Self-declared "fact-checkers", starting with Snopes, are systematically lying about anything even remotely political or ideological.

I've documented how they do this before. Here is a great example on how they participate in the cabal's fake pandemic, which is part of the "Great Reset":

"Was the COVID-19 Pandemic Planned in Rockefeller’s ‘Operation Lockstep’?"

A lot of people noted that the fascist lockdowns that are now imposed worldwide were described in a Rockefeller Foundation report, in one of 4 "scenarios":

"Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development"

So what does Snopes "debunk"? Do they prove that the Rockefeller report does not exist? No, they can't, because it's real. Do they dispute that the Rockefeller report contains the "Lock step" scenario? That would be ridiculous - it's right there for anyone to read. They can't even dispute the fact that the "Lock step" scenario looks exactly like what we experience now.

They make up a fake claim - a straw man - and then "debunk" this claim:

"The COVID-19 pandemic was planned by the Rockefeller Foundation in "Operation Lockstep.""

So they pull up some fake "Operation Lockstep Report" that supposedly circulates on social media - I've never seen it, it might well be made up by Snopes, but who cares? It's irrelevant. The relevant part is the official Rockefeller report and how it describes a world where governments react to an alleged pandemic the way they did over the last year.

So they finally have to address it, but all they do is claim that the "Lock step" scenario is "totally different from the Wuhan virus", such as the alleged source of the virus - a bird flue in "Lock step" (which actually happened, 2013 to 2017, which in and of itself is noteworthy), allegedly from bats for Covid-19 (based on all the evidence, it was a Wuhan lab leak or intentional release, but that's another debate).

Then the number of deaths, which "Lock step" puts at 8 million, while Snopes actually admits that the Wuhan virus only caused 600K deaths, worldwide, according to official numbers. So the main question becomes: "Why would anyone have panicked over it in summer 2020?"

Meanwhile, the official Wuhan death count stands at 2,702,014. That number is highly questionable, given that there is evidence of massive over-reporting. And despite this over-reporting, it did not reach the 8 million deaths the "Lock step" scenario saw as a global threat that would lead to fascist lockdowns.

Only Snopes knows how any of the "differences" they enumerate have any relevance to the issue of government reactions to a pandemic, which is the real issue.

The concluding Snopes statement: "it is in no way an “operation manual” for how to manufacture a virus in order to implement a police state".

Again a total straw man - no one said that the Rockefeller report explains how to manufacture a virus. What a bizarre claim. It does, however, suggest that governments could implement police state measures and maintain them even after the pandemic passed.

The Schwartz scenario states, “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months…” He continues, “The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” This sounds eerily familiar.

Then the scenario gets very interesting: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

And that's what the "Great Reset" demands: a "new normal" in which people are forced to submit to fascist governments to implement a global Marxist dictatorship to "save the planet" from a non-existent "man-made global warming".

In short, Snopes debunks nothing - it just tries to obfuscate the creepy similarities between the Rockefeller report's "Lock step" scenario and the reality we currently experience.

Given that 80-90% or more of all the Wuhan virus / Covid-19 deaths affected over-70 individuals with multiple co-morbidities, the only correct reaction would have been to protect the most vulnerable groups. Everyone else could have gone on with their lives without any negative effects. So why do we live in the world of the Rockefeller report "Lock Step" scenario?

Snopes shilling for Rockefeller