Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Crimes Go Public Starting December 13, 2018?
According to John Solomon, Thursday December 13th, 2018 is the investigative public hearing into Hillary's Clinton Foundation. Multiple courageous whistleblowers exposed allege corruption and illegalities. One whistleblower sent 6,000 pages of evidence to both the IRS and the FBI. Another insider whistleblower, stated that he “knows where all the bodies[/evidence] are buried”. If Hillary's Clinton Foundation alleged corruption and illegalities are true, what are those evidence? And will the same Laws apply to all? Or are some people above the Laws? Watch Black Conservative Patriot at https://youtu.be/z3uNJ6RMFNc?t=21
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Live Videos
Watch the December 13th, 2018 investigative public hearing live videos:
• Live video 1 by OVERSIGHTANDREFORM channel at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A
• Live video 2 by C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?455872-1/house-oversight-subcommittee-hearing-clinton-foundation
• Live video 3 by Jason Goodman at https://youtu.be/iqHHxY9PmtY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Corruption & Illegalities
The allegations include, but are not limited to:
• Illegal activities
• Corruption/Pay-for-Play/“quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State. Claims that donors were expecting favors at State from Hillary Clinton or from the former president Bill Clinton’s government connections in return for money.
• Solicited large donations from foreign countries with business interests before Hillary Clinton at the State Department
• Tax evasion. Millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.
• Compromised United States national-security interests. About the Uranium One controversy. Including Hillary's Clinton Foundation's connections with Russia’s dangerous meddling with the United States nuclear industry and energy industry Russia.
• Conflicts of interest
• Improper commingling of personal and charity business. Including Bill Clinton who runs up incredible [personal] expenses using your donations to the Foundation.
• Abuse expense privileges. Such as, but not limited to travel abuses.
Sources below
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Red Flags
Over the years Hillary's Clinton Foundation own auditors, lawyers, employees, and Chealsea Clinton privately warned of problems at the Clinton Foundation. Also lower-level employees “begged” for whistleblower protections after witnessing “less than fully compliant behavior or even worse are asked to participate in or condone it.”
• Source at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/27/us/politics/bill-hillary-clinton-foundation-wikileaks.html
• Archived source at http://archive.fo/treE9
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Four Whistleblowers?
First group of whistleblowers are Hillary's Clinton Foundation own lawyers. The whistleblowers used words like [Pay-for-Play]/‘quid pro quo,’ ‘conflicts of interest’ and ‘whistleblower protections’.
• Source at https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
• Archived source at http://archive.fo/1cpO3
Second whistleblowers is Andrew Kessel. An insider. He is the present Clinton Foundation CFO, Financial Risk Manager and Technologist. He works at the foundation from 2004 to present 2018. That is 14+ years of insider experience with Hillary's Clinton Foundation. Kessel stated that he “knows where all the bodies[/evidence] are buried”.
• Source at https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
• Archived source at http://archive.fo/1cpO3
• Public profile 1 at https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewkessel/
• Archived public profile 1 at https://archive.fo/VePho
• Public profile 2 at https://i.postimg.cc/15196HVX/Andrew-Kessel-Clinton-Foundation-CFO-Public-Profile-Dec-6-2018.png
• Archived public profile 2 at https://archive.fo/FFQYq
Third whistleblower is Justin Cooper. A member of the Clinton Foundation who is cooperating with United States Attorney John W. Huber's investigation into Hillary's Clinton Foundation. Cooper will get immunity. Justin proxies from Braverman, so there is a second source to back up Cooper.
• Source at https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/1068693499430744065
• Archived source at http://archive.fo/0lbHT
Fourth whistleblower is Nate Cain. Who used to work for the FBI. Also an US Army vet, Cybersecurity expert, and Federal Whistleblower.
• Source at https://www.theepochtimes.com/sen-grassley-questions-fbi-on-raid-of-clinton-foundation-uranium-one-whistleblower_2730374.html
• Archived source at http://archive.fo/Q8Myc
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Whistleblower Protections
Those whistleblowers benefit from all the whistleblower protections. For those not familiar with "whistleblower protections", it means a whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The Whistleblower Protection Act is a federal law in the United States in 1989.
• Read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_protection_in_the_United_States
• Archived read more at http://archive.fo/9z8XT
Are you interested to know more about how to be a whistleblowers, and be protected? Now is a good time to know your rights. Here are a few options for you to consider if both appropriate and legal for you:
• Option 1: Read more about your rights at https://www.whistleblowers.org
• Option 2: Get a free attorney from the NWLDEF review your confidential whistleblowers submission at https://www.report-fraud-now.info/contact-nwldef
• Option 3: Anonymously submitting your document(s) or your information to WikiLeaks at https://wikileaks.org/#submit
So that if somehow your documents and or your information are stolen, or are illegally cease, and somehow "disappear" for the authorities hands, then at least WikiLeaks have a copy ;)
• Option 4: For any of the options above, I suggest to further protect yourself with anonymity by using Tor Browser. It's free, and safer than other browsers.
Get Tor Browser for free at https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en
Read more about Tor Browser at https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en
Again I suggest for your to consider which option(s) above is both appropriate and legal for you. Those are my suggestion above. Obviously the information contained in this blog is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Strong Potential Criminality
Six former federal investigators reviewed the evidence. According to them the evidence of potential criminality was strong and warranted opening an FBI or IRS probe.
• Source 1 at https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
• Archived source 1 at http://archive.fo/1cpO3
• Source 2 at https://saraacarter.com/clinton-whistleblowers-thursdays-public-hearing-to-reveal-explosive-information/
• Archived source 2 at http://archive.fo/m9hi5
(Video "GOP launches new effort to expose Clinton Foundation" at https://youtu.be/fAkiSqXjXwA?t=229 . Starting at 3 minutes and 49 seconds.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judge's Questions
This is a related event. About the U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, said that Hillary Clinton must answer those two questions under oath before ~December 15, 2018:
"After what Judicial Watch describes as a “lengthy hearing”, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that [Hillary] Clinton must answer the following two questions under oath:"
Question 1. "Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational."
Question 2. "During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts."
• Video at https://youtu.be/-qP1_Y5KjUg?t=940
• Source 1. Press release by Judicial Watch at https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-ordered-hillary-clinton-to-answer-additional-email-questions-under-oath/
• Archive Source 1. Press release by Judicial Watch at http://archive.fo/jMDX8
• Source 2 at https://bongino.com/federal-judge-rules-hillary-clinton-must-answer-these-under-oath/
• Archived source 2 at http://archive.fo/LekNC
• Source 3. Related press release by Judicial Watch at https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-hearing-to-compel-testimony-from-hillary-clinton-and-make-video-depositions-public/
• Archived Source 3. Related press release by Judicial Watch at http://archive.fo/nQDP0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sources
John Solomon
• Read Solomon's opinion at https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
• Archived Solomon's opinion at http://archive.fo/1cpO3
• Link to latest aggregated news from John Solomon at https://muckrack.com/john-solomon
• Who is John Solomon? He is an award winning investigative journalist and the Executive VP at The Hill. He previously worked at AP, WaPo, TWT and Circa. Source at https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-solomon-a6b9ab1b/
Investigative hearing
• Oversight of Nonprofit Organizations: A Case Study on the Clinton Foundation
______• Date: December 13th, 2018
______• Time: 2:00 pm eastern time (UTC +5)
______• Location: 2154 Rayburn HOB
______• Map: https://osm.org/go/ZZca9Jwvr?m=
______• Calendar event: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/oversight-of-nonprofit-organizations-a-case-study-on-the-clinton-foundation/
______• Archived calendar event: http://archive.fo/UqPJ5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Diagram
Hillary's Clinton Foundation ‘Pay to Play’ alleged scam under criminal investigation? See small visual diagram below. Or this full size diagram at https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2018/12/05/Clinton-Foundation-Epoch-Times-infographic_Low-res-1200x1185.jpg
• Archived at https://archive.fo/ctbXT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Delay
The investigative hearing was first scheduled for December 5th, 2018, but then reschedule to December 13th, 2018. Will the hearing be delayed again? If yes, why? Some people are trying to hide things from you? Deceive you?
Will Hillary's Clinton Foundation alleged crimes go public starting December 13, 2018?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Evidence Of Crimes By Hillary’s Clinton Foundation? Hearing December 13, 2018.
Find blog at https://www.minds.com/blog/edit/920246318226948096
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More
Read critics of Hillary Clinton's services as public servant at:
• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/777046188208693266/
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Hillary.Clinton.Critics/
Read critics of Donald Trump's administration services at:
• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/804112862432178176
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Donald.Trump.Critics/
Read critics of Jill Stein's services as public servant at:
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Jill.Stein.Critics/
Read critics of Barack Obama's services as public servant at:
• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/804113053598384128
• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Barack.Obama.Critics/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Comparison between the Green Party and other Parties at http://www.gp.org/the_real_difference
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Will Trump's administration deliver their commitment to be Public-Servant, instead of Money-Servant? In other words, to serve the interests of the working citizens? Instead of serving money, corporate lobbyists, WallStreet banks, a few billionaires, or their self-interest. If Trump's administration fail their services, anyone else interested in being the next president and serve working citizens first? Any women interested? How about Jill Stein with the Green Party? Anyone else? If no women are interested, how about Bernie Sanders as independent candidate without the corrupted DNC? Which was bought by Hillary and is presently controlled by Hillary. Or how about another independent candidate? How about you?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For those not familiar with corporate lobbyists, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying_in_the_United_States#Lobbying_controversies
For those not familiar with the military–industrial complex, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex
For those not familiar with Hillary Clinton’s alleged “Entrapments” strategy, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment
For those not familiar with Hillary Clinton’s alleged “Projection Lying” strategy, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
“Projection Lying” is called "reverse projection" in psychology and "transference" in espionage.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Any other women interested in being the next president? How about you?
Speaking for myself, I am 100% for a woman as president conditional to her serving you the working citizens. Instead of serving money. Same condition for any man president. Unfortunately Hillary Clinton past behaviors demonstrated that she served money, she does not serve you the working citizens. To her money is more important than you the working citizens. Find above information for supporting evidence. So Hillary current talk about serving working citizens as little or no credibility. I suggest to demand all presidential candidates to serve the interests of the working citizens of the United States, and not be tied or dependent on money from corporations or money from a few billionaires. Any other women interested in being the next president and serving working citizens, instead of serving money? How about Jill Stein? Anyone else? If no women are interested, how about Bernie Sanders? Or how about an independent candidate?
- - -
Friendica Or Diaspora*
Are you facing a challenge with censorship on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, or Minds.com? You might be interested in the censorship-free and community-owned code, and really decentralized social media with either Friendica or diaspora*. Both are free, and without censorship. Read more or join at:
• https://friendi.ca
or
• https://diasporafoundation.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -