 5.5 percent of rapes. These percentages suggest that each of the three violent crimes is strongly intraracial for white offenders but predominantly interracial for black offenders.

This finding suggests that the motives behind black assault and rape are different than the motives behind white assault and rape. Reasons why the partially interracial character of violent crime has not been addressed are suggested. Five tables and 35 reference are included.