This christmas lacked a lot of spirit this year for me... probably an all-time low.
thumb_up8thumb_downchat_bubble3

More from Sly Bluepaw

IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO BE MADE! A friend found the text of the actual bill and it's actually nowhere near that bad. https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Stop_Internet_Sexual_Exploitation_Act_Text1.pdf Here's the definitions for it: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 As I quote a friend directly: "All it does is require the consent of those depicted for the upload to be handled as a verifiable paper trail, and add the infrastructure required to keep track of that consent. This is actually useful. This doesn't nuke porn at all, nor does it strictly require anything that most sites don't have already. (a 24 hour contact method that can be used by law enforcement) It even has a protection built in to prevent the law being used fraudulently."
https://twitter.com/CMYKGenet/status/1340702641748406274 "In case you were unaware the anti-porn bill SISEA has specific wording that includes drawn "computer-generated" sexually explicit material in the materials it targets. So yes, furry art sites will have to comply with this or stop hosting porn" Even as my friend points out: "Guess what else that massive dog-eared flea-ridden 5500 page bill managed to shoehorn in by holding the American peoples' financial stability hostage? https://www.sasse.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/331cad76-8a23-499f-83e9-c3fe322f408f/summary-stop-internet-sexual-exploitation-act-3-.pdf https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/2020/12/21/why-were-fighting-the-stop-internet-sexual-exploitation-act/ If this part of the bill passes, the entire American internet will have stricter rules on nudity than a public library in an Illinois Mennonite colony. For instance, the infamous Greco-Roman painting of whats-her-face and the dove? Can't 100% verify the age of the subject, it's now banned material. The statues (even in their neutered state, thanks Catholicism) in the Vatican, or even pictures of the statues in the vatican? Can now be deemed pornographic content, and taken down because the age of the subject cannot be verified beyond doubt."
36 views · Dec 24th, 2020

More from Sly Bluepaw

IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO BE MADE! A friend found the text of the actual bill and it's actually nowhere near that bad. https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Stop_Internet_Sexual_Exploitation_Act_Text1.pdf Here's the definitions for it: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 As I quote a friend directly: "All it does is require the consent of those depicted for the upload to be handled as a verifiable paper trail, and add the infrastructure required to keep track of that consent. This is actually useful. This doesn't nuke porn at all, nor does it strictly require anything that most sites don't have already. (a 24 hour contact method that can be used by law enforcement) It even has a protection built in to prevent the law being used fraudulently."
https://twitter.com/CMYKGenet/status/1340702641748406274 "In case you were unaware the anti-porn bill SISEA has specific wording that includes drawn "computer-generated" sexually explicit material in the materials it targets. So yes, furry art sites will have to comply with this or stop hosting porn" Even as my friend points out: "Guess what else that massive dog-eared flea-ridden 5500 page bill managed to shoehorn in by holding the American peoples' financial stability hostage? https://www.sasse.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/331cad76-8a23-499f-83e9-c3fe322f408f/summary-stop-internet-sexual-exploitation-act-3-.pdf https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/2020/12/21/why-were-fighting-the-stop-internet-sexual-exploitation-act/ If this part of the bill passes, the entire American internet will have stricter rules on nudity than a public library in an Illinois Mennonite colony. For instance, the infamous Greco-Roman painting of whats-her-face and the dove? Can't 100% verify the age of the subject, it's now banned material. The statues (even in their neutered state, thanks Catholicism) in the Vatican, or even pictures of the statues in the vatican? Can now be deemed pornographic content, and taken down because the age of the subject cannot be verified beyond doubt."
36 views · Dec 24th, 2020