play_circle_outline

"The PCR Test Cannot Be Used To Diagnose Anything" - Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (Most Cited German Scientist)

"The PCR Test Cannot Be Used To Diagnose Anything" - Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (Most Cited German Scientist) Jan. 18, 2021 During a November 11, 2020 interview, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi reaffirmed PCR inventor Kary Mullis’ statement on the PCR test that “it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.” Dr. Bhakdi is an MD, specialist in microbiology and publisher of over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology. He claims that the faulty diagnoses have helped to spur a global panic of public health measures based on a virus, Covid-19, that is not really new. “The coronaviruses have been with us, with man... since the beginning of mankind. You know, these are viruses that coexist with us.” https://www.bitchute.com/video/4Q13EEj3PCAZ/ https://youtu.be/6YzwY1v0IVg

48Upvotes
2Downvotes
6Reminds
thumb_upthumb_downchat_bubble

More from Progressive Truth Seekers

Mapping the Genome and Modern Genetics: Eugenics Repackaged for Modern Times July 4, 2015 Will the Modern Genetics Movement Preserve Life or Threaten Life? This is part II of a series on the relationship between the eugenics movement and modern genetics. It examines whether true health and true happiness lie in the human genome. Are we really bound to the set of genes that we received from our parents? Or can we overcome what we were given? What are the factors that activate or deactivate certain genes? How can we control the expression of our genetic make-up to promote our health and the health of our children? Can we trust everything we hear about the benefits of genetic research? Is there a dark side to genetics? Is there reason to suspect hidden motivations of certain groups who want us to be convinced that our genes, and only our genes, control every aspect of our health and well-being? Is it wise to believe that we have no other options than to suffer while scientists look for genetic cures for all that ails us? The previous article reviewed the history of the eugenics movement and examined how it was given a facelift and transformed into what we now think of as the modern science of genetics. It discussed the eugenics program of Adolf Hitler that terminated the lives of eleven million men, women and children. Hitler was strongly influenced by Darwin’s theory of evolution and by Americans who were promoting eugenics. He closely followed the teachings of university professors in the United States who were teaching eugenics and using the principles of Darwin’s theory of evolution to form a “superior” race of people in America. The previous article questioned whether there remains a link between the eugenics movement of the past and modern genetic science. Do they still share common goals? The superior race that American eugenicists and Adolf Hitler envisioned was intended to be free of disability, poverty, and chronic illness. It was to be a “beautiful” race of people (as they saw it) that consisted of men and women with blond hair and blue eyes. They would be a select class of people who were physically perfect, physically fit, intellectually superior, and financially prosperous. Modern eugenics does not seek to create a superior race, but it does have the potential for creating a superior class of people who will be distinguished by the absence of certain diseases, which they will call “health.” They will possess a certain set of traits that someone among them has determined to be “best” for humanity. Both movements sought, and are seeking, to achieve high and lofty goals supposedly for our benefit. They promise to provide rapid restoration for all that ails us. They seek to improve the defects that exist in humankind and create a future in which disease, illness, and poverty will only exist in the memories of older generations, because genetic defects will have been corrected or eliminated. [1] The previous article noted that the theory of Darwinian evolution and its implementation through eugenics disregards individual and personal choices concerning human reproduction, and it devalues human life itself. Darwinism and eugenics replace the love-based commitment between family members with allegiance to the state. They replace the worship of God with the worship of eugenic principles and evolutionary theory. They turn the hearts of the people away from valuing and protecting human life, and desensitize society to death. They teach people to accept the fact that the lives of some people must be sacrificed for the greater good of the “superior” ones who remain. At the heart of the eugenics movement was a deep seated belief in the superiority of the white race, and the need for eliminating other races that they determined to be inferior. It called for the cleansing of the white race as well to eliminate all people and families who showed evidence of having defective genetic material (germplasm). Additional Similarities between Eugenics and Modern Genetics I am struck by certain similarities between the old eugenics movement and the “science” of modern genetics as it is now known. Let’s take a look at a few additional similarities that were not discussed in the previous article. Both Eugenics and Genetics Claim to be “Scientific” Eugenicists were convinced that their observations were based on rigorously applied scientific methods. They believe that the human traits they observed were all directly tied to the human germplasm. They assumed that the environment where people lived, the food people ate, the lifestyle they chose, the educational opportunities that were provided, etc., had very little to do with the quality of the human life that would result. The balance between “nature versus nurture” was heavily weighted toward “nature.” This means that they believed that a nurturing environment could not overcome the power of one’s germplasm (genetic material), and thus, people were destined to have the same negative traits as their parents. Nature would always rule over nurture. It didn’t matter how well people were treated by other people in society or whether they were given opportunities to change, they would always remain defective. If we look at the general marketing of modern genetics, we see the same claims. We are told that genetics is a science, just as the eugenicists once said. We are also told that our genes set the stage for everything in our lives, and we must live with the defects we received at conception, which control our illnesses. It is true that genetics uses lots of scientific jargon, and uses advanced chemistry and highly sophisticated scientific equipment to study and manipulate genetic material. Geneticists, like most other professionals with PhD level training, could easily dominate and control most any conversation having to do with their field of expertise when speaking to non-scientists. However, just because they use scientific techniques and use a technical language filled with scientific jargon, does not mean that everything they say and all of the principles they use are accurate, logical, or true. A hundred years ago, eugenicists were equally able to dominate conversations, and they were fundamentally wrong on many points regarding the inheritability of traits that did not involve the germplasm. For example, their claim that black persons in America lived as an underclass in poverty was caused by their deficient germplasm was nothing but racist ideology squeezed into the box of “scientific” jargon.
62 views ·
Over 60,000 Sign Petitions to Stop Jeff Bezos from Returning to Earth June 21, 2021 Blast off, Bezos! More than 60,000 people have signed petitions to stop Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth after his Blue Origin space flight next month. Days after the Amazon founder announced earlier this month that he and his brother Mark would fly on his space tourism company’s first passenger flight to space, two petitions launched calling to prevent Bezos from coming back home. One of the petitions, titled “Do not allow Jeff Bezos to return to Earth,” has garnered more than 40,300 signatures. “Billionaire’s should not exist…on earth, or in space, but should they decide the latter they should stay there,” the creator of that Change.org petition wrote. And more than 20,000 people have signed another, titled “Petition To Not Allow Jeff Bezos Re-Entry To Earth.” Bezos, the world’s richest man with a net worth of approximately $200 billion, “is actually Lex Luthor,” that petition says, referring to the DC Comics supervillain. “He’s actually an evil overlord hellbent on global domination. We’ve known this for years.” The author of the petition also claims that Bezos, 57, has “worked with the Epsteins and the Knights Templar, as well as the Free Masons to gain control over the whole world.” “Meanwhile our government stands by and lets it happen,” they conclude. “This may be our last chance before they enable the 5G microchips and perform a mass takeover.” Bezos’ flight, which is slated for July 20, will make him the first of the billionaire space enthusiasts to blast off, though Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson has reportedly weighed beating him to the punch. SpaceX founder Elon Musk has spoken before about traveling to space with his company but has not yet given a firm timeline. The July 20 flight will bring Bezos, his brother, an auction winner who paid $28 million for a seat and one more crew member to the edge of space on the New Shepard, Blue Origin’s rocket system, which has flown more than a dozen successful uncrewed test flights. The name of the auction winner and “the fourth and final crew member” will be announced in the next couple of weeks, Blue Origin said. The rocket system is designed to carry as many as six people at a time on a ride to the edge of space. The passenger capsule has huge windows that give passengers a gaping view of Earth. Passengers will spend a few minutes in zero gravity before returning to Earth.
50 views ·

Alexa Reporting Veterans To Veterans Affairs, Inspector General

30 views ·

More from Progressive Truth Seekers

Mapping the Genome and Modern Genetics: Eugenics Repackaged for Modern Times July 4, 2015 Will the Modern Genetics Movement Preserve Life or Threaten Life? This is part II of a series on the relationship between the eugenics movement and modern genetics. It examines whether true health and true happiness lie in the human genome. Are we really bound to the set of genes that we received from our parents? Or can we overcome what we were given? What are the factors that activate or deactivate certain genes? How can we control the expression of our genetic make-up to promote our health and the health of our children? Can we trust everything we hear about the benefits of genetic research? Is there a dark side to genetics? Is there reason to suspect hidden motivations of certain groups who want us to be convinced that our genes, and only our genes, control every aspect of our health and well-being? Is it wise to believe that we have no other options than to suffer while scientists look for genetic cures for all that ails us? The previous article reviewed the history of the eugenics movement and examined how it was given a facelift and transformed into what we now think of as the modern science of genetics. It discussed the eugenics program of Adolf Hitler that terminated the lives of eleven million men, women and children. Hitler was strongly influenced by Darwin’s theory of evolution and by Americans who were promoting eugenics. He closely followed the teachings of university professors in the United States who were teaching eugenics and using the principles of Darwin’s theory of evolution to form a “superior” race of people in America. The previous article questioned whether there remains a link between the eugenics movement of the past and modern genetic science. Do they still share common goals? The superior race that American eugenicists and Adolf Hitler envisioned was intended to be free of disability, poverty, and chronic illness. It was to be a “beautiful” race of people (as they saw it) that consisted of men and women with blond hair and blue eyes. They would be a select class of people who were physically perfect, physically fit, intellectually superior, and financially prosperous. Modern eugenics does not seek to create a superior race, but it does have the potential for creating a superior class of people who will be distinguished by the absence of certain diseases, which they will call “health.” They will possess a certain set of traits that someone among them has determined to be “best” for humanity. Both movements sought, and are seeking, to achieve high and lofty goals supposedly for our benefit. They promise to provide rapid restoration for all that ails us. They seek to improve the defects that exist in humankind and create a future in which disease, illness, and poverty will only exist in the memories of older generations, because genetic defects will have been corrected or eliminated. [1] The previous article noted that the theory of Darwinian evolution and its implementation through eugenics disregards individual and personal choices concerning human reproduction, and it devalues human life itself. Darwinism and eugenics replace the love-based commitment between family members with allegiance to the state. They replace the worship of God with the worship of eugenic principles and evolutionary theory. They turn the hearts of the people away from valuing and protecting human life, and desensitize society to death. They teach people to accept the fact that the lives of some people must be sacrificed for the greater good of the “superior” ones who remain. At the heart of the eugenics movement was a deep seated belief in the superiority of the white race, and the need for eliminating other races that they determined to be inferior. It called for the cleansing of the white race as well to eliminate all people and families who showed evidence of having defective genetic material (germplasm). Additional Similarities between Eugenics and Modern Genetics I am struck by certain similarities between the old eugenics movement and the “science” of modern genetics as it is now known. Let’s take a look at a few additional similarities that were not discussed in the previous article. Both Eugenics and Genetics Claim to be “Scientific” Eugenicists were convinced that their observations were based on rigorously applied scientific methods. They believe that the human traits they observed were all directly tied to the human germplasm. They assumed that the environment where people lived, the food people ate, the lifestyle they chose, the educational opportunities that were provided, etc., had very little to do with the quality of the human life that would result. The balance between “nature versus nurture” was heavily weighted toward “nature.” This means that they believed that a nurturing environment could not overcome the power of one’s germplasm (genetic material), and thus, people were destined to have the same negative traits as their parents. Nature would always rule over nurture. It didn’t matter how well people were treated by other people in society or whether they were given opportunities to change, they would always remain defective. If we look at the general marketing of modern genetics, we see the same claims. We are told that genetics is a science, just as the eugenicists once said. We are also told that our genes set the stage for everything in our lives, and we must live with the defects we received at conception, which control our illnesses. It is true that genetics uses lots of scientific jargon, and uses advanced chemistry and highly sophisticated scientific equipment to study and manipulate genetic material. Geneticists, like most other professionals with PhD level training, could easily dominate and control most any conversation having to do with their field of expertise when speaking to non-scientists. However, just because they use scientific techniques and use a technical language filled with scientific jargon, does not mean that everything they say and all of the principles they use are accurate, logical, or true. A hundred years ago, eugenicists were equally able to dominate conversations, and they were fundamentally wrong on many points regarding the inheritability of traits that did not involve the germplasm. For example, their claim that black persons in America lived as an underclass in poverty was caused by their deficient germplasm was nothing but racist ideology squeezed into the box of “scientific” jargon.
62 views ·
Over 60,000 Sign Petitions to Stop Jeff Bezos from Returning to Earth June 21, 2021 Blast off, Bezos! More than 60,000 people have signed petitions to stop Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth after his Blue Origin space flight next month. Days after the Amazon founder announced earlier this month that he and his brother Mark would fly on his space tourism company’s first passenger flight to space, two petitions launched calling to prevent Bezos from coming back home. One of the petitions, titled “Do not allow Jeff Bezos to return to Earth,” has garnered more than 40,300 signatures. “Billionaire’s should not exist…on earth, or in space, but should they decide the latter they should stay there,” the creator of that Change.org petition wrote. And more than 20,000 people have signed another, titled “Petition To Not Allow Jeff Bezos Re-Entry To Earth.” Bezos, the world’s richest man with a net worth of approximately $200 billion, “is actually Lex Luthor,” that petition says, referring to the DC Comics supervillain. “He’s actually an evil overlord hellbent on global domination. We’ve known this for years.” The author of the petition also claims that Bezos, 57, has “worked with the Epsteins and the Knights Templar, as well as the Free Masons to gain control over the whole world.” “Meanwhile our government stands by and lets it happen,” they conclude. “This may be our last chance before they enable the 5G microchips and perform a mass takeover.” Bezos’ flight, which is slated for July 20, will make him the first of the billionaire space enthusiasts to blast off, though Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson has reportedly weighed beating him to the punch. SpaceX founder Elon Musk has spoken before about traveling to space with his company but has not yet given a firm timeline. The July 20 flight will bring Bezos, his brother, an auction winner who paid $28 million for a seat and one more crew member to the edge of space on the New Shepard, Blue Origin’s rocket system, which has flown more than a dozen successful uncrewed test flights. The name of the auction winner and “the fourth and final crew member” will be announced in the next couple of weeks, Blue Origin said. The rocket system is designed to carry as many as six people at a time on a ride to the edge of space. The passenger capsule has huge windows that give passengers a gaping view of Earth. Passengers will spend a few minutes in zero gravity before returning to Earth.
50 views ·

Alexa Reporting Veterans To Veterans Affairs, Inspector General

30 views ·