Imagine having to go to a site called "giantfreakinrobot" to read an article that is surprisingly well-balanced. They don't take shots at Carano or Disney. When they editorialize, they use markers like "I suspect" and "might." It's fairly clear when they are offering a supposition versus a statement of fact. I've never heard of the author, but they are clearly better at "journalism'ing" than Ivy Leage graduates who are paid millions of dollars a year to "journalism" on TV.
As far as the actual subject of this article, if anyone actually thinks Disney will apply the standard in a neutral manner, I have some magic beans for sale. Remember, this is not actually a change in policy at all, since Disney gets to decide what constitutes a controversial subject. Expect the norm, which is for them to coddle and protect those they deem worthy.
