explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

➝ Ordo Ab Chao — Order Out Of Chaos: Their Order ➝ Hegelian Dialectic — Controlled Opposition: Problem — Reaction — Solution 🚨

I amDec 22, 2018, 1:32:47 PM

➝ Ordo Ab Chao — Order Out Of Chaos: Their Order ➝ Hegelian Dialectic — Controlled Opposition: Problem — Reaction — Solution 🚨

A framework for guiding thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead to synthetic solutions which can only be introduced once those being manipulated take a side that will advance the predetermined agenda.

1. The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
2. The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
3. The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis

👉 The puppet masters will create “disorder” so the people will demand “order”. The price of “order” always entails a handing over of control and loss of freedom on the part of the citizenry. Out of “chaos” comes “order” – THEIR order – their WORLD order.

👉 The trick of creating chaos and then seizing power under the pretense of putting things back in order is a tried and true method of deception and manipulation. It’s the meaning behind the Latin motto: ORDO AB CHAO meaning ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.

👉 It’s also referred to as the Hegelian Dialect after the philosopher Georg Hegel who wrote about its effectiveness. He described it as: THESIS — ANTI-THESIS — SYN-THESIS.

👉 Others have described it as: PROBLEM — REACTION — SOLUTION in that firstly you create the problem; then secondly you fan the flames to get a reaction; then thirdly (like Johnny-on-the-spot) you provide a solution. The solution is what you were wanting to achieve in the first place, but wouldn’t have been able to achieve under normal circumstances.

“A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it’s going to get.” — Ian Williams Goddard

Increasing stress and confusion in the targeted business-person or in the masses is done on purpose to break them down so they go into self-doubt and become uncertain and confused about what is actually happening. Controllers purposely increase stress and confusion as a manipulation method to destabilize and weaken others, so they will be easily persuaded to go along with any solution the Controller offers just to reduce their stress.

This works on the principle that a drowning person will clutch at a straw, so the Controller in his manipulation deliberately attempts to push them under water so he can then offer them the straw.

Cycle of Pain – Problem, Reaction and Deceitful Solution

It is important to realize the cycle of emotional pain and human suffering is perpetuated repeatedly from those groups of people that have endured tragic pain. This leaves the imprint and residue of that pain to be carried by the family lineage and the rest of the human race that is on the earth. That pain continues to accumulate in the earth and the human race, until the cause of the cycle of pain and suffering is identified, recognized, and cleared from the earth and the people. The cause of pain and suffering must be identified in order to stop the painful recycling of previously recorded pain, which if left hidden, continues to recycle and generate even more pain and suffering Consciousness fields back into the earth. It is impossible to find effective solutions for human suffering and pain, when the people are deceived and given misinformation by those who protect their selfish interests. We cannot inoculate disease and starvation, end war and senseless killing, and stop co-creating the world to increase human suffering and slavery, until we get to the real cause and root of the problem. Real solutions start with full disclosure and global transparency. Solutions will not work when they are created from misinformation and carried out by those who are compromised by committing fraud, deceit and manipulation of the public to engineer the Death Culture.

Many conspiracy analysts have spotted the Hegelian dialectic in action repeatedly. The NWO handlers use the controlled mainstream media to create a PROBLEM where there was none before. The public REACTS to the PROBLEM and demands an immediate SOLUTION that was prepared by the same people who created the PROBLEM in the first place.

The SOLUTION always involves actions or legislation that never would have passed public approval under normal circumstances – that is, before the elite Hegelian strategists broadcasted there was a PROBLEM.

Once we realize that it was all planned out ahead of time, including our reaction in our programmed ignorance, it’s easy to stop participating. When enough people become aware, and stop participating in this sinister agenda, the house of cards will come crashing down.

In order to avoid falling victim to the Hegelian Dialectic from now on, you must remember the process involved. Any time a major problem or issue arises in society, think about who will gain or profit from it. Then remove yourself from the equation, take a step back and look at it from a third party perspective. See the so-called “problem”, look at who is reacting, why and in what way. Then look for who is offering up the solution.

The dialectic technique of debate that has been developed, by the illuminati, into a powerful instrument for the control of the mind of humanity: Just as guns do not kill, criminals do; so the dialectic is but a tool. We should look at the causes for criminality in studying both.

The purpose of confusion in tax laws and regulations is to cause COGNITIVE DISSONANCE. This is a state of mind where conflicts remain unresolved. It weakens the subjects with its prolonged uncertainty. People are then subject to breaking down and having paradoxical conversions. This can be found in researching the phenomenon of brain washing. It is a potent device for control.


I shall attempt to survey the use of an intellectual process, the dialectic. I will survey a broad perspective of the subject, concentrating on the failure of philosophy and its harm to our civilization. I will then finish the article with a look at the special case of medicine in the context of the dialectical tool – how medicine is being destroyed, how the dialectical tool is used increasingly for the purpose, and I will hint yet again at my increasing conviction that there is a plan behind this evil.1 If we, who are savvy, can recognize its purpose and identify its means of operation, there is a chance that we can preserve the wonders of our civilization. No man and no family live in isolation from society. Therefore, the welfare of society is essential to our own welfare, let alone the need for exchange through the generations for the other members of our species. We exchange produce, manufactured goods, know-how, and ultimately the sharing of a genetic pool. Ayn Rand expressed this concept well with her brief aphorism There is no conflict between rational men. As we can see, conflict abounds.

So what is wrong?

The lack of rationality amongst most men. [EDITORIAL COMMENT: I again encourage the reading of the classic Ayn Rand book, “Atlas Shrugged”. It is a must read for anyone interested in helping to bring about positive changes in society. A rational society is one in which individuals respect each other, exchange with each other for mutual benefit, strive together for essential inherent joint interests (such as national defense) and care for each other based on respect and self-interest. This is the Republican form of government that the founders of this country gave us in 1776. 2. The more I study the matter, the more I come to realize that that Republican gift was unique. 3 It is the first instance in history where these laissez faire precepts of rationality were made the foundation of a country, a society, a nation; although fragments of them were available from the history of Western Civilization before beginning with the Magna Carta (1215).

The Dialectic

As many terms and concept in our civilization do, this hails to the Greeks. Dialectic (also called dialectics) was originally a form of logical argumentation where two or more sides of a subject were reviewed before conclusions were drawn. Nowadays, it is a philosophical concept of evolution applied to diverse fields including thought, nature and history. Among the classical Greek thinkers, the meanings of dialectic ranged from a technique of refutation and debate, through a method for systematic evaluation of definitions, to the investigation and classification of the relationships between specific and general concepts. From the time of the Stoic philosophers until the end of the European Middle Ages, dialectic was more or less closely identified with the discipline of formal logic. Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) denoted by Transcendental Dialectic, the endeavor of exposing the illusion involved in attempting to use the categories and the principals of understanding beyond the bounds of phenomena and possible experience. Georg Wilhelm Fredrich Hagel (1770 – 1831) identified dialectic as the tendency of a notion to pass over into its own negation as the result of conflict between its inherent contradictory aspects. Karl Marx 4,5 and Friedrich Engels adopted Hagel’s definition and applied it to social and economic processes. 6

“…Marx and Engels understood materialism as the opposite of idealism, by which they meant that any theory that treats matter is dependent on mind or spirit, or mind or spirit capable of existing independently of matter. For them, the materialist and idealist views were irreconcilably opposed throughout the historical development of philosophy.”

I quoted this text from Encyclopedia Britannica to show you how the concept itself is muddleheaded. If you felt a little embarrassed reading the last paragraph, not quite understanding it, please – join the club. From my point of view, the fact that it is gobbledygook is what I am trying to convey.

Dialectic Contemporary Use

The modern usage of the dialectic has developed from a Greek form of debate, that was quite sensible, through a sesquipedalian philosophical rehash by the two famous German philosophers followed by Hagel into a philosophical so-called tool. Hagel’s usage is usually abbreviated and summarized: Thesis; antithesis; synthesis. Whereby a proposition (philosophical or other) is introduced. Its opposite is introduced promptly thereafter (Antithesis), and then some intermediary position is adopted as the final truth. You see, this denies the existence of absolute truth. It assumes that every issue can be debated. This is the origin of situational-ethics in philosophy. The process is simple. The premise is false. How is it popularized through our contemporary sesquipedalian science? Through using convoluted language that embarrasses the reader who doesn’t understand, and therefore is shamed into accepting the process. An important component of this brainwashing technique is using a part of a subject to generalize, namely pars pro toto.


The-Great-Work: https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com/ 
Minds: https://www.minds.com/MindCom/?referrer=MindCom 
Mewe: https://mewe.com/the_great_work.82 
Substack: https://thegreatwork.substack.com/ 
Gab: https://gab.com/SovereignLightWarrior 
Break-The-Spell:Telegram: https://t.me/break_the_spell_group 
Break-The-Spell:Mewe: https://mewe.com/join/breakthespell1