What to expect next in clown world

We all know the left is liable to follow its usual trajectory, or wheel of crazy; climate change, fat acceptance long as its women, socialism, diversity. Forgetting the irony of contradictions. They are well aware of these hence why they separate news cycles and know the public is by now more than used to honing in on only one cycle, be it brexit brexit brexit or corona corona and so on. The wheel however tends to get slowly more radical, resembling a Catherine wheel rather than one of fortune. Buzzwords slowly ramp up to make the radical slide more palatable. All aimed at the goal of a global population cull and a passive, obedient, dependent populace. From diversity to inclusivity, from global warming to climate change, from fat acceptance to body positivity. I say it's time we superseded these. On the surface it seems so obvious. But the length of the cycle is perfectly catered to stick in the memory yet evade critical analysis. So we need to get in there first; speculate on what buzz words they'll use and what we need to point out and when. So given contemporary knowledge of the duration and facilitating lexicon let's point out what those things will be; rough idea of dates and words the globalists will use. Followed by my suggestion of pre-antidotes and when to trigger these hydroxychloroquine-like defences. Why those who spout these mantras never venture as to why their doctrine just happens to line up so closely to that of globalists, still bemuses me. 

First let's look at the stats showing that since January 16th, cases of the slightly worse than flu have been on a continuous downward trajectory. Bearing in mind the government have set a date of 21st June, there may still be some small businesses that are able to survive and reopen at this time. For government to renege on this would cause a backlash, given the available stats surely? Not if dressed up in a catchy buzzphrase and a common cause. Boris alone will be a boogeyman. Hence, I expect "carry on collectively", with ad campaigns featuring all races, maybe even with the use of a Sid James likeness, or a minority that featured in the films, to be the mantra accompanying this. Now, in the preface, I forgot to mention something that will ensure this works for the globalists: The smokescreen that both spills from the message and distracts from its effects. Expect a whole media cycle dedicated to the racist undertones of the movies and the debate of should they/shouldn't they be banned. Forgetting the main point of keeping us distracted from being shut down and led further down the bigger government, fewer businesses, less individualism hellhole. Distracted long enough to make the covid passports seem inevitable, no matter how much the rest of us try to point out both the smokescreen and the real data. To pre-empt this, I suggest we "Embrace individualism" with E.I > A.I and a whole slew of videos dedicated to people who stood out not following a movement but doing their own thing in the face of others doing the opposite. To underpin this, contrast the artificial individualism like, Pharrel dressing like a women, while everyone else is; Harry Styles doing the same; Hollywood actors saying things in a room of people agreeing with them. Flyers with the heading Embrace Individualism and E.I > A.I as the subheading and a split photo of Styles and their ilk claiming to be different with a backdrop of the same types doing the same things. Next to them, Thomas Sowell with his credential written underneath with a backdrop of the angry socialists on college campuses. Written plainly with a white background, on the back of the flyers, don't conform for conformity sake; if you disagree let's debate. On our side, figures such as barefoot lawyer, Cheng Guangcheng should also feature. These real achievers to insipid celebrity contrasts should be made clear.

Should the government overplay their hand (or the above videos and flyers get produced and promote enough cognitive dissonance), expect a potential call for shut downs or avoidance of businesses that do not fall in line with pro green agenda, long term, an Offcom-esque body that look into if enough "green practices" are taking place in the business. Think, EU's "may contain fish" labels required to be put on all packaging that big companies could afford to implement but put a lot of the smaller ones out of existence. The media already talk about the changing climate as if it's not up for debate, despite Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore providing ample evidence against their claims. They also fired David Bellamy for daring to go against the grain. Unlikely then to bring about any change on the flagship echo chambers. So on and on their predictable, we debate every thing and show varied opinions, except on THIS vis-a-vis climate change, will go.

I would suggest a way to counter this before it goes into its next stage, as the use of the brand name that put out the E.I > A.I to gather more steam to the cause of free thinking and unfortunately, the globalists and their media puppets have come so far unopposed that collectivism betters any individual. Due to the fact that any one person will be attacked and "other'd" in the way they have to anyone with their head above the pulpit. Though such groups as proud boys have not been fortunate and Q nonsense made any patriot look full of empty rhetoric minus the media backing. I feel a group such as Turning Point or The Walkaway movement would be a great front for these pre-emptive campaigns. The beauty being they have both established themselves as debate ready and that the messages are clear enough to be applicable at any time. Yet triggered at the right point to be in the public consciousness long enough to coincide with the governments propaganda plans. 

The poster style for climate change reality would present all of the numerous big debates as umbrella headings, such as crime, under which it would have, family background, poverty, mental illness. The same umbrella pattern with numerous causes under in the same style. Then under the climate change umbrella have the names of David Bellamy and Patrick Moore crossed out. Perhaps, the Orwellian Pig cartoon at the bottom of these flyers, with the caption, "some opinions are more equal than others."

Date to pull the trigger for E.I > A.I: 1st of June. Synonymous with the month we'll get our freedom back, should they renege once pro individualism is in public consciousness a backlash will surely ensue. 

For the Climate change reality: Immediately after either we do get our freedom at the hands of the backlash or should the government stick to their word, on the 21st of June.

These on the defence first campaigns will have to continue and we will have to scout their next move toward globalism until a time where the government has receded its tentacles and regulations into what more closely reflects what a government should be for; protecting citizens against harm and conduct their business without intrusion. Or at least some steps away from a communist dictatorship and towards free market capitalism and ideas can be freely debated without shutdown of wrong-think. If we don't do this for at least the near future, expect more shut downs, even less local businesses and a bleaker future that any new businesses outside the global elites shall ever emerge, while following these endorsements, they will accuse the figures on the right of becoming more radical, merely for calling out the nonsense. All this, unwittingly endorsed by campus lefties who supposedly hate big corporations. The irony of our time.