Ok, well following on from "Normal .... or not Normal", I'm now going to outline the dysfunctional aspects of increasing polarisation. As I mentioned in the previous piece, where the traits of masculininty and femininity are in balance with each other, people can be seen flourishing under the influence of harmonious relationships and positive behaviours and strategies.
There exists - out there in meat world - forces that provoke division between orgainc units. As polarisation between people's belief systems increases, these positive outcomes are negated by unhelpful interactions. Extreme manifestation of the feminine is driven by intolerance and toxicity, while the same distortion in the masculine produces rejection and then toxicity. This is the zone of the Feminazi and the Macho Man.
The expression 'Hell has no fury like a woman scorned' describes the intolerance that disconnected femininity is driven by. Likewise the stereotype of the Emotionally Unavailable Father describes the rejection a disconnected masculine exhibits.
As the strategies of empathy cease to work, the feminine response is to become highly intolerant towards the strategies that work towards producing strong and positive relationships. It is as if empathy is suddenly turned inside out causing a withdrawal from everything desirable under bonded conditions, and a yearning for idealistic, alternative relationships. Therefore a strange situation arises where the urge to change becomes a jealous longing for the destruction of funtionality. This is where the chaotic feminine emerges, the deterioration into toxic behavoiur begins.
The masculine response is not as dramatic, exhibiting an increase in the disconnection that had previously driven the masculine to protect itself by immersing itself in ambitious projects. That focus on achievement becomes distorted and relationship much harder to establish or maintain, because the masculine essence in this state will reject all attemps at connection. It uses extreme forms of mental control such as rigid belief systems, literal interpretation, and narrow categorisation of data, driving itself further into dysfunction as the despair of lonliness exhibits itself as agressive, self-aggrandizing behaviours that repel the feminine.
And it is no surprise then to find that at the most extreme itteration of these complex situations a type of a disconnection with reality is so severe that functioning can be labled as insane for both the masculine and its feminine counterpart.
This is pretty much the end of the road for UNITY and the ultimate in DIVISION.
The lunatics on the left are highly chaotic, emotionally detached from positive mainstream interaction, and they live in a misery of fear and shame. The brutes on the far right are no less crazy as they destroy life and love with cold hard hatred provoking vilolence as an expression of their disconnection.
The diagram now looks like this in its entirety. So this is basic stuff, yes? Why am I bothering with it then? I think mostly because more and more I am seeing this polarity indicated in the reactions of peple towards opposing perspectives. I believe in healthy exchange of ideas. It is a beautiful thing. It is very difficult - on social media - to share an opinion without being mocked or insulted.
People living in the zone of total insanity - the complete breakdown of Rationality, and absence of Love - are setting the tone for societal debate. How have we allowed thios to happen?
On the Left are Lib-tards and on the Right are Cuck-servatives.
Has the whole world become insane?
Why is it that lunatic behaviour been adopted by the sane?
Could we not aim at interacting as strong, tolerant, wise, confident people?
Or not?