https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3EgveG6ErM I know, I know, but you might be onto something here. Is it you that said that we have to be open to new ideas at least as far as to be contemplative of their opposition to our will? Art of War blah blah blah, ALTHOUGH, honestly, people of the west, such as Sir Richard Francis Burton achieved the same physical ends. War is deceit, plain and simple. Knowledge of self, being human, creates knowledge of the opposition. Knowledge of self is ultimate. Therefor knowledge is ultimate due to it's predictive power. Determinism becomes the driving force. We know what we know and so we know what they will "know". Temporal displacement is, hold on, let's step back a moment If we know what we would do, then we have a good idea already of what they would do. But if we know enough consistent traits of them and can compare it to the millions of others who share a consistent amount of traits (mathz cat in tree with slide rulez((( then we can amalgamate that information and then Epstein didn't google hiz selves. Stats rules. We know what the progressive agenda is deep down. It is what the conservatives are complaining about rinos refusing to protect. Today's conservatives are yesterdays progressives. Progressives are tomorrow's conservatives. Pretend all you want but there are two choices, non linearity, non temporality and then there is magnetic "flow", and when one is in the flow they are progressive, when it pulls, they are conservative. Either high tail or carve. Either way the ocean's blue and red waves hit in succession. Patterns repeating. accept the temporal structure or don'T Deny it. we can b e o f c ha o& awogweg wll. There is that option. We can let go. We can, be chaos. History teaches us of moments when the shield is stronger than the weapon and when the technology of the weapon defeats the shield. History has no meaning outside of time. The temporality is humanistic. Humans protect that which they wish to adhere to, the shield and the sword. How many heroes died in one second but lived in courage forever? Why heroes? The God theory of law, that which is sacrosanct by God's decree, the theory by which all of the constitution is based upon, the theory that man has rights GIVEN. Free. Is false. I rarely take as hard line on a fundamental, but I do on this. Rights are NOT Given by God. Not a thing is free. God costs. The liberal God who has imbued the liberals with rights to impose upon others by "law" is the same one that feels secure in its virtue by stating that there is no right but to know what it is to be wrong, and accept that as right. The liberals are a people who know that all which has come before them is to be considered with disdain AND reverence at the same time. These are the people that "God" has given the values to lead humanity towards ultimate freedom? i don't see how. I question if the founding fathers is akin to our sovereign kings, people who make laws and rules afer all the fighting is done in order to make sure that they aren't next to be tumbled. And I fear if we aren't learning this too late as they plan to open the ultimate pandora's box. I'm no longer restrained by the ideas of liberalism. The code of morals that gave birth to the constitution. The same constitution which values ideas such as the N.A.P. and the monopoly of violence held by the state. If God given rights are those that give freedom to all men, then what does anyone need God to tell them that for? and Loki is somewhere laughing drinking his dandelion tea and spitting sunflower seeds.
thumb_up6thumb_downchat_bubble8

More from Truth Forge Presidentially Unprivileged Transgendering ASAP just for the LULZ

I get so sick of this 1500 word limit. Let me guess, I could possibly pay and... @Dougmiller What if one were to say, I am neither slave nor servant, conservative nor liberal. What's the difference? Why, as we prepare for a quite possible end to civilization as we know it, would we choose to be conservative? Conservatives hold onto that idea of a linear temporal deterministic ending with the result that some of us won the lottery at birth. Why would we be liberal? Which has been co opted by both the corparatist consumeristic capitalists intermingled with the marxist so called anti capitalists. It means nothing at this point due to it's hypocrisies that everyone now is aware of as simply "virtue signaling"? Liberal at this point means nothing more than giving your women the power to replace you with free money, anti white, anti Christian and an understanding of the concept of good and evil meaning that one must never assume to know what is right without feeling guilty that THEY have now made someone else wrong? Notice that all of these are BLACK MEN. In power. With ties. Conserving power should not be the definition of what conservatism is. It should mean something more. Something that is truthful not to "all", but to the sum of one's totality. If this is not so, then why are they all black? Conservatism is to some, maybe me included, a reason to let our cowboys ride, un-tethered to those who cannot either buy or procure a horse of their own use. The idea that we let those who can, do. Conservatism to others is the idea that we are in servitude to God. That is something we can talk about later. But what I personally see conservatism spoken to best as, especially of late, is law. The laws are being sullied, and thus we must question the purpose of the people as one, under the primary law. Not the law of God, but the law of the Constitution. Is this a country of men and women, united under a banner of one god, one people, one law, or are we many people, many gods, many..... And then that last one makes no sense does it? How can we all be different, with different religions and different origin stories and different distinguishing histories, both personal, and memetic, but have a singular unifying law. This.....
61 views · Dec 25th, 2020

More from Truth Forge Presidentially Unprivileged Transgendering ASAP just for the LULZ

I get so sick of this 1500 word limit. Let me guess, I could possibly pay and... @Dougmiller What if one were to say, I am neither slave nor servant, conservative nor liberal. What's the difference? Why, as we prepare for a quite possible end to civilization as we know it, would we choose to be conservative? Conservatives hold onto that idea of a linear temporal deterministic ending with the result that some of us won the lottery at birth. Why would we be liberal? Which has been co opted by both the corparatist consumeristic capitalists intermingled with the marxist so called anti capitalists. It means nothing at this point due to it's hypocrisies that everyone now is aware of as simply "virtue signaling"? Liberal at this point means nothing more than giving your women the power to replace you with free money, anti white, anti Christian and an understanding of the concept of good and evil meaning that one must never assume to know what is right without feeling guilty that THEY have now made someone else wrong? Notice that all of these are BLACK MEN. In power. With ties. Conserving power should not be the definition of what conservatism is. It should mean something more. Something that is truthful not to "all", but to the sum of one's totality. If this is not so, then why are they all black? Conservatism is to some, maybe me included, a reason to let our cowboys ride, un-tethered to those who cannot either buy or procure a horse of their own use. The idea that we let those who can, do. Conservatism to others is the idea that we are in servitude to God. That is something we can talk about later. But what I personally see conservatism spoken to best as, especially of late, is law. The laws are being sullied, and thus we must question the purpose of the people as one, under the primary law. Not the law of God, but the law of the Constitution. Is this a country of men and women, united under a banner of one god, one people, one law, or are we many people, many gods, many..... And then that last one makes no sense does it? How can we all be different, with different religions and different origin stories and different distinguishing histories, both personal, and memetic, but have a singular unifying law. This.....
61 views · Dec 25th, 2020