Identitarianism (Intersectionality) IS Hate

This article is going to ruffle some feathers as I'm going to say some things that shouldn't be controversial, but are. First and foremost, I guess a seriously controversial statement, perhaps one that should send all "note hateful" people screaming to their safe spaces "adoption is a universal good".

In my latest series, which I do plan on continuing, I've been exploring how feminism seems an awful lot like a hate movement, much more so than what you would expect a civil rights movement to look like. Now all this time I've been avoiding feminism's cousin born via a combination of sodomy and inbreeding- intersectionality.

That's right, you can tell you're in for a treat when your movement's name gets underlined in red by most spell checks because it represents that much of a fundamental misunderstanding of English. But then again LGBTQQIP2SAA is apparently acronym according to these nut jobs so- kinda says it all.

Identitarianism tends to look like hatred- period. That most definitely includes intersectionality.

Let's explore white identitarianism for a moment- especially in reference to its effects on white people.

How did the KKK treat white people again? Well just fine, as long as you didn't have the wrong opinions, in which case it was open season on your ass. Imagine if a Neo Nazi or KKK leader saw a black family with their adopted white son or daughter in the early days of segregation. Pretty easy to say that child would be gleefully traumatized. With identitarian movement's, keep this in mind, and you will never be surprised- Hate. Comes. First.

KKK and Neos will attack white people. Hell, Hitler is a record holder for white deaths, in concentration camps eleven million people died, six million were Jews- guess what color pretty much everyone else was. And that's not even covering the bombing, attacks on civilians and the euthanization of German citizen. The rule of identitarians is: Hate. Comes. First.

Caring about the individual people you're supposedly defending always comes second to “the cause” for white supremacists, so should it really be a surprise that female and minority supremacists behave in much the same way? When the FBI definition of rape was changed by feminists to include all victims of male rape only, I don't imagine women forced at gun point to pleasure other women, were too happy with that. I don't imagine abused mothers with 12 year old sons, are too pleased that feminists choose to mostly just ignore that they're not allowed to bring their young boys into shelters with them. I don't imagine feminists often consider the ramifications of shouting down MRAs calling for abuse shelters, when such shelters would facilitate fathers rescuing daughters from abuse. Hate. Comes. First. Feminists hate men. They hate men before they love women.

With intersectionality, things aren't much different. Remember that line earlier about Klansman or Neos seeing a black family with a white child? Intersectionals don't have enough political pull to get away with violence... most of the time... and lets face it, they're generally spoiled millennial couch potatoes. Rabbits aren't violent creatures, not because they're good natured, they would just suck at it.

"What about ANTIFA?"

I rest my case.

Still you really shouldn't be surprised by articles like this.

That's right, the second article is actually comparing innocent adoptive parents with people who drove themselves and their kids off a cliff after intense child abuse (the Harts story is a chilling story to read) because of skin color. This is of course “not meant to discourage white people adopting” they love to say, as they suggest in a thousand different ways that the very act of being adopted by someone of the wrong color will give these children an “identity crisis”.

For those of you a little soft on the reality of being an orphan, it may not be my “lived expereince” but a little research reveals stats like this for fatherlessness and this for straight up orphans. Heck I'll even zero in on the critical part so no one misses it:

"In 2012, 23,396 youth aged out of the U.S. foster care system without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed. Nearly 40% had been homeless or couch surfed, nearly 60% of young men had been convicted of a crime, and only 48% were employed. 75% of women and 33% of men receive government benefits to meet basic needs. 50% of all youth who aged out were involved in substance use and 17% of the females were pregnant."

Those are stats that blow any minority group right out of the water. Around half will be homeless and the MAJORITY of young men will commit crimes.

That's not even touching on the life of a child in foster care. We all know the story if we've even watched day time television. This is a serious charity for foster care kids: Suitcases For Kids. I'm not joking, and I would dare not criticize, because, in all seriousness, these children often have to transport all of their worldly possessions from place to place in garbage bags. These children routinely lose treasured toys, books and clothes and I would be surprised if they have any sense of identity at all as they can't put down roots being moved around like a toy no one wants. (And for anyone about to say “hey, you didn't back up the thing about the toys!” that's not the worst of it and... do you seriously need me to prove that kids lose things and might have trouble relocating them across states when moving multiple families?) This is the life of an orphan in America and supposedly it's, at least marginally, BETTER than being an orphan in other countries. The statistics are chilling and I have yet to hear or read of ANY child who had a positive experience in foster care.

But mark my words, it is NORMAL for intersectionals to question the motives of trans racial adoptions even to the faces of white parents saving children from this terrible system, because they are white. “White savior complex”... you mean, I don't know, a recognition of reality? Maybe it would have been better if the parents of that black child had lived or had the resources to raise them themselves, or hadn't been abusive ass holes, but I garaun-damn-fucking-tee you being adopted by white parents is better than the alternative for these kids with the situation they have. There are programs, again that I dare not criticise, that have parents “try out” potential adoptees for a few weeks, as if they were shoes. Again I say, I'm not criticising, I'm not, because as usual, when dealing with orphans, you always have to remember “it's better than nothing”. Orphan care is shit and is inevitably that way, every action basically has to be measured in terms of “is it better than nothing?”. And yes, retarded intersectional twats, I think BEING ADOPTED is better than nothing- but hey, maybe I'm wrong, I'm just spit balling here!

Can you seriously imagine, you care about someone so much, you try to prevent them being adopted? Of course you can't, that's stupid. You wouldn't prevent an adoption because you care about the adoptee unless you had serious questions about the intelligence, resources or behavior of the adopters. Otherwise you're just being an ass and using the kid as a prop for your cause. Intersectionals, mark my words and mark them well, COULDN'T CARE LESS about minority children. They hate white people first. They want a world with as few white people as possible, with everyone staying in their own lane and damn the consiquences to anyone.

If African countries continue to fall into darker and darker ages through isolation, that's just fine with them, as long as Europeans or Asians don't come in and upset their precious “diversity”. Identitarianism isn't about helping people, it's about an abstract cause and all the hatred of real life that comes with it.

Be proud of your culture, your family and your nation, but stay far clear of identitairians, they don't care about you. To them you are a prop for their cause, nothing more than a pawn. If you're in the wrong place they will gladly sacrifice your safety, your rigths, your psychology, hell they don't even care about your life. You are nothing to them. The reason, best I can tell, is that there is no legit reason to need to have your race or gender's problems or future matter more than any other, nor is there any realistic way to show one “better” than the other. Yes, America is better than Nigeria in just about every conceivable way, but looking at the sheer number of Nigerian immigrants in ivy league colleges, I don't think that's a reflection of the people themselves, just a fucked up culture. I salute George Washington for fighting to give me my freedom and in the same breath I salute the tuskegee airmen for risking their lives to keep it for me.

Take pride in who you are and the people who got you where you are, not in your pigment or what does or does not dangle between your legs.