Climate Alarmism is based on a flat earth model

The Marxists from the Club of Rome and the associated WEF managed to push their ridiculous "CO2 warming" propaganda into the mainstream, although it is based on a flat earth model. I kid you not - they really calculated their "warming" predictions based on a flat earth model, as I saw in the source code of the Cray-1 XMP at EPFL around 1990. That 400MFlop machine was obviously unable to calculate anything that could have been considered a mathematical model of the earth's climate system - which, to this day, is not well understood. The Cray could not even work with a proper 3D model of earrth. Hence they used a flat earth map heated by a weak, constant sun. The output was based on 50 fudge factors that the operators set arbitrarily to get whatever results they wanted. And they wanted to show that the earth was warming catastrophically. Naturally, not a single one of their "predictions" ever got even close to reality, as admitted, among others, by Stevens & Palmer, 2019: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/49/24390 They tried to downplay the fact that the models diverge among each other by more than the entire estimated warming. In typical Orwellian newspeak, they call lying about the dysmal state of the climate modeling experiment "deemphasizing". At least they have the intellectual honesty to admit that there is no such thing as a "consensus" about climate science. It's hilarious to see how alarmists constantly shifted the timeline. Based on their 1980s-1990s claims, NYC should have been under 15 feet of water since 2015. Extreme weather events did not increase, they declined. Snowfall did not end at lower altitutes, as the IPCC predicted - we just had several years with record snowfall all over the planet, from early fall to the end of spring. Switzerland just experienced record snow cover at the end of May. The rate of sea level change is still the same for at least 150 years. No acceleration whatsoever. Islands are not being swallowed by the ocean - on the contrary, almost all Pacific islands increased their land surface. US relative sea level changes are entire due to erosion. So yes, unfortunately, flat earthers have immense political power and they manage to scare people into accepting their political agenda, which will never have the slightest effect on the climate. Maybe someone could explain to the average person why it is impossible for CO2 "backradiation" to heat anything, as that would violate basic thermodynamics. It's by necessity cooler than the surface that emitted the radiation and hence cannot heat a warmer object. Greenhouses don't work based on radiosity, they work by preventing convection of the heated air trapped inside the greenhouse. Nothing prevents the convection of heated air in the earth's atmosphere. Hence no heat trapping effect and the term "greenhouse gas" is an insult to every educated person. The only - minuscule - heating effect that results from releasing more CO2 is due to the increased air pressure. That's not caused by CO2's chamical properties - adding any type of gas will have the same effect, including a noble gas such as Argon, as demonstrated by this Tuft University experiment: https://rtobin.phy.tufts.edu/Wagoner%20AJP%202010.pdf This is the world we live in - flat earthers now drive global economic and political agendas.

17Upvotes

More from Swiss Libertarian

Based on the current plan by the Merkel regime, Germany wants to cancel all its nuclear and coal power plants in 2022. Yes, they are INSANE! Based on current data, that means that 1/3rd of the time, Germany will not be able to cover its energy demand or about 8 hours per day. Guess which hours that will be? So what will they do? There are basically 3 options: - random blackouts, which will cause massive chaos - systematic brownouts where a lot of energy consumers have to reduce their energy consumption - which means that most of the German industry won't be able to operate - energy IMPORTS from countries that still have coal, gas and nuclear power, which means that all Germany would do is to transfer their own production to other countries Currently, Germany is already forced to import a lot of power from their neighbors, mostly for a few peak hours, which is incredibly profitable for Swiss energy producers - they buy cheap wind energy from Germany at night and use it to fill our high altitude artificial lakes, then they sell the energy from those lakes at peak energy prices during the day. Except that our storage lake capacity is limited. If Germany turns off their coal and nuclear power, they are up a creek without a paddle. Only French nuclear power will be able to supply the missing energy. Can they instead just ged rid of all the eco-fascists and Merkel and keep their power plants? https://wirtschaft-tv.com/2021/01/13/deutschland-von-stromknappheit-bedroht/
116 views ·

Any type of weather that supports the "man-made global warming" is proof of climate change. Any type of weather that contradicts the narrative is "just weather" and if you claim that it shows that the climate models are wrong, you don't understand the difference between weather and climate 😂😂😂 Climate = a statistical average of weather events Any weather event contributes to the resulting climate.

77 views ·

More from Swiss Libertarian

Based on the current plan by the Merkel regime, Germany wants to cancel all its nuclear and coal power plants in 2022. Yes, they are INSANE! Based on current data, that means that 1/3rd of the time, Germany will not be able to cover its energy demand or about 8 hours per day. Guess which hours that will be? So what will they do? There are basically 3 options: - random blackouts, which will cause massive chaos - systematic brownouts where a lot of energy consumers have to reduce their energy consumption - which means that most of the German industry won't be able to operate - energy IMPORTS from countries that still have coal, gas and nuclear power, which means that all Germany would do is to transfer their own production to other countries Currently, Germany is already forced to import a lot of power from their neighbors, mostly for a few peak hours, which is incredibly profitable for Swiss energy producers - they buy cheap wind energy from Germany at night and use it to fill our high altitude artificial lakes, then they sell the energy from those lakes at peak energy prices during the day. Except that our storage lake capacity is limited. If Germany turns off their coal and nuclear power, they are up a creek without a paddle. Only French nuclear power will be able to supply the missing energy. Can they instead just ged rid of all the eco-fascists and Merkel and keep their power plants? https://wirtschaft-tv.com/2021/01/13/deutschland-von-stromknappheit-bedroht/
116 views ·

Any type of weather that supports the "man-made global warming" is proof of climate change. Any type of weather that contradicts the narrative is "just weather" and if you claim that it shows that the climate models are wrong, you don't understand the difference between weather and climate 😂😂😂 Climate = a statistical average of weather events Any weather event contributes to the resulting climate.

77 views ·
Switch to App
Minds Take back control of your social media!