by James Corbett
April 18, 2020
It’s silent. It’s deadly. It’s spreading all around the globe. And, if you’re not careful, it’ll get you next!
The viral pandemic? No, silly! The viral infodemic.
Haven’t you heard? There’s a tsunami of fake news that’s coming to get you! And if you plebs don’t behave properly then your rulers are just going to have to shut down the internet for your own good.
If you haven’t heard the term “infodemic” yet, lucky you. But trust me, you’re going to be hearing about this idea ad nauseam in the coming months, so you’d better get prepared.
So what is an infodemic, exactly? Good question. Let’s turn to everybody’s favorite global health agency, the World Health Organization, for that answer, shall we?
On February 2nd the WHO released a situation report on the novel coronavirus outbreak. It section on “Managing the 2019-nCoV ‘infodemic’” helpfully explains that an infodemic is “an over-abundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it.”
Oh, no! Too much information? Say it ain’t so! If only someone can save us from this terrible scourge of having to use our own brains and apply a little discernment when sorting through the surfeit of information we encounter!
Don’t worry too much, though. The good folks at the WHO have a plan for dealing with such an “over-abundance” of information:
Due to the high demand for timely and trustworthy information about 2019-nCoV, WHO technical risk communication and social media teams have been working closely to track and respond to myths and rumours. Through its headquarters in Geneva, its six regional offices and its partners, the Organization is working 24 hours a day to identify the most prevalent rumours that can potentially harm the public’s health, such as false prevention measures or cures. These myths are then refuted with evidence-based information. WHO is making public health information and advice on the 2019-nCoV, including myth busters, available on its social media channels.
OK, everybody, it looks like the WHO has everything under control here. Be sure to follow them on Weibo, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Pinterest, and turn off your critical-thinking switch. After all, they’ll sort out the good info from the bad for you! No thinking required.
Well, that solves that. I guess we can all go back to enjoying our self-isolation in peace, right?
No, of course we have not seen the end of this hand-wringing over the “flood” of mis- and disinformation on the internet. Nor have we seen the last of the meddling globalist busybodies who are desperately seeking to reestablish the monopoly on information that they enjoyed in the old dinosaur media paradigm of TV, radio and print.
In fact, this is just the beginning of what is shaping up to be the largest battle in the history of the infowar. Perhaps the deciding battle.
So, what exactly is the gambit here? As with everything else about the corona crisis, we can get a better understanding of where things are heading by consulting the pandemic blueprint: Event 201.
As everyone knows by now, Event 201 was a tabletop exercise simulating a global pandemic that was held in New York last October. Hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in cooperation with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Event 201 simulated “a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic.”
Now, it’s important to note that Event 201’s “hypothetical” pandemic was caused by the sudden outbreak of a novel coronavirus that totally wasn’t in any way related to the sudden outbreak of a novel coronavirus that was happening at the exact same time as the simulation, you crazy conspiracy theorist, you! (What, you don’t believe the Center for Health Security’s blanket denial that their simulation of a novel coronavirus pandemic was related in any way to the simultaneous novel coronavirus pandemic? Fine, here’s a FactCheck.org debunk for you! Take that, you tinfoil wingnut!)
For those who haven’t checked out the entire Event 201 playlist yet . . . well, why not? It seems rather relevant to the events we’re living through right now, and it featured many of the same players who are directing the response to the real-life (but totally unrelated!) novel coronavirus pandemic—like Chinese Center for Disease Creation and Propaganda Director-General George Gao, US Centers for Disease Creation and Propaganda Deputy Director Stephen Redd and Bill & Melinda GatesofHell Foundation President Christopher Elias.
The penultimate session of the exercise was entitled “Information Dissemination Discussion” and centered on the problem of dealing with the disinformation and misinformation spreading in the wake of the (totally hypothetical!) novel coronavirus pandemic. After watching a literal fake news segment detailing how Twitter and Facebook have identified a “disturbing number” (what number is that, exactly?) of accounts “dedicated to spreading disinformation about the outbreak,” the participants discuss how to combat the horror of people saying things online that are not officially sanctioned. In brief, their discussion focused on the following points:
- Some of those evil authoritarian regimes (read: enemies of the US State Department) are going to respond by shutting down the internet (of course we would never do that!).
- Some of those evil enemy governments (read: Russia) are going to spread misinformation about the pandemic on social media in order to undermine democracy (or something).
- We good guys (read: America and its vassals) need to combat the misinformation not with blanket internet shutdowns, but by working with the social media giants to “elevate authoritative voices” (read: us) and getting rid of those misinfo trolls and disinfo bots (read: everyone who disagrees with us).
- We good guys also need to leverage trusted voices in the community to spread our message for us.
Several of the speakers referenced the “Edelman Trust Barometer,” which they use to determine who is considered “trustworthy” and thus who can help propagate their propaganda most effectively. Apparently, this barometer told these participants that the CEOs of large companies are considered trustworthy (what planet are these people living on?), and thus CEOs are prime candidates to be courted by “business leadership organizations” that can presumably be relied upon to toe the WHO line on information about the pandemic.
So how much of the simulation exercise is playing out in reality?
Government shutdowns and internet blockages over pandemic “misinformation”? Check.
Accusations that those dastardly Russian bots are waging disinformation campaigns around this pandemic? Check.
Social media giants working to “elevate authoritative voices” and purge dissenting voices from their platforms? Check.
Leveraging “trusted voices” to spread the WHO party line? Well, funny you should mention that. In fact, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has just released a creepy video telling us exactly where to place our trust. (Spoiler: Vaccines. He wants us to trust in vaccines.) Guterres has also announced the creation of “a new United Nations Communications Response initiative to flood the Internet with facts and science while countering the growing scourge of misinformation.”
The world eagerly awaits the word of the UN communications response team on what information to trust and what to distrust, I’m sure.
I jest, of course, but I think we all know where this “infodemic” narrative is going, and it is not good news for independent journalists like myself who do not agree with the WHO or its big pharma buddies on the solutions to the covid “crisis” (or even on the nature of that crisis itself). You can bet your bottom dollar that outlets like The Corbett Report are exactly what the Event 201 planners had in mind when discussing their purge of dissenting voices online.
Lest there be any doubt where crackdown on independent journalism is heading, we merely have to look at how the “infodemic” contagion is infecting “lawmakers” all around the world. You could start with pronouncements from governments around the world—from Russia to Cambodia to Thailand to Egypt to Azerbaijan and many other countries—that they are going to be working to stem the flow of oline misinformation online by various draconian methods. Of course, when they censor independent voices it’s seen as horrible thuggish authoritarian censorship. But when the good guys do it, like the British government announced last month. . . well, that’s just a prudent response to dangerous conspiracy theorists and foreign disinfo bots.
Take British MP Damian Collins, for example. In addition to calling for laws to punish the spread of “dangerous misinformation” about the pandemic, Collins has also set up Infotagion.com. Intended as a “fact-checking” site, Infotagion doesn’t just rate the veracity of claims that “the US Covid-19 lockdown is an anti-Trump plot” or that “Covid-19 is a big pharma conspiracy” but, in an even greater insult to its audience’s intelligence, tells them whether they should or should not share such claims on social media. (You know, in case the plebs are too dumb to get that rating something “false” means that you shouldn’t pass it on.)
Inspired by Collins—and, no doubt, admiring the sheer audacity behind the idea of locking people up for sharing information that has not been approved by the Ministry of Truth—Canada’s Privy Council President Dominic LeBlanc has admitted that the Canadian government, too, is “considering introducing legislation to make it an offense to knowingly spread misinformation that could harm people.”
Yes, in case you haven’t cottoned on yet, “infodemic” is a euphemism for “fake news.” And we all know that “fake news” is just the term that government officials and their MSM mockingbird repeaters use to describe independent online journalism. The current pandemic pandemonium provides the purveyors of official, government-sanctioned fake news the perfect opportunity to remove independent voices from the internet. You better believe they’re going to use it.
So watch out for the infodemic. If you’re not careful, the powers-that-shouldn’t-be are going to take care of this “problem” of the “abundance of information” by making sure you only ever get your information from approved sources.
This weekly editorial is part of The Corbett Report Subscriber newsletter.
To support The Corbett Report and to access the full newsletter, please sign up to become a member of the website.