879 views

HOW TO BE A CLASSICAL AND SOCIAL LIBERAL WITHOUT EVER BECOMING A POLITICAL OR PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL

I am a Classical Liberal, as well as a Conservative (which is the new, or has been at least since the 1980s, functional or working arm of Classical Liberalism) with a little bit of Libertarian thrown in. (I am not entirely a Libertarian for I do not make a god of liberty. I am all for Individual Liberty but then again so are progressives, at least in theory and in talk, and eventually they turn that into tribalism and “do as you will.” Do as you will meaning “as the crowd wills.” My romance with Individual Liberty though ends when it becomes self-indulgence, tribalism, and a pursuit of the individual as god opposed to the Good and to fundamental Morality. I make no damned apologies for that. Self-absorbed, narcissistic individualism is pussified, unmanly, reckless and self-destructive. It also destroys societies, and that evidence is everywhere. For those with eyes to see.) All of that being said I am a Classical Liberal and a Conservative with Libertarian tendencies. When most modern people hear that they immediately think I am speaking of my politics. (For what modern man is not now instinctively trained and predisposed to think almost all of life is nothing more than politics? He can hardly imagine a day without fucking politics, so inbred into his very gonads it is.) Actually, however, I am not this way and in no way mean this as politics is but a small part of what I just mentioned. Classical Liberalism is also human psychology and Nature, a/my Weltanschauung, a/my view of science and religion, etc. as, just as I said above, I no more make a god of politics than I do of Individual Liberty. For politics is a puny and weak and effeminate and hopelessly self-absorbed little god. If you do not understand this then just look around at your nation, society, and world today. Your god spawns endlessly but rules nothing of import. Has politics ever saved the world from anything? Will it? (For short periods of time it may stave off disaster, but as often as not it is the God-damned disaster. What do I mean by this – why simply that God would damn it too.) Does it add Courage or Virtue to Human Nature? Does it impel men to Righteous and Determined Action? Lol. Don’t be so juvenile and naïve. Let leftists make a religion and god of their politics. You be far, far Wiser. No, it does none of these things and never has. And never will. Politics is a pussy-talk god (If you do not understand this then look daily at the number of political posts on this very site versus any that call for Manly Action or that ever achieve Manly Action. You’ll be article-passing and memeing for fucking ever ladies. None of which ever add up to a single Action.) Therefore your pussy-talk-god is undeserving of your worship in any way. It is also underserving of much energy or effort on your part either. (Do you have political Duties? Why yes, you definitely do, but these arise from Morality and not the other way around. A discussion all its own for another day so important that is.) Anyway, to return to the main subject, if you do not understand that Classical Liberalism is not all about politics then look up and research Classical Liberalism, and its history. (Does it have important political components within in it, yes it does. Is it or was it all about politics – no it was not, and should not now be. Politics is but one arm of Classical Liberalism, it is not the Body and Being of Classical Liberalism.) Which means you can easily be a Classical Liberal without in any way ever becoming a Modern, Democrat, Progressive, and Political Liberal. As a matter of fact you should never become one of those things as they are now the very opposite of the True Classical Liberal, and they are anathema to True Classical Liberalism (which runs at least as far back as to the Ancient Greeks, and I suspect, farther back than that). (To some very vital degree the Classical Liberal is like the Frontiersman, he stands completely and utterly alone and self-reliant. He has friends of real merit, of course, but he is never a tribalist and he is never a member of “the Crowd.” He is First and Foremost – a Man.) Classical Liberalism is big, very big, on personal merit and ability and achievement and of Individuals having the right to pursue their own good talents and capabilities freely and without the restriction or suppression of anyone else, including group, organization, and government. Especially government. I am a Classical Liberal too in this fundamental respect; I view everyone as having the same rights as I in this regard. As long as they do not engage in malignant crime, harm, or wrong (evil especially included) then their own personal merits are their own and of no concern to me, and I have no right(s) to interfere with them. Period. They live their lives as fully and as best they can. (As a Christian and a Pragmatic Philosopher I do both very much enjoy and very much feel obligated to assist others in developing their own Talents, Abilities, Graces, and Merits. Or as the Greeks and Romans would say – Virtues. But I do not envy other people their Merits, how small and unmanly that is, or feel I have any right to control those people or their Merits. Or their properties or resources for that matter.) Therefore I never judge any man (women, or child, and sometimes not even animals) on class, nationality, race, religion (depends on the morality of their religion), ethnicity, species, origin, culture, society, wealth or property, status (popes and presidents are to me the same as janitors), or sex but on their own individual behavior and conduct. And individuals do definitely display their own behavior and conduct (which is sometimes, or even often, very different from their speech or claims), just give it time and that always demonstrates itself. Now does this mean that no culture is better than any other, that no civilization is either superior to (not perfect, but superior) or inferior to another, and that no society can claim higher or lower ideals than any other society? That too is a totally different discussion and question. For another day. So important to human progress and behavior it is. In any case, and as to the matter at hand now, you can be a Classical Liberal, and easily so, without ever becoming a modern or political liberal, a progressive, a democrat, a socialist, a communist, a fascist, an autocrat, a warlord, or any of the other false and fake variations of “self-elevated political humanity.” And if you become any of those things then you chances of being or remaining a Classical Liberal are less than zero. I had, by the way, in no way meant to talk about this matter or about politics today, so forgive me on the matter, but perhaps I and many other people should have been saying this long, long ago. Of course I’m not a modern pussy, so to hell with talking about it or commenting upon it over and over and over again – try fucking living it instead. Trouble with you modern people is you talk a lot. But usually about nothing much at all. And you say the same things over and over and over – ad infinitum. But you never fucking change your behavior or take the risk to live what you claim. Meaning putting yourself at personal risk. (Talking on the internet in America is still not really putting yourself at personal risk. Hate to break it to ya ladies. Maybe one day it will be. Like it is in China. Or England. And maybe that would actually be good for you. But for now talk is talk and words are wind.) Anyway, and that being what it may be, live what you claim. Because that is what Real Men do. And never fear to be an Actual Man. Every Age certainly needs their fair share. Now have a Good Day Folks… but an Honest and Active one too. #politics #Liberal #society #culture #Manhood

12Upvotes
1Remind
thumb_upthumb_downchat_bubble

More from JackWGunter

ON HAVING AND USING Some dogs higher than that I'd say. Probably far higher, like around an eight year old. In some cases maybe a young teen. Not having means to express that intelligence; hands or real language, does not mean they do not possess the intelligence, but that their ability to express their intelligence is limited - much like a dolphin or whale - though they both have very complex languages. Not only are natural and trained abilties fundamental to posessing intelligence, but the technical capabilties to gain and employ that intelligence is also central to the proper usage of your intelligence. There's probably a metaphor in there somewhere for people too...
Unfortunately, there's been quite a bit of zoophiles who have joined minds recently. To anybody who has a properly functioning conscience regardless of religious worldview, having sex with animals is an abominable act and evil. One common excuse I seem to be finding is that they'll argue that dogs can give sexual consent. They'll elaborate by saying that dogs can communicate when they want food, or if they're enjoying a belly rub for example. The thing is dogs have been found to have intellects similar to that of 2 year old children. Here's an article about such intelligence. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090810025241.htm I myself am not a father, but from what I understand, parents are able to find if their children are hungry or need naps. While this is true along with toddlers thriving on physical affections of love, it is wrong and dangerous to claim that this would extend to sexual acts. Kids, even when they don't understand sexual acts, are negatively affected and scarred by such acts. Kids who have gone through such tend to carry this weight with them throughout there entire lives, way into adult-hood. Furthermore, since kids at such a young age can't comprehend the acts, they could never consent to such acts. Truly anything sexual done to minors is abuse. This all being said, it should be painfully obvious that such actions performed against animals, such as dogs, would also be sexual abuse, and rape. Since the dogs only have the mental faculties of roughly 2 year old kids, hence they would have no concept of sexual consent with humans. I type this out, cause these people make endless justifications of their behaviour. Such behaviour should never be encouraged, and zoophiles tend to be allies with pedophiles. I don't know how else to end this except to those who enjoy such degeneracy, I say repent of such actions. You are adding up judgment from God for the day of judgment. And while you stay in your ways, people are gonna keep bullying you, whether you think you deserve such treatment or not. To those who are against this. We can pray for their repentance, continue shaming them & gatekeeping them. We can also push for them getting banned. If/when they post stuff that is illegal, we can report to the authorities. God Bless!
43 views · May 27th

More from JackWGunter

ON HAVING AND USING Some dogs higher than that I'd say. Probably far higher, like around an eight year old. In some cases maybe a young teen. Not having means to express that intelligence; hands or real language, does not mean they do not possess the intelligence, but that their ability to express their intelligence is limited - much like a dolphin or whale - though they both have very complex languages. Not only are natural and trained abilties fundamental to posessing intelligence, but the technical capabilties to gain and employ that intelligence is also central to the proper usage of your intelligence. There's probably a metaphor in there somewhere for people too...
Unfortunately, there's been quite a bit of zoophiles who have joined minds recently. To anybody who has a properly functioning conscience regardless of religious worldview, having sex with animals is an abominable act and evil. One common excuse I seem to be finding is that they'll argue that dogs can give sexual consent. They'll elaborate by saying that dogs can communicate when they want food, or if they're enjoying a belly rub for example. The thing is dogs have been found to have intellects similar to that of 2 year old children. Here's an article about such intelligence. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090810025241.htm I myself am not a father, but from what I understand, parents are able to find if their children are hungry or need naps. While this is true along with toddlers thriving on physical affections of love, it is wrong and dangerous to claim that this would extend to sexual acts. Kids, even when they don't understand sexual acts, are negatively affected and scarred by such acts. Kids who have gone through such tend to carry this weight with them throughout there entire lives, way into adult-hood. Furthermore, since kids at such a young age can't comprehend the acts, they could never consent to such acts. Truly anything sexual done to minors is abuse. This all being said, it should be painfully obvious that such actions performed against animals, such as dogs, would also be sexual abuse, and rape. Since the dogs only have the mental faculties of roughly 2 year old kids, hence they would have no concept of sexual consent with humans. I type this out, cause these people make endless justifications of their behaviour. Such behaviour should never be encouraged, and zoophiles tend to be allies with pedophiles. I don't know how else to end this except to those who enjoy such degeneracy, I say repent of such actions. You are adding up judgment from God for the day of judgment. And while you stay in your ways, people are gonna keep bullying you, whether you think you deserve such treatment or not. To those who are against this. We can pray for their repentance, continue shaming them & gatekeeping them. We can also push for them getting banned. If/when they post stuff that is illegal, we can report to the authorities. God Bless!
43 views · May 27th