Peaceful Yes, Pacifist No

I"The vast majority of Brazilian society is not pacifist but peaceful. And this is very different. Peaceful is the one who appreciates peace, hates violence, does not provoke, does not take the initiative to attack, does not incite or stimulate prejudice, but reverts with prudence if attacked, goes to war if summoned and pulls a trigger if this is necessary to defend , in the face of unjustified aggression, the life itself or the life of another." - Percival PugginaI

I am peaceful and not pacifist.

I am against violence. It is not your search, quite the contrary, I avoid it as much as possible.

How to help the firearms of the unavailable responsibilities they are carrying.

Same as having a master in martial arts possess. "Power" brings the responsibilities and duties of the size of the universe.

This awareness and responsibility is born through education.

It is not only a school, but it is the one that receives our parents.

Ethics, morality and justice. Be right and fair always. Try at least.

That is why I am a favor of the defense of life. It's simple.

Whoever initiates an action will never be the righteous, the correct, no matter the reason.

If X initiates physical violence against Y, Y has the natural and constitutional right to defend himself.

And there is a great possibility of defending human rights on a large scale, because 99% are violence, they are covered, disproportionate acts. Always the strongest physically or in numbers or with subjugated firearms in the physically weakest or most unarmed.

Arming the population is not a solution to crime. Obvious. It is a solution that the INDIVIDUAL has for him to protect.

So Bastiat you're right in your definition of law.

This collective organization that we calls society creates as laws to protect the INDIVIDUAL, which is the least minory that exists, and their interests.

Simple. The retarded and bad guys who preach otherwise and other fallacies are shut up.

No one, I repeat, should have the right to deny anyone the right to a defense.

People have the right to defend themselves.

It is absurd that one can not guarantee security and still curtail the right, I repeat, natural and constitutional the legitimate defense.

But i think there is no justification for physical violence.

Be it in the name of ideologies, sexual choice, skin color, much less in the name of God.

I will never really accept it because the only violence conceived in my soul is strictly in the name of self-defense the life of my family and mine.

That's why I believe in the peaceful being. I am one. I never had violence in my life. I had that chance in my life. Many don't have it. But I do where. Even if I have to swallow frogs. 

It is not a question of being good or evil, but of defending yourself and surviving when strictly necessary. 

That is the basis of the understanding of any reasonably normal citizen who possesses a firearm for that purpose.

We are peaceful people, not pacifists.

-

[What then is the law? It is the collective organization of the individual right of self-defense.]

The Law - Frederic Bastiat

-