Covid mRNA vaccines are not vaccines

The public is woefully uninformed about the true nature of the "vaccines" that various organizations try to push to allegedly fight the Wuhan virus / Covid-19. This article from Science explains the basic operating principle of the Morderna and Pfizer "vaccines":

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6520/1022

As you can see, they are not vaccines at all! They inject nanoparticles that contain mRNA code that will alter our cells to produce virus spike protein. Our immune system is then supposed to recognize the virus protein and react immediately when the actual virus shows up. The effect of forcing our cells ot produce virus proteins is totally unknown, in the long run.

These products - that should not be called "vaccines" - are expected to cause severe side-effects, as the Science article admits. So severe that the UK is in the process of buying a new AI system just to be able to handle the expected massive increase in adverse reactions, as per this post:

https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0
 

There have already been substantial issues with Covid vaccines as reported by Nature about AstraZeneca:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02594-w?error=cookies_not_supported&code=d5aa4e49-b139-4a6e-8c35-4ad1f713c065

The Moderna vaccine trial caused extremely severe reactions in at least one test subject. I'm amazed that they move ahead with the production, anyway - seems highly irresponsible:

https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/26/moderna-vaccine-candidate-trial-participant-severe-reaction/
 

Exaggerating the threat of Covid-19

After admitting that there will be a lot of adverse reactions to those mRNA products, the Science article downplays their severity and claims that people should just "bite the bullet" and accept to be vaccinated - by massively exaggerating the risk of Covid-19.

For starters, this study from Wuhan involving almost 10 million people found that there is virtually no risk of transmission from asymptomatic carriers, which elimiates one motivation for a widespread use of vaccination:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w?error=cookies_not_supported&code=77944769-5d43-4f3b-bbe9-2ac308428e2d

The Science article continues: "Those transient reaction should not dissuade people from getting vaccinated in the face of a pandemic virus that kills at least one in 200 of those it infects".

That is simply an absurd claim.

Innumerable deaths, worldwide, were counted as "caused by Covid" when in fact they were "with Covid" at best - if there was any connection with Covid at all. The CDC officially admitted that they counted deaths that were completely unrelated to Covid as Covid deaths:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm
 

The UK was also forced to admit that they had massively over-counted Covid-19 deaths:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8599213/Thousands-Covid-19-deaths-wiped-governments-official-toll-counting-fiasco.html

In Germany, the Robert Koch institute instructed public officials to count any death of a person who had once been infected with Covid-19 as Covid death even if the former Covid patient had completely recovered and had died of unrelated causes:

All of the above must be considered as outright scientific fraud intended to exaggerate the Covid threat.

A John Hopkins' newsletter recently observed that there are no excess US deaths in 2020 - the mortality rate is within the normal range. The article was immediately censored, but fortunately remains available through the WayBack machine:

https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https:/www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19

Here is a table of Covid death rates based on the official statistics, i.e. including the deaths that might have been falsely attributed to Covid-19, as published by WHO, based on a Stanford study:

https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf

As you can see, even including all the potentially problematic numbers, the claim of "1 in 200" is massively exaggerated - for people under 70, it is not even 1 in 2000, in many countries far less, very similar to the 'flu. Hence, as for the 'flu, the only people who should get vaccinated are those in high risk groups, i.e. especially people above 70 with other risk factors.

Qustionable authorities

The people who push those vaccines are tied to organizations that stand to earn tens of billions of dollars if vaccines are made mandatory. They also have a huge influence over WHO, which has previously been involved in vaccine-related fraud and corruption:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jun/04/swine-flu-experts-big-pharmaceutical

Even traditional vaccines are healthcare products like any others and therefore come with a significant risk to patients. As recently as September 1, 2020, WHO was forced to admit that one of its Polio vaccines - financed by the Gates foundation - had caused an outbreak of Polio in Chad and Sudan:

https://www.who.int/csr/don/01-september-2020-polio-sudan/en/

There are rumors about anti-fertility vaccines that the UN apparently applied without informing the patients of those intentional side-effects:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
 

Censoring opposing voices

The big social and mainstream media censor all the voices that expose exaggerated COVID threats or information that is critical of WHO, of the Gates foundation, of China's role and of those new experimental mRNA "vaccines".

Censorship even struck such experts as the microbiologist Dr.Sucharit Bhakdi who headed the department of virology at the university of Mainz in Germany for over 30 years:

https://www.wochenblick.at/zensur-geht-weiter-youtube-loescht-auch-kritischen-arzt-sucharit-bhakdi/

Tony Heller, a Colorado scientist, was censored for explaining serious issues with the COVID narrative based on official information as published by the New York Times, the CDC and WHO, as he explains in his latest YouTube video. He is no longer able to provide meaningful content on YouTube as they would just block his channel, hence he moved to NewTube.app and asks his followers to join him there:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mog-4KOtmjo&feature=emb_logo

This is the exact opposite of what we need - anything that affects our health, our liberty and the worldwide economy in such profound ways must be debated without any limitations.

Censorship is always proof that those who hold the power to censor fear being exposed as liars.