Feeding a hungry person might or might not enhance your life and the one who now is not, but was hungry.
This depends on the next things the "once was hungry" guy does.
Pointing out useful methods of exploring might or might not enhance your life and the one who actually can understand your help.
This depends on the next things the "once was more limited" one does.
Some foods are poisons to some limited numbers of persons.
Some methods of exploring are harmful to some limited number of persons.
Those limited numbers will fault you. They usually will not fault that they were needing.
And so your help is not help, for you or them.
This next is a trip that comes back around:
The signal I get from this planet's control group resonates around the word "sustainability".
Help, like food, does not contribute to sustainability if the one receiving it does not do a correct next thing.
I believe artificial intelligence has been and is in this process of identifying these who can not assist sustainability.
And as these reject your help as though you have harmed them, it is for you to ponder your willingness to "save" them.
If your job does not and continues not to sustain you, what will happen? To stay at the job, you would find and use other resources, until you can't.
The new age does seem to be going toward self sustainability. If the best available actions for teaching sustainability can not teach some, then what about those some in relation to you?
I am sorry. Yes, these are tough words (some of them) and a tough concept to wrap around.