More from TJ_Vista

repeat
5.53k views
Let's Learn More...Straight from Revolver News, Breaking the Story... Okay...If you Listen to 2 Videos today...Let this be the other one. 😁 (Granted there are several videos in this click, just consider them a part of 1.) Get Ready for Information Overload...We MUST Address ALL of this... This is LONG because there's a lot to learn. I'll try to break it into smaller interesting chunks in the comments, but, Read the Whole Article if you can. "Bishop Garrison"...I guess we have to Learn more about him..."He's doing Tremendous Damage to the United States Military and to the Country."... "Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions: In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies? Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)? Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)? From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers. If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in. If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups. One of the key consensus points among the FBI-DOJ and the regime media is the idea that, while 1/6 is primarily the fault of Trump-supporting QAnon-infused “domestic terrorists,” it is secondarily the fault of so-called “intelligence failures.” Klobuchar’s own question at the March 2, 2021 FBI hearing (above) reinforces this “intelligence failure” narrative, but she is not alone. A five-month “bipartisan” Senate investigation recently arrived at the very same “intelligence failure” narrative to explain the breach of the Capitol and associated events on 1/6: If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister. Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day. It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose? A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6. We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted. The question immediately arises as to why this is the case, and forces us to consider whether certain individuals are being protected from indictment because they were involved in 1/6 as undercover operatives or confidential informants for a federal agency. Here it is useful to draw a distinction between two discrete categories of participants in the so-called Capitol Siege." https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/
5.53k views · Jun 16th
repeat
5.82k views
Oh Yes...Yes, they did...from second one...This doesn't make sense any other way. THIS IS YOUR CLICK OF THE DAY...BOMBSHELL. Here's the Whole transcript from Tucker's video if you care to read along. This is just an excerpt. I don't wanna give it all away...Oh Yes...Yes, I do...😄 Pay special attention to the very last sentence in this post. 😉 Please, if you listen to just one video today...Let this be the one. The FBI is the Perpetual Problem...The Common Denominator...The Reoccurring Pattern...The Tie That Binds...and we KNOW this...We HAVE to DO something about it. Tucker goes there, and he Gives so many Examples of the Past where this tactic is used...That's what The FBI Does...They are set-up and cover-up artists...They do this to push Covert Political Agendas and to remain Relevant...as well, to Protect the Actual Criminals perpetrating the actual crimes...THEY ARE the ABUSE OF POWER. I call them, The FBLie... "And speaking of January 6th, why are there still so many things, basic factual matters, we don’t know about that day? Why is the Biden administration preventing us from knowing? Why is the administration hiding more than 10,000 hours of surveillance tape from the U.S. Capitol? What could possibly be the reason for that? Even as they call for more openness. We need to get to the bottom of it. They could release those tapes today, but they’re not. Why? We ought to be asking those questions, urgently. Because as the attorney general reminded us, a lot depends on the answers. At least one news organization is. Revolver.news is a new site and turned out to be one of the last honest outlets on the internet. A new piece on the site suggests an answer to some of these questions. We know the government is hiding the identity of many law enforcement officers who were present at the capitol on January 6, not just the one who killed Ashli Babbitt. According to the government's own court filings, those law enforcement officers participated in the riot. Sometimes in violent ways. We know that because, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most of the people who were in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But, strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven't been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls these people "unindicted co-conspirators." What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they're FBI operatives... ... For example, one of those "unindicted co-conspirators" is someone the government identifies only as "Person Two." According to those documents, "Person Two" stayed in the same hotel room as an "insurrectionist" named Thomas Caldwell, who's alleged to be a member of the group called the Oath Keepers. "Person Two" also "stormed the barricades" at the Capitol on January 6, alongside Thomas Caldwell. The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell -- who by the way is a 65-year-old man -- was led to believe there would be a "quick reaction force" also participating in January 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person Three" -- who had a hotel room and an accomplice. But wait. Here’s the interesting thing. "Person Two" and "Person Three" were organizers of the riot. The government knows who they are, but the government has not charged them. Why is that? You know why. They were almost certainly working for the FBI. So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on January 6, according to government documents. And those two are not alone. PELOSI PUSHES FORWARD WITH VOTING RIGHTS, JAN. 6 INVESTIGATIONS CITING ‘REPUBLICAN ASSAULT ON OUR DEMOCRACY’ In all, Revolver News reported that there are, quote, "upwards of 20 unindicted co-conspirators in the Oath Keeper indictments, all playing various roles in the conspiracy, who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities — and in some cases much, much more severe activities — as those named alongside them in indictments." Huh? So it turns out this white supremacist insurrection was, again, by the government’s own admission in these documents, organized, at least in part, by government agents." https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-government-agents-helped-organize-capitol-riot
5.82k views · Jun 16th
repeat
19 views
https://rumble.com/vipviz-amazing-this-man-destroys-left-wing-critical-race-theory.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Donald+Trump+Jr.&ep=2 this race thing is more created by the fake news then real. They're the ones that are whipping up this frenzy among the blacks. The fact is more blacks kill other blacks than anyone else. Matter fact since a lot of the ghettos for the blacks don't take taxes I think since they are the ones that want to defund the police I think the police should be not allowed to go into any neighborhood that does not pay taxes and they can just fend for themselves if we need to we can just give them guns. To protect himself. I don't want to send officers into neighborhoods like that so they can complain that they are being harassed by the police
19 views · Jun 20th

More from TJ_Vista

repeat
5.53k views
Let's Learn More...Straight from Revolver News, Breaking the Story... Okay...If you Listen to 2 Videos today...Let this be the other one. 😁 (Granted there are several videos in this click, just consider them a part of 1.) Get Ready for Information Overload...We MUST Address ALL of this... This is LONG because there's a lot to learn. I'll try to break it into smaller interesting chunks in the comments, but, Read the Whole Article if you can. "Bishop Garrison"...I guess we have to Learn more about him..."He's doing Tremendous Damage to the United States Military and to the Country."... "Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions: In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies? Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)? Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)? From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers. If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in. If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups. One of the key consensus points among the FBI-DOJ and the regime media is the idea that, while 1/6 is primarily the fault of Trump-supporting QAnon-infused “domestic terrorists,” it is secondarily the fault of so-called “intelligence failures.” Klobuchar’s own question at the March 2, 2021 FBI hearing (above) reinforces this “intelligence failure” narrative, but she is not alone. A five-month “bipartisan” Senate investigation recently arrived at the very same “intelligence failure” narrative to explain the breach of the Capitol and associated events on 1/6: If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister. Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day. It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose? A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6. We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted. The question immediately arises as to why this is the case, and forces us to consider whether certain individuals are being protected from indictment because they were involved in 1/6 as undercover operatives or confidential informants for a federal agency. Here it is useful to draw a distinction between two discrete categories of participants in the so-called Capitol Siege." https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/
5.53k views · Jun 16th
repeat
5.82k views
Oh Yes...Yes, they did...from second one...This doesn't make sense any other way. THIS IS YOUR CLICK OF THE DAY...BOMBSHELL. Here's the Whole transcript from Tucker's video if you care to read along. This is just an excerpt. I don't wanna give it all away...Oh Yes...Yes, I do...😄 Pay special attention to the very last sentence in this post. 😉 Please, if you listen to just one video today...Let this be the one. The FBI is the Perpetual Problem...The Common Denominator...The Reoccurring Pattern...The Tie That Binds...and we KNOW this...We HAVE to DO something about it. Tucker goes there, and he Gives so many Examples of the Past where this tactic is used...That's what The FBI Does...They are set-up and cover-up artists...They do this to push Covert Political Agendas and to remain Relevant...as well, to Protect the Actual Criminals perpetrating the actual crimes...THEY ARE the ABUSE OF POWER. I call them, The FBLie... "And speaking of January 6th, why are there still so many things, basic factual matters, we don’t know about that day? Why is the Biden administration preventing us from knowing? Why is the administration hiding more than 10,000 hours of surveillance tape from the U.S. Capitol? What could possibly be the reason for that? Even as they call for more openness. We need to get to the bottom of it. They could release those tapes today, but they’re not. Why? We ought to be asking those questions, urgently. Because as the attorney general reminded us, a lot depends on the answers. At least one news organization is. Revolver.news is a new site and turned out to be one of the last honest outlets on the internet. A new piece on the site suggests an answer to some of these questions. We know the government is hiding the identity of many law enforcement officers who were present at the capitol on January 6, not just the one who killed Ashli Babbitt. According to the government's own court filings, those law enforcement officers participated in the riot. Sometimes in violent ways. We know that because, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most of the people who were in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But, strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven't been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls these people "unindicted co-conspirators." What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they're FBI operatives... ... For example, one of those "unindicted co-conspirators" is someone the government identifies only as "Person Two." According to those documents, "Person Two" stayed in the same hotel room as an "insurrectionist" named Thomas Caldwell, who's alleged to be a member of the group called the Oath Keepers. "Person Two" also "stormed the barricades" at the Capitol on January 6, alongside Thomas Caldwell. The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell -- who by the way is a 65-year-old man -- was led to believe there would be a "quick reaction force" also participating in January 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person Three" -- who had a hotel room and an accomplice. But wait. Here’s the interesting thing. "Person Two" and "Person Three" were organizers of the riot. The government knows who they are, but the government has not charged them. Why is that? You know why. They were almost certainly working for the FBI. So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on January 6, according to government documents. And those two are not alone. PELOSI PUSHES FORWARD WITH VOTING RIGHTS, JAN. 6 INVESTIGATIONS CITING ‘REPUBLICAN ASSAULT ON OUR DEMOCRACY’ In all, Revolver News reported that there are, quote, "upwards of 20 unindicted co-conspirators in the Oath Keeper indictments, all playing various roles in the conspiracy, who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities — and in some cases much, much more severe activities — as those named alongside them in indictments." Huh? So it turns out this white supremacist insurrection was, again, by the government’s own admission in these documents, organized, at least in part, by government agents." https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-government-agents-helped-organize-capitol-riot
5.82k views · Jun 16th
repeat
19 views
https://rumble.com/vipviz-amazing-this-man-destroys-left-wing-critical-race-theory.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Donald+Trump+Jr.&ep=2 this race thing is more created by the fake news then real. They're the ones that are whipping up this frenzy among the blacks. The fact is more blacks kill other blacks than anyone else. Matter fact since a lot of the ghettos for the blacks don't take taxes I think since they are the ones that want to defund the police I think the police should be not allowed to go into any neighborhood that does not pay taxes and they can just fend for themselves if we need to we can just give them guns. To protect himself. I don't want to send officers into neighborhoods like that so they can complain that they are being harassed by the police
19 views · Jun 20th