The Vanilla-Cherry flavored Sugar Coated Pill
2019/05/11
The Vanilla-Cherry flavored Sugar Coated Pill
I was in the lab today and an idea came to me. We are intentionally fed black pills all day long and then we are offered alternatives to escape the harshness of everyday life, such as drugs, porn and video games. We are conditioned to reject all responsibilities, even to escape from the responsibilities of parenthood by aborting our children. This is slowly meant to break us down so that we get used to a nihilistic and hedonistic view of the world. We are conditioned to forget about tomorrow and live in the moment. We are made to believe that there is no future; no hope. The end goal is to make us give up before we even begin so the globalists can just erase us from history. We are condition to be docile while our way of life is taken away from us.
If you are having problems understanding the concept I’m talking about, look at WW2 or any modern war for that matter. Often enemy planes would fly over occupied cities, not to drop bombs, but propaganda. Every radio channels were also used for propaganda. The message of that propaganda was very simple: ‘’You have lost the war. We are occupying you capital. You are surrounded by impossible numbers. Drop your weapons and surrender.’’ Compare this to the current message we are fed day by day: ‘’The West is falling. The environment is destroyed. There is no future. Migrants are rushing in your countries to replace you. Women hate you. You are the cause of all the evils in this world. If you procreate, you will perpetrate more evil in the world. You do not deserve to exist.’’
You only need to take a step back and to calmly analyse this message to understand that some entity or entities are trying to break you moral. They are trying to make you give up so they can dominate you without a fight. If you end up killing yourself, this will make them very happy. It saves them the trouble of doing the deed for you.
These people are the embodiment of evil.
If I am correct, then I know exactly how to deal the biggest blow to the enemies of mankind. I need to use the biggest platform I can find and use the knowledge I have in science to deliver the biggest sugar coated pill to the masses in order to inhibit the sea of black pills.
I’m not sure if I have enough reach to make a difference in the world, but, for fuck’s sake, I will try. I’m going to break down this massive ball of evil piece by piece if I have too and bring some much needed hope to the world.
With this presentation, I will do all I can to bring you freedom; freedom from fear. A fear that prevents you from enjoying your life; a fear that prevents you from being hopeful of the future; a fear that you have lived with for so long that you don’t even notice it anymore but is rotting you at the core.
This fear is a foe. But when you gain knowledge; when you understand it; it holds no more power against you. This Titan you thought unbeatable becomes feeble and laughable.
First we need to understand the situation we are in right now. We are living a transition between 2 political systems right now. This happened many many times in history. We can all remember the fall of Rome; The Renaissance; the end of the Feudal Age; The Modern Period…
Usually, when a system collapses, people lose their shit and believe that the end is near. The following generation, we experience a renewal; tons of new developments are now possible and the people are filled with hope at the opportunities the future is holding for them.
Unlike Stefan Molyneux, who believes that if we lose this civilization, civilization will never appear again, I believe in human endless potential. We have become the Apex species of the Earth and I want to share with you how I see humans will soon dominate and utilize the entire solar system.
However, it is important to understand that we cannot achieve humanity’s full potential in the current system we live in. There is a force of coercion that is keeping us down, inhibiting our progress, so that it can continue to control us and feed on us. This force of coercion is the state. Humanity needs to grow out of statism.
I know that a lot of people cannot conceive in their minds a world without the state. They believe that the state is a natural force of nature that will naturally form, even if we get rid of the current government. Well, about 600 years ago, no one believed we could live in a world without a king. That is until the people had enough and brought the state to its knees. If the British peasants would not have believed the lies of the young king, in 1381, they would have wiped out the state and they would have lived in a free society. When I’m talking about getting rid of the state, I’m not talking about fiction. I’m talking about a possible reality that is based on historical facts.
Fossil Fuel
The first thing we need to tackle are fossil fuel. I hear so many idiots saying the dumbest shit like banning all fossil fuel. That would be insane and I will explain why in a moment. However, if those morons want to ban fossil fuel, the best way is to find another source of energy that is as abundant as fossil fuel and as cheap. Then people would be insane not to use the cheaper source of energy. This source of energy doesn’t exist yet.
What the basic millennial doesn’t understand is that you do not get only one product from crude oil. The way you obtain petrol for your car is by distilling the crude oil. By doing so, you separate the oil into different chemicals that are used in our everyday life.
Take for example, Naphthalene. This chemical is, in many ways, more valuable than the petrol you extract from the oil. With this chemical we make everything and I do mean EVERYTHING. We make pharmaceutical drugs, we make plastics, we even make the artificial fruit flavouring with that stuff. So you understand that even if you stopped using petrol, you would still be extracting oil from the earth for all the other products you need from oil and you would be left with all that petrol filling up landfills because the fucking government wouldn’t allow you to use that product.
This is how fucking retarded AOC is. In what kinda clown world are we living in that we listen to a waitress, like AOC, or a fraud passing for a scientist, like Bill Nye, for advice about the environment. This is fucking insane. It would be like me asking the homeless, dude who looks in everybody’s trash, if he wants to do my taxes. If he is broke ass is on the street, maybe he is not so good with finances… just sayin… 😉
One of the problems in the scientific community is that when one of our colleagues comes out with data, we have a tendency to believe them. Especially when their research has been peer reviewed.
We believe that they are professionals and that they take their work very seriously. We believe that they wouldn’t throw their career down the shitter by publishing erroneous findings in order to push a political agenda.
Sadly, this way of thinking predates the infiltration of the scientific community by the Marxists and the scientific community is only starting to react to the situation.
It is still considered unacceptable to question the integrity of another scientist. The best you can do is to come up with your findings that contradict the previous results and assume that there was an experimental error that led to this mistake. However, since most of the funding comes from the government, good luck finding a grant after contradicting the scientific article a leftist politician was using to base a policy on.
This is one of the reasons why so few scientists challenge other scientist’s research. This fear of challenging the status quo is also one of the reason sciences is stagnating today. Not all scientists are in a position where they are untouchable and they can freely speak the truth to the masses. One of these untouchables would be Dr. Patrick Moore, who has been publicly decorated by the Canadian government for his work; who has been praised by the CBC; and who is the founder of Greenpeace. Now that he is opposing the Canadian government, the CBC and Greenpeace on ‘’the man made climate change hoax’’, these organisations are in an uncomfortable position. But as we have seen with Dr. James Watson, the left is relentless and they will find a way to destroy your career.
Let’s break down this climate change bullshit piece by piece.
The Acidification of Oceans
Recently, university professors have started to teach their students that the increase of atmospheric CO2 will acidify the oceans and harm the aquatic life. I have a high esteem of some of these professors. They are pioneers in their fields and I will assume that they did not check the information before teaching it. Also, in Canada, universities are forced to include the ideology of the liberal party in their curriculum or the university will lose funding.
Let’s use one of the videos posted by a university professor about the acidification of the oceans as a tool to debunk this bullshit. I promise you, when I done tea bagging this guy, you will wonder how such an incompetent man ever got a job teaching future scientists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgBozLCGUHY&t=136s
At 0:24, he does a little experiment to ‘’explain the mechanism’’, but he is really trying to mislead you. I want you to notice the face that he is using distilled water. Why is he using distilled water instead of sea water? Well there are 2 reasons for that: 1) he wants to look scientific by producing a controlled environment free for any contaminants. 2) distilled water has almost no buffer capacity.
At 0:36, he is using a soda carbonation device to introduce CO2 into the water. This is concentrated CO2 under high pressure. Now I want you to visualize this situation on a large scale. Imagine we lived in an atmosphere that contained that amount of CO2 and that we were exposed to that kind of pressure. Let me say that Mars would be a planet more hospitable for life than the planet described in his scenario.
Let’s do a little science (something this chemistry teach is trying very hard to avoid doing). The ocean is not made out of distilled water. It is made of a NaCl 0.6M water solution. Why is that so important? Because when NaCl is diluted in water, it is in its ionic form; which means: Na+ and Cl-. When CO2 is diluted in distilled water, it forms an equilibrium between 3 moleculaire species: CO2, HCO3- and H2CO3. HCO3- interacts with Na+ to form NaHCO3, which is bicarbonate.
This means that with H2CO3 and NaHCO3 you have a weak acid and its conjugated base. This forms a buffer. The way a buffer reacts when it is that it will reduce the variations in pH when an acid or a base is introduced to the solution.
I also want to point out that there are 332 519 000 cubic miles of oceanic water. If there is going to be variation of the pH of the water, it is more likely to be on the surface water. The wildlife will not feel any effects from those variations.
If you want to make a proper experiment at home, dilute 35g of NaCl per 1L of distilled water and leave it on your from porch. The concentration of CO2 in the city (400 ppm) is higher than over the ocean, but your results will be much better than what this guy did. Do not touch the water, let the wind move it. After a few hours, there will be an equilibrium between the diluted CO2 and the NaHCO3. You now have a similar buffer as the ocean. Buy a 10$ pH meter and take readings as often as you like. You will see that on cold days your water will have a slightly lower pH and on hot days a slightly high pH. But you will not get any drastic results.
Also, you need to keep in mind that this CO2 is food for the microscopic algae. In the model this idiot made, the CO2 is just accumulating… No, this is not what happens in an ecosystem. The CO2 is consumed to produce more biomass that will feed the aquatic life.
At 2:15, he shows 2 measurements of the pH of the oceans: 1) in 1751 the pH was 8,25. 2) in 1996 the pH was 8,14. You might have noticed that these 2 measurements were taken 245 years apart. We also do not know the conditions in which these measurements were taken. Did they choose arbitrarily 1 location to take the readings or did they take multiple readings and produced an average?
This information is so useless, I don’t know where to start. This would be the equivalent of starting an enzymatic reaction and taking measurements every 2 or 3 months. It is like a carpenter taking a measurement in the North Pole and the South Pole to cut a plank of wood in Ontario. Any scientist using this data to produce any form of affirmation would be laughed out of the building, but for some reason we give a pass to the climate change nuts. But wait… the lunacy goes deeper than that. This guy uses these 2 data points to predict what the pH will be in 2100… Those who have a background in science are probably ROFL right now.
First, why are there only 2 measurements done? Our governments give billions of dollars to this climate change hoax every year. Why aren’t there boats in the oceans taking reading 50 times per day from multiple locations? Measuring pH isn’t expensive. It is not expensive at all.
There are many factors that can vary the concentration of CO2 in the water. The main one is the temperature. The solubility of CO2 will vary according to the temperature. This leads to the next reason why his model is worthless. The solubility of CO2 decreases when the temperature increases. This would means that his ‘’acidification of the oceans’’ problem will correct itself as the global temperature increases.
I think this guy should throw his diploma in the recycling bin for that it can be recycled into something useful.
And keep in mind that this lie is thought in university; it is repeated constantly in the media and it is accepted as fact in the UN…
The Increase of Atmospheric CO2
In the 90s, Greenpeace did this massive fear campaign. They made ads showing a barren world where the air was unbreathable. Where the corporate white men would walk around with fancy gas masked while the common man would beg for coins so that he could breath for 10 seconds from a plant inside a dome.
Let’s just say that Greenpeace has been shoveling bullshit down people’s throat and calling it candy for a very long time. Greenpeace learned some of their most valuable lessons from the National Socialist German’s Worker’s Party. Amongst these lessons, they learned that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Let’s break this down. We need to state a few facts right:
1) CO2 is not a toxic gas. CO2 is a molecule that is naturally produced by your metabolism and it is essential in maintaining the pH of your blood, your extracellular fluid and your cerebrospinal fluid. Usually, when you die of suffocation, you do not die from the lack of oxygen, but form the accumulation of H2CO3 in your system. The carbonic acid with lower the pH of the fluids in your body and below a pH of 6.3, the enzyme ATPase is denatured. Your metabolism can no longer cleave a phosphate off ATP molecules and use these molecules as a source of energy, thus your metabolism stops and you die. Therefore, CO2 is essential to life.
At the moment, the CO2 concentration on the planet is around 400ppm. The CDC (The Center for Disease Control and Prevention) determined that the lethal concentration of CO2 was 5000ppm. Since then, the CDC corrected their information. They previously made an error of the magnitude of 10. The correct lethal concentration of CO2 for humans is 49 500ppm. This means that we can avoid worrying about suffocation until the CO2 atmospheric concentration is 100 times higher.
2) CO2 is plant food. Something the NPCs at Greenpeace do not understand is that an ecosystem is a dynamic environment. CO2 is not just accumulating in the atmosphere; it serves a very important function in the ecosystem.
Through photosynthesis, plants reduce the atmospheric CO2 and transform it into organic molecules such as starch. The plant and other living organisms on the planet then use these organic molecules to survive and flourish.
Plants use a lot of energy to reduce CO2. When the CO2 concentration is between 1 000 to 1 500ppm the plant growth is optimal.
Contrary to the propaganda spewed by Greenpeace, the biomass on Earth has increased and not decreased with the increase of atmospheric CO2.
3) The CO2 that is contained in coal and crude oil was in circulation in the past. You need to understand that coal and crude oil is made out of organic material that originates out of prehistoric plants and animals. When you burn fossil fuel, you reintroduce this carbon into the cycle of carbon of the planet. Carbon is the building block of all life on this planet. So when you are burning fossil fuel, you are not killing the planet, you are increasing the amount of life on the planet.
You know, if those genocidal maniacs at Greenpeace (who advocates that human life on this planet is a cancer and that planet earth would be better off without us) would grow some shit instead of spewing their lies they would actually be doing something productive.
And I can already predict that a lot of people have voted this presentation down. These people want to believe all that end of the world crap; they are obsessed with human activity, because all human activity as a carbon footprint; they don’t want any future generations, they want human life on this planet to end. Well worry not you little nutjobs. I have an easy and quick solution to your dilemma, because I all about finding solutions.
Please, save us the trouble…
Global Warming
Let’s talk about global warming. In the 90s, the climate change alarmists were screaming on every roof top that the world was going to end in 10 years. Then in the 2000s, they screamed on every roof top that the world would end in 10 years. In 2010 they did the same thing and now in 2019, morons like AOE and O’Rourke are saying that the world will end in 12 years.
How many times do we need to hear the same story, again and again, before we question it?
Let me make an analogy to explain how the scientific method works. It is very relevant to this situation:
One of the first atomic model created was called the plum pudding model. It consisted of electrons swimming in a proton soup.
A New Zealand scientist, called Ernest Rutherford, performed an experiment in a Canadian university. He projected neutrons on a very thin sheet of gold in order to calculate their energy as they bounced off the protons. To his surprise, the neutrons did not bounce back. They went through the sheet. This meant that the atomic model was erroneous and could not produce any accurate prediction. He had to redesign the atomic model and created the planetary atomic model (which is the model most people know today). Of course, we now used the atomic model produced by Einstein that is based on probability of where the particles are. Einstein’s model also has different shapes of orbitals, which more accurately predicts the empirical data we have today.
But the lesson learned from Rutherford’s experiment is that, when a model is unable to produce any accurate predictions, you need to revise that model.
Let’s apply this knowledge to climate change. The current climate change model is wrong. It is not that it made one bad prediction. It is that is has never produced a single accurate prediction in over 40 years. The only consistency of the model is of being wrong. And since we live in clown world, politicians, the EU, UN and environmental activists want us to waste 100 trillons of dollars based on the predictions of this model.
Throwing more money down the shitter doesn’t make a falsehood true. It is just a waste of money. How could anyone possibly base a policy based on this model.
So yeah… you can take a deep breath and breath the free air. The man made climate change narrative is bullshit. The world is not coming to an end. Everything is going to be alright.
But for shits and giggles, let’s entertain the possibility of the earth getting warmer. Let’s just play out that scenario so we can finally bury that narrative in the ground and forget about it.
Water plays a large role in controlling temperature changes on this planet. There is a temperature difference between the land, the atmosphere and the sea. This leads to the evaporation of water that is then delivered inland by clouds and rain. This system allows life to be possible away from coast lines and it lowers the temperature of the land and the atmosphere.
If the Earth gets warmer, most of the energy from this additional heat will be consumed by the evaporation of water. This will produce more rain inland and thus allow more plants to grow.
If the Earth reaches temperatures around 35˚C, then C4 plants will be favored over C3 plants (this was the case during the time dinosaurs roam the Earth). C4 plants thrive at high temperatures and are much more efficient at reducing atmospheric CO2. As the concentration of atmospheric CO2 declines, the temperature of the Earth decreases and C3 plants are favored. And the cycle continues.
We also need to keep in mind that the Earth is not a closed system. Much of the heat is leaked into space and not all the heat from the Sun reaches the surface of the Earth. A lot of the Sun’s rays are reflected by clouds and as the humidity of the atmosphere increases, the more clouds you are going to get.
So you see that the climate change alarmist have no argument. This is nothing more than a nothing burger. It is fear meant to control you and it is fed as a toxin to everyone in the world from birth.
You can see that these con-artists are getting desperate these days to continue their lie. Every time you see the slightest change in nature, they automatically jump to the conclusion that it is climate change. No other scenarios are explored. And if a scientist, like me, challenges the narrative, he sees his career destroyed and he will be slandered by all the medias. Often he will even be doxed and harassed by leftists.
What you need to understand is that if the statists lose this narrative, they won’t be able to control you with anything anymore. Aside from fear, what are they selling you? When is the last time these social planners had a good talking point or even a good idea. All their policies are aimed at taking away your freedoms… that doesn’t sell. And all the international organisations like the EU and the UN are balls deep in this narrative. They have already stolen hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars from the international community using this lie. What would happen if the people realized they have been lied too. This political system would collapse. This is why this lie is too big to fail.
Let’s talk about over population now. This is another lie that has been fed to us for a very long time and that has made monsters out of a lot of people.
Can you imagine a lie that would make people wish other groups of people would die or to want to restrict the ability of people to reproduce? A lie that would make the narrative of reducing the Earth population to 1 billion people acceptable, which would mean, to get rid of 6.6 billion people? In a nutshell, a narrative that would bring genocide in the realm of acceptable conversation.
I shit you not. I have been in dinner parties where people openly talked about their ‘’solution’’ to the world problems and that solution was nothing more than gazing entire populations, producing a tyrannical government and enslaving huge chunks of the population.
We live in an age deprived of morality.
But let’s not get sidetracked. Let’s debunk some bullshit using the power of
Overpopulation
What most people think about when we bring up the topic of over population is the lack of room. They look at big cities, the lack of apartments available and the price of rent. Then they imagine the same situation with twice as many people and they already see a Blade Runner scenario in their minds.
Other people will say: ‘’well we cannot pave the planet. You will have to chop off all the threes and we will then starve to death.’’
Ok, these people are not the ‘’Go Too’’ people when you are looking for a solution. Years of watching television has killed any form of creative thinking they might have had and they cannot think outside the box.
You need to realize that, for the most part, we have only built 2 stories buildings with a basement and 3 stories apartment buildings. This has mostly been the norm in construction. We have barely scratch the surface (pun intended) of the potential of building downwards or upwards except for some attemps in the 60s/70s in which designers tried to look fancy and modern by connecting buildings underground.
There is an hidden potential here. When you look at mining operations, you realize that we can build miles down from the surface. And unlike those mines, we can make safe structure that can be maintained for generations to come. This would allow us to have 3 or 4 times the current population without occupying more land.
I can already hear the comments: Why would people want to live underground like rats?
First of all, it doesn’t have to look terrible. People may not know this, but you don’t have to hire a post-modern architect to design your underground city. It doesn’t have to look like crap. An underground city can actually look amazing. We are the ones who decide what it is going to look like. (I know, this is a mind boggling concept to realize that not everything needs to be square, dull and made out of concrete…)
Also, this is only a temporary solution. When we discover nuclear fusion, the sky will be the limit. You need to understand that the majority of the resources of this solar system are on the planets on the edge of our solar system. There is a real financial incentive to farm these resources and as soon as we have the capacity. As always, when there is a will there is a way.
Of course, if we are going to farm the moons of Jupiter or the frozen oceans of Neptune, we cannot send a simple expedition. We need to create generational ships. We need to produce cities in space. These cities will have industries; they will recycle air and water; there will be room for expansions. These cities need to be completely self-sufficient and able to produce new space cities.
This means that there will be trade between space cities. These cities will have their own distinct culture and their own way of life. Libertarians will finally be able to build a community based on voluntary interactions and be free from statism.
Of course, these cities will need to be able to defend themselves and there will probably be conflicts between different colonies.
This view of the future is completely realistic. We will be able to build these in the near future. However, we cannot move to this next step in humanity’s development when we live under the control of government. You need resources to make these cities and the purpose of a government is to strip all resources they can from the citizens. Also, the government doesn’t have an incentive to allow people to leave the planet because, how can they exploit their serf if their serfs are out of their reach?
The Scarcity of Food
The other argument for the overpopulation narrative is the lack of food.
Well, that argument is so easy to debunk, it actually feels like I’m beating on a dead horse. I’m even surprised that some people have such a low IQ that they still bring this shit up in the current year.
If you look at the West in the current year, we have never had so much food. For the first time in history, we are over-nourished. We have such abundance and diversity of food that we can be wasteful and still suffer from diabetes due to our excesses. 1/3 of the food we produce is discarded from the farm to the grocery store for no other reason than the appearance of that food. Westerners throw away so much food out of their refrigerator weekly, that waste alone could probably support a second family.
This means that in the West we could easily support 6 times the current population with our current production. We do not need to improve our methods of production; we need to improve our methods of preservation.
However, we could produce more food. We could produce A Lot more food. All we need is for Westerners to be less pussy and allow biochemist like me to play God and to produce GMO plants that will out produce any plant we grow right now; GMO that will resist pest, chemicals and diseases. If it wasn’t for the pussified West, we could continue the work of Dr. James D. Watson and improve all of creation and do a better job than the last administration 😉.
When people talk about the scarcity of food, they usually talk about Africa. So let’s talk about Africa for a moment.
It is not because Africa is unable to produce food that Africans are starving. You only need to look at the Bore in South Africa. They turned barren lands into some of the most productive farms on the continent. Africans are starving because they are racist bigots who support communist regimes led by cruel totalitarian governments who are only obsessed with power and who are willing to sacrifice the lives of every one of their citizens to obtain it. Africans rather starve by claiming that the whites are richer than them because of some injustices, instead of working with the Bore to create a wealthier Africa for all Africans. Africans only have themselves to blame and when I see the genocide of innocent white Africans, I think that Africans deserve to starve.
Nuclear Weapons
One tool that has been used by world leaders for a long time to instill fear in the population is the threat of nuclear war. Both the USA and the Russian have constructed an arsenal of nuclear weapons to intimidate their enemy. They have even produced some supersize nuclear weapons that would be tactically inefficient to deliver to the target, in order to maximize the element of fear.
One thing you need to understand about a weapon of fear is that their destructive effects are constantly over amplified. Let’s break down a nuclear attack by dividing it to its smallest identifiable elements and try to understand its real destructive abilities.
Can we all agree that the majority of the nuclear weapons that would be used in a conflict would be tactical weapons? The reason for that is that they are easier to deploy on a moment’s notice; they are less expensive; the main targets in a conflict will be the major navel and aerial bases and the head of the country; and when you nuke your enemy, you don’t want the radiations to backfire on you. So these are the weapons we are going to talk about here.
Your average tactical nuclear missile will have an impact radius of about a mile from what I read. So if you are outside of that radius, you are still in the game.
The first thing you need to do is to find shelter and resources. A basement is a good shelter. The concrete will offer a good protection against the radiation and you can add some boxes to improve your protection. You need to gather all of the food and water you can obtain. The city water is unlikely to be contaminated on the first day, so it is ok to bottle up as much water as you can.
When it comes to radiation, you need to remember the 7/10 rule of thumb. By every 7 fold increase of time, the radiation in the air will decrease by a factor of 10.
The main radiation will take 3 weeks to settle down as the fallout will fall to the ground. So your best bet is to wait 7 days in your shelter and then move away from the city.
The soldiers in WW2 walked 12 miles per day. But with women, children and the elderly, you might do a quarter of that. What you need to do is to put as much distance between you and the impact zone before the fallout settles down.
If you walk against the wind, your potential of survival increases.
The majority of the people who have followed these steps will come out of this in good health.
Afterward, you might want to reclaim your city. I suggest waiting a decade before you start working.
What is important to understand is the concept of exposure. This is measured by the levels of toxicity and the duration of the exposure. If workers spend a small amount of time in the contaminated zone, they reduce their chances of having health problems.
To decontaminate the zone you need to remove the organic material. Then you can wash the surfaces with detergent. If you ever worked with radiation in your life, you will know that cleaning a surface many times with detergent is a very effective method of removing the radioactive particles.
You can reduce the radioactive particles in the water and on the soil using the Shewanella Oneidensis to reduce the uranium in the water. This will cause a precipitation of the particles. You can then remove a layer of dirt that you will bury in a safe location.
When you have removed all of the contaminated material, life may resume in this city.
This bullshit about nuclear winter and the end of all life… That is for movies. Look at the population of Hiroshima. People have continued living there after the nuclear explosion and people are still living there today. And unlike in the West, the population of that region has constantly increased.
Are you starting to see the fear that fed to you?
The Government
Ok, now we are going balls deep in the biggest lie that was ever told to you; the biggest scary story that was ever made in order to control you.
I’m talking about the lie that you need a government to keep you safe.
The government will pretend that without its help, people will live in chaos and fear. There would be no police; no army; no schools; no running water. You would be barricaded in your house, hoping the raider don’t notice you…
The government would make you believe that homeless people and the elderly would die in terrible conditions if it wasn’t there to take care of them.
Well in reality, the opposite is true. Every single service I have just mentioned would be better offered by the private sector. And without the government, you would have the opportunity to decide where to send your kids in school; what security force better serves your needs; what health service you want and you would still have some money left to provide quality care to your elderly parents.
In fact, who else do you need to protect yourself from if not from the government? The state has been the biggest and vile coercive force in history. It has kidnapped millions of people and locked them in cages for a good portion of their lives; it has sent tens of millions of people to die on the front to serve its interests; it has murdered hundreds of millions of people in times of peace; and it has stolen trillions of dollars from hard working people.
If you are so dumb as to believe you need the state in any way shape or form… dude, I’m sorry to break it to you, but you are dumb as shit.
I hope you enjoyed this presentation. As always, I’m opened to any civil discussion.
Gato Villano