More from 𝔑⌖𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔗⌖𝔖𝔢𝔢ℌ𝔢𝔯𝔢®™

"Hunter Biden still appears to hold an ownership stake in a Chinese government-linked investment firm despite repeated pledges from President Joe Biden that his family would not have any foreign business ties. The...son of Joe Biden still holds a 10% equity stake in Bohai Harvest RST (Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Company, according to Chinese business records. Hunter Biden has reportedly been under criminal investigation as far back as 2018 as federal authorities scrutinize his taxes and potentially his foreign business dealings, and the 51-year-old's financial transactions with China might be at the forefront. That's despite White House press secretary Jen Psaki in February saying the president's son 'has been working to unwind' his 10% stake in the firm..." https://archive.li/nfAVg
40 views ·
"H.R. 899 is sponsored by Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and co-sponsored by 14 additional representatives, while S. 323 is sponsored by Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.). The two bills are identical; they consist of only a single sentence that states: 'The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2021.' From a constitutional standpoint, abolishing the DoE is essential. After all, nowhere does the U.S. Constitution give the federal government any authority over education policy. Under the 10th Amendment, education policy lies with the states and the people. By its very existence and shaping of U.S. education policy, the DoE violates the Constitution. Additionally, the federalization of U.S. education policy is enabling spread of curriculum that promotes left-wing values and that dumbs down students. These include Common Core and the Every Student Succeeds Act that codified the former. Furthermore, the Biden DoE is actively promoting critical race theory and the 1619 Project..." https://thenewamerican.com/legislation-in-congress-would-abolish-education-department/
54 views ·
Far from "just another birther hoax", the facts are all laid out very neatly here. "...the situation with Kamala Harris is quite clear. Neither her mother nor her father was a U.S. citizen at the time of her birth in 1964 — neither was even a permanent legal resident of the United States! They were in the United States on temporary student visas. Kamala Harris’ mother was a citizen of India at the time of Kamala Harris’ birth. She did not even apply for lawful permanent residence in America until 1967, three years after Harris’ birth. This means that no logical interpretation of the 14th Amendment would have Harris’ mother as having placed herself 'under the jurisdiction of the United States' at the time of the birth of her daughter, Kamala. Harris’ father did not even begin the process of obtaining U.S. citizenship until May 2015. Furthermore, Jamaican law specifically states that children born outside Jamaica to a Jamaican parent are Jamaican citizens. In blunt terms, neither of Kamala Harris’ parents had placed themselves under the jurisdiction of the United States when she was born in 1964. The most that Kamala Harris could be is a naturalized citizen of the United States, not a natural-born citizen. This makes her ineligible to serve as either president or vice-president of the United States..." https://thenewamerican.com/evidence-is-clear-vice-president-harris-is-not-constitutionally-eligible-to-hold-the-office-she-now-holds/
46 views ·

More from 𝔑⌖𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔗⌖𝔖𝔢𝔢ℌ𝔢𝔯𝔢®™

"Hunter Biden still appears to hold an ownership stake in a Chinese government-linked investment firm despite repeated pledges from President Joe Biden that his family would not have any foreign business ties. The...son of Joe Biden still holds a 10% equity stake in Bohai Harvest RST (Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Company, according to Chinese business records. Hunter Biden has reportedly been under criminal investigation as far back as 2018 as federal authorities scrutinize his taxes and potentially his foreign business dealings, and the 51-year-old's financial transactions with China might be at the forefront. That's despite White House press secretary Jen Psaki in February saying the president's son 'has been working to unwind' his 10% stake in the firm..." https://archive.li/nfAVg
40 views ·
"H.R. 899 is sponsored by Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and co-sponsored by 14 additional representatives, while S. 323 is sponsored by Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.). The two bills are identical; they consist of only a single sentence that states: 'The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2021.' From a constitutional standpoint, abolishing the DoE is essential. After all, nowhere does the U.S. Constitution give the federal government any authority over education policy. Under the 10th Amendment, education policy lies with the states and the people. By its very existence and shaping of U.S. education policy, the DoE violates the Constitution. Additionally, the federalization of U.S. education policy is enabling spread of curriculum that promotes left-wing values and that dumbs down students. These include Common Core and the Every Student Succeeds Act that codified the former. Furthermore, the Biden DoE is actively promoting critical race theory and the 1619 Project..." https://thenewamerican.com/legislation-in-congress-would-abolish-education-department/
54 views ·
Far from "just another birther hoax", the facts are all laid out very neatly here. "...the situation with Kamala Harris is quite clear. Neither her mother nor her father was a U.S. citizen at the time of her birth in 1964 — neither was even a permanent legal resident of the United States! They were in the United States on temporary student visas. Kamala Harris’ mother was a citizen of India at the time of Kamala Harris’ birth. She did not even apply for lawful permanent residence in America until 1967, three years after Harris’ birth. This means that no logical interpretation of the 14th Amendment would have Harris’ mother as having placed herself 'under the jurisdiction of the United States' at the time of the birth of her daughter, Kamala. Harris’ father did not even begin the process of obtaining U.S. citizenship until May 2015. Furthermore, Jamaican law specifically states that children born outside Jamaica to a Jamaican parent are Jamaican citizens. In blunt terms, neither of Kamala Harris’ parents had placed themselves under the jurisdiction of the United States when she was born in 1964. The most that Kamala Harris could be is a naturalized citizen of the United States, not a natural-born citizen. This makes her ineligible to serve as either president or vice-president of the United States..." https://thenewamerican.com/evidence-is-clear-vice-president-harris-is-not-constitutionally-eligible-to-hold-the-office-she-now-holds/
46 views ·