explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL?

PhableOmsriOct 29, 2019, 7:07:05 AM
thumb_up11thumb_downmore_vert

So, on the topic of "Climate Change Denial" : so first of all, in science it is customary to endeavor to falsify your own theory. The act of admitting all the ways your theory could be incorrect is the very kernel of science itself. To question the climate scientists is natural. They should be able to address any concerns that may arise in the process of determining whether human beings are catastrophically effecting the environment. To just stand there and demand that we accept their findings does not reflect well on their case.

Second, since human beings have been meddling with Geoengineering since the 70's and probably before, the natural environment is already being manipulated in various ways intentionally by the governments of the world. There was even a weather weapons treaty signed in the 70's were the nations of the earth agreed to not use weather weapons against one another.

http://www.chemtrailplanet.com/PDF/un_1976_weather_weapon_treaty.pdf

I believe that such a treaty would never have been signed if the technology to implement such weapons did not already exist at that time. Any "scientific study" of temperature on planet earth has been done beneath the backdrop of very intentional attempts to manipulate the weather, and as such, since the experiments did not take this meddling into account, the data is flawed.

Combine this with the fact that many other climate scientists have determined that humans are not responsible for the temperature increases or decreases but it is more likely to be a function of solar cycles. So we do not have a general consensus across all the scientists in the field.

One of the features of a valid scientific theory is that it should be reproducible by any other scientist and it should be possible to confirm the other scientist's data. Since we are not getting a general consensus from all the scientists then the matter is definitely still up for debate. It is definitely time to question the claims and the methods and to reproduce the experiments to confirm the theory. It is wrong to demand that the population accept the findings of scientists who refuse to turn over their data.