On Facemasks - more evidence that they are symbolic, not useful to prevent the spread of a viral respiratory infection: (ECDC), 15.02.2021: "The evidence regarding the effectiveness of medical face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 in the community is compatible with a small to moderate protective effect, but there are still significant uncertainties about the size of this effect. Evidence for the effectiveness of non-medical face masks, face shields/visors and respirators in the community is scarce and of very low certainty." https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/using-face-masks-community-reducing-covid-19-transmission https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 DANMASK-19 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32829745/ Sweden: https://theconversation.com/covid-why-are-swedish-towns-banning-masks-153681 373/bmj.n913 Using face masks in the community: first update - Effectiveness in reducing transmission of COVID-19 Norway https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/dokumenterfiler/rapporter/2020/should-individuals-in-the-community-without-respiratory-symptoms-wear-facemasks-to-reduce-the-spread-of-covid-19-report-2020.pdf https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/doku
thumb_up5thumb_downchat_bubble

More from Swiss Libertarian

Dr.Geert Vanden Bossche is one of the world's greatest vaccination experts on the planet - former GAVI, former Gates Foundation - and he is radically opposed to any kind of mass vaccination, which destroys natural immunity etc. Please listen to everything this man said over the last few months and read the documents he produced, including an open letter to WHO, then share it with everyone you know, ESPECIALLY anyone who wants to get a fake mRNA "vaccine". ----------------------- Why do we always have to learn things the hard way? This final lecture contains a summary, key lessons and conclusions from my Covid-19 analysis. My homework is now done but will remain available to everyone on www.geertvandenbossche.org https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3xq4cEHT0s
85 views · Apr 23rd
ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING REPORT on pregnancies and the fake mRNA "vaccines" in the New England Journal of Medicine: WHY would anyone take a "vaccine" while pregnant with this kind of risk level of losing the child or seeing seriously harmful outcomes for the child? Even a 1% risk would be way too much, but the numbers reported are truly horrifying 😖 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 RESULTS A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
135 views · Apr 22nd

More from Swiss Libertarian

Dr.Geert Vanden Bossche is one of the world's greatest vaccination experts on the planet - former GAVI, former Gates Foundation - and he is radically opposed to any kind of mass vaccination, which destroys natural immunity etc. Please listen to everything this man said over the last few months and read the documents he produced, including an open letter to WHO, then share it with everyone you know, ESPECIALLY anyone who wants to get a fake mRNA "vaccine". ----------------------- Why do we always have to learn things the hard way? This final lecture contains a summary, key lessons and conclusions from my Covid-19 analysis. My homework is now done but will remain available to everyone on www.geertvandenbossche.org https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3xq4cEHT0s
85 views · Apr 23rd
ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING REPORT on pregnancies and the fake mRNA "vaccines" in the New England Journal of Medicine: WHY would anyone take a "vaccine" while pregnant with this kind of risk level of losing the child or seeing seriously harmful outcomes for the child? Even a 1% risk would be way too much, but the numbers reported are truly horrifying 😖 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 RESULTS A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
135 views · Apr 22nd