Carter speaks with Dr. Michael Rectenwald about his new book, "Thought Criminal," which is the Unsafe Space Book Club selection for February 2021. Book Club on his book is tomorrow, Sunday 2/21. Dr. Rectenwald was a Professor of Liberal Studies and Global Liberal Studies at NYU from 2008 to 2019. He also taught at Duke University, North Carolina Central University, Carnegie Mellon University, and Case Western Reserve University. His scholarly and academic essays have appeared in *The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Academic Questions, Endeavour, The British Journal for the History of Science, College Composition and Communication, International Philosophical Quarterly, the De Gruyter anthologies Organized Secularism in the United States and Global Secularisms in a Post-Secular Age, and the Cambridge University Press anthology George Eliot in Context*, among others. He holds a Ph.D. in Literary and Cultural Studies from Carnegie Mellon University, a Master's in English Literature from Case Western Reserve University, and a B.A. in English Literature from the University of Pittsburgh. Professor Rectenwald is a pundit and champion of free speech and opposes all forms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism, including socialism-communism, “social justice,” fascism, and political correctness. As the notorious "@TheAntiPCProf" on Twitter, he has appeared on numerous major network political talk shows, on syndicated radio shows, and on numerous YouTube shows and podcasts. In addition to "Thought Criminal," he's the author of multiple other books, including Springtime for Snowflakes, Google Archipelago, and Beyond Woke. https://youtu.be/UBDotwN2SBc
thumb_up7thumb_downchat_bubble

More from unsafe

New Unsafe Space article just published. From the article intro: "BLM (“Black Lives Matter”) was nominated by a Norwegian MP for the Nobel Peace Prize. 🤔 Will the racist, violent, Marxist/communist group win? Perhaps, based on the history of Nobel Peace Prize winners. BLM just might join the list of previous Nobel Peace Prize laureates who used violence for political gain, including Barack Obama (2009), Yasser Arafat (1994), Nelson Mandela (1993), and Woodrow Wilson (1919). BLM has both the use of violence and the socialist credentials of these four Presidents, so would fit in well. The criteria for the Peace Prize from the will of Alfred Nobel stipulated that it was to be awarded to the person “who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Do BLM, Obama, Arafat, Mandela, and Wilson meet that criteria? Abolition of standing armies? Promotion of peace? Two things smell fishy in Norway, but only one of them is the fish. Let’s examine some previous winners BLM would fit in well with." [Keith] https://medium.com/unsafe-space/mostly-peaceful-prize-e745a85e7fe4
87 views · Feb 18th
In thinking about rhetoric and how effective it is, I thought about a point made by Thomas Sowell and put together some thoughts. Thanks for stopping by and I hope you enjoy 😉 (Thomas) "What’s important to think about is many of the ideas or concepts we hold to be true may simply be the result of years of repetition and rhetoric. They are debate club tactics that seek to confuse and cloud our judgement about incredibly important topics. They aim to replace our process of thought with copy & paste versions of what to think instead of encouraging us to investigate and challenge assumptions. And they are incredibly effective. But that’s not what should really bake your noodle. Just wait until you start thinking about how many other things you may take as factual, that just ain’t so." https://medium.com/unsafe-space/trickle-down-economics-2275b78514a2
102 views · Feb 17th

More from unsafe

New Unsafe Space article just published. From the article intro: "BLM (“Black Lives Matter”) was nominated by a Norwegian MP for the Nobel Peace Prize. 🤔 Will the racist, violent, Marxist/communist group win? Perhaps, based on the history of Nobel Peace Prize winners. BLM just might join the list of previous Nobel Peace Prize laureates who used violence for political gain, including Barack Obama (2009), Yasser Arafat (1994), Nelson Mandela (1993), and Woodrow Wilson (1919). BLM has both the use of violence and the socialist credentials of these four Presidents, so would fit in well. The criteria for the Peace Prize from the will of Alfred Nobel stipulated that it was to be awarded to the person “who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Do BLM, Obama, Arafat, Mandela, and Wilson meet that criteria? Abolition of standing armies? Promotion of peace? Two things smell fishy in Norway, but only one of them is the fish. Let’s examine some previous winners BLM would fit in well with." [Keith] https://medium.com/unsafe-space/mostly-peaceful-prize-e745a85e7fe4
87 views · Feb 18th
In thinking about rhetoric and how effective it is, I thought about a point made by Thomas Sowell and put together some thoughts. Thanks for stopping by and I hope you enjoy 😉 (Thomas) "What’s important to think about is many of the ideas or concepts we hold to be true may simply be the result of years of repetition and rhetoric. They are debate club tactics that seek to confuse and cloud our judgement about incredibly important topics. They aim to replace our process of thought with copy & paste versions of what to think instead of encouraging us to investigate and challenge assumptions. And they are incredibly effective. But that’s not what should really bake your noodle. Just wait until you start thinking about how many other things you may take as factual, that just ain’t so." https://medium.com/unsafe-space/trickle-down-economics-2275b78514a2
102 views · Feb 17th