Slacktivism and Resisting the Great Reset/Agenda 2030

Have you ever heard the term, "slacktivism?" One definition is: political activities that have no real impact on political outcomes, but only serve to increase the "feel good" factor of the participants. I'm certainly guilty of this. You probably are, too. I'm not here to scold you for it. On the contrary, I'm asking you to employ slacktivism in a way that can actually make a real difference and, depending on how widely the idea is employed, in less than two weeks. 

First, we should examine slacktivism and how useful it has been for the powers that be.
(scroll down to "Step 1" if you don't care about this)

My theory is that this slacktivism arose to, essentially, serve just a handful of purposes. First, social media interaction on posts about causes lets Google, FB, Twitter, YouTube etc. understand the prevailing sentiments regarding an issue in a given area. "Hunger," for example might be a hot topic in some countries while "tax-payer funded abortions for pregnant atheist pansexual male pygmies" may be popular in other countries.

If your business is influencing opinion, this kind of information is invaluable. You know where to expect the best return on your investment when launching propaganda campaigns, for instance. Over time, you can learn what works best in shifting public opinion to one that greases the path for your agenda there. Before too long, you can have an entire nation or global region supporting whatever it is you want them to support, even if in reality, that agenda is not in that region's best interests. Or, you can use what you know to manipulate both sides and sneak your agenda in right under their noses.

Second, whether the people post in favor of or against your aims, they've now identified themselves for you. Big Tech will gladly point out to the governments who the "extremists" are. ProudAmerican1776 is staunchly pro-2nd amendment. His profile has many picture posts of what we assume to be his arsenal, and videos of him engaging in shooting competitions. He only makes disparaging remarks about the (Pres, PM w/e),  we have his location at least to the city and can ping his IP to discover his actual location... They can use this information to marshall resources (human and equipment) more efficiently for the management of what they deem are legitimate threats. It's what they call a force-multiplier and can literally make a team of 5 people (say) as effective as a group of 50.  

If that makes sense, then I beg you to consider doing some meaningful slacktivism. It will have an impact, and I'll try to explain how as I put this all in order. These will be specific steps you can take today from within the comforts to which you're accustomed. It will require you to do just a bit of research (source and instructions provided), click a few buttons, type a message (and copy it), and have the courage to ask like-minded people to do the same. 

If you stand against the Great Reset and/or Agenda 2030, this is the easiest, simplest and safest way I know to meaningfully declare your resistance in a way that will have an actual impact. It will only cost you whatever time is required to complete the steps. 

I don't want your money and there's no fee for this outside whatever you're already paying for electricity and internet access. If you see this as a good idea link to this blog. I'm going to pay coins to promote it because I believe its that important. 

Step 1 - Click on this link and search the database of the corporate partners of the World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/partners  Search for companies you're currently a customer of. Who do you bank with? Who holds your insurances? Who produces the brand food you eat? Be exhaustive in your search to have maximum impact. Write down or otherwise make a note of companies you do business with that you find in your research. 

This list is not exclusive to a handful of companies from a few countries. Thai people will find Bangkok Bank and other Thai banks and businesses on the list, for example.

Step 2 - This is the hardest part. You have to decide if your resistance to all this is greater than the conveniences you currently enjoy from these companies. Can you find another service provider NOT on the list? Can they service your needs as efficiently and affordably as the WEF partner company? These are real considerations, but I hope that fighting for freedom is more important to you than ease and leisure. 

That being said, go down the list you've compiled, visit their websites, log in to your accounts and close them. Many websites will ask you to provide feedback as to why you're leaving. You should tell them. Even copy this if you want:

Amazon (example), 

I closed my account today because (Amazon) is a corporate partner of the World Economic Forum. WEF leader Klaus Schwab has openly bragged about seeding people he's trained into governments over the years who are now doing his bidding. Your support for the World Economic Forum tells me that you support Schwab's effort to "get around" democracies. I think it's abhorrent and, if their goals advance, it poses a serious threat to liberty. I will not continue paying you or any company in support of such an agenda or way of doing business. I will encourage everyone I know to close their accounts as well. 

That easy, really. Type your own message once (or copy this one), and then just paste it in every time you get a pop-up asking to explain why you're closing your account. For the companies that don't ask for feedback, find their email address, make an email addressed to them and paste the message into the body of the email. 

There are over 1,000 corporate partners of the WEF. What would happen if Amazon, for instance, had 80 million accounts close over a week with each customer sending similar feedback?

You could get 80 million account closures from North America alone between Americans and Canadians who claim to stand against the Great Reset. How many in Europe? It will affect the stock price, which means even people who don't care about this at all will likely sell their shares to preserve their gains. More weight...

That's why this will work. Either they'll react and reconsider, or they'll accept the permanent loss of those accounts. Whichever they choose, they will be financially hurt, and they'll have a new metric by which to measure how we feel about their agenda. Whining is just noise. Account closures in mass is like actually pushing the bully back. 

Note for stock investors: this is not financial advice. If you own shares of Blackrock mutual funds or Vanguard mutual funds, sell those shares. Make sure to divest yourself of the shares you own in companies on your list, and of mutual funds holding shares of the companies on your list. You can do it in your account online, or you can call your advisor to make the trades. Be sure to tell them why you're selling. Those notes get passed up through the brokerage firms and the presidents will pay attention. If their financial institution is on the list, cancel your account with them. That may mean being out of the market for a while, or converting your holdings to another investment not associated with any companies on your list. I own gold, silver and crypto. Depending on the size of your stash, maybe buy a piece of land in the country. 

This One-Two non-violent attack (loss of revenue and investment) would be devastating to many of the companies on your list. I guarantee that. I can't guarantee what their reaction will be, but whatever it is we'll understand who's side they're really on. 

Step 3 - Post on all your social media accounts about this. Link them here if you wish. Explain why you chose to do this. Post it in an insta video or FB live or whatever. Post on Reddit and PANTIP and wherever else you go online. In your video, let your passion come through. Inspire others to consider doing the same.

If you read this far, thank you from the bottom of my heart. God bless you. I really do believe this is the easiest, safest and most effective non-violent way we can resist and have an impact. I'm sorry if any (or a lot) of this seemed redundant, or like I was trying to teach a small child or condescending. That wasn't my intention at all. I just wanted to be as clear as possible about what to do, why, and what impact we can deduce that action will have.