explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

Judeo-Christian Values: The subversion and subjugation of Christianity.

KeeperFeb 6, 2018, 11:40:18 PM
thumb_up43thumb_downmore_vert

              Its something you've undoubtedly heard countless times before, usually as the basis for half baked belief structures, opinions, and political actions; the infamous "Judeo-Christian values." With it being such a commonly believed idea and constantly reinforced everywhere from social media, to regular media, to actual politicians it begs for further investigation. What are Judeo-Christian values? When did the idea become commonly practiced and why? Were Jews and Christians historically always best friends? If they are friends with similar values then why does it seem to be a master-servant relationship, not an equal partnership? 

What are Judeo-Christian values? 

The common argument is that they have the same God, but this is directly contrary to biblical scripture. 

“Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.”  John 2:23

There is no mistaking what this passage means. If you deny Jesus Christ, you do not have God. This is the fundamental Christian belief. So how can there be Judeo-Christian values when Jews not only deny Christ, but conspired against him in his life as well as express the deepest hatred for him and his holy mother well after their passing? 

There is also a fairly new belief that claims the Romans led by the "cruel" Pontius Pilate are to blame for the conspiracy against Jesus and his eventual Crucifixion, but is that biblical? Lets take a look. 

"Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. " Matthew 27:22 

"Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? And they cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify him." Mark 15:14 

"Then said Pilate to the chief priests and to the people, I find no fault in this man." Luke 23:4

"Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him.John 19:4 

"And so Pilate, willing to content the people, released Barabbas unto them, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged him, to be crucified."  Mark 15:15

"Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?"  John 18:35 

"When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him."  John 19:6

"And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but the Jews cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar." John 19:12

"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it."  Matthew 27:24 

"The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let him go."  Acts 3:13

Analyzing actual biblical scripture we can see that this new narrative of the evil Romans and cruel Pilate is in fact not biblical. The bible makes it clear that Pilate was determined to let Jesus Christ go, felt he had done nothing wrong, and in fact was a "just" person. He wished to distance himself from the whole event, and let everyone know that he was innocent, but "thine own nation, and the chief priests" were guilty of the killing of Christ. 

So where did this "evil Roman" narrative come from? Well its not hard to figure out that this comes only from the Judeo side. The Jews hated the Romans, always fought against them, and viewed Roman occupation as a great offense to them. From the Christian perspective, the Romans are not inherently evil and in fact started the first official Church of Jesus Christ; The Roman Catholic Church. Christians who accept this historical revision are betraying biblical scripture in favor of Jewish propaganda. They are complicit with those who denied Christ, and turned against those who felt he was just. This is clearly subversion against their own faith, but many of them do not know it. Even after the crucifixion the only respect for Christ seems to come from Pilate and Jesus' disciples as displayed by these passages. 

"Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice."  John 18:37 

"Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews."  John 19:21

"Pilate answered, What I have written I have written." John 19:22

"And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus."  John 19:38 

The Jews denied Christ in every conceivable way, the idea that Jesus was "king of the Jews" came from Pilate's respect for him. He is the one who wrote it.  The Jews begged him to make a distinction that he was not their king but merely claimed to be and Pilate refused. It is even written that Jesus' own disciples secretly feared the jews and trusted Pilate. With the overwhelming amount of scriptural evidence, it is not hard to see this modern revision is a bold faced lie and not based on scripture. The revision's soul purpose is to establish the sense of Judeo-Christian values in which Christians will serve a master they revere as "God's chosen." Though it couldn't be any more clear that these people are not chosen by the Christian God in anything past the old testament, and in fact would no longer would even be accepted by God according to the Christian faith. 

The Old Testament and The Torah

This is perhaps the strongest argument for the alleged Judeo-Christian values. The Torah is essentially the first 5 books of the old testament, meaning that yes the religions share 5 books of common scripture. The old testament is important to Christians mostly for setting the stage and understanding ancient bloodlines and their political leanings to give proper context to the testament of Jesus Christ (The New Testament.) 

In what way is the Torah important for the Jews? They will tell you it is their most important scripture, but is that the truth? In short; no.  The truth is that modern Jews do not practice or believe much of anything in the Torah. They don't even believe things really happened as it is says they did, instead favoring the belief that they are early tribal stories and moral guidelines. This means it has some value as a historical work for their people but very little as a religious one. So what is modern Judaism based on? The Talmud.   What is the Talmud? The Talmud is a collection of writings, thoughts, debates, philosophies of rabbis passed down from one generation to the next for centuries. (Hint: those "high priests" who crucified Jesus) 

A Christian might be thinking something along the lines of: wait a minute that sounds like their religion is just a cult centered around the teachings of men passed down for centuries. That they really do deny Christ and therefore our God.  Yes, that pretty well sums it up. Didn't you ever wonder how so many Jews also claim to be atheists? Their teachings don't normally come from a deity, you can technically practice large parts of Judaism as an atheist. The ones that remain theists often claim things like "there are many paths to God, all religions are one of those paths." Which we now even hear the current Pope say, coincidentally the current Pope also admits to seeing a Jewish psychiatrist. This again is the Judeo-Christian values but as usual the dominant one in the relationship is the Judeo side. It is always the Christian faith which is subjugated or amended to make this relationship work. Now apparently Christian values are no longer "the only path to salvation is through Christ" which is biblical scripture and onto the Jewish led value that "there are many ways to salvation and all religions are a path to the same God" which is of course from the Talmud. 

Even worse is that the Talmud makes some bold claims and insult towards Christ and Mary which now many Christians even believe. The Talmud claims that Jesus was not the Messiah, never claimed to be the messiah, and the real messiah has yet to come but everyone of the world is open to receiving him. Now according to biblical scripture this second messiah is literally the Anti-Christ or Lucifer, yet the Talmud states that this is the real messiah. Again, Judaism and Christianity are polar opposites yet somehow we believe they have common values? 

The worst is how many false prophets there are, especially centered in America which coincidentally is disproportionately controlled by Jews and houses a larger Jewish population than Israel. (though this statistic fluctuates from year to year.) 

Here you can see popular Pastor John Hagee teaching Christians the  values of the Talmud, which is pure heresy according to Christian scripture. This is the real root of Judeo-Christian values which are actually just...Judeo values.  



Historical relationship

With everyone getting along so well now, surely it must've always been that way, right? Of course not, this new mindset which is based on deceit and heresy that has us all getting along at the mere price of the destruction of Christianity and it's people is a new construct. As if that's a surprise to anyone. 

Its nearly impossible to document all the quarrels between Jews and Christians through history, and  in many different countries. Yet some of them have even been immortalized by art works. 


San Simon of Trento

Pictured above is a statue of the case of San Simon of Trento.  On Easter Sunday 1475, the dead body of a 2-year-old Christian boy named Simon was found in the cellar of a Jewish family's house in Trent, Italy. Town magistrates arrested eighteen Jewish men and five Jewish women on the charge of ritual murder — the killing of a Christian child in order to use his blood in Jewish religious rites. 


Often called "medieval antisemitism" it again depicts Jewish rituals of using children's blood. 


another painting from Poland depicting Jewish ritual murders 

As you can see, one of the most common accusations from multiple countries was that Jews conduct blood rituals, child abduction, torture, sacrifice etc. However it did not stop there, many also accused the Jews of being involved with the spreading of Black death, and the murder of European monarchs. You could spend all day reading about all of the things through history that Christians used to believe about jews. The main point for this blog being, Judeo-Christian values is entirely a new idea with no historical relevance. 

Perhaps the best example of this is the Crusades. When Christian armies marched on Jerusalem they did not give it to the Jews, they established a Christian monarchy there. When they said retake the holy lands and artifacts, they did not mean for the Jews (as we believe today with modern Israel)  they meant for Christians. The Catholic and Orthodox churches in particular have been highly skeptical of the so-called Jews for centuries. This is why these churches tend to come under the most vitriol in modern history classes, while heretical ones like Mormonism are left nearly completely untouched. Only protestants and other "rebirths" of Christianity began changing the narrative, but even then not all of them did; example: Martin Luther. 

In regards to Catholicism in particular it is now told that it was cruel warmongers who only cared about power and "oppressed" everyone. Though it doesn't come as a surprise that this is more opinion than fact. Much like people saying the Western powers are oppressive today because they don't have enough special programs for special interests. I wonder who would find Catholics to be cruel and oppressive? Maybe the same group that was bitter about the establishment of the Kingdom of Jerusalem in "their" land and/or constant criticism by various Popes for their antics and schemes. 




Now that's not to say this was one sided persecution or unjustified as we are told today. The Jews have also historically never cared about Christians. In fact if given a choice between Muslims or Christians they actually chose to let Islam spread and worked together with Islam against Christianity. They've never lifted a finger to stop the spread of Islam or the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East/North Africa and  Southern Europe. As I've previously discussed in other blogs they also created Communism and the ideological movements meant to turn strong Christian kingdoms/Empires into Godless Republics obsessed with egalitarianism. This is not only historical but continuing today, even with our alleged Judeo-Christian values; which is really a master-servant power structure in which the servant can serve the master when needed and be abused as subhuman the rest of the time. 






In the case of Marx, its not only being Jewish but the amount of rabbis in his family tree that is significant if you remember what the Talmud consists of. 

IE: The thoughts, debates, philosophies, discord of rabbis. 

Modern Day Relations 

Many of the above images already set the tone for the true modern day relationship, but its a relationship that only one side seems to understand. The other side seems to have been successfully subverted into debasing their own religion, and believing the propaganda that the jew has unfairly been victimized because they are really God's chosen. 

This is especially exaggerated in the United States; which has become a den of false Christian prophets and coincidentally houses a disproportionate amount of rich and powerful jews. However, not only is the United States worshiping jews and their doctrine for distorted religious reasons, they also believe that Israel is a great political ally to their country, and  that white Christians have "unfairly persecuted" the Jews which provides the guilt angle.(never forget the 6 million, and make sure we teach it to 1st graders!) This perverted trifecta sets the stage for the absolute submission of Americans to Jews. 


hard to read, but worth trying. Try saving it and magnifying it or reverse searching for a clearer image. 


Israel's loyalty to the USA


America now embraces Jewish supremacy and an Israel first stance. Its almost amazing the devotion some people have to a foreign country who has quite frankly never done anything for them, but did attack the USS Liberty. As well as a people who quite openly hate and revile the United States' traditional identity  and only cherish the future that they are creating for it. A future they admit is both anti-white and anti-Christian. Yet many Americans willingly harm themselves and their nation so that these people may continue to thrive. 

This is why America is changing so rapidly. Within two generations Americans now fully accept revisions to history like "the founders/settlers were not Christians!" "this country was always intended for all religions, and peoples"  Judeo-Christian values,  or the false song of egalitarianism; with up to 50% of millennials being full blown communists. Not to mention things like vastly growing atheist, gay, transgender communities.  This is a shocking change for a country that not so long ago had restricted immigration to Europeans only, lived with races segregated into their own communities and mentioned God pretty much everywhere. If you go back a bit further it was a country that hung gay people in public and burned witches; now its has exclusively gay television channels and support groups. 

The so-called conservative figures of the modern USA are coincidentally also overwhelmingly Jewish. Dennis Prager is a sneaky jew pretending he's a good Christian American, Ben Shapiro is an openly zionist Israel firster who is not afraid to call any critic an antisemite, Milo Y is a gay degenerate Jew, Mike Cernovich you guessed it...jewish. The list goes on, its as if everyone given a serious platform whether left or right is of a certain tribe. Essentially you have one tribe that controls 90% of all thoughts and opinions being injected into the greater society. The end result is a constant shift leftward and a limp-wristed  docile conservative response still talking about nazis as some primary enemy, if you can even call that a response. 

The remaining dwindling Christian ranks are so successfully subjugated that they do not even think to fight back as they watch their society turn into the likes of Babylon or the Wiemar Republic. Many openly support the sources of their own destruction such as Jewish supremacy, open borders, or tolerance and peace at all costs. They are watching the destruction of everything they supposedly believe in and asking for more of it. 

In Conclusion

I'd like to say I covered everything but the fact is there is much to discuss it would be impossible to get everything in one blog. The main point here was to investigate the merit of the alleged Judeo-Christian values, and its source. In my opinion I would conclude that it is purely propaganda coming from one group of special interests and no such thing has ever truly existed. This is based on factual observances, history, and Biblical scripture. You are free to draw your own conclusion but I'd certainly like to see someone come to the opposite conclusion and what facts they could provide to prove it. I'm guessing that it can't be done, at least not truthfully. Now with lies/revisionism which are the main tools of such propaganda, then yes it could be done and is being done to those who are less informed.