About the UN Migration Compact

                                                                                                                    2018/12/27

                                       About the UN Migration Compact

A lot of content creators have covered the subject and they did a very good job too. I strongly suggest you go see the video Stefan Molyneux did on the migration pact. He completely broke down the document and analysed it thoroughly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WRszRZBfYw&t=2723s. This will help people understand the impact this document will have on the international community.

In this short presentation, I want to touch on one aspect I haven't seen everyone covert and I believe it is important we talk about it.

I came accross a video from Lauren Chen about the UN migration pact and she said that the pact wasn't completely bad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUEQdYOuAWs&t=187s . . She points out that the UN compact on migration talks about combating human traficking by allowing international cooperation and to minimize the adverse drivers and structural factors that compel people to leave their country of origin. This type of opinion is something I have seen many conservative express in the past few years. It is a form of virtue signalling that has terrible consequences.

In this presentation, I will argue that this way of thinking as led to disaster in the past and that we need to learn for our mistakes.

I want to start by saying that I have nothing against Lauren. I don’t want to attack her in anyway and I understand that there are some things she might not understand due to the fact that she is a millennial, therefore, she did not see the present global situation unveil so she doesn't recognize the ideas and the policies that led to the fucking mess we are in today. Also, I would like to point out that I don't follow her content. I don't find her smart or interesting and only good points she has is when she is repeating the opinions of other content creators.

So let's go back in time to September 11, 2001. People were enjoying a nice autumn day. It looked like a day like any other. Then the news started talking about an accident. A plane crashed into the world trade center. Moments later, a second plane crashed into the other tower and now people realized that this shit was real. This wasn't an accident. This was an attack. Everyone around the world started speculating about what happened and they were pointing fingers left and right when nobody actually had a clue what was going on.

What is more important for this discussion is what followed. In the months that followed the attack, some alphabet agencies started to name culprits of this crime. Although the terrorists on the plane mostly originated from countries like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan became the main target of the USA. At this point, Americans had already lost their minds and everyone who tried to calm them down was called a traitor. So the international community went along with the Americans and occupied Afghanistan. At this point, we were all hoping the Americans had their pound of flesh; that their anger would be satisfied and that peace would be restored. Unfortunately it wasn't so.

Bush addressed the world saying that not all the nations had the same values; that we needed to bring freedom and democracy to the world; that we go forward... something about good or light being on our side and crap about god guiding our way...we are going to fight terror and shit... It was a load of crap and no amount of sugar coating could mask the after taste of shit this speech left in our ears. Bush used the UN to try to rally other nations in order to bring democracy to the savages around the world. Does this sound familiar? Bush used the excuse of changing the condition of other nations as a pretext to wage war on those nations. Thankfully, only the globalist Tony Blair was cuck enough to join this maniac in his crusades.

I would like to make a tangent and point out that countries stood up to Bush and refused to help him destroy Iraq for no reason, France and Canada. The Canadian prime minister at the time was Jean Chretien. Chretien was a very interesting person. He was constantly bashed by the media (even after he retired) even though he probably was the best Prime Minister Canada ever had (until Mad Max gets into office). This simple man spent most of his political career signing trade agreements; he reduced the national dept quite a bit; and he was the only prime minister in Canadian history that refused to join the Americans in one of their wars. Standing up to a warmongering republican president takes a lot of courage and Chretien had to retire after making this controversial decision so that Canadians would not suffer any backlash from the Americans. In a way, Chretien was to the Liberal party what JFK was to the Democratic Party: one good guy in a sea of morons.

I grew up with Chretien in office. Canada back then was a homogeneous nation; it was a very peaceful country to build a family; people felt safe; there were a lot of economical opportunities; and Canadians had a positive view of the future. If I can make a World of Warcraft analogy, I grew up in the Vanilla Canada ;-).

I remember once, Chretien punched a protester. Today, we would have called this protester an SJW, but we didn't have too many of those back then. I think it is a fun fact to show that Canadian prime ministers weren't always a bunch of pussies. I feel sorry for the generation that grows up with the biggest Canadian pussy in office (Trudeau). These kids are going to be traumatized as fuck.

It is interesting to note that Jean Chretien's adversary, for most of his career was Jacques Parizeau. Parizeau was in many ways the Quebec's Trump. Parizeau didn't hold his tongue. He was loud; he was rude; he was controversial. Parizeau was a nationalist and proud of it. He thought of his nation first and he wanted to free his nation from the central planners in Ottawa. Parizeau divided Quebec in 2. There were a lot of conflicts between Quebeckers and a lot of friendships were broken over this topic. I saw Parizeau walk into a crowd of tens of thousands of people with no hesitation and with no body guard to protect him. He wasn't afraid, because this was his people, the people he loved and the people loved him. He was the most loved prime minister of Quebec's history. 

To think that these 2 great men were in office at the same time. Can you imagine what they could have accomplished if they had worked together. It would have been amazing.

Ok, let's get back on topic.

So what did ''bringing democracy and freedom around the world'' look like. Well, The USA army took control of Afghanistan; they turned tribes against each other; they took control of Iraq; had the Iraqi leader hanged; the people of Iraq now live under a military regime; they had to struggle to survive without the basic necessities of life, like clean water and electricity; the death rate in Iraq is sky high. Good job making the world a better place Bush... good job...

We also need to mention all the US soldiers that died in those countries and those who came back home with cancer due to the injections they received.

What followed Bush? Obama followed. Mister ''yes we can''. Yes we can spend the tax payer's money in nation building. Yes we can fund fanatic rebel groups and create Isis. Not only did Obama taxed the unborn in order to transform Islamic states into countries the Muslims did not want, he also decided to overthrow some countries of his own, starting with Libya and then Syria. The only reason Syria still has a government is because of the 2016 election.

So what did all this ''bringing democracy to the world'' and this ''nation building'' do? Well it nearly destroyed the Western economy; it created terrorist groups around the world; and it flooded Europe with economical migrants, because those migrants were so goddamn fucking happy with the nation building Obama did. Now Europe is on the verge of collapsing under the weight of the migrants and our very way of life is in danger.

Thank god Trump got elected. This wonderful wonderful man is finally putting an end to this madness. With his policy of America first, this bullshit nation building is coming to an end. Soldiers are going to leave Syria and Afghanistan. No more US soldiers dying in order to destabilize countries. Mr. Trump, I know your job isn't easy and you are taking hits on all sides. I just want to say thank you sir. Thank you for preserving our way of life and Merry Christmas. God I love this man!

So what is the moral of the story? The moral is that Evil always creeps in under the disguise of good intentions. When world leaders say they will fight awful stuff around the world and improve the way of life in 3rd world countries, this actually means that they are planning to make radical changes both inside your country and in the 3rd world nations; they want to do massive redistribution of wealth that will ruin your economy; they want to make endless wars, overthrow governments and destabilize countries; and they plan on taking away your freedom and your way of life. The UN migration pact plans on forcing the nation states to do more of this bullshit.

We need to learn from our mistakes. Also, I understand that YouTubers like Lauren Chen have pretty smiles and that good looks are a marketable attribute. But you should look for your information from better sources than her.

Again, thanks for listening. I'm always open for civil conversations.

Gato Villano

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MznHdJReoeo&list=RDMznHdJReoeo&start_radio=1&t=100