"If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been gassed also." -These are the words of one of the living gas chamber witnesses of #Auschwitz. Up until 1985, no judicial witness of these gas chambers had been cross-examined on the material nature of the facts reported. When, in Toronto, at the first Zündel trial in 1985, the author (*Robert Faurisson) was able to cause such witnesses to be cross-examined, they collapsed; since this date, there are no longer any gas chamber witnesses presented in court except perhaps at the trial of Demjanjuk in Israel where, there again, the witnesses revealed themselves as false. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask them for material explanations about the #gaschambers (exact location, physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners before, during and after execution). From the cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order, a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical extermination of the #Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas. A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the witness with the results of #investigations or expert opinion regarding the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers. Witnesses, in fact, are satisfied to nearly always mention them as a rumor that "everyone is talking" about. https://codoh.com/library/document/witnesses-to-the-gas-chambers-of-auschwitz/en/
thumb_up5thumb_downchat_bubble

More from KristinaBarroso

SOLUTION PREPARATION: As I progress with my solutions via the Sisyphus Complex Solution, I am making preparation for an economic safeguard proposition and wanted to see what kind of feedback might influence this. The main term I have encountered is 'Parallel Economy' or sometimes 'Parallel Market' but this has a couple of problems of association through the black market and also the over reach of a new monetary system for this stage, which far too often comes hand-in-hand with talk of a 'collective', which is basically just another form of socialism, so the term I have in mind right now is 'Positive Trade'. The principles for this should not be overly deep to begin with so for the time being I have: 1. Prime position would be steadfast rejection of any activism like ‘wokism’ or ‘climatard’ or any ideological bent. 2. Wherever practical, and based on progress of the movement, maintain a safe supply chain through working with fellow members. 3. Wherever possible, and based on progress of the movement, refuse and avoid any subsidy, funding or any form of assistance where the source is taxpayer money. 4. Develop an ethical member based private equity proposition to enhance the creation of new members. a) Competence based, i.e. projects meeting PoC and PoB criteria. b) True growth ambition, not limited vision. c) Avoidance of exit based IPO or sale to non-members. 5. Develop a talent bank of strong minded and competent persons committed to the principles of ‘positive trade’. 6. Develop an international alliance with fellow ‘positive trade’ advocates. 7. Create and develop a resource database for the ‘positive trade’ network to research for their needs. Thoughts, contributions? #positivetrade

140 views · Feb 8th

More from KristinaBarroso

SOLUTION PREPARATION: As I progress with my solutions via the Sisyphus Complex Solution, I am making preparation for an economic safeguard proposition and wanted to see what kind of feedback might influence this. The main term I have encountered is 'Parallel Economy' or sometimes 'Parallel Market' but this has a couple of problems of association through the black market and also the over reach of a new monetary system for this stage, which far too often comes hand-in-hand with talk of a 'collective', which is basically just another form of socialism, so the term I have in mind right now is 'Positive Trade'. The principles for this should not be overly deep to begin with so for the time being I have: 1. Prime position would be steadfast rejection of any activism like ‘wokism’ or ‘climatard’ or any ideological bent. 2. Wherever practical, and based on progress of the movement, maintain a safe supply chain through working with fellow members. 3. Wherever possible, and based on progress of the movement, refuse and avoid any subsidy, funding or any form of assistance where the source is taxpayer money. 4. Develop an ethical member based private equity proposition to enhance the creation of new members. a) Competence based, i.e. projects meeting PoC and PoB criteria. b) True growth ambition, not limited vision. c) Avoidance of exit based IPO or sale to non-members. 5. Develop a talent bank of strong minded and competent persons committed to the principles of ‘positive trade’. 6. Develop an international alliance with fellow ‘positive trade’ advocates. 7. Create and develop a resource database for the ‘positive trade’ network to research for their needs. Thoughts, contributions? #positivetrade

140 views · Feb 8th